Very good photos (well, most of them).
--Sasha
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
Thanks John (and David, Larry and P.J. too)!
I´m flattered but luckily (?) others, like the Pentax Gallery don´t agree .-)
Actually, after about 10 years at a Norwegian web photo
On Mar 18, 2010, at 8:52 PM, Sandra Hermann wrote:
Your cheapest fast glass is going to be a 50/1.4 supertak
with an adapter. If you play your craigslist cards
right, you can get the glass for free, or with an old spotty
for $50. M42 adapters are about $20. The problem with using
the old
On 3/18/2010 5:17 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Mat Maessen
On 3/17/10, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Do you have a name? We generally have names here -- most of us
have nothing to
hide. And those of us who do have something to hide, like Cotty
and Frank, have
already been
That's pretty good for hand held and the exposure looks spot on.
A couple of things - I think it would benefit from a degree or so of
clockwise rotation because I assume those posts are supposed to be
vertical, and maybe cropping out some of the foreground.
Cheers
Brian
Nice job - just a pity there wasn't a tad more separation between the
boy and the rail.
Not sure about the title. Is that Klingon or something?...
:-)
Cheers
Brian
(who really does understand the title but who loathes 'text-speak')
++
Brian Walters
Western
...keep a straight face?
http://www.baconbabble.com/index.php/2010/03/13/24-reasons-why-it-must-be-love/
Some folks might be offended by the language.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Excellent framing on this, Jack, but I think I prefer a rendering
somewhat between the two presented. Maybe the first rendering overall
but with the extra detail on the shed wall from the second.
Cheers
Brian
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
2010/3/19 mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com:
Some folks might be offended by the language.
they certainly won't shoot weddings then...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Excellent. A very nice abstract and I agree that it's a better crop
than the original.
Cheers
Brian
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:15 -0400, Daniel J. Matyola
danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
The colors and textures of
Looking at them purely from the point of view of composition, I like the
Tight Crop best. It seems to accentuate the lines leading into the
frame. I'm not seeing the noise on the web sized images.
Cheers
Brian
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Congrat's Ken. I gave up a while back
Dave
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
No not my age, but the number of images accepted by the Pentax Gallery.
That makes 5 in the collection and 95 in the rest of the gallery.
Kenneth Waller
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
I keep trying to go digital, but I just can't.
If Frank can do it, any one can do it
Dave
I just love film.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
wrote:
What is this 'film'
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
--nor will you have to show papers when
you cross the border :-))). Cheers, Christine
You've never met me or Frank then, have you.
Dave
- Original Message - From: Miserere miser...@gmail.com
To:
On 3/17/2010 21:34, paul stenquist wrote:
Hi Z,
Are you the same Z who rated thousands of photos on photo.net without ever
posting? No offense intended, just curious.
that person is obviously a usurper of my name and should be flogged with
a roll of T-MAX... the only things i've looked
That's great, Ken! I took a quick look at what I found to be some exceptional
work.
You're making the obvious extra effort in the pursuit of images and justifying
it with a quality end product.
Well done.
Jack
--- On Thu, 3/18/10, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
From: Ken Waller
And isn't pommes de terre in French the equivalent to
potato in English?
Yes, but generally you'll hear people referring to them just as pommes, and
the context tells you whether they mean apples or potatoes. So, pommes
frites, pommes dauphinoises, pommes vapeur etc. all refer to potato
I´ll probably never stop photographing. It´s
just a way of making comments without words.
Can't allow that one to go unreMark!ed...
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
Behalf Of DagT
Sent: 18 March 2010 22:59
To: Pentax-Discuss
I agree. I have all these great film cameras and a great selection of
lenses that I love to use. I also have two good scanners that do a
decent job. But, scanning is slow and cloning out dust spots is
tedious. Not to mention the cost of buying and processing a roll of
slide film...especially
I have for sale:
*ist Ds
K10D
FA100 2.8 macro
k300 F4
Contact me with an offer. Thanks.
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Thanks, Brian. I see the re-do a bit contrasty in the fence area, but didn't
like the original rather bland look produced by my cheap flat bed scanner.
I could reduce the intensity slightly if I do print one for framing.
Thanks, Brian.
Jack
--- On Fri, 3/19/10, Brian Walters
Wow, and I've been avoiding English Muffins all these years.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
On Mar 15, 2010, at 17:38 , Keith Whaley wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Here's a crumpet
http://tinyurl.com/2pth3n
THIS is crumpet
On 3/19/10, sonpix son...@mac.com wrote:
Might be interested in ...
