Powers of state has a much richer history than media when it comes to
altering images. :-)
I think it's quite interesting that we're all raging about media *now*
doing what propaganda machines of many societies, capitalist,
religious and communist all alike, have done for maybe a century
already.
AlunFoto wrote:
Powers of state has a much richer history than media when it comes to
altering images. :-)
I think it's quite interesting that we're all raging about media *now*
doing what propaganda machines of many societies, capitalist,
religious and communist all alike, have done for
Yep, that's mankind although it's not photography.
Photography is special, though, having been toted as representing the
objective truth independent of the rulers. The fourth power of
state, and the whole genere of documentary photography, relies on its
credibility. As does photographic evidence
Both are very good Paul, and the scans look nice to.
Time sure flies, does'nt it
Dave
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm organizing some of my half a million BW negatives. Right now, I'm
concentrating on pulling the pics of my kids. I'm scanning them on
the Epson
AlunFoto wrote:
Yep, that's mankind although it's not photography.
Photography is special, though, having been toted as representing the
objective truth independent of the rulers. The fourth power of
state, and the whole genere of documentary photography, relies on its
credibility. As does
Wow,
Just read through the first three parts of this series. I stumbled on it
through Alec Soth's photographs (one of my favourite Magnum shooters).
The thoughtful, non-judgemental writing is superb as well.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/portal/main.jhtml?xml=/portal/2008/06/28/sm_america28.xml
Beaker wrote:
BTW, the portrait of the little girl is a stunner.
Oh- and when you buy a cassette deck, make sure it has a db meter.
Because it's
better than a VU meter. This from a salesman talking to an audio
engineer.
My friend, the engineer, was duly impressed. He didn't buy the
Cotty wrote:
On 12/7/08, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have joined the Dark Side:
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/gallery/2793835_9yqag#330153850_t3FLR-A-LB
Now, what do the others who have preceded me have in the way of wisdom
for me in his transition period?
I *knew*
In the flurry of PESOs from our Runde trip, I forgot to post any of
the shots from day 2.
Instead of posting single photos I've made a more comprehensive
field-day report in my blog.
There are 6 images, my personal favourite is #5. Of the trio there,
the two birds on the left were quite
What treasures! Renews my hope that today's electronic impulse images will last
for awhile and there will be equipment on which to reproduce them.
Nicely rendered.
Jack
--- On Sat, 7/12/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESOs:
Interesting interplay! Well exposed and nicely rendered group. Makes me want to
see larger images, however.
Jack
--- On Sun, 7/13/08, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESOs - Fulmars
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, July
2008/7/13 Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Interesting interplay! Well exposed and nicely rendered group. Makes me want
to see larger images, however.
Did you click on the images, Jack?
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks Dave. Yeah, it seems like just the other day.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Both are very good Paul, and the scans look nice to.
Time sure flies, does'nt it
Dave
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:02 PM, [EMAIL
Thanks Jack.
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What treasures! Renews my hope that today's electronic impulse images will
last
for awhile and there will be equipment on which to reproduce them.
Nicely rendered.
Jack
--- On Sat,
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:12:01 +1000
Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow,
Just read through the first three parts of this series. I stumbled on
it through Alec Soth's photographs (one of my favourite Magnum
shooters). The thoughtful, non-judgemental writing is superb as well.
To frame the question is often to control the answer. Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AlunFoto wrote:
Yep, that's mankind although it's not photography.
Photography is special, though, having been toted as representing the
objective
Jostien,
Those are marvelous photos - like a National Geographic TV special.
Great detail in all of these.
I love how the turning bird is looking down in #1
The Grooming Fulmars in #2 make a heart ;-)
The behavior displayed in #3 is tender
Moving Out, #4 has very effective motion blur in the wings
Very good essay - thanks.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of AlunFoto
Sent: 13 July 2008 13:59
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESOs - Fulmars
In the flurry of PESOs from our Runde trip, I forgot to post any of
the shots
I'm very much with you here. Unfortunately, it looks like
people are paying
less and less attention to what the power does for
manipulating the public
opinion and getting wider consensus. That's a strong trend to
totalitarism
under a thin democratic mask, and I hate it. That's
Bob W wrote:
Here in the UK we are always provided with full, impartial evidence by
whichever government is in power. [...]
Doesn't your tongue get cramps, what with being that firmly planted in
your cheek, and all. ;-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Duh...yeah, I have now. Can better appreciate your fine images.
