John Francis wrote:
As others have observed, PUG submissions are significantly
down as compared to previous years. While I'm sure that
a lot of this is because of the upsurge in PAW/PESO/...,
I really don't feel this is the time to make it harder to
submit to the PUG.
It's my belief that the
To see where Jens works enter this into Google Earth. Rather low res.
55 27 N 12 12 E
Powell
At 06:35 PM 29/01/2006 , you wrote:
This website is about building a new harbour and renewing a part of the old
harbour - building new homes, offices, cultural institutions etc. As a
planner/architect
We had an obedience trial this weekend.
This fella did really well for his boss.
And doesn't he look proud of himself!
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/turboribbons.html
Technical (such as there is any)
istD, FA50/1.4
1/60th at f6.3
Lighting by Metz.
William Robb
File size/dimension restrictions make me reticent to post images to the
PUG, by
most current web image presentation standards it's pretty limiting.
I would like to see a bit larger image size.
Powell
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can the PUG get further promotion?
Remind the notoriously forgetful like me that (a) the deadline is
approaching and (b) what the month's subject is.
And please do keep it somewhat Pentax eclusive.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG -
Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But luckily
it was not a whole lot, possibly a degree or so.
An entire degree is an awful lot for subjects like industry or
architecture.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras
Oh yes, sure, but the difference with the PUG is that,
here, I 'know' many of the submiters (or at least I
have read their posts for many years), and I know that
I will receive their feedback if I comment or ask for
details in the PDML.
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I don't know
Perhaps we should make it more restrictive. It's the lens that counts,
not the body. Why not stipulate that the picture must have been taken
using a Pentax lens?
John
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:11:54 -, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oh yes, sure, but the difference with
Gautam Sarup wrote:
Ken is it totally off or do you think something could be
done to give it some appeal?
Thanks,
Gautam
Ken has touched on the reeason for it's lack of appeal, but I think a
clarification might be in order.
Too late with the current image, but for later shots, you might
John,
In Australia there is basically no restriction at all on who or what
you can take photos of if you are on public property. If you are on private
property (which includes shopping centres and council owned land) then the
property owner has the right to set the rules. A lot of the time
mmm...
I would have subscribed this for film but, in the
digital era, the body (sensor, processor, ...) has
acquired a great relevance, quite close to the lens
IMHO.
To me the current restriction is fine (Pentax body or
lens) and I would even admit rebadgeds like the new
Samsungs, although this
I could agree if we still used film, but now much of the limitations also
relate to the sensor and electronics in the camera. So if brand has any
interest at all the camera is part of it.
DagT
fra: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps we should make it more restrictive. It's the lens
That won't work. I'll bet half the group have more
than one Sigma, Tokina, Zenitar, Vivitar and
others in K mount or even M42. Not only that, but
this rule would exclude images taken though
microscopes and telescopes. Some part of the
equipment needs to be Pentax and the body is the
obvious
I keep suggesting the most obvious rule:
There must be some Pentax equipment involved
(IMO, even disguised, if well known it is Pentax like in case of Samsung
clones)
Dario
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006
John Forbes wrote:
Perhaps we should make it more restrictive. It's the lens that counts,
not the body. Why not stipulate that the picture must have been taken
using a Pentax lens?
John
I was just going to comment on that thought, John.
There are basically two elements involved in a
I am sure it isn't a new idea, but I could not find any specific data in
the archive.
It is time to upgrade my DS with split-image/raster focussing screen
ripped from an older (Pentax) body.
There are some places on the Net offering s/i screens, but:
1. the cost is more than 10 donor
Don Williams wrote:
That won't work. I'll bet half the group have more than one Sigma,
Tokina, Zenitar, Vivitar and others in K mount or even M42. Not only
that, but this rule would exclude images taken though microscopes and
telescopes. Some part of the equipment needs to be Pentax and the
Gonz wrote:
Oops wrong pic. It should have been:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg
Gonz wrote:
Another one with a similar technique as Soft, easier to do in PS.
http://www.g0nz.com/images/ksoftaprox.jpg
Comments welcome.
rg
I like k2 much more than k, which seems a little
Hi,
I bought a used Pentax ZX-5n off ebay last week. I only have
manual-focus lenses and found it a bit hard to focus using the AF
screen in the ZX-5n.
Is there a possibility of changing the focusing screen on the ZX-5n
and using a split-image screen instead? If yes, then for how much
approx. I
Since the image is formed on the _top_ surface of the screen,
thickness is not critical.