A20mm f2.8 Pentax
A50mm f1.4
...
K105mm macro f2.8 Kiron
...
Vivitar series 1 2X macro convertor
I'm in China, but I'm Canadian, have a bank account there that
I could send you a cheque on. Also, a daughter in Ottawa
How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
to the point) one to avoid?
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Steven Desjardins wrote:
How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
to the point) one to avoid?
The 28mm f/3.5 lenses are the ones to get.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
From: Doug Franklin
eckinator wrote:
true. that is what us Germans plus the French and Belgians call them.
short for pommes de terre frites. short because pommes means apples.
And isn't pommes de terre in French the equivalent to potato in English?
Literally earth apples, no pommes de
2010/3/19 Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com:
Also known as frenching them, way back when, in some areas. At least,
that's the story I was told. :-)
isn't that also a term for french kissing? and what do you call the
variety with braces? I recall in school we called a certain type of
From: David Mann
Looks like someone painted a shoebox.
Dave
On Mar 19, 2010, at 5:43 AM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
Arriflex has a new digital system. It offers both optical and EVF options.
The first 16mm camera I used was 1960's era Arriflex 16S. They've come a long way.
oui
--
From: Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:22 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: question for the brits American to English translation
eckinator wrote:
true. that is what us
That's an M, right?
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Steven Desjardins wrote:
How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
to the point) one to avoid?
The 28mm f/3.5 lenses are the ones to get.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Steven Desjardins wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Steven Desjardins wrote:
How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
to the point) one to avoid?
The 28mm f/3.5 lenses are the ones to get.
That's an M, right?
- Original Message -
From: Sasha Sobol
Subject: peso - curtain
This might be not work safe (depending on what do you do).
http://flickr.com/gp/sobol/te12X3
Very nicely done.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Sick of cheap scans
I keep trying to go digital, but I just can't.
I just love film.
There isn't a lot of reason to shoot film if you are going to scan it.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
There's an M and a K 28/3.5 (don't know if they're the same optical
design)
Just checked and they're definitely different designs
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/wide-angle/index.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com wrote:
This might be not work safe (depending on what do you do).
http://flickr.com/gp/sobol/te12X3
Comments and critique welcome
oink
My critique is that there is an annoying curtain in the way preventing
me from seeing full
That is indeed impressive! Congratulations!
Dan
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
No not my age, but the number of images accepted by the Pentax Gallery.
That makes 5 in the collection and 95 in the rest of the gallery.
Kenneth Waller
Jostein:
Who is the third member of the Pentax Century Club, besides you and Ken Waller?
We should have a web page where all the members of this list could
post the URL of their Pentax Gallery (and perhaps their other
galleries) so we could check them all out. Is there such a place?
Dan
On
On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:30, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Sasha Sobol Subject: peso - curtain
This might be not work safe (depending on what do you do).
http://flickr.com/gp/sobol/te12X3
Very nicely done.
Those were going to be my exact words.
Of course
Will consider shipping worldwide. Email me for pics (serious inquiries
only please).
Will ship however you want (fast/slow) via USPS.
S-M-C Takumar 85mm f1.8 with matching Takumar hood (exc. $380) This is
a beauty and considered by some to be one of the top m42 lenses of all
time.
Pentax-M 28mm
The M28/2.8 is soft and prone to sticky aperture blades. I have no
experience with the M28/3.5. The M28/2.0 is classy. And the K28/3.5
isan old sharpie!
I think the A28/2.8 is a bit sharper than the M28/2.8, but the plastic
aperture ring can be a problem. It falls apart internaly. I suppose
Isn't that a bit like saying there's no reason to play a real piano if
you're going to record it digitally? You might as well use a digital
piano, right?
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:32 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Sick of
On Mar 19, 2010, at 9:22, Bob Sullivan wrote:
The M28/2.8 is soft and prone to sticky aperture blades. I have no
experience with the M28/3.5. The M28/2.0 is classy. And the K28/3.5
isan old sharpie!
I think the A28/2.8 is a bit sharper than the M28/2.8, but the plastic
aperture ring can
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Sick of cheap scans
There isn't a lot of reason to shoot film if you are going to scan it.
Isn't that a bit like saying there's no reason to play a real piano if
you're going to record it digitally? You might as well use a
Logic doesn't quite match my limited experience
Otis Wright
On 3/19/2010 10:36 AM, Nick Wright wrote:
Isn't that a bit like saying there's no reason to play a real piano if
you're going to record it digitally? You might as well use a digital
piano, right?
