Bob W wrote:
[ from Knarf ]
Isn't that the stuff that men used to put in their
hair to, you know, like slick it down? Back in the
50's and 60's, there was Brylcreem and Vitriol, IIRC
(I was only a kid then).
No - you must be thinking of Victrola...
you're both off the mark
Nice photegraph, Jostein. I like a photograph that gives you information -
yor explanation is fine too.
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 9. juli 2004 23:25
Til: [EMAIL
The first of a series. Somewhat risque. Not for children.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2516284
You used the word SEX man. SSXXX... Its wrong and you should know
better!! (sarcasm) Using words like sex in public is sin, and the Baptist
preachers will require a double tithe or they wont be able to convince Jesus
to save your soul... Because, when the preacher gets a BMW, we all
Hi William
could you explain that cartoon like face thing a bit more?
I got some ugly violet artifacts on skin parts on most of my enlargements
of 20x30 cm black and white photos
which I did not see on my monitor before transmitting the pictures to the on
line service. The prints where
simple
Hi Bill
what do you like the Agfa negative film for? Compared to Fuji Superia for
ex. or Kodak?
And which type and ISO do you use, color and b/W ? Do you have a favorite
brand for b/w negative film?
Agfa ISO 200 Vista negative color is sold in packs of 4 films with a big
discount at the moment
Great shot, Ken.
I might have to start hating you for that FA*600 lens, though...:-)
Maybe Boris was thinking of f as in f-16?
What kind of planes are they?
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004
Beautiful indeed!
Do you carry this black cloth around with you for this purpose?
keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts posted:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/_IGP0717.jpg
In the garden behind the house.
ist-D, ISO 800, FA*80-200/2.8
Beautiful!
ER
Don,
Glad you came out of the closet...:-)
Those are very good photos, imo. What I like most with them is the way the
light enhances the composition. Especially the stroke of sunlight on the
distant buildings in the lower picture. Lovely moods in both of them.
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original
Jim,
What's the matter? From your text you come across as just having an allergy
for a certain three-letter word?
Puzzled,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jim Colwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 3:07 AM
Subject: PAW: Sex With Filing
Brian Walters referred that revelation to the list just a few hours ago.
Maybe his message hadn't reached you yet. It certainly brings more fuel to
the rumor fire towards Photokina. It brings some more substance to the press
release from Kodak a year ago about cooperation with Pentax for a MedF
Thanks Jostein, coming from you that means a lot.
I've decided to try to take more time to work on technique, so maybe I'll
get better. ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 4:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Couple of
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer
Subject: RE: Film Is Dead / A Contrary View
Hi William
could you explain that cartoon like face thing a bit more?
I got some ugly violet artifacts on skin parts on most of my
enlargements
of 20x30 cm black and white photos
which I did not
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: Re: Max weight of tele lens on *ist D
Well, what about vertical shots, where the camera
has to be flopped, vs the lens mount rotated? I would
assume vertical shots are trickier to keep sharp on
long lenses w/out tripod mounts.
If
- Original Message -
From: David Miers
Subject: RE: Film Is Dead / A Contrary View
Mini labs are mass market machines. The pros who want the big
files
are doing their own scans.
William Robb
Are the pros with large size files from high res scans limited to
printing
from
Hi!
I should say I made another step against the stream (digital g).
I've enabled myself with Voigtlander Perkeo I folder (6x6).
Below is just raw scan with minimal clean up and resizing to fit the
screen. The model is yet another ME Super with M 50/1.7 lens... Very
lonely.
Don Sanderson said:
With the proper tools and a little patience it's not too
bad.
Can you give me a few details, such as needed tools, etc.?
Any adhesives needed or foam? Are the tools needed to take
off the chrome cover basically? Anything else to watch for
when the cover is off?
Yes,
Thanks Frank. It was a fun shoot. I did some others with red light.
They're intereting as well. It's also very interesting that you
replied. The original message never showed up in my mail. I guess some
people got it.
Paul
On Jul 11, 2004, at 8:33 AM, frank theriault wrote:
--- Paul
Well, I would agree that that is the only economical way.
I was thinking of this the other day, I would some day like to try my hand with
platinum prints. Then I got to thinking, if I do that it would be stupid to put
them under glass where you could not see the subtleties of the print.
After I
Jostein, in this part of the world, violence is okay, sex is bad. You
can show someone getting hacked up on national tv, but you damn well
better not show someone's ass!
Norm
Jostein wrote:
Jim,
What's the matter? From your text you come across as just having an allergy
for a certain
frank theriault wrote:
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first of a series. Somewhat risque. Not for
children.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2516284
Interesting.
Very interesting.
I think what I like about it is that the young lady
with holding the sword and apple
(PTAW = Picture Twice A Week...)
Could we ~please~ not change from PAW ?
If everyone does his/her own thing, it will make it more difficult
for those of us who manage their list mail with filtering.
Thanks for your consideration.
Fred
Quite nice...
The focus was selective...the depth of field is correct but subtle. You
have to look at the wood grain on the benches to see it was spot-on.
