Ok, ok, I grew up in Utah and know what snow is (at least I used to).
But yeah, that thing is certainly safe from snow plows around here.
Bruce
Friday, March 18, 2005, 6:06:56 PM, you wrote:
WR - Original Message -
WR From: Rick Womer
WR Subject: Re: PESO - Mail
Pity the snowplow
I hope that a WTB post isn't against the list's charter. If so, I
apologize.
I'm looking for a few lenses on the used market (aren't we all?).
SMC Pentax-FA 35mm f/2 AL
SMC Pentax-FA 135mm f/2.8
I'm also interested in an AF500-FTZ flash.
...I guess that'll do it for now.
If I manage to get my
In a message dated 3/18/2005 11:38:28 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Therefore I can
perhaps say I do have a color calibrated mind instead of the computer. :-)
Cheers,
Bedo.
=
Hmmm, hold on, checking... nope. Although my mind is pretty color calibrated,
it doesn't
In a message dated 3/18/2005 9:28:02 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/OnTheBridge2.jpg
It's still not a great shot, but I think that this is much better.
This stuff with people in it is hard! :-)
Much, much better, IMHO.
Yup, people is
In a message dated 3/18/2005 4:26:59 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3207780size=lg
I sort of felt stupid for saying I liked after seeing others' reactions. But
taking a second look, nope, going against the stream, I still
ROTFLMAO
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: OT: European Banking / Ebay Payment Question
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 18,
Na raze,
Frantisek
ft Personally, I think they're sending love letters to each other.
ft Not that there's anything wrong with that...
ft g
ft cheers,
ft frank
Oh Frank, come on, don't be jealous ;-)
Good light!
fra
Hi,
What's that game where drunken teenagers ride around in cars, with
the passengers swinging at passing mailboxes with baseball bats? Is
it called Mailbox Baseball?
I spent the hot summer of 1976 working on a building site in Bordeaux,
and living in a Foyer des Jeunes - a kind of youth
Hi,
Pity the snowplow that hits that sucker!
You might have to explain to Bruce what a snowplow is.
William Robb
LOL.
Actually, he's not a native Californian, so he knows. I, on the other hand...
Hehehehe.
Marnie Good one.
In England we spell it 'snoughplough'.
--
In case any Maryland PDMLers fancy a bit of music and have free
time tomorrow ...
Tomorrow, Sunday, 20 March, at 3:00 PM, I'll be performing with
a recorder ensemble at First Unitarian Church in Baltimore, MD.
The church web site lists this as an early music concert, but in
addition to the
Hi Shel
a good crop and adjustment of the original, I like the photo this way.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 3:52 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PAW: Lee and Tim, Blowing
Hi Jack
thanks for pointing me to the new Kodak Ultra Color film, I will try a roll
of it and the Reala
before the real adventure starts with some flower close-up shots. There is
garden shop near my home
with a park and wonderful flowers and plants where I can freely take photos.
On the other
Hi Peter
nice framing and moment but unsharp and realy ugly Copyright notice (remove
the shadow there)...
greetings
Markus
I decided to use a few prime lenses on the *ist-D just to see how they
preformed.
The oft maligned smc P-M 85mm f2.0 was mounted on the *ist-D when
Canon/Coffee house
girl
Add another who's interested in the FA 35/2.
Thanks,
Alex
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:11:48 -0800, David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope that a WTB post isn't against the list's charter. If so, I
apologize.
I'm looking for a few lenses on the used market (aren't we all?).
SMC
Guys I have discovered a weird problem which I cannot come up with any
explanation
so I need some guidance. Some recent shots have revealed that about 1/5 on the
right-hand side of the picture is blurrier than on the left-hand side under
normal
shooting condition (aperture f11 for all samples).
Hi Alan,
I can confirm that I make the same observations that you're reporting.
I have no explanation.
However, if someone had cut out the blurry part and asked me what's up? I
would have said that from my experience it looks like blur from camera movement
or shake.
This led me to ask myself,
--- Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know - I don't - the facts about the shooting, shutter speed and possible
camera movement, which may completely eliminate.the grounds for my questions.
Hi Lasse,
I forgot to mention, all shots were done on tripod with 2s mirror pre-fire so
Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would love to have the Pentax 28-70/2.8...except
that I'm really attached to the extra 4mm at the wide
end of the 24-90 (and, of course, I don't have the
discretionary income!).
Neither do I... yet. Hence the sale of the Tokina and a few other
I like this. The composition works with the out of focus guitar player
balancing the prominent sax man on the left. The light is extremely
hard and direct. That combined with the high contrast gives you a look.