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:32 AM,
Congratulation Ken. That's 100 more than me.
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
No not my age, but the number of images accepted by the Pentax Gallery.
That makes 5 in the collection and 95 in the rest of the
The bottom line is that I really truly prefer film. I prefer the look.
I prefer the process.
Thanks for the input.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Otis C. Wright, Jr. ocw...@att.net wrote:
Logic doesn't quite match my limited experience
Otis Wright
On 3/19/2010 10:36 AM, Nick Wright
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
The M28/2.8 is soft and prone to sticky aperture blades. I have no
There are actually two versions of the M28/2.8.
I suspect you're referring to the old version.
The new version is mechanically and optically identical
Christine Aguila wrote:
Ok, I'd like to hear some chatter about the Chicago Exhibit.
1) Who's coming?
2) Do you want to do a group photo-walk on Sat or Sun or neither?
3) Do you want to do a group dinner Sat night at some place cheap and
cheerful?
Well, now it's a party. Looks like I'll be
OK, the curator has made her decisions and we have 41 photos selected
for the gallery show in Chicago. If your name is on this list and you
haven't heard from me you should contact me ASAP.
Thank you to all participants and congratulations to those who made
the gallery exhibit. I know Sue Barton
On 3/19/2010 7:17 AM, Bob W wrote:
And isn't pommes de terre in French the equivalent to
potato in English?
Yes, but generally you'll hear people referring to them just as pommes, and
the context tells you whether they mean apples or potatoes. So, pommes
frites, pommes dauphinoises,
Mat Maessen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
The M28/2.8 is soft and prone to sticky aperture blades. I have no
There are actually two versions of the M28/2.8.
I suspect you're referring to the old version.
The new version is mechanically and
On 3/19/2010 7:57 AM, eckinator wrote:
2010/3/19 Doug Franklinjehosep...@mindspring.com:
Also known as frenching them, way back when, in some areas. At least,
that's the story I was told. :-)
isn't that also a term for french kissing? and what do you call the
variety with braces? I
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Sick of cheap scans
The bottom line is that I really truly prefer film. I prefer the look.
I prefer the process.
I find it odd that a person can prefer importing a digital file by scanning
a piece of film rather than just
2010/3/19 Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com:
Jostein:
Who is the third member of the Pentax Century Club, besides you and Ken
Waller?
Bong Manayon.
There may be more, for all I know.
We should have a web page where all the members of this list could
post the URL of their Pentax
I beleive the M, A and F 28 f2.8's all have the identical optical
formulas, (well there's an earl and late M version, which was
different). All were, at one time, considered mediocre performers
though If you're deciding between these three I'd get the F if I had
a choice, (better coatings
Doug, I'd love to see the Eggleston exhibit.
Jostein
2010/3/19 Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com:
Christine Aguila wrote:
Ok, I'd like to hear some chatter about the Chicago Exhibit.
1) Who's coming?
2) Do you want to do a group photo-walk on Sat or Sun or neither?
3) Do you want to do a group
Wow, that is quite a list. I'm impressed that this group could come
up with that many exhibition quality shots from so many different
artists in just one year. Congratulation to all those selected to
represent us!
Dan M
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Not Nearly what I had before my ex pawned them for sex/drugs and didn't bother
to tell me so I could get them back. I have a 20mm 2.8 I believe. my 100 mmm
macro which is 2.8 also. Two 50mm lens. One of which is a newer one that is
2.82 I believe and the other one says 1.7 on it. and the
I should have been able to guess that . . .
Congratulation to the three of you on an amazing accomplishment.
Those guys at Pentax are pretty picky, and, based on what I have seen,
very adept at choosing the highest quality work.
Dan
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, AlunFoto
AlunFoto wrote:
Doug, I'd love to see the Eggleston exhibit.
Jostein
me three...
and I used to practically live at the Art Institute... spent hours in
the THorne rooms and in front of
_the_ Seurat
ann
2010/3/19 Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com:
Christine Aguila wrote:
Ok, I'd
The one to get is the K 28/3.5 or if you want
to spend $500 more, the K28/2.0
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
-Original Message-
From:
Like Dan says, congratulations to all those selected.
It's a list of familiar names and great photographers.
