You think Pentax is going to care that a handful of people on this list want
something?
I don't.
Tom C.
Original Message Follows
From: Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: K1D aperature
I don't know how good the Huey is. I wasn't particularly impressed
when my friend Paul used it to do calibration on his systems last
week. Very few useful options.
I use the Gretag-Macbeth Eye One Display 2 which allows me to set up
exactly the screen calibration I want (5500K white point,
In a message dated 10/11/2006 12:02:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your two sensative, take thinks to personilly, have know cents of humour on
lion - altho ewe are very funny.
PS You spelt altogether wrong in the secont lion of you massage. ;-))
Shel
==
Shel, now
Your two sensative, take thinks to personilly, have know cents of humour on
lion - altho ewe are very funny.
PS You spelt altogether wrong in the secont lion of you massage. ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J. C. O'Connell
None to the reader but to imply I don't know how to basic
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: The JCO survey
No I do get it. You fail to understand the signifigance that
LENSES not bodies last forever practically and long term
Support of the lenses is of utmost importance.
Umm, tell that to the Canon FD lens
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: The JCO survey
1. you are assumeing that these DSLRs will never need service
No, you are assuming that I am assuming that.
2. can be more reliable means just that. A pair of pliers
has moving parts, when was the last time you
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
- The most disconcerting thing is quiet resignation of most folks on
the
PDML. Even though I'd love to see it, it's not happening, and
that's
just the way it's gonna be.
I know you didn't write this Mike.
On 10/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Epson 925 is getting a bit elderly. Still works fine but technology has
passed it by.
Heh, I know the feeling.
Anyone have experience with the R1800? Or the R800? Do you like it? What do
you like? What do you not like?
My local
I've stayed out of the thread so far, as I haven't seen much point to
yet another rehash of the same old thing.
For your survey however, I will respond. I am a mild yes. I have 3
lenses that would be slightly more useful with the cam. Since I shoot
mostly manual mode anyway, pushing the green
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
I have to say I basically agree with JCO on this one with respect to
the
minimal cost of inclusion and with Pentax's reasoning for not
including it.
Pentax probably lost more money designing and implementing the
I see the point you're all making but don't you find that fiddling
with the bracket every time you change orientation a bit tiresome ?
The idea is to use the flash in contrast control mode with the rtf or
a nother flash unit on the camera's hot shoe with the one on the
bracket angled up for a
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
On 11/10/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They must figure none, or they would have figured out a way to leave
the
thing on the cameras.
They simply got it wrong up front, the green button
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: The JCO survey
With a cam sensor we are talking about
Something far closer to a pair of pliers than
A mechnical watch.
I've never seen a pair of pliers that was designed to modulate an
electrical signal, or that would fail
Please insert this r in the appropriate place. Apparently my smell
checker thinks shirt without the r is an OK word.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
graywolf wrote:
For general
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
These discussions with JCO have kept me from doing any real work.
When I
go off line to take care of business, I can't wait to get back to see
what
spelling errors JCO has made, what interesting turn the
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: The JCO survey
AE LOCKED- is what I called it. Not just true AE with Lock as an
additional option.
And AE stands for what?
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
I have to say I basically agree with JCO on this one with respect to
the
minimal cost of inclusion and with Pentax's reasoning for not
including it.
Pentax probably lost more money designing and implementing the
No because you have springs, tiny parts, a variable resistor with its
own tiny linkage and the pot brush arm that depends on friction but not
too much that it would wipe out the resistive surface.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With a cam sensor we are talking about
Something far closer to a pair
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: The Economics of Lenses (was Re: Stakeout)
I think buying what
you want is more Important than lowest price.
Most people buy strictly on lowest price. It's what has made Wal-Mart
into the most successful retailer in the world.
If they don't they are marketing imbeciles. Oh, wait, this is Pentax we
are talking about...
Look at it this way there are about 600 regular list members, and
sometimes as many as 1800 counting the floaters who come and go. Now if
each of them has some influence on what 10 friends and
On 10/11/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
First sold by Eastman in 1881 for $25, the Kodak camera came loaded with a
100-exposure film that Houston would process and reload the camera for $10.
Houston died a rich man in 1906.
http://www.todayinsci.com/
Interesting, Tom. Thanks!
