It's amazing what you can snap with a suitable vantage point.
http://epod.usra.edu/blog/2012/08/sunset-above-the-atlantic-ocean.html
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Tonight, there was a blues/fusion dance at 418, the space I asked about
processing images from. There was no band, and the room was lit with the blue
LED spots, and with some red incandescent bulbs. In some ways, the lighting
was even more bizarre than it was on the band Saturday night.
It
On Aug 20, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
What would be the best, most affordable option -- best bang for the lowest
buck -- for the wider landscapes? All I really care about is the focal length
and IQ -- everything else is mere window dressing as far as I'm concerned.
I'm
Hi Darren,
I have the Sigma 70-300 /4-5.6 APO DG, I like its sharpness and I made
some very nice macro's with it (it has a macro switch for 200-300mm) It
is bulky but supprisingly light weight.
Recently I did a comparitive test with some lenses a had that covered 200mm.
I took pictures at
Dan, I have to make a comment. Bob, Ann and Jeffrey's posts were pretty
amusing. It is what keeps a list enlivening to read. From a neutral
Aussie point of view, I immediately saw James Carville as a somewhat
dangerous and bulbous mushroom to be approached with caution. Did not
see any
I have the same rule, and the same one to be broken. Love the tonal
separation on his profile, and apropos of the recent pedal discussion,
that focus on this feet. Works for me.
On 20/08/2012 11:59 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I kind of broke a personal rule (or, more accurately,
This one is very groovy
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/7829610438/
You have an iconic t-shirt design on the left there.
On 21/08/2012 5:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Tonight, there was a blues/fusion dance at 418, the space I asked about
processing images from. There was no band, and
Excellent shot
Dave
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/i-2ZB3pxc/0/X2/train-X2.jpg
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Nice portrait shot
Dave
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:59 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I originally started talking to the fellow with the boater; I wanted
to get the hat for Real Canadians Wearing Real Hats (haven't posted on
that blog in months). However they wanted me
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
It seems to me that the least expensive way to get wide angles and high image
quality is to stitch multiple exposures together in a panorama.
Put the 50mm prime on your camera, mount it on the tripod in vertical
My take on the dream cruise, including 20 photos. The one example I posted here
didn't make the cut, probably because the Maserati isn't a typical dream cruise
machine.
http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/21/the-woodward-dream-cruise-rediscovers-its-strut/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Nice work!
and I love that pink Bel-Air - though I prefer it in Aqua :-)
ann
On 8/21/2012 07:34, Paul Stenquist wrote:
My take on the dream cruise, including 20 photos. The one example I posted here
didn't make the cut, probably because the Maserati isn't a typical dream cruise
machine.
No, I believe it is a Super Q that takes K-mount lenses in AF. The
idea, from Pentax's viewpoint is to sell more lenses.
Pentax is doubling down on the Q (as well they should). A near Q
with an AF K-mount and this range of normal lens is going to be
awesome.
It is the perfect time to make people
This guy certainly gets it link:
http://www.seriouscompacts.com/f90/pentax-q-real-world-user-review-11773/index4.html#post91442
You'll find Pinholecam on seriouscompacts.com and pentaxforums.com
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I believe it is a Super
Amazing indeed!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:20 AM, David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
It's amazing what you can snap with a suitable vantage point.
http://epod.usra.edu/blog/2012/08/sunset-above-the-atlantic-ocean.html
Dave
--
Thanks for that
Dave
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Jos from Holland
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote:
Hi Darren,
I have the Sigma 70-300 /4-5.6 APO DG, I like its sharpness and I made some
very nice macro's with it (it has a macro switch for 200-300mm) It is bulky
but supprisingly light
Derby, there are many places where politics and political humor can be
discussed among those who wish to do so.
I have participated in other internet groups that once were lively and
dynamic, and provided a valuable exchange of information and ideas,
but have been torn apart by the injection of
Thanks for the report! We were at the other end of the state and I couldn't
manage the trip down. Maybe next year . . .
stan
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 21, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
My take on the dream cruise, including 20 photos. The one example I posted
Hate him, or Really hate him, RiceHigh is early with a leak:
ricehigh.blogspot.com
The pics are probably accurate, but I don't think the description probably is.
