At 03:06 PM 12/22/2005, William Robb wrote:
If they stay with the 2x3 aspect ratio, approximately 2450 pixels x 3675
pixels.
Hardly a huge inprovement in ability to make a larger or higher resolution
print.
William Robb
Yes, but it's enough to meet the minimum requirements of some stock
On 12/22/05, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:So after spending
hundreds of dollars I am still a lousyphotographeroften frustrated by my
results….
Join the club.
Since I have been following the list for awhile I know who to believeand not
to believe. I promise not to get into any
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:08:30AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 22, 2005, at 10:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, 9mp would be a significant improvement over 6mp.
And if the price is right, 6mp bodies prices will have to
drop like bricks. And quickly.
Significant is a matter
you can make a digital file of *any* (finite) size.
best,
mishka
On 12/22/05, Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:06 PM 12/22/2005, William Robb wrote:
If they stay with the 2x3 aspect ratio, approximately 2450 pixels x 3675
pixels.
Hardly a huge inprovement in ability to make a larger or
You probably think he uses Velvia
Is that a brand of compact flash??
No, its a brand of cheese.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Did I say something wrong? An Introduction.
On 12/22/05, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funny thing. Thanks to Gmail, I have most PDML messages since I
resubscribed in September 2004. I searched for Auggie, just to see
when Shel had posted this last year. And this is what I found: Frank,
your answers were exactly the same, down to the two exclamation marks
:)
So a lot more than
Well after successfully lurking for about 18 months it seems that
mypost to Bill Robb's provocation has broken the list! I got a
coupleof messages that indicated The User is out of space as at
least oneother member has gotten too.
Perry.
Tom C wrote:
We are a good bunch of GUYS, aren't we Ann? :-)
Tom C.
hehe - we are a good bunch 'a persons, puleeeze :)
a
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Did I say something wrong? An Introduction.
Hey troops.
Looks like Frank and i have next week off. Looking to do a TOPDML meet Thursday
or Friday
afternoon.
We've contacted the known listers out there, but if there is/are any lurkers
who would
like to stop
On Dec 22, 2005, at 4:22 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:08:30AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 22, 2005, at 10:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, 9mp would be a significant improvement over 6mp.
And if the price is right, 6mp bodies prices will have to
drop like
ActuallyDougBrewerthelistguyappreciatesitifyoudon'tusespaces.Itsavesonba
ndwidthandmakesthelistmorechallenging.Itbecomessomewhatofawordpuzzle.Ann
sanhasalsovoicedherapprovalforthistypeofformating,beingthewordgameperson
thatsheis.
Welcometothelist!
PaulStenquist
On Dec 22, 2005, at 5:41 PM,
ActuallyDougBrewerthelistguyappreciatesitifyoudon'tusespaces.Itsavesonba
ndwidthandmakesthelistmorechallenging.Itbecomessomewhatofawordpuzzle.Ann
sanhasalsovoicedherapprovalforthistypeofformating,beingthewordgameperson
thatsheis.
Welcometothelist!
At 07:23 PM 12/22/2005, Mishka wrote:
you can make a digital file of *any* (finite) size.
best,
mishka
What you suggest is upsizing the image to meet the spec, but that doesn't
provide results quite as nice as having a sensor which can actually create
a file that large at its native
If you've been lurking for 18 moths you have actually been here longer than
me.
But welcome anyway ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original
Since I haven't used either of these bodies for several years, out they go.
Two low mileage bodies. Used all their life by adult user. Both functioned
perfectly last time used. Buyer pays shipping.
Batteries not included.
+ ES Black (Honeywell) - KEH rating - EX - $ 150 USD
with ever ready
Since this is my last opportunity
before going away for the Christmas
break - I'd like to wish all PDML-ers and their families a very Merry
Christmas and a happy New Year.
Looking forward to more puns, flames, esoteric information and plain old
I'm not trying to scare you, I'm trying to piss you off by offending you.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault
Forgot this ;-) in my previous post.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22.
No we blamed the farting on the dogs... though this is a little hard to
stomach... :-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2721099
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Did I say something wrong? An
I just don't get any respect around here...
Tom C.
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Did I say something wrong? An Introduction.
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:10:35 -0500
On 12/22/05, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL
That's scary! I readthatwithnoproblematall.
Maybe we really _don't need spaces. ;-)
D o n
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 7:11 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Did I say something wrong? An
I'm very sorry I left you out, Tom.
Perry - Tom C is full of crap, too.
On 12/22/05, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just don't get any respect around here...
Tom C.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman
Original Message
Subject: Re: Samsung GX-1L?
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:09:44 -0700
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
This one, perhaps?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0511/05110701cypress9mp.asp
--
Hmmm. That Kodak camera, at least in
Original Message
Subject: Re: Samsung GX-1L?
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:22:22 -0700
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
My guess it will be a huge hit at the big box electronics stores like
Best Buy and CompUSA.
gs
I suspect it would sell
G'day Perry,
Welcome to the house of fun. You've got some nice pic's on your web page.
And don't be afraid to join in on the flame wars. I find they make a
boring month quite interesting. :-)
Dave
On 12/23/05, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Since I have been following the
Not to mention the fact that the first lens shown is a lightly modified
SMC-DA 18-55.
--
I wonder if it will have full SMC coating? Or will bypassing that be how
Samsung achieves a price advantage?