It's reminiscent of old Speed Graphic flash pictures. However, I have
to wonder how
Markus wrote:
Nobody advised me to carry the A-28mm 2.8 or M-35mm 3.5 with me when I have
the A 24mm so far.
Will I not miss the gap between 24mm and 50mm (or 35mm when I carry the
35-70mm A/4 zoom too) for landscapes.
I wonder if I should use a 28mm too for more normal wide views.
I downloaded one of these and opened it in photoshop. I find it
somewhat soft at both edges and quite sharp in the middle. I suppose
one edge might be somewhat softer than the other, but it's a minimal
difference. I don't think anything is wrong. It seems to be just the
characteristics of the
Just a hunch, I don't have any hard knowledge on this
I think one issue with wide-angles is that the all optical elements
have to be properly centered. I know one German photo journal used to
test this when doing MTF tests. Maybe a slight misalignment of an
element could cause what you
Hi,
sorry to ask this on PDML, but there are some pretty technical
people here. And it's concerning photography, at least the showing
of photographs on the web :-)
Please reply off-list to not clutter the list, thank you.
I am redesigning my website, handcoding mostly, and my
Peter,
You focused on the tip of her nose! Try the eyes next time. That
lens has a very short depth of field wide open.
(Your contributing to the urban legend about one of my favorite lenses.)
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:35:17 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Jostein wrote:
Just a hunch, I don't have any hard knowledge on this
I think one issue with wide-angles is that the all optical elements have
to be properly centered. I know one German photo journal used to test
this when doing MTF tests. Maybe a slight misalignment of an element
could
I think I was impressed with how light that lens felt given its physical
dimensions. Looks like it can produce an acceptably sharp image as well.
For a big zoom, it seems like a good option. IIRC, G. said it was not too
expensive, either.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton
Yes,
Focus, Peter, focus. This pic is OOF. Y'gotta get those eyes sharp in a
portrait. The extra compression over a standard portrait focal length
doesn't seem to work well here, but 'twas good to try it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter J. Alling
The oft maligned smc P-M 85mm f2.0 was
Took this one Sturday March 12, 2005, at the farm. It was a very o/c day with
snow. The
duck and
Trumpeter Swans were good,as they were in snow and some sun, but i just like
the looks of
this one.
Shot in raw, PS El 3 converted to Tiff then a minor saturation tweak then SFW.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Logically, I think it should be compared to the DS, not the D.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
I don't own a Ds. I can only compare to what I've got.
Christian
In a message dated 3/19/2005 6:17:48 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Logically, I think it should be compared to the DS, not the D.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
I don't own a Ds. I can only compare to what I've got.
Christian
---
LOL. Well, there
In a message dated 3/18/2005 8:18:38 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3208164size=lg
I actually cropped a bit vbg. Personally, I think it's the
strongest photo of that session, but I'd really like to hear your
thoughts. It's times
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:42:16 +0100, Frantisek wrote:
(using 'array' in JS), but how to make the title name of the
randomly selected photo differenciated from the rest of the list
(e.g. bold) while changing the image link so clicking on the image
would take the viewer to the
I don't think the concrete slab is any different from the cherry tree
photos, but they're difficult to compare because of the different size
of detail. In the cherry tree pics, the softness is most evident in
minute detail like the foreground grass. In the concrete slab pics,
there's a bit
Very nice. Good color, and it appears to be quite sharp.
Paul
On Mar 19, 2005, at 8:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Took this one Sturday March 12, 2005, at the farm. It was a very o/c
day with snow. The
duck and
Trumpeter Swans were good,as they were in snow and some sun, but i
just like the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm, hold on, checking... nope. Although my mind is pretty color
calibrated,
it doesn't know specific RGB numbers. So guess that little trick
won't work
for me. ;-)
Oh, well. Thanks for expounding.
Use Adobe Gamma to get your screen
- Original Message -
From: Christian
Subject: Re: Rebel XT vs *ist D.
I don't own a Ds. I can only compare to what I've got.
Go out and buy a Ds.
You know you want one.
William Robb
I just did a couple of quick tests with PEF files generated by my
*istDS.
The PEF files are approx 10Mb in size.
Converting them to DNG (converter v2.4), with loseless comprerssion,
reduces that to approx 6Mb.
Converting them to PEF, but embedding the PEF, increases the size to
approx 16Mb.
On 19/3/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Go out and buy a Ds.
You know you want one.
Hmm. Christian?? ;-]
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
H... a pretty girl. That may be the problem in that you forgot to
focus on the eye closest to you. ;-)
Jim
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:35:17 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to use a few prime lenses on the *ist-D just to see how they
preformed.