Marnie -
I have the R800 and am very happy w/it. I seldom have the need to print
anything larger than 8x10, so it fits my needs well I haven't branched
out into papers other than the Epson series so I can't report how it
works w/other vendors papers. Epson just updated the paper profiles
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: The JCO survey
I read somewhere that there over 10 million K/M
Lenses in the field. What makes you think that
This will only sell 100 cameras? Secondly,
I don't expect them to provide this in every model
They sell, just the
Rick, for what its worth.
I gave up printing from EL3. I would only use EL 3 for nef and pef
conversions, then reopen in PS6, that is until i stumbled upon PSCS.
I could never get the colours to look anything close to the monitor,
on the print outs.
In my PS6 and CS they are as close as
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: The JCO survey
Backwards, razors last forever and the blades wear out.
With camera systems, the lenses essentially last forever and the
Bodies wear out.
It's just a marketing concept, but one that camera makers have been
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: The JCO survey
Cant you read my posts? Canon did not simply bail on their base
They completely abandoned their FD user base.
I'm not debating that the FD mount wasn't compatable with the new
available technology, BTW.
What
Has anyone seen this.
http://www.rangefindermag.com/magazine/Oct06/showpage.taf?page=BG69
It must be a mistake OTOH I really hope its true :-)
Regards
Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
You must work in a very peculiar office! That sort of thing is grist
to the mill over here.
--
Cheers,
Bob
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=264755
Someone definitely wouldn't think this is funny in an office
environment. This is not work safe unless you work at
I sometime use my old Vivitar, or even one of the Normans, as a flash
bracket mounted slave with my digicam (They both have very high sync
voltages --hence the slave thing). Seems to work fine except when the
camera thinks it is smarter than I (usually when there is a bright
window in the
Graywolf has not bought a new camera since 1981, so Pentax doesn't give
a damn what he thinks.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Lon Williamson wrote:
I'm going to wait another day or
frank theriault wrote:
On 10/11/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
First sold by Eastman in 1881 for $25, the Kodak camera came loaded with a
100-exposure film that Houston would process and reload the camera for $10.
Houston died a rich man in 1906.
http://www.todayinsci.com/
Patrick Genovese wrote:
Has anyone seen this.
http://www.rangefindermag.com/magazine/Oct06/showpage.taf?page=BG69
It must be a mistake OTOH I really hope its true :-)
Regards
Patrick Genovese
If it comes in at that cost, I'll buy one. Definitely. Will even buy a
bunch of Pentax
On 10/11/06, Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to wait another day or two to finalize this survey.
I'm sorry it brought JCO back to argumentative life, but this is a
chance for the list
to show Pentax what we want. Check results below to see if I have your
response
recorded
I've compared prints from the R800 to my R320. They're indistinguishable
(On Premium Luster paper with Epson ink). I'd not bother with either the
R800 or 1800. Get a 220 or 320 for 8.5x11 and the R2400 for larger.
-Adam
Paul Sorenson wrote:
Marnie -
I have the R800 and am very happy w/it.
William Robb wrote:
And yes, I can read your posts, but they don't make a whole lot of
sense, as they tend to ignore things like facts.
And grammar and punctuation. (poke, poke, poke)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
gfen wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Doug Franklin wrote:
They can go into newer Photoshop versions (CS1 and above?) that have
Adobe Camera Raw installed.
Oh. Err, free download? I have a copy of CS2 I've been evaluating on my
Mac...
Adobe Camera RAW 3.5 supports K100D RAW's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Forbes
Sent: 11 October 2006 14:46
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: YouTube - The Pentax K10D (shake reduction)
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:04:43 +0100, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your two sensative, take thinks to personilly, have know cents of humour
on
lion - altho ewe are very funny.
PS You spelt altogether wrong in the secont lion of you massage. ;-))
Dammit Shel, you almost made milk come out my nose!
:D
John Celio
--
http://www.neovenator.com
AIM:
If they don't they are marketing imbeciles. Oh, wait, this is Pentax we
are talking about...