Thanks, Jostein.
Jack
--- On Sun, 7/13/08, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESOs - Fulmars
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, July 13, 2008, 6:27 AM
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza
Subject: Re: Hilarious Photoshop hijinks from those nutty Revolutionary Guards
That's a strong trend to totalitarism
under a thin democratic mask, and I hate it. That's happening here in Italy,
unsure if this applies elsewhere too.
In
2008/7/13 Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To frame the question is often to control the answer. Regards, Bob S.
And what is that supposed to answer, then?
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The body snatchers took Bob
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: RE: Hilarious Photoshop hijinks from those nutty Revolutionary Guards
Here in the UK we are always provided with full, impartial evidence by
whichever government is in power. They want to make the
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto
Subject: Re: Hilarious Photoshop hijinks from those nutty Revolutionary Guards
2008/7/13 Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To frame the question is often to control the answer. Regards, Bob S.
And what is that supposed to answer, then?
Do
Subash,
I'm ambivalent about this pic. Compositionally, it's an intriguing angle on a
very lifelike statue; but was the utility pole included intentionally or was it
unavoidable? It both adds some interest and distracts. Technically, a bit
more light on the statue would be helpful, such as
Hey you, whoever you are. Stop hijacking Bob_W's email account.
Jostein
2008/7/13 Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm very much with you here. Unfortunately, it looks like
people are paying
less and less attention to what the power does for
manipulating the public
opinion and getting wider
2008/7/13 William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And what is that supposed to answer, then?
Do you still beat your wife?
LOL
that's it!
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
She whom I love and obey and I went to a wedding of one of her co-workers
yesterday. While I
wasn't the official photographer, after almost 4 decades of shooting the darned
things, I don't
feel right going to one without a camera.
Good thing too, as the hireling was shooting with a Nikon
After a small price drop I couldn't resist the new 55-300 any longer.
A very nice lens. Lots of plastic fantastic but it feels well build.
The lens doesn't creep like the 80-320. The 16-45 feels cheaper.
Image quality is very good. Corner sharpness could improve a little.
The MTF program line
Outside the Staatsbibliotheque (public library) in Berlin. She didn't look up
even when she crossed an intersection.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7535195
K10D, DA 50-200, ISO 100, f/5.6 @ 1/125, RAW, some cropping and play with
curves (!) in LR.
Rick
--
PDML
Stop action slap? Wiping away a tear?
Absolutely, present it to them. Will be well received a much cherished, I
assure you.
Beautiful timing and rendering, William.
Jack
--- On Sun, 7/13/08, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Wedding
Exceptionally well presented. Very nice performing lens.
Looks like you made a good move, Toine!
Jack
--- On Sun, 7/13/08, Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DA 55-300 LBA
To: pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, July 13, 2008, 10:37 AM
After a small price drop I
Thanks, my plan is to use it a lot.
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exceptionally well presented. Very nice performing lens.
Looks like you made a good move, Toine!
Jack
--- On Sun, 7/13/08, Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer
Subject: PESO: A Good Book
Outside the Staatsbibliotheque (public library) in Berlin. She didn't look
up even when she
crossed an intersection.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7535195
K10D, DA 50-200, ISO 100, f/5.6 @ 1/125, RAW,
- Original Message -
From: Toine
Subject: DA 55-300 LBA
After a small price drop I couldn't resist the new 55-300 any longer.
A very nice lens. Lots of plastic fantastic but it feels well build.
The lens doesn't creep like the 80-320. The 16-45 feels cheaper.
Image quality is very
I thought purple fringing was a sensor, not lens issue. ???
JC OCONNELL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 2:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: DA 55-300 LBA
-
If you want to pixelpeep the original files click on the images in this link:
http://www.repiuk.nl/peso/peso.htm
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:03 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Toine
Subject: DA 55-300 LBA
After a small price drop I couldn't
Thanks, Bill. I played with the cropping a while, and decided I slightly
preferred the bit of foliage at the top. Both work for me.
Rick
--- On Sun, 7/13/08, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A Good Book
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Toine,
I'd love to see a comparison between the 80~320 and the 55-300. Especially at
300mm. Have you considered such?
I have the 80~320, also, and find there are occasions when it produces
surprisingly good images. Those occasions are when on a tripod and in good
light.