The oft maligned smc P-M
In a message dated 3/19/2005 7:12:16 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Use Adobe Gamma to get your screen close, then with it still open,
open a picture in photoshop and fine tune the screen until the image
in photoshop looks correct.
This may or may not agree with Adobe
It's an interesting photo, and I love shadows. The
top half of the image is -very- dark, though, and
somehow that darkness seems to bleed over onto the
photographer (his dark hair doesn't help!). I would
be tempted to play with this a bit in PS to open up
the top a bit, and introduce some
The
40 is so restricted in its usefulness
The normal lens is the most versatile lens on earth.
FW Is the loss of some metadata worth a 40% reduction in storage costs ?
FW Well I guess that's a decision each of us will make for ourselves.
FW I think it is, but I'm still using CDR rather than DVD for my archiving.
IIRC somebody here looked into the files, and found out that the PEFs
have
I agree with you, Marnie.
Shel's version makes for a more powerful image, but the orginal told more
of a story, which I think was the point here.
And I like the OOF guy, too.
John
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 03:33:51 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/18/2005 4:26:59 PM Pacific
Having recently bought a lens from Chad, I can vouch for the quality of
his gear, and his patience in dealing with my rather complicated payment
arrangements.
John
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:09:10 -0600, Chad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have for sale a Pentax FA 24-90 /3.5-4.5 IF AL lens.
Yes, lightness, manual focus feel, speed and a usable f4 were all
quite important. The price was reasonable considering what it is. I
suspect that the issue of no AF brings the price down. For me, that
is a non issue for it's intended use.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, March 19, 2005,
Always possible. I didn't use a magnifier, I was focusing on the
features in the center of the image.
Godfrey
On Mar 18, 2005, at 6:28 PM, David Nelson wrote:
Good work for doing the test - I love seeing this sort of thing... one
thing I'll point out though is that it appears that focus wasn't
On Mar 19, 2005, at 8:02 AM, Sung Nee wrote:
The
40 is so restricted in its usefulness
The normal lens is the most versatile lens on earth.
And for a *istD/DS, that would be something in the range of 28-35mm. A
28/2 would be perfect for me.
Godfrey
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't own a Ds. I can only compare to what I've got.
Go out and buy a Ds.
You know you want one.
Actually, I have about as much interest in the Ds as I do in having my
wisdom teeth put back in my mouth and removed
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: Rebel XT vs *ist D.
On 19/3/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Go out and buy a Ds.
You know you want one.
Hmm.
[A70-210/4 Macro]
According to the repair tech, it's a beautifully made lens too. I paid
$100 through Ebay for mine, then paid him another $100 to repair it
(one of the guide bushings and retaining screws for the zoom control
had come loose and fallen out). It was worth it. There was another
Is it possible to use an AF lens in the cold and damp for long periods of
time without damaging the electronics? I want to get rid of an MF lens I
don't like and never use, and the only reason I can think of to keep it is
for astrophotography. I was thinking of using the Sigma 20mm EX for this
This version certainly gives the picture a lot more more ooomph, but for
my taste the crop on the guitarist is too tight. It's that right arm
that's making the music, and if we can't see it, the guy becomes rather
irrelevant. This is a pity, because although he may not be in focus, to
me
On Mar 19, 2005, at 9:53 AM, William Robb wrote:
The normal lens is the most versatile lens on earth.
And for a *istD/DS, that would be something in the range of 28-35mm.
A 28/2 would be perfect for me.
Have you tried the 31?
It's big and heavy, but is an excellent lens.
Yes, I had the 31
Amita,
Damp weather is not a threat to the lens. As long as it's not left out
in the rain you'll be ok. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 6:10 PM
Subject: AF lenses for astrophotography?
Is it
Frantisek mused:
Hi,
sorry to ask this on PDML, but there are some pretty technical
people here. And it's concerning photography, at least the showing
of photographs on the web :-)
My immediate impression is that you're using the wrong tool:
instead of a client-side (JavaScript)
Why don't you present your version and we can see how it looks. There's a
balance between information, information that's implied, and the overall
balance and symmetry in a photograph itself that sometimes has to be
maintained.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Forbes
This version
I humbly introduce my first PESO.
This was taken way back in October and I finally got around to working
on it this last week.
Camera Info:
Pentax *ist D
Pentax 28-70mm F/4 @ 65mm F/7.1
1/125
iso 200
Photoshop processing:
Noise ninja, Nik Color Effects brilliance/warmth, Highpass filter
That's a lot of fancy work with filters, plug-ins, and such. Too bad we
can't see the result of all that digital magic. Care to post a link to the
pic LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Volkert
I humbly introduce my first PESO.