The microprism and matte screens I purchased for the ist-D
are a bit thicker than the 'stock' screen.
I can easily tell this because the spring arms that hold the
screen in position are loaded quite a bit more
- Original Message -
From: keith_w
Subject: Re: PUG (No longer Re: *istD2)
We may end up stipulating either/or. Either the body OR the lens must be
Pentax.
You haven't read the rules. Thats the way it has been for several years.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle
Subject: Re: Full Page Pentax Ad ...
Whata crappy cover design! Looks like a 1950's superhero comic rather
than a supposedly serious hobby magazine.
It isn't a serious hobby magazine.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jens Bladt wrote:
The LCD preview is interesting.
I suppose this camera does not have a prisma at the place of the mirror
(like the Olympus E-10 and E-20 SLRs). So, I guess the DOF button opens
the
mirror and fires the shutter as
Hi,
I downloaded Gallery Constructor2, installed it,
and set it going on a random bunch of TIFF images
taken yesterday around the yard and hill. Nothing
happened. I closed the window and found another
that informed that it would take 180 minutes to
make the gallery and this estimate rose to
See my post in response to:focusing screens - thickness?
The only problem is that Pentax MF screens are _slightly_
smaller than the 5n screen, I have made them work by
carefully aligning them though.
Be aware that using screens from other bodies can change
exposure readings by a stop or so.
Don
I did have a couple of issues with version 1.6 so I went
back to 1.5 until the bugs in 1.6 are worked out.
This was created with 1.5 in about 2 minutes:
http://www.dsanderson.com/M28_3.5/
Don
-Original Message-
From: Don Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 30,
Hi!
If it comes to a vote, keep it with Pentax lenses, and allow a body of
the photographer's choice.
When you say Look at how this image turned out! you're not bragging
about the fact it was shot with your MX, or your K-1000, you're saying
Look at the special way this lens makes images!
For those new to the list wondering what the heck we are talking
about I thought this might help:
Where and what it is: http://pug.komkon.org/
How to submit: http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html
and
The themes: http://pug.komkon.org/general/themes.html
Don
I know I only did a PAW on Saturday, but I got this one printed up,
too, and I'm away next weekend, so I don't think I'll have a PAW next
week, so I'm posting this early. Besides, I kind of like it (if I can
be so immodest) g:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4073757size=lg
All
Don Sanderson wrote:
Since the image is formed on the _top_ surface of the screen,
thickness is not critical.
That's right, I am just not sure if M series screens are thin enough to
fit the tiny metal frame in DS.
The only donor I have handy at the moment is a P30, unfortunately
removing
John Forbes wrote:
Perhaps we should make it more restrictive. It's the lens that
counts, not the body. Why not stipulate that the picture must have
been taken using a Pentax lens?
In a digital camera, doesn't what's behind the lens count for quite a
bit, too?
So maybe the stipulation
YAY!
I really like this for all the disconnected (for lack of a better
term) people in it.
Nice one Frank.
Dave
On 1/30/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I only did a PAW on Saturday, but I got this one printed up,
too, and I'm away next weekend, so I don't think I'll have
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:29:44 +0100, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
Perhaps we should make it more restrictive. It's the lens that
counts, not the body. Why not stipulate that the picture must have
been taken using a Pentax lens?
In a digital camera, doesn't
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
http://www.alphoto.com/images/bummer.jpg
Hope you'll be sharing the story behind it in due course.
There is a little town called Santa Claus, Indiana. It is the home of
Holiday World, a little amusement park my wife has been wanting us to
visit
On 1/29/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We had an obedience trial this weekend.
This fella did really well for his boss.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dawgpictures/turboribbons.html
Technical (such as there is any)
istD, FA50/1.4
1/60th at f6.3
Lighting by Metz.
He
We can argue forever about how restrictive the rules for the PUGshould be. The
bottom line is that, if no one pays any attention towhat is posted, very few
will bother posting anything -- Pentax onnon-Pentax.
On 1/29/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boone, N.C., and in good health, I believe
Other interests have taken him away from us for the time being.
What? You mean there's a universe outside of PDML?
-frank
g
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
If you mean upcoming PUD topics, you can go the the PUGform page:
http://oksne.net/autopug/PUGform.asp and click on Select, and you will see
the topics for the comings months.
