On 9/11/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
congrats! why do people in Canada face a potential math question, eh?
Everyone knows Canadians are lousy at math so Pentax is just going
with the flow. Seriously though:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skill_testing_question
It's the law. Now I need
For Pentax? The Tamron site says it's only for C N...
Bong
On 9/12/07, Paulus Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have that lens (Tamron 300/2.8 AF) and can confirm that its a great lens.
Paul
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För mike
Scott Loveless wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote:
Hello, everybody... [ ... ]
Anyhow, based on this I can safely say that Agefix can keep for at least
10 years, don't you think?
Yes.
Good ;-)
Or is there *some* way the fixer can change so that it doesn't fix the
film
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/11 Tue PM 09:23:10 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A few more images
Thank you Mark! That did the trick it seems. I didn't have the right color
space. I'm going to repost the images.
I see there are
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/11 Tue PM 11:09:34 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The occasional 300mm
But my first thoughts are BIG! and HEAVY!
Big heavy, you haven't seen big heavy until you've lugged a 600mm FA for
a mile or so
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/12 Wed AM 12:24:34 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A few more images
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So is your scanner calibrated to a reference Velvia film
From: Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/12 Wed AM 07:19:32 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The occasional 300mm
For Pentax? The Tamron site says it's only for C N...
Bong
There _was_ a Pentax version but maybe it has been withdrawn now that
Rebekah wrote:
congrats! why do people in Canada face a potential math question, eh?
I dunno.
Now if it was a *spelling* question, the reason would be to keep Dave
Brooks out ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Everyone knows Canadians are lousy at math so Pentax is just going
with the flow. Seriously though:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skill_testing_question
It's the law. Now I need to go do some clicking on a map with little boxes.
weird canadians.
Did everyone get an email from Pentaxian.com? I
Rebekah wrote:
Did everyone get an email from Pentaxian.com? I don't remember giving
them this email address
I've gotten three or four in the last week to both the email address I
gave when I joined the Pentax Gallery as well as a different address
that I probably gave them as part of a
I've gotten a number of them, beginning in July. Still haven't seen
the site. No time.
Paul
On Sep 12, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
Rebekah wrote:
Did everyone get an email from Pentaxian.com? I don't remember
giving
them this email address
I've gotten three or four in
Joe,
It would be great to have you join us!
There is a Parking Authority garage at 5th and Market,
beneath Independence Mall. I've never had a problem
in the PPA garages.
SEPTA is a =much= better deal, though! IIRC you are
in Bucks County; if you're anywhere near the R1,3,5,
or 8 you could
This url was in a reply to the Philly PDML message, so I was thinking too many
people would miss Joe's truly excellent work. You can see it here:
http://photo.net/photos/pjjdxn
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Joe,
I agree with Paul.
That's a fine bunch of sports photos.
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This url was in a reply to the Philly PDML message, so I was thinking too
many people would miss Joe's truly excellent work. You can see it here:
My typical luck. I just won something too but it's not what I really
wanted. I got a K10D Magic Lantern Guide. At least I have the
camera for it but I rather have one of the lenses or even a Tee Shirt.
At least I do not have to change my underwear ;-)
Perry.
On 9/11/07, John Celio [EMAIL
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Working on pictures from recent evening and morning walks ...
Another from Sunday evening in San Francisco:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/38b.htm
Wow, very moody, nicely seen and shot.
And then Monday morning, in the soft overcast light:
I love that first one :o) great lines.
rg2
On 9/12/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Working on pictures from recent evening and morning walks ...
Another from Sunday evening in San Francisco:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/38b.htm
Wow,
I found the idea of having to take the time to put my pointer on ever square
extremely irritating, and I actually did it once. I really couldn't care
less what other Pentaxians have to say about their gear.
It would be a lot less irritating if a list of testimonials was given and at
the bottom
Good for you. Getting a free lens when you're already a Pentax user is
great.
Pentax is being pretty cheap and backwards though. Why not give away a few
camera bodies to boot? That way people that visit Pentaxian.com that are
not Pentax users, if winning a body, would be introduced to Pentax
Gads, Tom. How could they make such an egregious error?