This was taken way back in October and I finally got
David Volkert wrote on 3/19/2005, 3:09 PM:
I humbly introduce my first PESO.
This was taken way back in October and I finally got around to working
on it this last week.
Camera Info:
Pentax *ist D
Pentax 28-70mm F/4 @ 65mm F/7.1
1/125
iso 200
Photoshop processing:
Noise
Looking for a Tokina AT-X 90mm 2.5 macro in PK. I already have one but a
friend of my wife wants one. Condition: prefer a user rather than mint,
limited budget.
Thanks
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Comments on Stan's Pentax site are limited on this lens, I'd like to
know more about it.
I'm enjoying the mixture of F series modest-aperture zooms and faster A
series primes. :-)
Godfrey
In a message dated 3/19/2005 10:00:30 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/frankpic2.html
There are certainly many ways to interpret a scene.
Shel
=
Now that looks good! ;-)
Without losing either guy. I felt frank had the shot in
Frantisek mused:
FW Is the loss of some metadata worth a 40% reduction in storage costs ?
FW Well I guess that's a decision each of us will make for ourselves.
FW I think it is, but I'm still using CDR rather than DVD for my archiving.
IIRC somebody here looked into the files, and found
Hi Bernd
only two lenses sounds good, but without filters?
You must have been shooting in the morning or evening then, right?
At the moment I mostly use the Tamron 90mm, maybe I should limit myself on
the first trip on that and the Pentax A24mm to not get lost in too much
choice of material...
Hi Bruce
A nice picture , I like the composition.
The fence has a kind of interesting artificial look for me, don't know why.
Have your drink and show us the swans after that ;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded one of these and opened it in photoshop. I find it
somewhat soft at both edges and quite sharp in the middle. I suppose
one edge might be somewhat softer than the other, but it's a minimal
difference. I don't think anything is wrong.
--- Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think one issue with wide-angles is that the all optical elements
have to be properly centered. I know one German photo journal used to
test this when doing MTF tests. Maybe a slight misalignment of an
element could cause what you observe?
That's what
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: More DA Limiteds
On Mar 19, 2005, at 8:02 AM, Sung Nee wrote:
The
40 is so restricted in its usefulness
The normal lens is the most versatile lens on earth.
And for a *istD/DS, that would be something in the range of
28-35mm. A
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mar 19, 2005, at 8:02 AM, Sung Nee wrote:
The
40 is so restricted in its usefulness
The normal lens is the most versatile lens on earth.
And for a *istD/DS, that would be something in the range of 28-35mm. A
28/2 would be perfect
Well, thanks ... but as was pointed out in another message, it doesn't tell
the whole story that I think Frank was trying to convey (F and I were
talking off list). However, I did another fiddle last night that I sent to
Frank directly as it was late and I was tired and cranky, and didn't feel
Thanks John. Hope you are getting some use out of that lens. :)
Chad
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:16:32 -, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having recently bought a lens from Chad, I can vouch for the quality of
his gear, and his patience in dealing with my rather complicated payment
Shel,
I actually liked Frank's original framing of this picture, and wouldn't
wish to change it. It works for me. I think that you, with your superior
Photoshop skills, are able to do a lot to improve the presentation of
the image (if that's a suitable word) to produce an excellent final
Thanks Andre and Peter. Looks like it was a good buy.
I love the M28/3.5, but I wanted something like this to take out at night...
j
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:07:39 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't actually handled one but *Robert Monaghan's 3rd party lens
megasite
Hi Godfrey,
I have this lens (didn't bring it to the NorCal meet). Don't know if these are
the comments you are looking for but:
I really enjoy it for 75% of my casual, walk around, shooting needs on a ZX-5n.
I purchased it to replace the FA28-70/4 because it is longer at the tele-end. I
prefer
Element that should of course read that element.
J
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:58:57 -, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel,
I actually liked Frank's original framing of this picture, and wouldn't
wish to change it. It works for me. I think that you, with your
superior Photoshop skills,
At least because it looks much beter on a K1000 or similar...
OK, not a good reason ;)
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:40:55 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 19, 2005, at 9:53 AM, William Robb wrote:
The normal lens is the most versatile lens on earth.
And for a *istD/DS,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/17/2005 9:30:17 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wrote:
BTW you are very goot at naming your pictures...
obviously it should read good. :-|
Bedo.
Sounded like Dutch or German to me! I'm used to hearing
Time to use CSS.
There's a good reference at www.devguru.com
Basically, set a class for the titles.
a.title {
color:
position-abolute: top 55px left 200px;
}
In JavaScript you can then set the objects color to another value as needed.
