Ok, Whatever. When your operating manually like that, I just
Call it manual or bracketing, not instant exposure compensation.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
P. J. Alling
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:13 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
I have an issue with the blueness too, Godfrey. After some
consideration I left it in since it is more or less real. The sky
overhead was totally cloudless, and I expect the clouds took colour
from it. High humidity in the air may have contributed too. I remember
watching sunrise over the Blue
No, I haven't considered any crops. I wanted the sunlit bit in for the spark.
After considering Godfrey's comments, I think it balances the blue in
the valley fog.
Jostein
On 10/19/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/10/06, Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed:
Been away from Linux for very long.
Are there any 16-bit image editors for Linux yet? I remember this was
one of the main features absent from GIMP back when.
Jostein
On 10/19/06, SJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
for those of you on linux, raw therapee-1.1-pre5 is available for linux
On 18/10/06, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's a Mark VII Veeblefetzer. DO NOT attempt to operate the computer
without it, as dire events may unfold.
Don't be ridiculous Bob.
Everyone knows it's a Mark VI.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 19/10/06, Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed:
No, I haven't considered any crops. I wanted the sunlit bit in for the spark.
After considering Godfrey's comments, I think it balances the blue in
the valley fog.
It's excellent.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:29:37PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Your example is extreme, but most films seem to be slightly overrated
in regard to ISO.
Hardly. The ISO testing procedure is well-defined, and rigorously
followed. If a film says ISO 400 on the box, you can be darn sure
that
How did you get so close? It doesn't seem to have been shot through
bars or through glass? I have similar close-ups of the tigers in
London Zoo, taken with a 400mm lens, but in mine you can still see
that I'm shooting through a fence. In zoos where there has been a pit
separating the tigers and
Op Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:13:30 +0200 schreef graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BSI was, I believe, the same as Weston. If so, it is 1/3 stop off from
ASA, I forget which way.
According to wikipedia, Scheiner-Grad is DIN minus 10. That'd make SCH33°
equivalent to DIN23°, or ASA 160. Indeed 1/3 of a
hi,
yes, currently there are two. one is the relatively old Cinepaint,
which was a fork of gimp (www.cinepaint.org). right now it uses
gtk+-1.x but they are in the process of shifting to fltk.
the other one is the relatively new Krita (www.koffice.org/krita)
which is a part of the Koffice
Hi John,
I will have some bargaining power when I buy it. I'm also buying a K10D
and a 12-24 Pentax lens. I wanted to find out about the Sigma offerings
first before I tried any of that, but from the sounds of things they
aren't good enough to worry about.
Tomorrow I will have time to
On 19/10/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
How did you get so close? It doesn't seem to have been shot through
bars or through glass? I have similar close-ups of the tigers in
London Zoo, taken with a 400mm lens, but in mine you can still see
that I'm shooting through a fence. In zoos where
I haven't found a way yet Ann, but I did send them an email complaining
about it, and also about the fact that it changes my settings in the Delete
folder from Hide read messages to Show all messages!
I have speakers in my screen, which are surprisingly good, but I leave an
earphone set
At 03:39 PM 19/10/2006, Cotty wrote:
On 19/10/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
How did you get so close? It doesn't seem to have been shot through
bars or through glass? I have similar close-ups of the tigers in
London Zoo, taken with a 400mm lens, but in mine you can still see
that I'm
I'm waiting for the DA*60-250. I would have preferred a 60-300, but I
haven't been happy with the results I've seen from any of the 300mm zooms.
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
Toine wrote:
After reading all the positive comments on the pentax 50-200 and
Bill Owens wrote:
Tom,
The long side of this thing is about the same length and the wide end makes
it about the right size for a PCMCIA slot. However, inside the computer
there are contacts only where the long side fits, and I can't figure out
what's inside the computer where the short end
On 19/10/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How did you get so close? It doesn't seem to have been shot through
bars or through glass? I have similar close-ups of the tigers in
London Zoo, taken with a 400mm lens, but in mine you can still see
that I'm shooting through a fence. In zoos where
Big wooses, in 'Stralia' they put the visitors in the cages with the
big cats :-)
The land where man are men, and so are women.
My little sis (shot by her boyfriend):
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/100_1369.jpg
That's great. The cheetah should have a bell round its
The meet a cheetah tour at the Canberra zoo and acquarium?
It's a great zoo that one.