Joe
i know that, but i also think that having a file size requirement
is silly.
best,
mishka
On 12/22/05, Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:23 PM 12/22/2005, Mishka wrote:
you can make a digital file of *any* (finite) size.
best,
mishka
What you suggest is upsizing the image to meet the
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7573195155
It seems that there are still some keen collectors of Pentax esoterica out
there. I dipped out at $45, which is a lot for a camera case, even if it is
the only MX accessory that I don't have. I guess I'm not as much of a
collector as
I think it's somewhat silly also, but I don't run the stock agencies. I
would like to be able to sell some images through them one day, however.
take care,
Glen
At 10:06 PM 12/22/2005, Mishka wrote:
i know that, but i also think that having a file size requirement
is silly.
best,
mishka
On
Stock agencies are quite happy with images from 6 megapixel cameras
that have been upsized to the stock house's normal size requirement,
which is generally about 50 megabytes. If you upsize a RAW when
converting, the results are very good.
On Dec 22, 2005, at 10:45 PM, Glen wrote:
That's it! Proof that Frank is actually a machine... :)
t
On 12/22/05 16:41, Juan Buhler wrote:
Funny thing. Thanks to Gmail, I have most PDML messages since I
resubscribed in September 2004. I searched for Auggie, just to see
when Shel had posted this last year. And this is what I found:
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Not to mention the fact that the first lens shown is a lightly
modified SMC-DA 18-55.
--
I wonder if it will have full SMC coating? Or will bypassing that be
how Samsung achieves a price advantage?
Joe
From the Photo, the coating looks identical to the
On 12/22/05, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sold my ME Super to a list member in a moment of stupidity or generosity.
The first 35mm camera I used was a K1000. That made me go into the camera
shops and lust after the ME Super which I could not afford. The first 35mm
body I owned was an MX.
None, but it is a way to differentiate the *ist-D from the Ds/Ds2.
Jack Davis wrote:
In the TTL/P-TTL meter/flash conversation, what roll does lens
compatibility play?
Jack
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
Sounds to me like the resister has been knocked out of position.
Jon Myers wrote:
I have brand new batteries of proper type, and have
run the aperture resistor and ISO resistor around
quite a bit, no change. Watching the meter while
making those adjustments shows quite linear change in
shutter
or Frank for that matter...
frank theriault wrote:
On 12/22/05, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well after successfully lurking for about 18 months it seems that mypost to
Bill Robb's provocation has broken the list!
snip
Welcome, Perry.
If you've been lurking here, you
Not quite, it's _cheese food_
Kenneth Waller wrote:
You probably think he uses Velvia
Is that a brand of compact flash??
No, its a brand of cheese.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message - From: Perry Pellechia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Did I say something wrong? An
Wait a minute, maybe Frank's an automatic answering program!
Juan Buhler wrote:
Funny thing. Thanks to Gmail, I have most PDML messages since I
resubscribed in September 2004. I searched for Auggie, just to see
when Shel had posted this last year. And this is what I found: Frank,
your answers
Jack Davis wrote:
In the TTL/P-TTL meter/flash conversation, what roll does lens
compatibility play?
I'm not sure what you're looking for, Jack. What aspect of lens
compatibility are you interested in?
Basically, if you want full compatibility, use A, F, FA, DA and D-
FA series lenses
Hi!
Happy Birthday! I'd drink to that.
Thanks, Boris.
We gotta share another bottle of Scotch some time. :-)
That would be awesome!
Boris
Hi!
May the light of Hannukah candles lead us to better year...
And of course Merry Christmas...
Boris
Hi!
Welcome. As a list mathist on duty :-), I should say, perhaps I should
hand you a handful of spaces ;-), you seem to miss them regularly.
Welcome to the club...
Boris
And don't forget, Happy Festivus for the rest of us!
:)
j (I don't celebrate any religious holidays, but I like this season
because the days start getting longer from now on)
On 12/22/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
May the light of Hannukah candles lead us to better
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Did I say something wrong? An Introduction.
No we blamed the farting on the dogs... though this is a little hard to
stomach... :-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2721099
You taste wonderful in the morning..
Is that
- Original Message -
From: Glen
Subject: Re: Pentax body but not glass? (was Re: Samsung GX-1L?)
If they stay with the 2x3 aspect ratio, approximately 2450 pixels x 3675
pixels.
Hardly a huge inprovement in ability to make a larger or higher resolution
print.
Yes, but it's
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Did I say something wrong? An Introduction.
I'm not sure whose *ist D it was taken with. This is the picture. I
obviously didn't take it... now that I think about it... I'm pretty sure
the first time I saw it was when we exchanging
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: Meter adjustment of ME
Sounds to me like the resister has been knocked out of position.
I'm wondering if the meter cell doesn't just need cleaning.
It should be visible as a small glas glob somewhere in the mirror box.
A Q-Tip
Okay I've added a few things to last week's list and changed a few
things. here is my updated list soon to be making its way to e-bay.
Reasonable offers accepted
I am also willing to trade and am particularly interested in the older
Tokina 20-35 f3.5...with the yellow stripe or the latest
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Did I say something wrong? An Introduction.
I'm not sure whose *ist D it was taken with. This is the picture. I
obviously didn't take it... now that I think about it... I'm pretty sure
the first time I saw it was when we exchanging
The boys and girls at Don's Photo here in Regina apparently have, waiting
for me, an Epson 4800 printer.
The best part is, I have four days off to play with it.
William Robb
101 - 150 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