On 1/30/06, Gautam Sarup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a place where one
can get a list of upcoming PAW subjects?
I meant, of course, to type PUG topics, rather than PUD topics. Sorry
On 1/30/06, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you mean upcoming
PUD topics, you can go the the PUGform page:
http://oksne.net/autopug/PUGform.asp and click on Select, and you will see
the topics for the
On 1/30/06, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can argue forever about how restrictive the rules for the PUGshould be.
The bottom line is that, if no one pays any attention towhat is posted, very
few will bother posting anything -- Pentax onnon-Pentax.
I agree, Dan.
Most of the
I picked up a copy of ilife 06 the otherday,and stumbled upon some
discussions
in Mac support.
Seems a lot of loading isues and bugs in programs.
Any one upgraded and have problems to report.
I cannot find my ilige 05 CD to reistall if
Frank,
Interesting group of rectangles. Like the composition and exposure.
Might consider tilting the left end up a bit or the right edge down.
Children's aimless presence always a delight.
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I only did a PAW on Saturday, but I got this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I picked up a copy of ilife 06 the otherday,and stumbled upon some
discussions
in Mac support.
Seems a lot of loading isues and bugs in programs.
Any one upgraded and have problems to report.
I cannot find my ilige
Reading all the comments in this thread has given me pause for thought. I
now feel that the PUG should stay as it is wrt equipment, although I'm
still in support of an agreed upon increase in file dimensions and size.
Shel
On Jan 30, 2006, at 14:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I picked up a copy of ilife 06 the otherday,and stumbled
upon some discussions
in Mac support.
Seems a lot of loading isues and bugs in programs.
Any one upgraded and have problems to
On 1/29/06, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont have a soft portrait lens. I've been looking for one for a
while, but I keep missing them. Well, I figured I would try to use PS
to aproximate the effect. Its hard. Those lenses are quite special.
Here is an attempt using an older portrait
On 1/28/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
This is not Pentax content :-).
http://www.photoline.ru/photo/1138474583
Boris
Gorgeous! No wonder those Norweigians decided to stay. g
I like the way the clouds curl down from the top of the mountains.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness
Reading all the comments in this thread has given me pause for thought. I
now feel that the PUG should stay as it is wrt equipment, although I'm
still in support of an agreed upon increase in file dimensions and size.
Exactly how I feel about it.
I have submitted dozens of images to the PUG
On 1/30/06, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Does anyone else get some flashy ads for TV superimposed over the photo?
Shel
yes.
keith
no
Dave
frank theriault wrote:
On 1/29/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boone, N.C., and in good health, I believe
Other interests have taken him away from us for the time being.
What? You mean there's a universe outside of PDML?
-frank
g
Well, you yourself ignore us
Before the digital revolution, I replaced the
focusing screen on my ZX-7 with a focusing screen from
the ZX-M based on information from the pdml. I
called Pentax in Colorado and ordered the ZX-M
focusing screen. I think the screen cost around $5
plus shipping at that time, and so I bought two,
.. seen in the current issue of Popular Photography. Surprised
the heck
outta me!
The cover date of the issue is February, 2006. Here's a pic of
the cover:
https://www.neodata.com/hfmus/phot/images/phot_cover_206x271.jpg
Shel
--
I haven't seen the ad yet. I hope it isn't a
A screen for the ZX-M should fit.
Below are instructions from a pdml member:
If it's anything like the ZX-M, it's painfully easy.
This works for the ZX-M: Take the lens off the camera,
and at the front of the focus screen there is a gap in
the metal frame that holds it in. Stick a small screw
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On 1/29/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boone, N.C., and in good health, I believe
Other interests have taken him away from us for the time being.
What? You mean there's a universe outside of PDML?
-frank
g
Well,
On 1/30/06, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops wrong pic. It should have been:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg
I like this one even better than the first one!
She has gorgeous eyes...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
It's for the DS2 and shows the camera sporting the kit lens. Mentions that
the camera is an entry level DSLR ... I think that's what I read. The ad
is pretty nicely done, IMO.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Joseph Tainter
.. seen in the current issue of Popular Photography.
Just can't justify the expense this year, kids
I'll miss it - and seeing all of you
ann
Thanks, John. Yes, it's a nice place to live - a little cold and a little
boring - no mountains, no sky scapers, no rivers (just small streems).
