On 28/3/06, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
So now, my plan A is to build a gapahuk - a primitive hide in English. I
will make it using some branches and some old curtains. The gapahuk will
scare them off at first, but after a while they will get used to it and come
back. That's the time
On 27/3/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any time I try to phone my friend in Birmingham, I wonder if there is a
phone system at all in Britain.
It's a well-known fact that Brummies are not fussy who they befriend.
That would be why one of them married a Canadian girl..
Amazing how this person has gone from selling clothes in Texas to expensive
lenses in Barnsley overnight.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/PENTAX-smc-P-FA-300mm-F2-8-ED-IF-Telephoto-Lens-NEW_W0QQitemZ9503841218QQcategoryZ102955QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Why you chose photosight for displaying of your work?
German www.fotocommunity.de has turned into an awful place where the
admins watch on while a bunch of free-member trolls indulge in insults
and racism. So, I deleted my pictures there.
Photosight
David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.broenink-art.nl/maukie2.swf
Very nice. :-)
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005
Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6 mount
Here is a 300/4 with 1.4x extender AND 2x extender for a total of
840mm f11 equivalent. I used a Sigma flash with Kirk flash x-tender
for a bit of extra light. The bird was about 50 feet away and this
is quite a crop and resized for the web, etc, etc. (It's crappy
composition; I hate
Hi!
Totally abstract question - are all excellent English photographers
masochists? ;-) Well, you just admitted to be one of the latter and
I am of very strong opinion that you also one of the former...
I wouldn't say that I enjoy pain, but I do seem to attract it.
Now Bill's wife,
We first thought this was a joke but it's all over the press now:
Leica have terminated all agreements with Berlin photo dealers including
the renowned KaDeWe department store.
Leica sales manager Steffen Keil explained that they want Leica to be
perceived as a luxury brand like Gucci or Marco
On Mar 28, 2006, at 1:42 AM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
allow me to finish
If you paint with light.. you use an enlarger.
The painting with light does not finish with the camera exposure.
Mudh more is done in the darkroom.
This is what digital removes. Yes, you can fiddle with pixels all
Boris,
At home you haven't paid anything for the privilege of watching (save maybe
your television service provider). Beer is 1/16 as expensive. You have the
benefit of a truck full of graphics and stats guys, you can actually
understand the announcers, you can properly whack somebody if
I agree. I do find that there is a sense of mystery about IR shots,
particularly those taken in winter with no leaves on the tree. With the
light foliage that the method produces in warmer months, the effect may
be different.
Paul
On Mar 28, 2006, at 12:58 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
I
Interesting.
Leica terminates partnership with 3rd party distributors, and takes to doing it
themselves.
Pentax lay off their distribution offices and form partnerships with 3rd party
distributors.
hmmm... :-)
Jostein
Quoting Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We first thought this
Hi All,
Work flow is not a digital term. It's a process and product management
term. It's simply a term used for how one gets to the end product.
There are a lot of ways to produce an image. The people who made
tapestries complained about the upstarts who used oil paints. And the
trend
This one time, at band camp, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand the feeling of people who work with computers all day that
they don't want to work with computers on their free time, but the
feeling is the same for those who work in the darkroom all day. The
darkroom is
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: PESO: Bird shot with Canon
Totally abstract question - are all excellent English photographers
masochists? ;-) Well, you just admitted to be one of the latter and
I am of very strong opinion that you also one of the
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 27 Mar 2006 at 23:11, Cotty wrote:
When I was in training (nearly 30 years ago :-( we used many terms and
acronyms but it is pointless me repeating them here as they would mean
nothing to someone not involved in film production. I have never been in
the telephone
Sorry for the misunderstanding, Kevin -- I mistakenly understood painting with
light vs. binary to be another one-is-art, one-is-tech statement.
You really meant more like painting with pixels vs. stripping out sensitized
grains of silver embedded in resin... right?