Look at it this way there are about 600 regular list members, and
sometimes as many as 1800 counting the floaters who come and go. Now if
each of them has some influence on what 10 friends and
I didn't do much to it as i just wanted to what possibilities a little
fiddling and tweaking could do - there's a fair amount of potential in the
shot. Try working with a copy of the original file on a duplicate layer.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jon Myers
Thanks for the honest
I have an R800. I use Qprint with it. It makes good prints and is easy
to use.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Anyone have experience with the R1800? Or the R800? Do you
like it? What do
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of DagT
Sent: 11 October 2006 18:49
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - :-}
Just another street photograph.
Office friendly? Depends on someones sense of humor...
I think I'll go buy all the used 645 glass. ;-)
Tom C.
Original Message Follows
From: Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: 645D estimated street price - unbeleivable it must be a
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: The JCO survey
Cant you read my posts? Canon did not simply bail on their base
They completely abandoned their FD user base.
I'm not debating that the FD mount wasn't compatable with the new
On 11/10/06, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
But now we've got that interview (first posted here by Ken) where
the same executive who first hinted about the K10D is suggesting
that Pentax intend to release a higher-specification K-mount body.
Sake!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
I see the point you're all making but don't you find that fiddling
with the bracket every time you change orientation a bit tiresome ?
Actually, not at all. When I rotate the camera to vertical shooting, I just
flip the flash at the same time. It's one fluid movement. If I had a video
On 10/11/06, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just another street photograph.
Office friendly? Depends on someones sense of humor...
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=264755
I work in a very unfriendly office, so I guess it's of no import.
Can't say the photo does much for
I never said I wouldn't buy a Pentax DSLR without the
K/M full support, its just it would add a LOT of value
To the camera for me if it had it, much more than
The minimal extra cost to implement it. For me it's the
Annoyance factor, I hate to buy ANYTHING that I know
Could be much better for
On 10/11/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I'll go buy all the used 645 glass. ;-)
Will the 645D have an aperture simulator? ;-)
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Is it possible that JCO used to sign in as The Who. Lots of similarities
if not.
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 10/11/2006 1:30:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have an R800. I use Qprint with it. It makes good prints and is easy
to use.
--
Cheers,
Bob
==
Thanks. Thanks, everyone. I am looking at the 1280 too, simply because it's
cheaper (than the 1800). I
On 11/10/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
to imply I don't know how to basic spell is
Another matter altogher.
Mark.
Classic!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
On 11/10/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
Out on purpose like in don't cant etc.
Oi! You callin me a cant??
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 10/10/06, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forget about the K10D. Heck, forget even about a Leica M8.
This is what I really need:
http://red.com/
12 Megapixels, 60 frames per second. 24x14mm sensor.
Here is a frame from it:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, graywolf wrote:
Graywolf has not bought a new camera since 1981, so Pentax doesn't give
a damn what he thinks.
I don't buy this argument. People sell their old equipment to buy new.
We are the real enablers.
E.g. I would not touch the *ist-D with a bargepole.
Kostas
--
Hi Bob
Prices have dropped since I bought my R800. Now I would buy an R1800
for the occasional A3+ size at the same great quality.
In the UK the R2400 is a lot more expensive with no huge advantage,
especially if you do mainly colour glossy prints. Black and white is
another matter apparently
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, John Celio wrote:
And anyway, are you really going to tell your relatives, who probably don't
care about this aperture simulator doohickey, to go buy a Nikon?
When the -D and the -DL were the only DSLRs available in the UK I was
as warmly positive about the offerings as
Cotty wrote:
On 11/10/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
Out on purpose like in don't cant etc.
Oi! You callin me a cant??
Dude, don't attribute that shite to me. That was your buddy JCO.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:56:46 +0100, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As sometimes happens Mr. Forbes attacks the person not the topic. It's
easier to have something to say that way. Whoops, I'm making the same
error.
Who gives a rip about speeeling errors?, we all make them. In addition
I second that. I am on my third bracket. The first I had was a flip
for 35mm. Worked reasonably well. Only thing I didn't like about it
was that the camera felt upside down because I shoot left eyed and the
flip wanted me to go the other way - but workable.
Then I started shooting 67's and
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:34:27 +0100, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
No commas I am careful with, it's the apostrophe I leave
Out on purpose like in don't cant etc.
jco
HAR! You forgot the comma after No!