I can't wait to see the exhibition.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Daniel J. Matyola
danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, that is quite a list. I'm impressed that this
ann sanfedele wrote:
AlunFoto wrote:
Doug, I'd love to see the Eggleston exhibit.
Jostein
me three...
and I used to practically live at the Art Institute... spent hours in
the THorne rooms and in front of
_the_ Seurat
ann
OK, that's three of us. Where's Fernando?
--
PDML
Looks like I've been promoted!
Here's the roster:
...
Christ Mitchell
...
Seriously, it's great to be in the exhibition and thanks to Mark and the
team for all the hard work.
Chris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Did I miss the announcement of who is in the book (but not in the show)?
Or should I just consider it a bad sign if I haven't heard anything yet?
:P
Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
OK, the curator has made her decisions and we
For sale:
Pentax SMC-F 50mm f/1.4
Pentax SMC-F 50mm f/1.7
Both in EX- condition. Some internal dust visible. Diaphragm blades
clean and clear. Fully functional with minimal exterior wear to
aperture ring, lens barrel, etc. Front and rear lens caps included
(front caps are generic).
\\/\/ 00T
It looks like I'll be out there the weekend of May 7th!
On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
OK, the curator has made her decisions and we have 41 photos selected
for the gallery show in Chicago. If your name is on this list and you
haven't heard from me you should
On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Wow, that is quite a list. I'm impressed that this group could come
up with that many exhibition quality shots from so many different
artists in just one year. Congratulation to all those selected to
represent us!
I saw last year's
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com wrote:
Did I miss the announcement of who is in the book (but not in the show)?
Or should I just consider it a bad sign if I haven't heard anything yet?
:P
My understanding was that any PDML member who made a submission would
CheekyGeek wrote:
Did I miss the announcement of who is in the book (but not in the show)?
Or should I just consider it a bad sign if I haven't heard anything yet?
You did miss it, but if you were on the PDML during December 2009 you
should be in. (In fact, you are - I just checked).
Here's
im interested, please contact via my private email
at hifis...@gate.net
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
-Original Message-
From:
Both lenses have sold (very quickly!)
Joe
On Mar 19, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Joe Wilensky wrote:
For sale:
Pentax SMC-F 50mm f/1.4
Pentax SMC-F 50mm f/1.7
Both in EX- condition. Some internal dust visible. Diaphragm blades
clean and clear. Fully functional with minimal exterior wear to
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
to the point) one to avoid?
The A28/2.8 was one of my first Pentax lenses. It was a little soft
wide-open, very sharp by f/4-5.6, and had beautiful
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
The bottom line is that I really truly prefer film. I prefer the look.
I prefer the process.
Thanks for the input.
If you prefer the look and the process of working with film, I'd
recommend either buying a top-notch
Ouch, I am in!
The list looks great.
Congratulations to everyone.
--Sasha
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com wrote:
Did I miss the announcement of who is in the book (but not in the show)?
Or
Congrats to everyone on the list of exhibitors. I'm gutted I can't make
it over - business is picking up but nowhere near enough for me to
afford the trip across the pond. Probably do me good to miss out once in
a while!
Meanwhile, the PDML documentary is stalled as I search for a backer. Not
Same model, slightly different look.
http://flickr.com/gp/sobol/R8t80V
Tell me what you think.
--Sasha
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Sandra Hermann
jeepgirls2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Not Nearly what I had before my ex pawned them for sex/drugs and didn't
bother to tell me so I could get them back. I
have a 20mm 2.8 I believe. my 100 mmm macro which is 2.8 also. Two 50mm
lens. One of which
On 19/3/10, Sasha Sobol, discombobulated, unleashed:
Same model, slightly different look.
http://flickr.com/gp/sobol/R8t80V
Tell me what you think.
Great work Sasha - I'd move that heart on the bed a bit to give it more
symmetry and clone out edge of headboard top right. Very nice!
--
Love it!
Tom .
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
The colors and textures of these roof tiles at the Castel Sant'Angelo
in Rome caught my attention. I have cropped the image slightly to
remove the distraction in the upper right corner, as suggested
From: Sandra Hermann
Not Nearly what I had before my ex pawned them for sex/drugs and
didn't bother to tell me so I could get them back. I have a 20mm
2.8 I believe. my 100 mmm macro which is 2.8 also. Two 50mm lens.
One of which is a newer one that is 2.82 I believe and the other one
says
If you ordered pommes dauphinoises and were served with apples cooked in
garlic, butter and cream to go with your grilled lamb you'd probably be a
bit put out.