-Aaron
-Original
What a bunch of idiots! Leica used to be a very well respected marque, and
now it seems to have become a designer camera. The long slide into
oblivion continues ... 'tis a shame. Glad I got mine while they were still
cameras, not jewelry.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 28, 2006, at 7:16 AM, Leon Altoff wrote:
The dark room may not be an inherently magical place, but it is a
place of ritual more than any computer. What the darkroom lacks is an
undo button. One wrong step, one incorrect movement in the ritual and
you have to start again.
I don't
On Mar 28, 2006, at 7:45 AM, E.R.N. Reed wrote:
And, I don't know about the majority of the general US public, but I
never encountered the term until it showed up in this thread. Not a
clue what it meant until translated.
I'm not in the U.S. and I'm not in I.T. and I didn't know what it
I have the 300 DX pro, which is quite similar to the 400Dx.
There is an optional short centerpost, which I purchased, and
the centerpost is reversible.
I consider the 300 to be a much better tripod than the Bogen 3001,
which I've also used. I currently own a 3021, but use the Slik
much more
Aaron, you, and others, don't get it. It's about personal perception and
feeling, which doesn't have to conform to ~your~ logic. There are those
who take a very pragmatic view of the digital world and what it
offers/doesn't offer, and there are others who feel things more emotionally
or
On 3/28/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 28, 2006, at 7:45 AM, E.R.N. Reed wrote:
And, I don't know about the majority of the general US public, but I
never encountered the term until it showed up in this thread. Not a
clue what it meant until translated.
I'm not in
I'm in the US. I'm not in IT, but I am somewhat of a techy. But I
didn't know what POT means other than cookware in uppercase.
Paul
On Mar 28, 2006, at 8:07 AM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Mar 28, 2006, at 7:45 AM, E.R.N. Reed wrote:
And, I don't know about the majority of the general US
Ahhh ... that's what IT means. Thanks been trying to figure it out,
or remember it, for a few days now, since I saw it used on a billboard.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: E.R.N. Reed
(Yes, I know IT stands for Information Technology. Been married
to him long enough to learn that
Oh, one thing I forgot: the 300/400 locks the centerpost with
TWO adjustments, making post extension much more secure.
My 3021 is very bouncy with even an inch of extension.
David J Brooks wrote:
Just pondering over the Slik Pro 700DX or the 400Dx models. They both
have adjustable multi
Actually, Aaron gets it completely. As do the others who've done enough
darkroom work to realize that , like processing pics on the computer,
it's just work. Both can be rewarding, both can be difficult and
tedious.
On Mar 28, 2006, at 8:11 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Aaron, you, and others,
On Mar 28, 2006, at 8:11 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Aaron, you, and others, don't get it. It's about personal perception
and
feeling, which doesn't have to conform to ~your~ logic.
Shel, I'm sorry that I feel insulted when people say what you do is
not art, it is binary, it is product, it
On Mar 28, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Actually, Aaron gets it completely. As do the others who've done
enough darkroom work to realize that , like processing pics on the
computer, it's just work. Both can be rewarding, both can be difficult
and tedious.
Yes, thank you.
-Aaron
On 28 Mar 2006 at 8:14, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm in the US. I'm not in IT, but I am somewhat of a techy. But I
didn't know what POT means other than cookware in uppercase.
POT is what Clinton didn't inhale.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Mar 28, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Actually, Aaron gets it completely. As do the others who've done
enough darkroom work to realize that , like processing pics on the
computer, it's just work. Both can be rewarding, both can be
difficult and tedious.
I have never heard of transcend before. Is this a reliable brand? I
don't want it to crap out on me after a whole week in Europe or
anything like that.
Methinks you're taking this too personally. No one said that what ~you~ do
is or isn't art, and so what if they did. It's just one person's opinion,
one person's perception, one person's feeling about how something (in this
case the digital workflow and process) effects him. If you drove a Ford
Transcend has been around for a while. Friends have been using them for
years, and that's why I bought mine + the price was nice for the features.