Jack
--- On Sun,
Disclaimer: the images linked here are graphic and may induce feeling
of horror in some sensitive individuals.
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Spider/IMGP4088.jpg
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Spider/IMGP4030.jpg
Other episodes of the love story:
Man, I love this list! Where else could one see a post by someone named
Igor saying, the images linked here are graphic and may induce
feeling of horror in some sensitive individuals.?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
It would be a lot easier for your audience if you put these in some
sort of gallery.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Igor Roshchin
Sent: 13 July 2008 19:44
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: fatal attraction (The Insect Play)
Sun Jul 13 14:54:25 EDT 2008
Mark Roberts wrote:
Man, I love this list! Where else could one see a post by someone named
Igor saying, the images linked here are graphic and may induce
feeling of horror in some sensitive individuals.?
HAR!
You will probably like this new twist when it
Op Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:03:41 +0200 schreef Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
opinion and getting wider consensus. That's a strong trend to
totalitarism
under a thin democratic mask, and I hate it. That's happening here in
Italy,
unsure if this applies elsewhere too.
I would say the
I thought purple fringing - understood as Chromatic Aberration is a lens
issue - caused by the fact, that different coloured light act differently
when passing through glas:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromatic_aberration
Regards
Jens
I thought purple fringing was a sensor, not lens issue.
Please see this as well:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_fringing
Regards
Jens
I thought purple fringing was a sensor, not lens issue. ???
JC OCONNELL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent:
I can't tell you what it's supposed to answer, but I can tell you the
answer is 42.
AlunFoto wrote:
2008/7/13 Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To frame the question is often to control the answer. Regards, Bob S.
And what is that supposed to answer, then?
Jostein
--
You
purple fringing is a different phenomena than CA
JC OCONNELL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 3:48 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: DA 55-300 LBA
I thought
per wikinpedia, Other explanations:
Purple fringing is usually attributed to chromatic aberration, although it
is not clear that all purple fringing can be explained this way. Other
attributed causes of purple fringing in digital photography include many
hypothesised sensor effects:
Chromatic
Two words carbon tetrachloride...
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Disclaimer: the images linked here are graphic and may induce feeling
of horror in some sensitive individuals.
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Spider/IMGP4088.jpg
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Spider/IMGP4030.jpg
Other
I sold my 80-320 to finance this lba. My only problem with the 80-320
was lens creep while walking. Corner sharpness is a little better on
the 80-320 which isn't a surprise for a FA lens. Contrast and image
quality at 300 is better with the 55-300. At the wide end the 80-320
has very good image
In general I have found that most telezooms are softer
at the long end than the short end and most primes
at the same focal length as the long end of zoom
will easily beat the zoom at the long end. For this reason, I try
to avoid telezooms ( and wide zooms, and extended
range zooms for that matter
Actually, Superwide zooms these days often exceed the performance of
primes, look at Nikon's recent 14-24mm f2.8, which matches or exceeds
any prime in its range except the Zeiss C/Y mount 21mm Distagon, their
older 17-35mm f2.8 AF-S is nearly as good, outmatching pretty much any
lens in its range
ROTFLMAO
NO prime of same cost is ever going to underperform a
zoom of same cost, they do less, but do what they
do better,
I say this is hogwash unless you are picking out
very cheapo primes vs very expensive zooms.
To be fair, you need to compare lenses of same
general cost/quality. DUH.
The
A nice shot. I like the light.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outside the Staatsbibliotheque (public library) in Berlin. She didn't look
up
even when she crossed an intersection.
Very nice. You might burn in the groom's face a bit. He looks somewhat pale.
Not surprising really:-). But an excellent shot. I'm sure they'll appreciate it.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
She whom I love and obey and I went to a
Second thoughts on this,
I find it so funny because you seem to have a very basic fundamental
misunderstanding of the differences between prime and zooms optical
designs. THERE IS NO WAY that a zoom can be better than a prime
for a give amount of money no matter what focal lenght range. What I
Nice results. Looks like another good one from Pentax.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After a small price drop I couldn't resist the new 55-300 any longer.
A very nice lens. Lots of plastic fantastic but it feels well build.
The lens
What you're ignoring in your assumptions is that almost all the
development that's gone into lenses in the last couple of decades has
been into zooms. Particularly in the last 5 years there's been a
massive improvement in the performance of ultra-wide zooms, which has
not been matched with primes.