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - The Eye of the Tiger
On
Bruce, I agree that a crop from the left might work. There is a small
white field below the lower eye, and I think I would have cropped to
just exlude that. There is still a bit of paper left, but it looks
doable to remove it then. Leaves the remaining eye in a nice position
too, I think.
Jostein
Then you'd better see a doctor :-)
Regards, JvW
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:53:48 -0500, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
They are growing on me . . .
On 10/18/06, Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:22:03 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 19, 2006, at 12:45 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I would appreciate any suggestions with this one. There is some
shredded paper in the lower left corner that would be very difficult
to clone out. One option is to crop it somehow to remove most or all
of it - without weakening the picture
On Oct 19, 2006, at 1:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a mate telling me a high res drum scan of a 6x7 neg would
only be 10MB in
TIFF format. Surely it would be in the hundreds of MB
neighbourhood wouldn't it?
About 70 MB.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The film image is second generation. It's a drum scan of the film --
probably the most accurate way of representing what's on the film.
Certainly more detailed than an optical print. The first generation of
negative film is useless.
On Oct 18, 2006, at 9:23 PM, graywolf wrote:
Welcome to the
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, William Robb wrote:
Truthfully, it's like asking Pentax to put an aperture cam follower onto
a DSLR. The big difference between Canon and Pentax regarding this is
that it's recent history with Pentax.
I cannot see how an aperture cam removal is the same as a register
Based on my experience, which is based on the work and tutoring of Katrin
Eismann and others, that's a *lot* more than 10-15 minutes of work. Of
course, you may be a lot better than I at making such a repair
I love tigers and all cats, big and small, but from a photographic
standpoint I
On Oct 19, 2006, at 3:01 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 18/10/06, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's a Mark VII Veeblefetzer. DO NOT attempt to operate the computer
without it, as dire events may unfold.
Don't be ridiculous Bob.
Everyone knows it's a Mark VI.
I believe you are confusing
And, of course, with BW film, there's a lot more control on the processing
end, so one can over expose the film, or expose for the shadows, and
develop for the highlights, so that there are no blown highlights. So, for
a QD example, you can rate TX @ 200, cut back the standard processing time
by
I think you're way off, Bob. I get a bit more than twice that size from a
16-bit scan of a color 35mm negative, and about 40-50mb from a 16-bit scan
of a BW negative, both @ 4000ppi You must be basing your scan on a lower
ppi or perhaps an 8-bit scan, or both.
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
And if you don't process film yourself?
I will be taking film to the local pro lab for processing.
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: Remedial film photography. :)
Your mate is grossly mistaken.. Rob Studdert has given you some more
realistic figures. Just to put those figures in perspective, I've some
8-bit scans of BW 35mm done @ 4000ppi that are more than twice that size.
I suppose one must define what high res is LOL Here's a chart that
provides the
um...
Did I come across as biting your head off there? That certainly wasn't
my intention...
I think I see what you mean, too. Letting the road trail off the frame
in the upper left corner, for example...
Will look at it at home tonight. :-)
Jostein
On 10/19/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks mate. I've set my mate straight. :)
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:41 PM
Subject: RE: File size of scanned 6x7 neg
Your mate is grossly mistaken.. Rob Studdert has
Use a lab that does custom processing and run some tests first.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J and K Messervy
And if you don't process film yourself?
I will be taking film to the local pro lab for processing.
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
And, of course, with
This is an old shack by the side of the Monaro Highway between Canberra and
Cooma in NSW Australia. I'd driven past this a number of times and thought
I should take some shots, so back in April, I did just that. This one was
my favourite. I used the channel mixer in PS CS2 to get this black
If you can source the chemicals, home processing of BW is quite easy.
Dave
On 10/19/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if you don't process film yourself?
I will be taking film to the local pro lab for processing.
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL
To do a really good job takes more time, but I managed this...:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/sfzoo_0248_std%5b1%5d.jpg
...in 10-15 during my lunch break at work today. With more time
effort the lighting in the repaired area could be improved.
Dave
On 10/19/06, Shel Belinkoff
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:07:27 +0100, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Putting a simple $5 part back into the current DSLRs
Is not something impossible like FD or M42
DSLRS which use totally different very old lens
Mount. Why are you so sure its gone forever?
I suspect it may be to
David Weiss wrote:
What is the difference between SeaMonkey and Firefox? (I am a happy
Firefox user). Just cosmetics?
SeaMonkey includes the web browser, mail, html composer and chatzilla.