This is your K-5 upgrade.
--
The key to seeing the world's soul, and in the process wakening one's
own, is to get over the confusion
I haven't done the math, but I'm guessing around 4x. That makes the
kit lens a 16-400mm in 35mm FOV equivalency.
Think iPhone quality sensor only LARGER instead of so much smaller
than APS-C. Even Pentax Full Frame buyers are going to own an X-5. It
is like the Ultimate 4x Teleconverter for all
On Aug 21, 2012, at 7:29, Darren Addy wrote:
Hate him, or Really hate him, RiceHigh is early with a leak:
ricehigh.blogspot.com
The pics are probably accurate, but I don't think the description probably is.
This is your K-5 upgrade.
PS Superzoom.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson -
Walt,
I have some lenses that I am willing to loan out.
Tamron 300/5.6.
M100/4 macro
M28/2.8 (second edition, same as the A but w/o the A setting)
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML
On Aug 21, 2012, at 8:16, Darren Addy wrote:
I haven't done the math, but I'm guessing around 4x. That makes the
kit lens a 16-400mm in 35mm FOV equivalency.
I see no mechanism/switch/whatever for removing the lens.
The promo refers to the camera itself (not the supplied lens) as a 26x
On Aug 21, 2012, at 5:46 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
No, I believe it is a Super Q that takes K-mount lenses in AF. The
idea, from Pentax's viewpoint is to sell more lenses.
I don't see any sort of a lens release button on the pictures.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
Tim - I noticed the same thing and had been chalking it up to gmail.
For a while, I would see re: on replies in the message list. When I
opened the message gmail would display the full thread with the
original subject line at the top of the list.
Now I don't even see the re: in the message list.
It's a bridge camera. Superzoom non-detachable lens.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, I sort of missed the lens.
4.0 to 105mm ?
4mm. Clearly this is not a full frame.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
On Aug 21, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Oh yeah! This is teetering dangerously close to being Fine Art, Larry.
You better watch out.
I doubt my work even qualifies as art, and I'm at least a gallery exhibit and a
pretentious artist statement from any of those photos being fine art.
It is obvious that it is non-changeable lens:
words 16 megapixels are written on the lens.
(and as couple of people mentioned, - no lens release button is visible)
Igor
On Aug 21, 2012, at 5:46 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
No, I believe it is a Super Q that takes K-mount lenses in AF. The
idea,
You can rent various Pentax wide angle lenses for two weeks for well
under $50 at borrowlenses.com. Cost varies by lens and length of
rental period.
http://www.borrowlenses.com/category/penax_wide_angle
I'm not sure how long you'll be gone, but this seems like a good way
to use a high quality
On Aug 21, 2012, at 4:22 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
It seems to me that the least expensive way to get wide angles and high
image quality is to stitch multiple exposures together in a panorama.
Put the 50mm prime on
- Doctor, when I do this, it hurts...
- Don't do that!
;-)
I experimented a bit taking photos in the ambient mixed blue or
blue and red light 1-2 years ago, albeit not in as dark space as
in your case. If you are curious, - take a look here:
The first few photos here:
Maybe the old Tokina RMC 17mm f/3.5. If you can find one it should be
very cheap.
I would prefer the DA18-55 II for the best price/performance.
Toine
On 21 August 2012 00:56, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
. . . and give me your thoughts.
Say you're going to be leaving for the Black
Haven't been in the Convention Center in at least 10 years, so I didn't
recognize the mural. I may have to pay a visit.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday,
Well, that's good to know. I guess maybe I am over-preparing a bit. But,
this could turn out to be a once-in-a-lifetime kind of thing, so I just
have the better to have it and not need it than need it and not have
it mentality. I'll probably temper it a little between now and then.
-- Walt
On 8/21/2012 3:27 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
What would be the best, most affordable option -- best bang for the lowest buck
-- for the wider landscapes? All I really care about is the focal length and IQ
-- everything else is mere window dressing
On 8/20/2012 8:19 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-08-20 16:56 Walt Gilbert wrote
[...] and
I'd like to have something wider for landscapes. I have a Takumar
28/2.8, but
it's really a pretty crappy lens compared to the others.