IMO, they're as good as Lexar, Sandisk, or Kingston. Comes with a five
year warranty.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Sunny Chung
I have
Motorcycle racing stuff from last weekend's grand prix in Spain:
http://www.superbikeplanet.com/image/2006/mgp/jerez/3/index.htm
With the usual bizarre but entertaining captions!
Don't know who the photographer is but he was definitely in the right
place at the right time.
At the end of next week, I will be flying to Anaheim, CA, to join mywife, who
will be at a conference there most of that week. I willhave a day or so in
Anaheim, then we will drive down to San Diego tospend a few days with my wife's
uncle.
Can anyone give me advice on interesting places to
I have no great personal attachment to my car or my TV. But what I do for a
living is a great passion of mine. It largely defines who I am.
It's not a hobby for me. Wouldn't you feel insulted if people took shots at
what you do for a living?
Sorry, Shel, call me sensitive but I just can't
Mark Roberts wrote:
Motorcycle racing stuff from last weekend's grand prix in Spain:
http://www.superbikeplanet.com/image/2006/mgp/jerez/3/index.htm
With the usual bizarre but entertaining captions!
Don't know who the photographer is but he was definitely in the right
place at the right time.
Heh, Are there any women who shoot MotoGP -- I've only seen a female sports
photographer once, and she was part of the Japanese media contingent following
Hideki Matsui's consecutive games played streak.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Sorta
I watched that race on TV. Rossi is one lucky guy...
And that photographer had his finger on the button at the right time too. :-)
-Mat
On 3/28/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Motorcycle racing stuff from last weekend's grand prix in Spain:
On 3/28/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Methinks you're taking this too personally. No one said that what ~you~ do
is or isn't art, and so what if they did. It's just one person's opinion,
one person's perception, one person's feeling about how something (in this
case the digital
Hi!
Totally abstract question - are all excellent English photographers
masochists? ;-) Well, you just admitted to be one of the latter and
I am of very strong opinion that you also one of the former...
Boris, English men actually pay money to be spanked by middle aged women.
HTH
John Whittingham wrote:
http://ww2.xian.us:8080/flicker_IMG_4798.jpg
Hi
I'm amazed at how good the image is considering the use of two TC's, did you
have to correct for CA?
Nope. I did a little web sharpening after the crop and re-size and
that's about it. I was more than happy
Looks like another Canon magazine ad.
Terrific sequence!
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Motorcycle racing stuff from last weekend's grand prix in Spain:
http://www.superbikeplanet.com/image/2006/mgp/jerez/3/index.htm
With the usual bizarre but entertaining captions!
Don't
...is to NOT go on the internet after a funeral.
Sorry for being snarky last night.
Dave
Equine Photography in York Region
Hi Boris,
Excellent shot, golden hour light, great composition, birds flying
into the frame; I like it very much.
Usually I agree with Kenneth, but cropping in VF would leave the birds
out of the picture, so wouldn't touch a thing.
On 3/27/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Tel
On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:27 AM, frank theriault wrote:
However, every time I say how I'm more than satisfied with film, that
I like the results it produces, and that I like the process (at least
my involvement in the process - or lack of involvement as the case may
be), someone jumps in to tell
When you're working in IR, you're seeing a scene with light that
human eyes generally cannot see. It is often other-worldy, removed
from life as we know it.
I like this scene, although I feel the landing at the bottom is a
little too much of the composition. The composition is unsettling:
Nope. I did a little web sharpening after the crop and re-size and
that's about it. I was more than happy with the results.
I'm even more inpressed now, the combination really is very good. I've never
used more than one converter with the 300 APO.