For my taste, it offers more configuration options, and looks less
toyish. It is a matter of
On 19/10/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks mate. I've set my mate straight. :)
It's very easy to illustrate if need be, see the PS open dialogue following:
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/67_new_dialogue.gif
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
On Oct 19, 2006, at 7:32 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I think you're way off, Bob. I get a bit more than twice that size
from a
16-bit scan of a color 35mm negative, and about 40-50mb from a 16-
bit scan
of a BW negative, both @ 4000ppi You must be basing your scan on
a lower
ppi or
You guys must be better than I at using plain matte screens. The
best thing I've ever done with my -DS was *add* a split-prism focus
screen. Probably about 1/10th as many missed focus shots since I've done
that.
I agree that micproprism aids suck with lenses slower than 2.8
Would 20x24 be considered a mural?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob Shell
I was just giving an average size of the 6 X 7 scans commonly used
for repro. You can make the file size much bigger, but it has no
real practical value unless you're printing murals.
--
PDML
yes, currently there are two. one is the relatively old Cinepaint,
which was a fork of gimp (www.cinepaint.org). right now it uses
gtk+-1.x but they are in the process of shifting to fltk.
the other one is the relatively new Krita (www.koffice.org/krita)
which is a part of the Koffice
You can do it, Tom! Just apply yourself and don't get discouraged. You
have the potential to make it to the next cyber level eventually. PC
YES!! =))
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CRAP MS WINDOWS XP CUTPASTE NONSENSE :-)
Tom C.
Original Message Follows
From:
:-))
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: PESO - The Eye of the Tiger
I would appreciate any suggestions with this one. There is some
shredded paper in the lower left corner that would be very
difficult
to
:-))
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: PESO - The Eye of the Tiger
I would appreciate any suggestions with this one. There is some
shredded paper in the lower left corner that would be very
difficult
to
Well, there y'go. You're clearly a lot better than I at making such
repairs. I'd have probably struggled for hours on that. How'd you do it
so well and so quickly?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
To do a really good job takes more time, but I managed this...:
John Forbes wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:07:27 +0100, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Putting a simple $5 part back into the current DSLRs
Is not something impossible like FD or M42
DSLRS which use totally different very old lens
Mount. Why are you so sure its gone forever?
I
Old weathered shacks and barns are some of my favorite targets. I, for
some reason, regard this shot as incomplete. Needs a setting or, as
it's often stated, a sense of place.
Being in shadow, the shack sort of looses its strength..so to speak.
Jack
--- J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very Interesting site...
9 inch by 18 inch film camera taking landscapes
Equivalent to a 4,000 megapixel digital capture.
...and some pretty serious dudes involved in the venture.
Thanks for the link.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/18/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/10/06,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a mate telling me a high res drum scan of a 6x7 neg would only
be 10MB in
TIFF format. Surely it would be in the hundreds of MB neighbourhood
wouldn't it?
Depends on the scanning resolution.
If you're an Imacon Flextight at 3200 dpi (its max resolution)
No, 20 X 24 is not a mural, but you certainly can print 20 X 24 from
a 70 MB TIFF file. You can print that size from considerably smaller
files, for that matter.
Bob
On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:33 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Would 20x24 be considered a mural?
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
On 10/19/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:07:27 +0100, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Putting a simple $5 part back into the current DSLRs
Is not something impossible like FD or M42
DSLRS which use totally different very old
FWIW, I print my 13 X 19 gallery prints from TIFF files that average
about 15 MB for color and about 6 MB for grayscale.
Bob
On Oct 19, 2006, at 9:20 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
No, 20 X 24 is not a mural, but you certainly can print 20 X 24 from
a 70 MB TIFF file. You can print that size from
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:32:08 -0400 (EDT)
Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, I use cinepaint for manipulation of color-managed
digital photos. Unfortunately, monitor calibration is still more or
less nonexistant. Since I rarely do any adjustments other than
I cheated of course ;-)
Basically I mirrored the exposed part of the face and placed it over
the obstructed side. This is how I did it.
- Using the measure tool draw a line through the centre of the tigers
face. Then ImageRotate CanvasArbitrary, to align the centre of the
face to the horizontal
Everyone knows it's a Mark VI.