Sheesh. It seems you always something to be critical about, even when
someone has been gifted with a very nice prize unexpectedly. I guess
for some people the glass is always half empty.
Godfrey
On Sep 12, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Tom C
Tom C wrote:
They can't afford to include a single K10D or K100D on the
prize list?
And later wrote:
It would be a lot less irritating if a list of testimonials
was given and at the bottom it said Click here to see if
you won a prize.
Do you always look gift horses in the mouth?
Take a
No why would I have a problem with anyone receiving a nice prize? You
obviously chose to ignore my first two sentences.
I'm just pointing out the irony of a *camera company* having legendary
products not giving some of those legendary cameras away in a 'contest'.
It would be like a major auto
Yes I do, but it's not the current version. It's supposedly optically the
same as the great adaptal one. I've never seen it new or used anywhere else
than where I got it.
Paul
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Bong Manayon
Skickat: den 12
From:
Digital Image Studio
On 12/09/2007, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After all, they are supposed to look colorful and vibrant. Thats why I shot
them! They are mostly shot under spectacular lighting conditions with very
vibrant colors. Velvia helps as well.
Whatever you are
From:
Kenneth Waller
I've shot a fair amount in south central Utah have gotten similar
comments about some of those images, especially those shot in canyons
under optimum lighting. It's hard for those who haven't experienced
those colors to appreciate what can be captured.
Some of what
Because commercial games of chance aren't legal in Canada.
But if you have to answer a mathematical question, something along the
lines of How much is 2 plus 2?, then it's no longer a game of
chance, but a game of skill ... and commercial games of skill are
legal in Canada.
From:
Rebekah
From:
Bong Manayon
For Pentax? The Tamron site says it's only for C N...
Bong
On 9/12/07, Paulus Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have that lens (Tamron 300/2.8 AF) and can confirm that its a great lens.
But that was not always so.
Tamron (and Tokina) *USED TO* offer some of their
From:
Scott Loveless
Anyone else just spend 20 minutes touching every square on that damn map?
Congrats John!
John Celio wrote:
Holy shit holy shit holy shit holy shit holy shit!
I think I just won a DA 21mm lens from Pentaxian.com.
No, 'cause I figured it was already too late ... and now
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/38b.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/38c.htm
Thanks for the comments!
From: Jim Hemenway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[38b]An interesting night shot.
It doesn't look all that different from when I lived in the Bay
Area in the mid '60s.
On Sep 12, 2007, at 13:30, John Sessoms wrote:
From:
Scott Loveless
Anyone else just spend 20 minutes touching every square on that
damn map?
Congrats John!
John Celio wrote:
Holy shit holy shit holy shit holy shit holy shit!
I think I just won a DA 21mm lens from Pentaxian.com.
No,
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070912223848
^^^ yyet another sunset. your comments/critique welcome...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
No there's two more :-)
Tom C.
From: Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What, they're only ever giving away ONE lens?
-Charles
--
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Those are gorgeous. The third one is certainly my favorite, for the
shadows and colors in the sand as well as the dark clouds. Just
lovely.
rg2
On 9/12/07, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070912223848
^^^ yyet another sunset. your comments/critique welcome...
Enjoy your new lens, Brendan. I'll be looking forward to seeing what
you do with it. :-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Probably only the latest (last?) generation of scanners has enough colour
depth capability to cope with the high saturation emulsions such as
Velvia.
I have a Nikon Super Coolscan 4000ED, several years old (not the latest)
that has no problem coping with Velvia, the only film I shot for the
Some very nice pictures there. I can see some masts from boats out in
the water that I would have loved to see more detail of the boats. A
split neutral density filter may have enabled you to bring up the dark
parts of the pictures and still keep that wonderful sky you had.
--
Bruce
Anyone else just spend 20 minutes touching every square on that damn map?
Congrats John!
John Celio wrote:
Holy shit holy shit holy shit holy shit holy shit!
I think I just won a DA 21mm lens from Pentaxian.com.
No, 'cause I figured it was already too late ... and now I know it
More work on Ground Signs ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/38d.htm
Comments, critique, etc always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
www.gdgphoto.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
John Celio wrote:
Do you always look gift horses in the mouth?