No, commas I am careful with, it's the apostrophe I
The next Pentax K1d will be full frame so you are going to need
adapters for your APS lenses more than aperture simulators. It might
even bring a smile to the face of JCO with his full frame K lenses!
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Lon Williamson wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis responded, not sure of vote.
You 've got me (correctly) on the yes.
No:
I read Godders to also be under this. First in line probably :-)
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Autochage did that not me. jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:36 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
But if Pentax is going to go broke if they
Do you know the differene between AE and AE locked?
If you don't then shup up and go read some Pentax manuals.
If you do then your just blowing smoke as ususal to argue.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Wednesday,
The K/M lens sensor would not be redundent as there
Is no function already in there doing that. It has
Been removed along with its function just like I stated.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Wednesday, October 11,
On 11/10/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
Dude, don't attribute that shite to me. That was your buddy JCO.
Apologies, I should have cropped the attribution line. What a cant I am.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:28:22PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: The JCO survey
With a cam sensor we are talking about
Something far closer to a pair of pliers than
A mechnical watch.
I've never seen a pair of pliers
When the -D and the -DL were the only DSLRs available in the UK I was
as warmly positive about the offerings as possible (which is mildly,
though I offered free access to my numerous lenses), then told my
mates to do their own research. Guess what, they bought Canon.
Yeah, and they probably
Never, I always stated it should be available In at
Least the top models or one model for more money.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:55 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The
Not to me it isnt. Satisfaction with a high quality product lasts
Far longer than the short term pleasure of a cheaper price. My
Philosophy has always been to buy WHAT I want at the cheapest
Price possible, not just buy the cheapest price possible and
Make a bad decision of getting something you
LOL
John, I have that JPEG on one of my web pages as well. I've only had to
invoke it here once.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Celio
This one's for you:
http://www.neovenator.com/special/stfu.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yes but what they did was IMPROVE their entire
Mount, Penatax has done no such such thing
Here. That's what I am talking about. Its all
Loss with no gain. Canon EOS mount had a huge gain.
There is no gain with new pentax cameras and lenses
With regards to the mount. None.
jco
-Original
In a message dated 10/11/2006 2:53:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John
(PS: I only attack really irritating people who won't let go of a subject
until they have repeated themselves fifty times at least.) Of course, I
don't mean you, Tom. :-)
==
I don't think
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 04:00:41PM -0400, Adam Maas wrote:
Patrick Genovese wrote:
Has anyone seen this.
http://www.rangefindermag.com/magazine/Oct06/showpage.taf?page=BG69
It must be a mistake OTOH I really hope its true :-)
Regards
Patrick Genovese
If it comes in at
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:52:46PM +0200, Patrick Genovese wrote:
Has anyone seen this.
http://www.rangefindermag.com/magazine/Oct06/showpage.taf?page=BG69
It must be a mistake OTOH I really hope its true :-)
Regards
Patrick Genovese
Would it have been *that* hard to quote the
Thank you John - that's been suggested here before but for some reason
people like us to guess - as if it's some great mystery. What a crock -
it's always nice to have some idea about what we'll find.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Francis
Patrick Genovese wrote:
Has anyone seen
Seems like a price like that on a high Megapixel camera would really turn
some heads. Like you, I was quite surprised about the K10D. Perhaps
Pentax is aware that a medium format digital that is priced as high as
the Canon full frames just may not sell very well. This could get
very interesting
You and me both.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I'll go buy all the used 645 glass. ;-)
Tom C.
Original Message Follows
From: Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: 645D
John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 04:00:41PM -0400, Adam Maas wrote:
Patrick Genovese wrote:
Has anyone seen this.
http://www.rangefindermag.com/magazine/Oct06/showpage.taf?page=BG69
It must be a mistake OTOH I really hope its true :-)
Regards
Patrick Genovese
If it comes in
I will be out of the office starting 12.10.2006 and will not return until
13.10.2006.
I will respond to your message when I return. In urgent cases please
contact Ali Adelstein, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Cotty wrote:
On 11/10/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
Dude, don't attribute that shite to me. That was your buddy JCO.
Apologies, I should have cropped the attribution line. What a cant I am.
As long as you aren't a Kant, I'm cool.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
The R2400 is the best printer for BW and matte finish papers. It's
also markedly superior on Epson Premium Lustre Paper and Semigloss.