I thought the Mark VI had a simulator.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Black thingy
On 18/10/06, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's a Mark VII Veeblefetzer. DO NOT attempt to operate the
If you're shooting color neg film, C-41 process is fairly standard. However, I
still find that most color films process better when rated a half to a full
stop slower than the indicated ISO. In other words, shoot Portra 160 at about
100 to 120. Shoot Portra 400 at about ISO 300. You'll get
about the monitor calibration, perhaps you know this already, but have
you tried lprof?
http://lprof.sourceforge.net/
Yeah... I know of it. When I first started to get interested in
color management a year or so ago, lprof had pretty much died on the vine.
It's great that
Cinepaint, which has been around for a while, does 32 bit and 16 bit
editing. Very obtuse interface.
-Adam
Jostein Øksne wrote:
Been away from Linux for very long.
Are there any 16-bit image editors for Linux yet? I remember this was
one of the main features absent from GIMP back when.
Mark Roberts wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:07:27 +0100, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Putting a simple $5 part back into the current DSLRs
Is not something impossible like FD or M42
DSLRS which use totally different very old lens
Mount. Why are you so
They suck with any lens faster than f2 or slower than f4. They black out
with the latter, and with the former, your depth of field is too shallow
wide open to focus and recompose accurately with subjects that are
within 10'-15' of you.
-Adam
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
You guys must be
On Oct 19, 2006, at 9:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everyone knows it's a Mark VI.
I thought the Mark VI had a simulator.
Another common misconception.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I assume then that you're not printing on inkjet or that you interpolate the
file up before printing.. A 15 meg file would yield only about 90 dpi on 13 x
19. Ideal dpi for most inkjet printers is around 300 dpi. If I print a 13 x19
from a 15 meg file on my Epson 2200, I can count almost count
I'm printing primarily on an Epson 2200. One of my 15.6 MB files
opens in Photoshop as 13 X 19 inches at 300 dpi. I just opened one
to verify.
Bob
On Oct 19, 2006, at 9:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume then that you're not printing on inkjet or that you
interpolate the file up
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, William Robb wrote:
Truthfully, it's like asking Pentax to put an aperture cam follower
onto
a DSLR. The big difference between Canon and Pentax regarding this is
that it's recent
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy
Subject: Re: Remedial film photography. :)
And if you don't process film yourself?
Then you should..
I will be taking film to the local pro lab for processing.
Colour negative film doesn't respond to increases in development time,
I know it's a little early but here goes I've decided to lighten my
load still further
I'm selling my
MZS with grip - Excellent plus condition. Hardly used
One LX body with winder - I have two ... one slightly better than the
other... take your choice... Both come with winders and
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: The JCO survey
Putting a simple $5 part back into the current DSLRs
Is not something impossible like FD or M42
DSLRS which use totally different very old lens
Mount. Why are you so sure its gone forever?
I'm sure because a
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, William Robb wrote:
Had Canon so desired, they could have left the register distance alone,
and it should have allowed adapting FD lenses to EOS cameras, though the
lenses themselves may have needed modification.
It's a pretty simple concept to get ones head around.
Only time will tell with respect to higher end bodies
I think its pure speculation as to what will happen with
Those at this point.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Forbes
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:00 AM
To:
In a message dated 10/18/2006 11:34:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(1) Can I get that or older versions as a free download?
Someone wrote (on our list) I could download 7.1 and I can't find that
email now
I want to start using my road runner email account but
Then you must be opening it with the RAW converter, which is interpolating it
up. How big does PhotoShop say it is once it's open? Should be around 60 meg if
it's 13 x19, 8 bit at 300 dpi.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm
Pros don't care because they are cheap ( need to turn
Profits like whores ) and they will use whatever
Makes money. I want something better.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Roberts
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:56 AM
To:
Joe,
Don't take it personally. I certainly didn't mean it that way. You just
happened to provide the post that made me want to reply to =all= the
worriers. I consider you a valuable member and am always glad to see
your photos, especially the ones featuring decaying structures.
But you do
I find that not only is the speed of the lens important,
But the quality of the lens wide open is Important when
Using split image rangefinder screens. I can tell right
Away with how good a lens I am dealing with by the split
Image behaviour. With the best optics, the split image is
Knife edge,
Sheesh! I can't believe this thread is still going. I even put it into my
kill file yet it surfaces once again.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, William Robb wrote:
Had Canon so desired, they could have left the register distance alone,
and
Companies put out stories to fit the current
Condtions all the time. I wouldn't believe
The engineers anyway, its up to marketing.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 10:05 AM
To:
What's this RAW converter got to do with the subject. The discussion was
about the file size for a scanned 6x7 negative. This isn't a fruit stand
where we're comparing apples and oranges.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then you must be opening it with the RAW converter,
No one ever answered my question - what is the default
Status of the aperture on a canon FD lens when not
Mounted on a camera? ( Stopped down like PK, or wide
Open like M42?)