What would be the best, most affordable option -- best bang for
I think I may be the only current *actively posting* digest subscriber.
I've never seen anyone else get bitched out for screwing up the threading.
I try to pay attention to the subject line when I post a reply
manually put the RE: in if it's not already there.
From: Anthony Farr
I
Thanks, Toine!
I'll look into that one and see if I can find a nice deal. I really
would like to have a decent short prime -- one that's better than my Tak
28/2.8. But, if I can't come up with one, I suppose my 18-55 will be fine.
-- Walt
On 8/21/2012 9:34 AM, Toine wrote:
Maybe the old
From: Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com
It's not often that logic and Pentax appear together in the same
thought.
Mark!
LOL. That's sort of what if say about rap. Rap and music do not belong
in the same sentence unless the words 'is not' is between them.
I screwed up the Re:'s on this post on
Thank you, Collin! I may very well take you up on one or more of those
and will happily pay the shipping when the time comes and I still
haven't come up with anything.
I very much appreciate the offer!
-- Walt
On 8/21/2012 8:29 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Walt,
I have some lenses that I
From: Darren Addy
No, I believe it is a Super Q that takes K-mount lenses in AF. The
idea, from Pentax's viewpoint is to sell more lenses.
It says right in the blog that it's a super-zoom point shoot.
Previous Pentax 'X' cameras:
X70
Yep, well I've been convinced that this is not an interchangable lens
camera (and that it is the same sensor size as the Q), which means
that they used some of their Q knowledge to make it. I guess it
confuses me that they make the Q and K-01 interchangeable lens but no
viewfinder, and then make
I have to admit that it is a little hard to put oneself in your shoes
because your objectives seem at odds with each other.
You started off saying you wanted wide (for landscapes) and then say
that f3.5 is too slow for you. Few landscapes are shot wide open, and
most wide lenses are going to be
Wow that's cool. Good photography there.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:43:52 -0400
From: Steven Desjardinsdrd1...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: Peso: I Hear the Train A'Comin'
Message-ID:
That's most likely what'll happen. I was just hoping there might be a
glut of some great short lens out there that everyone has in their kit
just because they're so great and readily available.
-- Walt
On 8/20/2012 10:39 PM, l...@red4est.com wrote:
Borrow something.
Walt Gilbert
Thanks, George.
I'll be sure to check out the rental option between now and then. I was
hoping I might be able to buy a nice, older lens for a really cheap
price -- maybe even get one on an old film body. I've got my eyes peeled
for all kinds of opportunities. I'd much prefer to have one for
Good street portrait, I like the attitude.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:59:17 -0400
From: frank theriaultknarftheria...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail ListPDML@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - The Three Caballeros
Message-ID:
Sorry I'm feeling prankish today so take what I say in that light. :)
I guess it
confuses me that they make the Q and K-01.
Yes that confuses me also.
I really don't know why they would engineer a 4-105mm for a Q-sized
sensor.
I don't know why they would engineer a Q. I'm sure it takes
On 8/21/2012 11:01 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
I have to admit that it is a little hard to put oneself in your shoes
because your objectives seem at odds with each other.
You started off saying you wanted wide (for landscapes) and then say
that f3.5 is too slow for you. Few landscapes are shot wide
A few members of the Omaha Camera Club spent Saturday evening at the
Omaha Stormchaser's game. The Stormchasers are the farm team for the
KC Royals and were called the Omaha Royals for many years. When they
moved from Rosenblatt Stadium in Omaha to the much smaller Werner Park
in Papillion, they
Thanks for the comments. The mural is in the Philadelphia Convention
center, part of which is an old train station. Igor: There was too
much distracting stuff down there so I had to crop it.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:16 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent shot
Dave
On
From: Walt Gilbert
Well, I was thinking there may be third-party lenses that might make the
cut, so I thought that might make it semi-OT. But, since they'd be
K-mounts, I guess I was just being a little extra cautious.