The R1800 is really for glossy papers, and it's performance on any
paper other than glossy can't matech the R2400.
Paul
On Oct 11, 2006, at 5:19 PM, Peter
Patrick Genovese wrote:
Has anyone seen this.
http://www.rangefindermag.com/magazine/Oct06/showpage.taf?page=BG69
It must be a mistake OTOH I really hope its true :-)
That simply has to be a misprint.
If it isn't I'm buying one
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Trying to buy on Ebay drives me nuts. I had a body lined up in the US. The
auction had ended and the seller agreed to relist at a price I'd offered with
buy it
now. I watched and waited for several days for him to get around to it. He
finally
did it...in the middle of the night Australian
OK. Thanks for the notice.
Tom C.
Original Message Follows
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Markus Bauernfeind/FAST TV Server AG is out of the office.
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:03:33 +0200
I will be out of the
It's redundant on all but K/M lenses. All other lenses (the vast
majority of what would actually be used on a DSLR) don't need one. A and
later lenses because they couple electronically and adapter-mounted
lenses becuase they don't couple at all.
-Adam
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
The K/M lens
That's a real stretch. Nothing in Pentax marketing plans indicates
any interest in full frame.
Paul
On Oct 11, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Peter Fairweather wrote:
The next Pentax K1d will be full frame so you are going to need
adapters for your APS lenses more than aperture simulators. It might
even
I saw this message yesterday. Is the list regurgitating or is JCO?
On Oct 11, 2006, at 5:56 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Yes but what they did was IMPROVE their entire
Mount, Penatax has done no such such thing
Here. That's what I am talking about. Its all
Loss with no gain. Canon EOS mount
Lon Williamson wrote:
On the offhand chance that Pentax peeks at this list,
Pentax *does* monitor this list (and unfortunately for the aperture
simulator die-hards, they evaluate the credibility of respondents by
their tone as well as the semantic content of their messages) and I
have
Cotty wrote:
On 11/10/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
Dude, don't attribute that shite to me. That was your buddy JCO.
Apologies, I should have cropped the attribution line. What a cant I am.
Is that because you prefer to use Immanuel-focus cameras?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
But we were talking about K/M lenses so its not redundant.
There are more K/M lenses than all other lenses combined
So its not insignifigant. In other words, MOST Pentax
Lenses are not fully supported ( but could be ).
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I have to reiterate things for people who don't understand
The basic difference between the Pentax DSLR K/M abandonment
And incompatibity in the name of progress caused by a new
Lensmount design. Pentax doesn't have a new lensmount design
With any progress. Its all regression.
Jco
-Original
Good luck in your search, however i still love shooting my 6x7 so
Dave
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Trying to buy on Ebay drives me nuts. I had a body lined up in the US. The
auction had ended and the seller agreed to relist at a price I'd
offered with buy it
now. I watched and
On 10/11/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lon Williamson wrote:
On the offhand chance that Pentax peeks at this list,
Pentax *does* monitor this list (and unfortunately for the aperture
simulator die-hards, they evaluate the credibility of respondents by
their tone as well as the
Don't believe what companies tell you. They lie to
Hide motives. Secondly, I WILL PAY for the feature,
They don't need to reduce the cost of the body,
Especially if its going to remove key features I want.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
On 12/10/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not me. I wasn't one of them who claimed that.
You've got to learn to read John, I didn't suggest or infer that you did.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
Ironically, Canon was forced to introduce a new low-end FD body which
lasted for a number of years (the T50, made by Cosina) after they
tried
to kill FD, they didn't succeed until 1991 or so. Minolta sold MD kit
Scott Loveless wrote:
How exactly does one go about contacting a Pentax engineer? Any time
that I've sent Pentax an email message asking anything other than can
I send it in to get it fixed, it results in a response similar to
Please visit us online at pentaxslr.com or some crap like that.
My
The 1280 is old tech, nice in its day, I would go with the 1800 based
upon the performance of my R200. NOTE: I have not used either, I just
have found out from experience that Epson has made lots of improvement
in function on their newer printers, even if they do look and feel cheaper.
--
201 - 300 of 377 matches
Mail list logo