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:14:40PM +0200, AlunFoto wrote:
Yep, that's mankind although it's not photography.
Photography is special, though, having been toted as representing the
objective truth independent of the rulers. The fourth power of
state, and the whole genere of documentary
That's too harsh!
This spider is almost a pet. :-) (and a science project)
(Mark will have a convulsion hearing this from Igor)
He (she? it?) leaves in the corner of the kitchen window and helps taking
care of the fruit flies that tend to appear during the season of
extremely ripe and
Purple fringing and chromatic aberration seem to be separate issues to some
degree. And purple fringing is common to digital sensors. But some lenses
obviously exacerbate the problem, while others minimize it. Most extreme high
contrast situations, like tree banches against a white sky, can
True.
-- Original message --
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
purple fringing is a different phenomena than CA
JC OCONNELL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL
And once again, you assume that a 20+ year old prime design can match
a brand new zoom design, especially one that's well optimized. While
you could no doubt produce a modern prime design to match these new
zooms, nobody actually is doing so except Ziess, and Zeiss doesn't
have any currently
I am not ignoring ANYTHING, zooms can never outperform primes
all else being equal because zooms have to have a whole bunch
of optical and mechanical compromises that primes DONT NEED.
So for a given focal length, speed, company, format, cost,
etc , the PRIME will exceed the zoom on optical
All else is not equal.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am not ignoring ANYTHING, zooms can never outperform primes
all else being equal because zooms have to have a whole bunch
of optical and mechanical compromises that
2008/7/13 John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So, in fact, court proceedings automatically consider photographs
not to be credible - they are merely an aide-memoire.
Looks like I could need one too... :-)
I believe that's the way it works over here also. I wish this would
sink in with other
Thanks for looking, Jack! Glad you liked them.
Jostein
2008/7/13 Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Duh...yeah, I have now. Can better appreciate your fine images.
Thanks, Jostein.
Jack
--- On Sun, 7/13/08, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESOs
Thanks Bob.
2008/7/13 Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Very good essay - thanks.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of AlunFoto
Sent: 13 July 2008 13:59
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESOs - Fulmars
In the flurry of PESOs from our
YOU dont get it, prime will always beat zooms all else being equal . PERIOD.
The point you dont seem to understand is that there is nothing being done
with zooms that cant be done with primes too. A zoom is always a comprimise
compared to a non zoom, that is so BASIC.
JC OCONNELL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Bob!
It'd be a pleasure to guide you, should you ever come this way.
Unless Øsleby intercepts you in the fjords, I guess... :-)
Jostein
2008/7/13 Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jostien,
Those are marvelous photos - like a National Geographic TV special.
Great detail in all of these.
So are you trying to make the bad argument that an expensive
zoom can beat a cheapo prime so zooms are better than primes?
Thats the other guys argument. Joining him??
JC OCONNELL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL
From this morning's walk ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/115-under-construction.jpg
Under Construction - Sunnyvale 2008
Panasonic L1 + Olympus ZD 25mm f/2.8 lens
ISO 200 @ f/5 @ 1/100 sec
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/116-imperative.jpg
Graffiti Imperative - This Cafe Life 2008
Panasonic
Sorry, I don't mean to be obtuse.
If you let the opposition frame the question you are debating,
you are often letting them control the answer or conclusion you will reach.
For example:
If the Iraqi war is about freeing the Iraqi people from terrible conditions,
How can you be against their
No, as Adam said, all the development work has been targeted at zooms. So all
is not equal. In terms of what's available, zooms are at least the equal of
primes. In terms of what's possible, I'm sure primes can excel. But we were
talking about what's available.
Paul
-- Original
We currently have a rather awkward debate over the credibility of
nature photography over here. It has been going on for over a year,
perpetuated by a small handful of conservative photographers. The
latest flames flared up after an exhibition in Stavanger by Steve
Bloom:
I do not agree that all the development in optical design
has been targeted at zooms and thus by your inference prime
designs are somehow lagging. Thats absurd, everything they
learn in developing zooms gets 100% applied to primes because
primes are a simple subset of zooms. THEY DO LESS, not more
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, as Adam said, all the development work has been targeted at zooms.
So all is not equal. In terms of what's available, zooms are at least the
equal of primes.