Take a broader look at the pentaxian.com website and I think it's obvious
that
the site is not primarily there to draw in new users, but to make current
users
more excited about their equipment and give them some place to express
Thanks, Godfrey, I'm sure I will. I have two events
coming up near the end of the month that I will be
shooting with this lens.
It's funny, though. I've been so busy shooting other
(paid) stuff lately, I don't know when I'll get a
chance to get out and shoot with it just for fun. So,
no
On 13/09/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gads, Tom. How could they make such an egregious error?
Sheesh. It seems you always something to be critical about, even when
someone has been gifted with a very nice prize unexpectedly. I guess
for some people the glass is always half
On 13/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the impression they're supposed to look like that to give an
accurate rendition of the light.
I'd love to know what everyone else is using to view these images or
whether it's just the expectations that images like this have to be
On 13/09/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gads, Tom. How could they make such an egregious error?
Sheesh. It seems you always something to be critical about, even when
someone has been gifted with a very nice prize unexpectedly. I guess
for some people the glass is always
I'd love to know what everyone else is using to view these images or
whether it's just the expectations that images like this have to be
over-saturated?
We have a very successfully Landscape photographer here, all his
prints are completely over the top with saturation too and I've been
to a lot
It's the Thomas Kinkaid of the photography world!
--
Bruce
Wednesday, September 12, 2007, 2:42:33 PM, you wrote:
DIS On 13/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the impression they're supposed to look like that to give an
accurate rendition of the light.
DIS I'd love to
What makes you think that they'll give out anything other than the
standard Pentaxian teeshirts you can buy from Pentax Imaging?
Tom C wrote:
On 13/09/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gads, Tom. How could they make such an egregious error?
Sheesh. It seems you always
Those look like typical Velvia, or as I like to call it Velveeta, (Kraft
Corporation's processed Cheese Food, since it has the same
relationship to natural color that Velveeta has to natural cheese), to
me.. I still have a hard time believing that this stuff actually
displaced Kodachrome as
It all depends on how you use it. Ken's Velvia shots are quite
lovely. I've used it for a couple of car shoots. Exposing it at ISO
60 or 70 yields a very nice pallet.
Paul
On Sep 12, 2007, at 5:58 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Those look like typical Velvia, or as I like to call it Velveeta,
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I still have a hard time believing that this stuff actually
displaced Kodachrome as the saturated slide film of choice. Kodachrome
may have been highly saturated but it still had some relationship to the
colors of nature.
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
can't believe that Pal would need to boost saturation or contrast on a
scan
from Velvia. He showed like images a year or more ago, and I don't recall
having the same negative reaction to the saturation back then. DOn't know
if
On 13/09/2007, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those look like typical Velvia, or as I like to call it Velveeta, (Kraft
Corporation's processed Cheese Food, since it has the same
relationship to natural color that Velveeta has to natural cheese), to
me.. I still have a hard time
Paul, Bob and Rick, thanks you for the kind words about my photos.
And yes Rick, no one ever told me I was not allowed to shoot sports
with Pentax gear. By the way I added a few more photos today.Joe
At 09:53 AM 9/12/07, you wrote:
This url was in a reply to the Philly PDML message, so I
On 13/09/2007, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They have not been touched! Only the new images are and two of the old ones.
If you have a different reaction to them, its you, not the images
I have not boosted saturation on the images displayed now.
So if you aren't working on a
I agree with you on this Pal. As I've stated many times, photos generally
don't live up to the real thing, and Velvia may give some images that little
boost that makes them appear closer to our memory of the scene.
Tom C.
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
That could be entirely true.
I think the reaction is generated by seeing the thumbnails all together,
because when viewed separately, I don't have the same gut level reaction.
Also I know last time I saw them I had a regular CRT monitor at work and
since then I've got dual Dell LCD's. So it
I like that. For some reason, the little red leaf at the bottom makes
the whole picture feel balanced to me.
rg2
On 9/12/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More work on Ground Signs ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/38d.htm
Comments, critique, etc always
I can buy t-shirts :-)
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentaxian.com Contest
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:59:55 -0400
What makes you think that they'll give out anything
Same is true for me, Rod. Ya' wonder if it's their monitors or a jaded
acid view much the same as calloused eardrums requiring the sound be
turned too loud.