Thanks,
John
John Whittingham
Juan
I won't be useful, just want to tell you that I had a great time
looking at them ;o)
On 3/27/06, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a very first pass at editing the photos I will show at the end
of next month:
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/sp3.html
The final edit will have to
Frank, more than one person in this thread has said that the wet darkroom has
soul and the digital darkroom doesn't. I'd be as quick to jump on someone
arguing digital's inherent superiority as a process. 99% of what you see is
what the person brings to the process, not the process itself.
I have one Transcend 1G SD card, rated at 60x. it's been reliable but
is not as fast a performer as the Sandisk Ultra II 1G SD card, also
rated at 60x. The difference is noticeable but not that huge a
difference. It was about 20% less expensive.
Godfrey
On Mar 28, 2006, at 5:51 AM, Shel
John Whittingham wrote:
Nope. I did a little web sharpening after the crop and re-size and
that's about it. I was more than happy with the results.
I'm even more inpressed now, the combination really is very good. I've never
used more than one converter with the 300 APO.
When I had the
Mark Roberts wrote:
Motorcycle racing stuff from last weekend's grand prix in Spain:
http://www.superbikeplanet.com/image/2006/mgp/jerez/3/index.htm
With the usual bizarre but entertaining captions!
Don't know who the photographer is but he was definitely in the right
place at the right time.
This
shot of the woodpecker was the GASP! Canon EF 300/4 IS and Canon TCs.
Ah, must have missed part of the thread. Still very inpressive.
Regards,
John
John Whittingham
Technician
you can't be optimistic with a misty optic
-- Original Message ---
From: Christian [EMAIL
On 3/28/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's meaningless to say one is better than the other without
including the all important for what?.
snip
Exactly!! g
cheers,
frank the luddite (and proud of it) g
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 3/28/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank, more than one person in this thread has said that the wet darkroom has
soul and the digital darkroom doesn't. I'd be as quick to jump on someone
arguing digital's inherent superiority as a process. 99% of what you see is
what the
For my info, can someone give an idea of write times for such a 80x
card with a *ist DS? I only have cheap/slow cards now, and I'm
wondering if I should invest in at least a few fast ones, as I shoot
RAW.
Regards
Patrice
2006/3/28, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have one Transcend 1G SD
Of course this is a waste of time. But you are the one not getting
it. The fact that you have an opinion and feel a certain way about
various photographic processes is not the issue.
Expressing your person perception and feeling in such a way as to
disparage other people's passion and
On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:57 AM, frank theriault wrote:
It's meaningless to say one is better than the other without
including the all important for what?.
snip
Exactly!! g
cheers,
frank the luddite (and proud of it) g
It's my favourite argument: which is better, the hammer or the
Interesting shot of the photographers. Only two are chimping:-). Almost
all are using fill flash. Lenses appear to be in the 300mm range. I'm
surprised that none of the flashes have Xtenders mounted.
Paul
On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Motorcycle
Thanks Godders. I debated whether I ought to frame up a bit, but the
imposing pier felt best in the viewfinder. Of course, when shooting
with the IR filter, what you see in the viewfinder isn't what you get
:-).
Paul
On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:40 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
When you're working in
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Heh, Are there any women who shoot MotoGP -- I've only seen a female
sports photographer once, and she was part of the Japanese media contingent
following Hideki Matsui's consecutive games played streak.
There was a female photographer shooting at the Mid-Ohio Superbike
It's hard to be precise without more precise data, Patrice.
Basically, an 80x card has the potential of transferring data at
about twice the speed of a 32x card, but that potential is
constrained by how fast the camera's data bus can support. The *ist
DS body can just about use the full
Mat Maessen wrote:
On 3/28/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Motorcycle racing stuff from last weekend's grand prix in Spain:
http://www.superbikeplanet.com/image/2006/mgp/jerez/3/index.htm
With the usual bizarre but entertaining captions!
Don't know who the photographer is but he was
Intense stuff. That could have been bad...
Godfrey
On Mar 28, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Motorcycle racing stuff from last weekend's grand prix in Spain:
http://www.superbikeplanet.com/image/2006/mgp/jerez/3/index.htm
With the usual bizarre but entertaining captions!