This may apply to all photography of the usual sunday and garden
variety. Take any of those zooms into a
Adam Maas wrote:
And once again, you assume that a 20+ year old prime design can match
a brand new zoom design, especially one that's well optimized. While
you could no doubt produce a modern prime design to match these new
zooms, nobody actually is doing so except Ziess, and Zeiss doesn't
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, as Adam said, all the development work has been targeted at zooms.
So all is not equal. In terms of what's available, zooms are at least the
equal of primes.
This may apply to all photography of the usual sunday and garden
variety.
Adam Maas wrote: The Prime's
more complex, not less
We are not discussing Any given prime
vs Any given zoom.
We are discussing PRIMES vs ZOOMS.
Any argument that zooms are less complex
than primes zooms is very incredble and pretty
dumb if you ask me. Zooms have to
have more optical and
so now hes arguing that zooms are better than primes
because an old particular prime isnt as good as new particular zoom, well
that certainly proves his point, NOT!
JC OCONNELL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
On 13/7/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
From this morning's walk ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/115-under-construction.jpg
Under Construction - Sunnyvale 2008
Panasonic L1 + Olympus ZD 25mm f/2.8 lens
ISO 200 @ f/5 @ 1/100 sec
Godders you know I loathe this genre but
On 13/7/08, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed:
Disclaimer: the images linked here are graphic and may induce feeling
of horror in some sensitive individuals.
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Spider/IMGP4088.jpg
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Spider/IMGP4030.jpg
Other episodes of
2008/7/14 Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose. They said (and still say)
the same thing about Capa's shot militiaman. All I can say is that the
people who think they are fakes cannot be real photographers. Real
photographers see these great things all the time,
On 13/7/08, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed:
You will probably like this new twist when it comes out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrSX8NYN2x4
Laughed out loud at the iGor slapping bit.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Ah!
So... -Not sure whether you were referring to my contribution in this
discussion, or to how propaganda machines go about their business...
- I certainly didn't intend to control anything, though...
It's just this debate we're having nationally that's been on my mind
for a couple of months. It
-- Original message --
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... or prepared enough.
As Cotty says; if you see the moment, it's gone.
How true. I came to realize that when I was shooting drag racing for magazines.
I was pleased when I didn't see the shot I
Cotty wrote:
On 13/7/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
From this morning's walk ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/115-under-construction.jpg
Under Construction - Sunnyvale 2008
Panasonic L1 + Olympus ZD 25mm f/2.8 lens
ISO 200 @ f/5 @ 1/100 sec
Godders you know I
Good information. Thanks, Toine.
Jack
--- On Sun, 7/13/08, Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DA 55-300 LBA
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, July 13, 2008, 1:25 PM
I sold my 80-320 to finance this lba. My only problem with
I like both of these. On the first (Under Construction) I feel an itch to see
a tiny bit of the foreground in front of the cinder blocks. The second I have
no quibbles with at all, only a question: what does this have to do with cafe
life? Most of the shots in that series seem to have been
Hmmm... One would have to know the couple to be able to distinguish between (1)
another effort to repair the manifold flaws in her imminent hubby, and (2) a
loving gesture.
Nice shot, nicely timed, well-rendered in any case.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sun, 7/13/08, William
Thanks, Paul! The light was so dappled that it needed a bit of work in
Lightroom.
Rick
--- On Sun, 7/13/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: A Good Book
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, July
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: Hilarious Photoshop hijinks from those nutty Revolutionary Guards
Sorry, I don't mean to be obtuse.
If you let the opposition frame the question you are debating,
you are often letting them control the answer or conclusion you
On my way home from work Friday evening:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7556373
K10D, FA 28/2.8, ISO 560, f/2.8 @ 1/250, RAW via LR.
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Godfrey: Congrats on the show!!! Hope you have a great turnout! Cheers,
Christine
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jul 10, 2008 9:58 PM
To: SeePhoto Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED], PAW Picture-A-Week project [EMAIL
PROTECTED], DUG [EMAIL PROTECTED], PDML
Scott: Terrific job on the PUG! And congrats to everyone's pictures. They
look fantastic! Cheers, Christine
-Original Message-
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jul 10, 2008 10:03 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: July PUG is up
It's been a
Media using Photoshop to alter images... would never happen here.
What makes you think it was done by the media?
The little I've read about it never mentioned that.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
I've not seen a mention of who caught the fakery.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hilarious Photoshop hijinks from those nutty Revolutionary Guards
Pretty bad when it's obvious at this small a size...
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