I think this would look good blown up to 11x14. There's something about
it...
I have an Agfa Isolette III (6x6 cm format) with a brand-new
Hi,
Sunday, July 11, 2004, 4:06:48 PM, Norm wrote:
Jostein, in this part of the world, violence is okay, sex is bad. You
can show someone getting hacked up on national tv, but you damn well
better not show someone's ass!
I'm sure it's only Republicans that think that way:
I have about a zillion things to do this AM, I'll get this posted later
today.
I'll see if I can scan a page from the 1000 service manual and put it up,
this should help.
Don
-Original Message-
From: David Weiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 9:28 AM
To:
Vey nice! Guess I'll have to play with the124G a bit more.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 10:27 AM
To: PDML
Subject: Technical PAW
Hi!
I should say I made another step against the stream (digital g).
I've
Actually, I'd a take D70 with a pentax name on it...
Films days are numbered. Just because one catalog out of thousands has more
film stuff than digital just means those guys are milking the remaining film
market pretty effectively. Film and Digital are at the point now where each
makes some
That looks like one of my fears. That I've left my camera sitting on a
bench somewhere..
CW
goes to put his eyes on his cameras.
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 11:27 AM
Subject: Technical PAW
Hi!
I
I would like to thank everyone for their kind words. I haven't
participated in the list for the last
few days because Elton breathed his last breath on July 5th. If I had
followed the emergency vet's advice
he wouldn't have had the last 10 days of his life, 8 of which were very
good days. He
Dotty wrote:
On 4/7/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, offered:
That's a difficult decision Cotty. You may not have made the best financial
decision but you made the right decision for your peace of mind. How old
is the
dog and what is the prognosis...
Vic
He means Peter. Ah, now I
Then why are all the criminals in Florida democrats, they can't all be
sex offenders, can they
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Sunday, July 11, 2004, 4:06:48 PM, Norm wrote:
Jostein, in this part of the world, violence is okay, sex is bad. You
can show someone getting hacked up on national tv, but you
Hi Keith. They're both women. I went back and redid the RAW. It was too
blue. Here's the warmed up version:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2517097
I deleted the earlier one. Hope that doesn't inconvenience anyone.
Paul
On Jul 11, 2004, at 11:10 AM, Keith Whaley wrote:
frank
Hi!
DS Just so you know that I DO take photos once in a while. ;-)
DS http://www.donsauction.com/PDML/Ellis.htm
Here are my cents.
The Ellis Park at Sunset has very interesting lines. It looks like a
skeleton of some odd animal is hiding in the bushes.
Ellis Harbor at Dawn is yet another
Hi!
BW Hi,
BW a lot of it is very gruesome:
BW http://www.i-witness.net/
Very sad but unfortunately true. Technically perfect. Emotionally
stunning...
Boris
([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hi Keith. They're both women.
I stand corrrected. Thank you.
keith
I went back and redid the RAW. It was too
blue. Here's the warmed up version:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2517097
I deleted the earlier one. Hope that doesn't inconvenience anyone.
Paul
On
Thanks a lot for all your comments.
I'll definitely look for a 5n as soon as I find a good one on Ebay (or if one of you
has one at a good price).
REgards,
Thibouille
Hi all,
I rarely shoot chromes. The other day however I got a 5 pack of Provia 100F, 120-film,
for free, just to try out on my 1930-40-ish Zeiss Ikon Nettar (6x9 cm) and maybe on
some other odd MF body.
I am sure some of you have experience of, or know this film very well.
Could you please tell
Norm, thanks for taking the time to look and comment.
Any ideas for improving the artistic rating?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Norm Baugher
Subject: Re: PAW: Angel sighting
Cool shot Kenneth, that rocks! Although artistically, I would give it a
zero.
Cheers,
Norm
Jostein,
the planes are FA-18 Hornets built by Mcdonnell Douglas.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW: Angel sighting
Great shot, Ken.
I might have to start hating you for that FA*600 lens, though...:-)
Maybe Boris was thinking of f
Boris,
AAAHHHAAA
For some reason I thought you were referring to f stops!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW: Angel sighting
Hi!
KW Boris,
KW Thanks for taking the time to look and comment.
KW I'm at a loss for -
I am
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am convinced that at this point, the only way to
get a good black
and white print is still the old fashioned way, with
film and a
darkroom.
Indeed. I've tried various methods of digital BW
printing. I had an Epson 860 with the MIS Full
Spectrum
--- graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How are folks
supposed to know what a
truly good print looks like when they are prevented
from seeing them properly.
Oil paintings are not always under glass, but
photographs seem to be. How strange?
Hmmm, well I've been to several exhibits and can
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, to quantify; Less than 1/4 way down, there is a curving line which
could either be the horizon or a change in the colour of the clouds if
the horizon is in the trees. Almost halfway from the right is a
downward loop in this line. Above it and very
I have been on the net almost as long as you, but I haven´t seen many
pictures like Franks there.
Do you have any recommendations?