I wanted to carry three bodies just to make sure I have a fairly long
zoom
On 8/21/2012 9:45 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walt Gilbert
Well, I was thinking there may be third-party lenses that might make the
cut, so I thought that might make it semi-OT. But, since they'd be
K-mounts, I guess I was just being a little extra cautious.
I wanted to carry three bodies
Darren, interesting thoughts. Is there verification that it has
inter-changeable lens? I have played around with Pen 4/3s and if I had
money to throw away he Q might be useful I never looked at it seriously.
If this new one is PS I have an older Nikon with articulating screen
that is my least
On 8/21/12 11:15 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
The team of French magazine Réponses Photo is either always well
informed or particularly good at guessing. Their prognosis ahead of
Photokina in earlier years have usually been spot on.
Here's what they predict for this year's show:
| All logic
I do know one other Pentaxian who lives locally, though he's not a
PDML'er. I'll see what he has and is willing to loan out for a few days.
I'm not sure he's got much glass at all, but it certainly wouldn't hurt
to ask.
I do appreciate the offer, though.
Is it true that the focusing rings
From: Ann Sanfedele
Nice work!
and I love that pink Bel-Air - though I prefer it in Aqua :-)
ann
On 8/21/2012 07:34, Paul Stenquist wrote:
My take on the dream cruise, including 20 photos. The one example I
posted here didn't make the cut, probably because the Maserati
isn't a typical dream
I've concluded that it's generally better to mix photography with one's
politics than to mix politics with one's photography.
-- Walt
On 8/21/2012 7:56 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Derby, there are many places where politics and political humor can be
discussed among those who wish to do so.
Great shot.
I lived in Omaha for 7 years. Wonderful city. Miss it more all the time.
Went to the old Rosenblatt, but haven't had a chance to see the new park yet.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
On Aug 21, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
My take on the dream cruise, including 20 photos. The one example I posted
here didn't make the cut, probably because the Maserati isn't a typical
dream cruise machine.
It depends on three things 1.) Quality of the lens, 2.) Quality of the
firmware, 3.) Processing speed, otherwise it's just another me to ZLR
with cosmetics to make it look like a K-5. Let's face it, if it's just
another PS camera the market is saturated with them. Now I have to go
shower,
on 2012-08-21 9:01 John Sessoms wrote
I think I may be the only current *actively posting* digest subscriber. I've
never seen anyone else get bitched out for screwing up the threading.
i detected those who reply to digests by searching for In-reply-to: headers
that include mailman; this works
The team of French magazine Réponses Photo is either always well
informed or particularly good at guessing. Their prognosis ahead of
Photokina in earlier years have usually been spot on.
Here's what they predict for this year's show:
| All logic suggests that Pentax will stick to the APS-C
Oh yeah! This is teetering dangerously close to being Fine Art, Larry.
You better watch out.
Really fun shots.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
This one is very groovy
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/7829610438/
You have an iconic t-shirt
From: Darren Addy
Hate him, or Really hate him, RiceHigh is early with a leak:
ricehigh.blogspot.com
The pics are probably accurate, but I don't think the description probably is.
This is your K-5 upgrade.
Probably not - 16 Megapixel, 26x Ultra-Zoom Point and Shoot
Comparable to the Sony
Photolitics beats poligraphy every time
B
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Walt Gilbert
Sent: 21 August 2012 17:53
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Flame ahead Re: PESO: Ugli Fungi
I've concluded that it's
Thanks for the heads-up, Steven!
I've got a little time to do a little more saving-up. If I can manage to
save enough dough, I'll definitely put that in the possibilities pile.
-- Walt
On 8/20/2012 8:49 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
A K28 3.5. Really sharp. They can be had at KEH for a
Actually, I sort of missed the lens.
4.0 to 105mm ?
4mm. Clearly this is not a full frame.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hate him, or Really hate him, RiceHigh is early with a leak:
ricehigh.blogspot.com
The pics are probably accurate, but I don't
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Larry Colen
On Aug 21, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Oh yeah! This is teetering dangerously close to being Fine Art,
Larry.