Don't know who
On 28/3/06, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
However I do insist - please answer my initial question VBG.
Which was 'are all excellent British photographers masochists?' - the
true answer is, and it pains me to say this, but I don't know.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Humm. Nether of your two post's made it to my inbox, so i cut this from the
archives.
Thanks for the info Lon.
I wonder if i have an older brouchere, as i only see one lock on the 300. I
wonder if the 700 has it to.
Thats good to know anyway. I might go with the 700 and not have to worry
Bob Shell wrote:
On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:27 AM, frank theriault wrote:
However, every time I say how I'm more than satisfied with film, that
I like the results it produces, and that I like the process (at least
my involvement in the process - or lack of involvement as the case may
be), someone
On 3/27/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one of my equine services is a CDof a show nature.
I make it quite cleaer that i am giving them a CD with unadjusted files.
Sofarc no comlaints\\Dave
A lot of photographers who shoot dogsports do this too.
I can't bring myself to do it
On 3/28/06, Peter Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amazing how this person has gone from selling clothes in Texas to expensive
lenses in Barnsley overnight.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/PENTAX-smc-P-FA-300mm-F2-8-ED-IF-Telephoto-Lens-NEW_W0QQitemZ9503841218QQcategoryZ102955QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
This
Thanks Aaron for your suggestion. The laptop is about 15 diagonally across,
so the Kipling does sound like it would work. I'll definitely take a look at
it.
Thanks again,
Derek
-- Original message --
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it a
Godfrey,
Thank you for both of your replies. As usual, they will help a lot.
Thanks again,
Derek
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a Timbuk2 Commute XL that does this duty for me. It's not the
most convenient camera
Hi!
However I do insist - please answer my initial question VBG.
Which was 'are all excellent British photographers masochists?' - the
true answer is, and it pains me to say this, but I don't know.
Hmmm... I expected you would thank me for an odd compliment... After
all you admitted to be
Mark Roberts wrote:
Mat Maessen wrote:
On 3/28/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Motorcycle racing stuff from last weekend's grand prix in Spain:
http://www.superbikeplanet.com/image/2006/mgp/jerez/3/index.htm
With the usual bizarre but entertaining captions!
Don't know who the
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Heh, Are there any women who shoot MotoGP -- I've only seen a female sports
photographer once, and she was part of the Japanese media contingent following Hideki
Matsui's consecutive games played streak.
-Aaron
There's certainly one who shoots ocean yacht racing.
On 28/3/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
BTW: Looking at that crash sequence I get the impression that the
photographer was taking single shots, not getting a sequence by
holding she shutter button down.
At more than 8 fps there's little that is missed !
Cheers,
Cotty
Adam Maas wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:27 AM, frank theriault wrote:
However, every time I say how I'm more than satisfied with film, that
I like the results it produces, and that I like the process (at least
my involvement in the process - or lack of involvement as the case
If you like the imposing nature of the pier, I would try a more
square cropping to reinforce its geometry. I played around with it
some and found it interesting.
Godfrey
On Mar 28, 2006, at 7:17 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Thanks Godders. I debated whether I ought to frame up a bit, but
On 28/3/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Let's wrap this up and move on to a subject from which we can learn and
grow as photographers and equipment fondlers ;-))
Yeah, have a heart dude!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 28/3/06, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hmmm... I expected you would thank me for an odd compliment... After
all you admitted to be masochists, you're known to be British and I
added Excellent to the mix...
;-)
Sorry Boris, I can't see the wood for the trees sometimes. Thank
Hi,
I don't have the exact numbers here, although I did test the cards and
record the figures. The Transcend was about 25% faster across the board
than the slower PNY card that I first bought. I made 54 exposures in 160
seconds with the Transcend shooting RAW in the istDS. There is a very
Aaron,
I think you have every right to be proud of your work and your
methodologies.