DagT
På 11. jul. 2004 kl. 03.07 skrev Jim Colwell:
frank,
I'm new to PDML, but I've been on the www since it was a DARPA project
in
the 1970's. There are many
Sure, and don't go looking at http://apug.org either. Actually what seems to be
happening is PDML has become the Pentax Digital Mailing List in the past year.
--
El Gringo wrote:
Actually, I'd a take D70 with a pentax name on it...
Films days are numbered.
--
graywolf
Sunday, July 11, 2004, 4:06:48 PM, Norm wrote:
Jostein, in this part of the world, violence is okay, sex is bad. You
can show someone getting hacked up on national tv, but you damn well
better not show someone's ass!
To which Bob W. replied:
I'm sure it's only Republicans that think
--- Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please tell me something about it's
characteristics and what kind of shooting you find
it best (and maybe not so well)suited for?
I was thinking of using it for shooting a model in
a lot of skin.
Provia 100F is good for several
We processed a roll of XP2 today and printed it on the 375. This machine
has a setting for BW negatives and I was impressed with the results.
Bill
The only good black and white option that I have seen so far involve
darkrooms.
William Robb
My slides from the 1960's on the old Agfachrome 64 are fine, but I don't
have enough old negatives to render an opinion.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: Polaroid/Agfa
On 11 Jul 2004
When I first got my istD I was very worried about the 3-5 hot pixels, some
red, some purple, one blue, that tended to turn up in longish exposures.
And the red pixel that showed up in 80% of my exposures at the same
position. Well, after about a month, I completely got over the hot-pixel
if it's not very easy to pick out, well, then it must not be very easy to
pick out, so why worry??
I got excited about the hot pixel issue when it first came up, but when I
realized it was somewhat normal I settled down. If noticed it's really easy
to fix. My main concern would be not
On 11 Jul 2004 at 21:13, El Gringo wrote:
Dust causes me more problems than hot pixels do, in fact, hot pixels are the
best kind of flaw, they're in the same place every time
I prefer dust personally, I can get rid of it easily, not so hot pixels. The
degree of the problem to the individual
Glad your back, better than last.
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
hi guys and gals,
well, after a really rough week, i'm back. i have actually felt unbelievably
lonely this week without your emails flooding my inbox! i'm not going into
details now, as i am really emotional and also exhausted, but
Hi!
Welcome back!
Boris
- Original Message -
From: David Miers
Subject: RE: More *ist D Hot Pixel Oddness
I'm guessing it
will worsen, but will it be at a rate that is even an issue?
What's the
oldest *ist D on this list right now? Since Canon Nikon have had
DSLR's
longer, some of their statistics
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens
Subject: Re: Film Is Dead / A Contrary View
Many of you seem to want a digital Rebel, with a Pentax name tag
on it,
sold in Wal-Mart by pimple faced kids who don't even know how to
spell
photography.
Wheatfield and I resemble that remark!
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: PAW: Sex With Filing Cabinet
Works great for getting rid of Jehovas Witnesses and door-to-door
salesmen, too!
You wanna get rid of the door to door annoyances?
http://pug.komkon.org/01nov/2Rotties.html
Hot Spit!!!
WW
Hi Frank,
Great shots. I love the choice of media and composition, and they just
have a certain feel that I really like (and I must confess to preferring
the first one)
Sorry I can't be more specific.
Cheers,
Simon
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Nice pic, but a little more saturation might bring out the perceived
colors. Like this shot I took and posted a couple of months ago:
http://home.austin.rr.com/randj/pics/imgp1693.jpg
It may be that the available light was against you though, I had very
sunny blue skies that day.
[EMAIL
Any ideas on how much a sensor swap costs outside of the warranty period?
-el gringo
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 9:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More *ist D Hot Pixel Oddness
- Original Message -
From:
I've uploaded two more shots in the Temptation of Eve series. The
first one listed below is meant to be the first shot in the serie. The
previously listed shot is second, and the last listed is meant to be
the condlusion. I believe thee are all in good taste, but the two new
pictures do
Ouch, I'll bet you don't really wanna know!
-Original Message-
From: El Gringo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 12:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: More *ist D Hot Pixel Oddness
Any ideas on how much a sensor swap costs outside of the warranty
When I first got my istD I was very worried about the 3-5 hot pixels, some
red, some purple, one blue, that tended to turn up in longish exposures.
And the red pixel that showed up in 80% of my exposures at the same
position. Well, after about a month, I completely got over the hot-pixel
i disagree with simon here - i *really* prefer the second one! it has very
cool composition and i love the movement in her foot - the way that the
backlight shows the shape of her leg is very sensual too. these are really
cool shots frank, probably my favourite that i have ever seen of yours
Hi Frank. I find these very interesting. They support the concept
without being full image snapshot cliches (which might have been the
instinctive thing to do for most shooters). Good eye. Nice images.
Paul
I see your point.
I do believe, that the SLR market is very limited. Not to mention the DSLR
market. Very few people, I know (photo club members exempted - and that may
be about 0,05 % of the intire population), would want a DSLR. It's just too
bulky. Most people want a camera to sit in the
66 matches
Mail list logo