Jack
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the impression
Paradise, Michigan that is...
Just got resubscribed after a week in a little cabin
on Whitefish Point - no internet and limited TV (5
channels, 3 of them Canadian). Unfortunately, cell
phones now work up there.
After months of drought the rain came with us - and
while my wife and I managed to
WHAT?
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A few more images
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Same is true for me, Rod. Ya' wonder if it's their monitors or a jaded
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exactly which ones are the newer ones you've been having issues with?
The five first ones. But now I have reposted them without saturation boost.
They do not look as vibrant as the slides.
This one:
Very nice abstract !
As found?
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO 2007 - 38d - GDG
More work on Ground Signs ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/38d.htm
Comments, critique, etc
.Velvia may give some images that little boost that makes them appear
closer to our memory of the scene.
Probably why most (if not all) of the current nationally known outdoor
photographers shot Velvia for years before switching to Velvia.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
-
Yesterday I picked up a couple of expired rolls of
3200TMax, dated 1/07. I shot a roll of it today, and
developed it in D76, undiluted stock solution.
This roll is incredibly fogged. The camera store keeps
film at room temperature, but I figured that 8 months
expired would not be a big a deal.
Some nice abstractions there Mark.
Glad to hear about all that rain ! We were in the Newberry area the third
week in August it sure was dry. Hope that rain puts the fire out - they
were worried about the bogs continuing to burn.
How'd you like Paradise? Last time there, we stayed in the
I won the K10D Magic Lantern Guide too. Unlike you though, I have a DL
and not a K10D. I suppose it's a hint that maybe I should be upgrading
at some point!
Cymen
On 9/12/07, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My typical luck. I just won something too but it's not what I really
wanted.
On Sep 12, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
I was rather disappointed with the auto-focus
performance of the K10D and DA 16-45 f4 lens. It
seemed to have a distinct problem getting a lock for
landscapes or scenics where the lens was basically
focusing at infinity. This was especially
I only used TMax 3200 a couple of times, but in my experience it was
very easy to fog via heat, age, or just overly casual handling. My
standard darkbag was not adequate to load it into tanks, I found that
using a double darkbag was essential. No other film I've used proved
quite so
DUH - should be -
Probably why most (if not all) of the current nationally known outdoor
photographers shot Velvia for years before switching to digital
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few more
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/38d.htm
Thanks for your comments and compliments!
From: Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like that. For some reason, the little red leaf at the bottom makes
the whole picture feel balanced to me.
From: Michael Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You've quite a
And here I thought you were really trying to make the point that they
use Velvia - always! grin
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, September 12, 2007, 4:53:33 PM, you wrote:
KW DUH - should be -
KW Probably why most (if not all) of the current nationally known outdoor
KW photographers shot
And here I thought you were really trying to make the point that they
use Velvia - always! grin
me too! I just thought it was a clever little statement, I guess I
just read too much into things ;)
rg2
On 9/12/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And here I thought you were really
The only ultra high speed film I've used that didn't fog with heat was (of
all things) color. It was Kodak PJ1600 @ (pushed to) 3200. This stuff was
lost in the trunk of my car for about two and a half years in the Southern
California sun with exposed images. Fogging was very minimal.
The PJ
Obviously, I'm in a very hectic moment of rendering out a bunch of
new work ... I hope y'all are enjoying these.
Yet another in the Ground Signs set ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/38e.htm
Comments, critique, etc always appreciated.
best,
Godfrey
www.gdgphoto.com
--
Mark Cassino wrote:
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/stream/stream09.htm
I really like this one:
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/stream/2007/070910/IMGP0850.htm
Very nice indeed!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
That last one is my favorite, very beautiful.
rg2
On 9/12/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Cassino wrote:
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/stream/stream09.htm
I really like this one:
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/stream/2007/070910/IMGP0850.htm
Very nice indeed!