One thing that has not been directly said here is that digital has
opened up a new direction for photography - that is - event
photography. This includes speculation shooting of various events
along with
On 3/27/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Tel Aviv is indeed very interesting city... Here is one of my first (one
thousand) shots with *istD:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12772
As usual, please click on the image in order to have it open in full size.
Thanks.
FYI, I just ordered a Timbuk2 Commute (non XL) from
http://www.sierratradingpost.com for $60. This is $40 off retail (and
the timbuk2 web site). They had limited colors but I was tired of
carrying around a black bag anyway.
It is a couple of inches smaller than the XL. I only carry a 14
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 09:53:02PM +1000, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand the feeling of people who work with computers all day that
they don't want to work with computers on their free time, but the
feeling is
Good point Bruce.
I still do event work, but no more on site printing. I had a young lad
do that for me an i just shot the pictures.
Now, with me having to do both, by the time the season gets near the
end, i'm pretty much fed up with the proccess.I tend to put of doing
prints till the last
On 3/27/06, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had some time before the game began to crawl around the Metrodome
looking for photo opportunities. The stands were still only about
half full as the prior game in D.C. hadn't finished and everyone was
out in the hall watching the TVs.
I hope you find it as useful as I find mine. That's an excellent price.
My laptop is a PowerBook G4 15, a little wider than the average 14
due to the 10:16 format screen, and fits in the XL with room to
spare. My real reason for going with the XL was that it handles my
most commonly used
Better invest in a view camera, so I can move the focusing board about
to get rid of that distortion.
frank
sacrilege
or scan and PhotoShop.
/sacrilege
Powell
Cotty wrote:
On 28/3/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
BTW: Looking at that crash sequence I get the impression that the
photographer was taking single shots, not getting a sequence by
holding she shutter button down.
At more than 8 fps there's little that is missed !
Actually, he
Many of the lenses I see there are shorter than 300mm. But that's
what I'd expect - by the looks of it, this is a posed photo-op.
My guess would be that it's the group shot of all the riders at
the start of the season.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 10:10:26AM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Boris, I'll apply your question to my experience with watching auto racing.
is it right that except the general atmosphere of *being there* there is no
reasonable difference between sitting at home in front of big TV screen and
sitting on those top rows?
Sitting at home watching on TV is so
There are a few that I know. LAT (official photographers
of Champ Car) have Lesley Ann Miller on their strength, and
one of National Speed Sports News' photographers is female.
And if you can bring yourself to watch Drivel^Hn, you'll
see another one (whose name escapes me at present).
The most
Juan.
They are all VERY VERY GOOD.
I don't see any frame numbers but the middle two, top row, are my favorites.
Good job and best of luck with your show.
Very good conversions BTW
Dave B
Quoting Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here is a very first pass at editing the photos I will show at
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Workflow (was: Bailing out.)
Actually, Aaron gets it completely. As do the others who've done enough
darkroom work to realize that , like processing pics on the computer, it's
just work. Both can be rewarding, both can be
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 09:12:21AM -0500, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
At the end of next week, I will be flying to Anaheim, CA, to join mywife, who
will be at a conference there most of that week. I willhave a day or so in
Anaheim, then we will drive down to San Diego tospend a few days with my
On 28/3/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Actually, he *could* have been shooting at 8 fps and just picked out
the best ones..
You're a snapper with your lens trained on the star rider as he is
tumbling down the track - it all happens in what? less than 5 seconds or
so. Do you shoot
I have been looking for a bag to replace the one I have been carrying
to work every day. The one I am using now was a freebie I got at
PittCon (analytical chemistry conference/trade show) and is getting
raggy. I mostly use the bag for carrying lunch. I have a second bag
that I use for carrying
If you paint with light.. you use an enlarger.
Or a floodlight, flashlight etc.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Workflow (was: Bailing out.)
This one time, at band camp, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For
1 - 100 of 283 matches
Mail list logo