Denmark is a bit like a small H.C.Andersen museum :-)
I know - some places makes it difficult to be a normal human being, since
you are judged by
frank theriault wrote:
On 1/30/06, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops wrong pic. It should have been:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/k2softaprox.jpg
I like this one even better than the first one!
She has gorgeous eyes...
Thanks Frank. I like this one better too.
cheers,
frank
--
Mike,
Thanks for the advice on selling. Regarding your other
comment, I believe that there are some equipment junkies
out there who would make the trade between certain body
parts and the right piece of high-end glass. :-)
--Mark
mike wilson wrote:
You've got it the wrong way round,
I obtained iLife 06 yesterday but have not installed it as yet. I
don't use iLife all that much (mostly iTunes, occasionally iPhoto,
iDVD and iMovie, never GarageBand) so I've never installed the whole
package. I'm curious about iWeb, but I may build a boot system on an
external drive to
Hi Jens,
It's a beautiful town, well photographed. Thanks for sharing these.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, John. Yes, it's a nice place to live - a little cold and a little
boring - no mountains, no sky scapers, no rivers
Hi folks,
the February PUG is open.
It can be found at http://pug.komkon.org
Have Fun it is small but nice.
Cheers
Adelheid
--
Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie
I obtained iLife 06 yesterday but have not installed it as yet. I
don't use iLife all that much (mostly iTunes, occasionally iPhoto,
iDVD and iMovie, never GarageBand) so I've never installed the whole
package. I'm curious about iWeb, but I may build a boot system on an
external drive to
I converted an MX screen for my use on my DS - no problems with thickness.
On 1/30/06, Tomasz Machnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure it isn't a new idea, but I could not find any specific data in
the archive.
It is time to upgrade my DS with split-image/raster focussing screen
ripped
My $.02, as if they matter...
The PUG should continue requiring that either the body or lens be Pentax.
A size change is desirable.
I'm not opposed to there being a 3rd section of the gallery each month -
Non-Pentax gear.
Tom C.
From: Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Shel,
I see it not so much as a Pentax ad, but a dormant feature in Pop
Photo's monthly Justout series. (page 25?)
Was, also, pleased to discover it.
Jack
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's for the DS2 and shows the camera sporting the kit lens.
Mentions that
the camera is
очень хороший, Борис
On 1/28/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! This is not Pentax
content :-). http://www.photoline.ru/photo/1138474583 Boris
AvK wrote:
Hi folks,
the February PUG is open.
It can be found at http://pug.komkon.org
Have Fun it is small but nice.
Cheers
Adelheid
It is indeed small but nice.
Four I think are truly excellent: Paris from the ground up, Sundial
shell, Undone and In the air.
Adelheid wrote:
the February PUG is open.
It can be found at http://pug.komkon.org
Very good entries indeed! My personal favourites; Fallen Posts; Geometric
Landscape Silver Stars.
Malcolm
On 1/30/06, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just can't justify the expense this year, kids
I'll miss it - and seeing all of you
ann
:-(
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
There's somthing for everybody. I especially liked Tom's Reflections and
Refractions and Matjaž Osojnik's Playing Around. The former because
Tom saw in the ordinary something extraordinary, and the latter for
reasons I can't quite put my finger on, except to say that it has that
In a message dated 1/30/2006 9:10:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not opposed to there being a 3rd section of the gallery each month -
Non-Pentax gear.
Tom C.
Hmmm. Not a bad idea. We could even label that section Darkside Defectors.
Hehehehe.
Although I am
Registration for the 2006 GFMNPW begins February 1st, kids. It will sell
out in a matter of hours. Set your clocks.
Thanks John... I appreciate the kind words.
Tom C.
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: February PUG is open a bit early
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:59:23 -
There's somthing for everybody. I especially liked
I'm sure you accidentally left off the smiley from that statement
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... it would just go to show that Pentax gear is better,
when one compares the shots side by side.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/30/2006 9:10:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not opposed to there being a 3rd section of the gallery each month -
Non-Pentax gear.
Tom C.
Hmmm. Not a bad idea. We could even label that section Darkside
I'll take another look this afternoon when I get to the book store. You
may be right
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jack Davis
I see it not so much as a Pentax ad, but a dormant feature
in Pop Photo's monthly Justout series. (page 25?)
Was, also, pleased to discover it.
Jack
On 1/30/06, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Registration for the 2006 GFMNPW begins February 1st, kids. It will sell
out in a matter of hours. Set your clocks.