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only used TMax 3200 a couple of times, but in my
experience it was
very easy to fog via heat, age, or just overly
casual handling. My
standard darkbag was not adequate to load it into
tanks, I found that
using a double darkbag was
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some nice abstractions there Mark.
THanks, Ken!
Glad to hear about all that rain ! We were in the
Newberry area the third
week in August it sure was dry. Hope that rain
puts the fire out - they
were worried about the bogs continuing to burn.
I like this, but the color distracts me because it is almost there. I
don't know if that makes sense, but I think I would like this better
in BW, so that the white letters would stand out more. Of course, I
shout BW about everything so ignore me :oP Anyways, I think it's
really interesting :o)
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Cassino wrote:
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/stream/stream09.htm
I really like this one:
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/stream/2007/070910/IMGP0850.htm
Very nice indeed!
Thanks, Mark! That was the first one I tried using the
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found that the DA14 on mine shows behavior like
that
occasionally too. Accurate infinity focus with an
ultra-short focal
length is probably a hard thing to do, depending on
the scene and the
light.
Well, I was surprised to have
--- Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That last one is my favorite, very beautiful.
rg2
Windmills in Canad? Thanks - that's my favorite too.
Dozens of electricity generating windmills that flash
random red lights after dark. A lot of the texture is
lost in the small web JPG.
Thanks for
Hi Mark!
Sounds like our honeymoon, 30 years ago...
I like the pics, except for the last one, which
doesn't do anything for me.
Rick
--- Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paradise, Michigan that is...
Just got resubscribed after a week in a little cabin
on Whitefish Point - no
On Sep 12, 2007, at 18:30, Kenneth Waller wrote:
.Velvia may give some images that little boost that makes them
appear
closer to our memory of the scene.
Probably why most (if not all) of the current nationally known outdoor
photographers shot Velvia for years before switching to
It's been my experience that t3200 is super sensitive to heat and or
age.
Evan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Sep 12, 2007, at 19:30, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Obviously, I'm in a very hectic moment of rendering out a bunch of
new work ... I hope y'all are enjoying these.
Yet another in the Ground Signs set ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/38e.htm
This would be a LOT less
A couple of those are very nice, Mark. They have a
plein air quality, especially the first one of the
trees and beach scene.
Sorry you got so much rain.
-Brendan
--- Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paradise, Michigan that is...
Just got resubscribed after a week in a little cabin
on
I've souped i3200 TMax in D-76 in the past without any problems.
Although I found T-Max developer was best for this film.
Paul
On Sep 12, 2007, at 7:36 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
Yesterday I picked up a couple of expired rolls of
3200TMax, dated 1/07. I shot a roll of it today, and
developed
Interesting work. I like it. Beautiful color and nice compositions.
I've found that for landscape shooting with autofocus it's better not
to:-). Manual focus gives you so much better control for that. But if
you do want to autofocus, select a point and choose the focal point
yourself. I
I'm talking about those who do not see excess color saturation in Pal's
much discussed images.
My take was that you were not one of them and that you only liked the
true Velvia pallet.(?)
Was there something else?
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WHAT?
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis
That one doesn't work as well for me as the
others--the lettering is just too fuzzy and illegible,
and doesn't stand out enough to be really striking.
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously, I'm in a very hectic moment of rendering
out a bunch of
new work ... I hope
That's better:-)
Paul
On Sep 12, 2007, at 7:53 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
DUH - should be -
Probably why most (if not all) of the current nationally known outdoor
photographers shot Velvia for years before switching to digital
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original
REPLY II: It does occur to me that I may have missed some of your posts
on this thread.
I did not have you in mind at all when I sent the WHAT email.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WHAT?
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Mark,
Tony sweet would be flattered.
I thought the forest stuff worked better than the shore photos.
Interesting idea.
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/12/07, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paradise, Michigan that is...
Just got resubscribed after a week in a little cabin
on Whitefish Point - no
At 09:13 AM 13/09/2007, Mark Cassino wrote:
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Cassino wrote:
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/stream/stream09.htm
I really like this one:
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/stream/2007/070910/IMGP0850.htm
Very nice indeed!
95 matches
Mail list logo