Done properly that doesn't sound like it would be half bad.
Baking an apple with a filling and bed of garlic and rosemary or
herbes
Contacting you, as directed.
Alas, I won't be able to be in Chicago, because I'll be returning from a
meeting in beautiful Birmingham, UK on the Thursday evening, and have to work
all day Friday.
What will be the fate of my mounted and framed print once the exhibit ends?
Rick
From: CheekyGeek
Did I miss the announcement of who is in the book (but not in the show)?
Or should I just consider it a bad sign if I haven't heard anything yet?
:P
I may be wrong, but I understand that if you submitted an image you're
in the book ... except apparently for the dark-side
On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:47, Cotty wrote:
On 19/3/10, Sasha Sobol, discombobulated, unleashed:
Same model, slightly different look.
http://flickr.com/gp/sobol/R8t80V
Tell me what you think.
Great work Sasha - I'd move that heart on the bed a bit to give it more
symmetry and clone out
... but I got a new camera and daylight's burning.
Later!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I didn't even check the box for the show. Already been in a show and can't
make it to Chicago anyway. (And also I am not sure of the relevance to the
place where they are being exhibited.)
No biggie.
Marnie :-)
In a message dated 3/19/2010 9:59:00 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
I have a version that has more symmetry in it:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/104671
--S
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:47, Cotty wrote:
On 19/3/10, Sasha Sobol, discombobulated, unleashed:
Same model, slightly
not allowed...
2010/3/19 Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com:
I have a version that has more symmetry in it:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/104671
--S
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:47, Cotty wrote:
On 19/3/10, Sasha
On 19/3/10, Sasha Sobol, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have a version that has more symmetry in it:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/104671
I'm getting a 'must log in' on that page
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
Sorry.
this should work:
http://flickr.com/gp/sobol/s2rVED
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:09 AM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
not allowed...
2010/3/19 Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com:
I have a version that has more symmetry in it:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/104671
--S
On
definitely get rid of the heart... do the less innocently thinking
among us a favor! other than that great shot and a close-up of the
tattoo would be appreciated
cheers
ecke
2010/3/19 Cotty cotty...@mac.com:
On 19/3/10, Sasha Sobol, discombobulated, unleashed:
Same model, slightly different
On 19/3/10, Sasha Sobol, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry.
this should work:
http://flickr.com/gp/sobol/s2rVED
Much better - but I just need that little heart a bit lower because of
the way it mimics her bum ;-)
Compelling shot.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Rick Womer wrote:
What will be the fate of my mounted and framed print once the exhibit ends?
Yours to keep, but you have to arrange with the gallery to get it
shipped to you.
You can, of course, offer it for sale at the exhibit. I'll post the
gallery's terms (commission, etc.) later.
--
At 12:57 PM -0400 3/19/10, John Sessoms wrote:
From: CheekyGeek
Did I miss the announcement of who is in the book (but not in the show)?
Or should I just consider it a bad sign if I haven't heard anything yet?
:P
I may be wrong, but I understand that if you submitted an image
you're in the
I am most honored and humbled to be in the list.
Julia suggested I take yet another trip across this big pond. I will
check what can be done...
Boris
On 3/19/2010 5:03 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
OK, the curator has made her decisions and we have 41 photos selected
for the gallery show in
I've owned the A and M(1st version) 28/2.8's and now use a Tamron
28/2.5 Adaptall-2. The A was decent, the M poor, the Tamron is
superior to either.
-Adam
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Steven Desjardins
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
OK, the curator has made her decisions and we have 41 photos selected
for the gallery show in Chicago. If your name is on this list and you
haven't heard from me you should contact me ASAP.
Congrats to all that will
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Doug Franklin
jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
eckinator wrote:
true. that is what us Germans plus the French and Belgians call them.
short for pommes de terre frites. short because pommes means apples.
And isn't pommes de terre in French the equivalent to
Chris Mitchell wrote:
Looks like I've been promoted!
Here's the roster:
...
Christ Mitchell
...
Seriously, it's great to be in the exhibition and thanks to Mark and the
team for all the hard work.
Chris
I started to do a riff on that but
Thanks! I agree .-)
DagT
http://www.thrane.name
Den 19. mars 2010 kl. 07.12 skrev Sasha Sobol:
Very good photos (well, most of them).
--Sasha
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
Thanks John (and David, Larry and P.J. too)!
I´m flattered but luckily (?)
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