As far as the registration change, I do not know
For sure why it was done, there may have be
Technical advantages to do so
Your argument doesn't make sense in that with fast lenses,
You have so much speed and such shallow DOF that the
Standard surrounding ground glass (not in the center) on just about
Any finder will allow you to get correct focus. What
Youre saying is that you don't like the split image in
The
I've ordered and received the Epson R1800 and want to take it for a test run.
With my old Epson 925, I never successfully used Epson's printer profiles. I
had a hard time matching print color to my monitor color. But I also have a
Spyder now and will calibrate my monitor (again).
Is there a
In a message dated 10/18/2006 9:51:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would appreciate any suggestions with this one. There is some
shredded paper in the lower left corner that would be very difficult
to clone out. One option is to crop it somehow to remove most or all
of
There is one thing I don't understand about your pro
Statement, to pros, cameras are just tools. There is
Nothing worse than not having the right tool for
The job and sometimes AE **IS** the right tool, just
Like **AF** or any other automation is. Its just
Another option to have and a possible
From what I found on a Google search shows it is apparently an express card
slot.
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Depends on on dpi.
I can get 550M sized file sizes at 4000dpi from a 6x7
scan.
-Brendan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a mate telling me a high res drum scan of a
6x7 neg would only be 10MB in
TIFF format. Surely it would be in the hundreds of
MB neighbourhood wouldn't it?
--
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Vic MacBournie wrote:
K100 f2.8
K105 or M100?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 10/18/2006 12:59:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5092852
Leaves and Ice
Tom C.
I like that much better than the last one. The jagged edges of the ice and
the leaves complement each other, so do the
The RAW converter has everything to do with the subject at hand. It's
impossible to get a 13 x 19, 300 dpi image from a 15 meg file without
interpolation. When you open a digital file in the RAW converter, you have the
option of interpolating to a larger size. Thus, I asked Bob if that's what
In a message dated 10/18/2006 2:37:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/garmo.html
Thanks for looking.
Jostein
===
Very nice!
Marnie aka Doe :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 10/18/2006 9:38:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The fog rolls into the bay...
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/8
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3433.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
===
Nice, Bruce. I love the upper tree
It is very simple to use the profiles supplied, and they're generally
quite good. Here's how.
Assuming you are using Photoshop CS2 on Mac OS X (CS' and Windows
nomenclature is a little different but you should be able to
translate without too much difficulty), are working with a calibrated
If build quality is the same as Pentax, I probably never need service
and warranty. If I do need it: in europe the reseller handles
warranty.
If Samsung=Pentax, I want to keep it forever ;)
I won't touch Samsung DSLR's. Probably the pentax firmware doesn't
work in Samsung which could be a major
My first camera was a $50 buck camera from k-mart. I dont recall what it
was but I was 13 yrs old and I begged my great uncle to give me a job so I
could buy myself a camera. I made just enough money by the end of the
school year I could buy that camera and one roll of film for the end of the
Marnie, I too am thinking about the 1800. A friend has one that he really
likes as well.
Last evening our camera club had a meeting, and one of the members was
discussing a recent problem he is having with his older 1800 (2 yrs old). It
refuses to recognize 8.5x11 paper all of a sudden.
In a message dated 10/19/2006 8:53:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Last evening our camera club had a meeting, and one of the members was
discussing a recent problem he is having with his older 1800 (2 yrs old). It
refuses to recognize 8.5x11 paper all of a sudden.
In a message dated 10/18/2006 3:17:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually I should ever have let on
I collected the leaves and froze them in a 1/2 or so of water in
translucent cookware. No light box. I turned the pan on end and leaned it
against the rails of an
Unfortunately there is something there, The whites aren't pure white.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Are you viewing them @ 100%?
I DL'd one of the images that people said contained moire, but viewing @
100% I didn't see any.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Joseph Tainter
Links here:
I got 4.8 - seems to be the same as 4.6 -
ages ago I heard bad things about 6.0 being buggy.
I just did a cc here to show you guys my new address -but it didn't seem to
take on the automatic stuff to update PDML
I gave myself another handle and now I'm kinda sorry I didn't just do
annsan.
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