This will do what you want.
Collin
At 10:38
I humbly introduce my first PESO.
This was taken way back in October and I finally got around to working
on it this last week.
Camera Info:
Pentax *ist D
Pentax 28-70mm F/4 @ 65mm F/7.1
1/125
iso 200
Photoshop processing:
Noise ninja, Nik Color Effects brilliance/warmth, Highpass filter
That is not so any more, Marnie. You have learned a little something over the past
few years (grin). However being new sometimes allows a fresh way of looking at
photos. What Shel proposes is the age old way of eliminating distracting
backgrounds in BW photography. In this case it would
I haven't had a chance to do too much with it yet, partly because when I
first got it I didn't know how to get it to work on the D! I was
convinced it was possible, but didn't know about the clutch. Eventually
all was clear.
John
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:09:10 -0600, Chad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just received this offer from Pantone.
I've had the Color Vision Spyder for several years find it well worth what
I spent for it.
Their closeout price is $77 USD!!!
If you're serious about getting your monitor and print agreeing in color,
this is one way to achieve that end (@ a very cheap
While I tend to agree with you, there are a few points that may merit more
discussion.
First, as to my Photoshop skills - they really are rudimentary. To call
them superior in any way surprises me, although I have to admit feeling
OK about it ;-)) Oh, I don't see presenting your interpretation
In a message dated 3/19/2005 1:33:41 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That is not so any more, Marnie. You have learned a little something over the
past few years (grin). However being new sometimes allows a fresh way of
looking at photos. What Shel proposes is the age old
Lovely invisible roses.
David Volkert wrote:
I humbly introduce my first PESO.
This was taken way back in October and I finally got around to working
on it this last week.
Camera Info:
Pentax *ist D
Pentax 28-70mm F/4 @ 65mm F/7.1
1/125
iso 200
Photoshop processing:
Noise ninja, Nik Color Effects
David,
Photoshop processing:
Noise ninja, Nik Color Effects brilliance/warmth, Highpass filter
sharpening, converted to black and white using some process I found
online a while back, burned in some of the pedals, and added film grain.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6767390/
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: More DA Limiteds
Yes, I had the 31 Limited. It's truly an excellent lens, but I
don't see why such a lens should be double the size and 50% heavier
than a 35/2. I sold it because I found that its size and weight put
me off
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: OT: Pantone Color Vision Spyder
I just received this offer from Pantone.
I've had the Color Vision Spyder for several years find it well
worth what
I spent for it.
Their closeout price is $77 USD!!!
For that price, I wouldn't have
I photographed some candles this afternoon. They were shot with the SMC
Pentax 135/2.5 on the *istD. I decided to try this two ways. Once with
a lot of depth of field and consistently sharp images, the other with
very limited depth of field and diminishing sharpness. One is at f22,
20 seconds,
http://www.misenet.sk/Berlin/
Bedo.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Lacus
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] PESO: The splendour and the misery of
Berlin
http://www.misenet.sk/Berlin/
Good thing Caveboy seems to have left the list
William Robb
P.S. That is not to say, frank, (see my previous comments re this pic, where
forehead was specifically mentioned) that I think out-of-focus works every
time. Because I still think Taking the Bloor Train Home was one of your best
shots to date.
IMHO, standard disclaimers re just my opinion,
From Pentax Japan's Japanese site - Babelfish translation.
Japanese Yen = 0.009551 US Dollar
US Dollar = 104.700 Japanese Yen
View the list using a fixed width font.
Powell
Last Update : 2005/3/18
Focal length - brightness
Trouble is, you have to go to Japan to get some of these. I called BH
to tell them that the FA 300 f4.5 was still listed on Pentax Japan's web
site, and to ask if they could get me one. The guy I talked with said
that since Pentax USA doesn't list it, they can't get it.
Joe
William Robb wrote:
Good thing Caveboy seems to have left the list
May I ask you why, William? Seems I don't getting the picture once
again. :-(
Bedo.
On 19 Mar 2005 at 10:12, Fred Widall wrote:
Is the loss of some metadata worth a 40% reduction in storage costs ?
Well I guess that's a decision each of us will make for ourselves.
I think it is, but I'm still using CDR rather than DVD for my archiving.
I'm not pleased that Pentax botched up
You failed
My comments interspersed:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:13:40 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I tend to agree with you, there are a few points that may merit
more
discussion.
First, as to my Photoshop skills - they really are rudimentary. To call
them superior in any way
On 19 Mar 2005 at 11:53, Christian wrote:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA (sorry, couldn't type without busting out laughing)
Apparently it's therapeutic (I don't mean waiting for Pentax) LOL
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