I guess the reg'n form wont' actually be ready until Feb 1? I just
went to the site, and there was nothing ready.
Or, maybe
Darned - I tried to post an image some hours too late. Geometry. But I
couldn't.
Anyway, this was meant to be my contribution:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/93210652/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: AvK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 30.
...sell the FA* 2.8 28-70mm to me for 100 USD :-))
No, I do wnat this, but my available funds went to the FA* 80-200mm :-
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Mark Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 30. januar 2006 01:07
Til: 'pentax-discuss'
In a message dated 1/30/2006 10:58:15 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sure you accidentally left off the smiley from that statement
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... it would just go to show that Pentax gear is better,
when one compares the
frank theriault wrote:
On 1/30/06, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Registration for the 2006 GFMNPW begins February 1st, kids. It will sell
out in a matter of hours. Set your clocks.
I guess the reg'n form wont' actually be ready until Feb 1? I just
went to the site, and there was
Thanks for looking Paul
:-)
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 30. januar 2006 17:48
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: My Home Town
Hi Jens,
It's a beautiful town, well photographed. Thanks for
Adelheid wrote:
the February PUG is open.
It can be found at http://pug.komkon.org
Very good entries indeed! My personal favourites; Fallen Posts; Geometric
Landscape Silver Stars.
Malcolm
Thanks for the comment on fallen posts Malcolm
Dave
David J Brooks
Equine Photography in
On Jan 29, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
.. seen in the current issue of Popular Photography. Surprised
the heck
outta me!
The cover date of the issue is February, 2006. Here's a pic of
the cover:
https://www.neodata.com/hfmus/phot/images/phot_cover_206x271.jpg
Is that a
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:25:02 -0600, E.R.N. Reed wrote:
It is indeed small but nice.
Four I think are truly excellent: Paris from the ground up, Sundial
shell, Undone and In the air.
Thank you for commenting!
Regards, JvW
--
Jan
Mark,
I was just wondering if a promise of sending Christmas cards
(from me and on behalf of your beloved lens(es))
to you every year for the next 20 years would count as a half
of the requested price.
If not, I can throw in a promise for birthday cards every other year as well.
:-)
Igor
Sun,
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
I agree on lager pictures, though.
Some folks might become rather bitter about that.
Perhaps its time to draft some new rules.
-- Original message --
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
I agree on lager pictures, though.
Some folks might become rather bitter about that.
Why?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: mike wilson
Some folks might become rather bitter about that.
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
I agree on lager pictures, though.
According to dpreview.com the intro of the DL 2 only in Asia and Canada
may be an indication of the intention to sell the future cameras as Pentax
branded in some markets and Samsung in others (namely Europe and the
US). I'm screwy enough that I want my Pentax to say Pentax on it and not
The FA* 28-70mm is (still??) sold new in Germany (Foto Palme) for 1279 Euro
= 1547 USD, including the 17 % German MwSt).
Plus shipping of course - probably 100 Euro on top of it.
European buyers may want a new one and pay a few hundreds more.
(Sigh: Why doesn't Pentax make lenses like that
Thanks Bob.
Having looked at them again, I like this one best too :-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Bob Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 28. januar 2006 23:35
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: PESO: Strange Fruit
Jens, I really
Aren't you jumping the gun a bit? Hasn't happened yet. This alleged badging
scheme is only an assumption based on scant evidence.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: dick graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to dpreview.com the intro of the DL 2 only in Asia and
I think i't brilliant except for the nearly burned out (closed negative) in
the sky.
I know it is practcally impossible to avoid, and this high light IS
important in the picture.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL
Better hop to it then.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps its time to draft some new rules.
-- Original message --
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
I agree on lager pictures, though.
Some folks might become rather bitter about
Thanks, John. I'm glad you like it.
Matjaz
There's somthing for everybody. I especially liked Tom's Reflections and
Refractions and Matjaz Osojnik's Playing Around. The former because
Tom saw in the ordinary something extraordinary, and the latter for
reasons I can't quite put my
On 1/30/06, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very moving Frank. Very effective use of the fisheye, it heightens the
emotional impact of the scene.
Thanks, Gonz, Dave.
Gonz, I don't know if the fisheye affects the emotional impact, but
what I do like is that it allowed me to get the flowers and
Like: No wasps?
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=217314
DagT
Den 30. jan. 2006 kl. 21.54 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps its time to draft some new rules.
-- Original message --
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