You better watch out.
I doubt my work even qualifies as art, and I'm at least
Paul,
Good story, excellent photos.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
My take on the dream cruise, including 20 photos. The one example I posted
here didn't make the cut, probably because the Maserati isn't a typical dream
cruise
Yeah, that feels more like it, Paul. ;-) Sharp image with good DOF and well
written article.
Jack Davis
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/jackdavis
http://www.photolightimages.com/
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Lebanon CT. I've got about 2000 messages in my PDML folder, I'll be
poking around there for a while. Might not respond quickly or at all.
On 8/19/2012 7:38 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
That actually took me by surprise..
where were you?
ann
On 8/19/2012 19:22, P. J. Alling wrote:
I always try to take a windows seat, and have my camera bag in my feet
(under the seat in front), so that I can pull the camera out quickly.
Sunset is my favorite subject, but it doesn't always get spectacular, it
depends on the cloud structure and other circumstances.
Other typical challenges
Nice, dramatic image!
Igor
Tue Aug 21 12:23:33 EDT 2012
George Sinos wrote:
There's one pano here
http://georges.posterous.com/photo-night-at-omaha-stormchasers and
you can click through the link in the blog to see the whole Smugmug
gallery.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
on 2012-08-21 9:39 Walt Gilbert wrote
I've thought about trying my hand at stitching in the past. I may well give it
a whirl at some point on this trip. Is there any particular pano stitching
software you recommend?
i've used Hugin Photoshop; Hugin gives you a lot of control, and is free, but
Is there really anything on that body that looks like a lens release to
you? You know that notiable button which on Pentax K sits in the lower
right hand quadrant of the lens mount, say just about where the SR logo
is. Anybody who thinks images of the Pentax X-5 represents an
interchangeable
From: Walt Gilbert
On 8/21/2012 3:27 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
What would be the best, most affordable option -- best bang for the lowest buck
-- for the wider landscapes? All I really care about is the focal length and IQ
-- everything else is
No, if I forgot to post it here... I have been convinced now that it
is not interchangable lens.
I do think it will have the Q-sized sensor (since Sony does make a
16mp version) and I think the question now is: will it shoot RAW?
If so, it is only the 2nd camera in its class to let you do that.
I
On 8/21/2012 2:05 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-08-21 9:39 Walt Gilbert wrote
I've thought about trying my hand at stitching in the past. I may
well give it
a whirl at some point on this trip. Is there any particular pano
stitching
software you recommend?
i've used Hugin Photoshop; Hugin
On 8/21/2012 2:41 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walt Gilbert
On 8/21/2012 3:27 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
What would be the best, most affordable option -- best bang for the
lowest buck -- for the wider landscapes? All I really care about is
the
Just the Nikons.
Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
I do know one other Pentaxian who lives locally, though he's not a
PDML'er. I'll see what he has and is willing to loan out for a few
days.
I'm not sure he's got much glass at all, but it certainly wouldn't hurt
to ask.
I do appreciate
Good job Paul
Dave
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
My take on the dream cruise, including 20 photos. The one example I posted
here didn't make the cut, probably because the Maserati isn't a typical dream
cruise machine.
on 2012-08-21 7:54 Larry Colen wrote
I didn't say that it was the best way, I just said that it was the cheapest way.
actually, the cheapest way is to stitch hand-held shots; it works pretty well
if you practice a little; pano software can compensate for a lot; i've only
done a few of these,
If shooting RAW, set all captures to the same RAW setting - anyone but auto.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: steve harley p...@paper-ape.com
Subject: Re: Semi-OT: Put yourself in my shoes for a moment . . .
on 2012-08-21
Nice take on the event. I've talked to several participants and they all
stated this year's was among the best if not the best. I doubt the weather
could have been better.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
It's very easy to do handheld panorama shots if you are doing
landscapes where there isn't something close to you that will shift
with parallax.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
It seems to
David Parsons wrote:
It's very easy to do handheld panorama shots if you are doing
landscapes where there isn't something close to you that will shift
with parallax.
Another good trick is, if there are any objects close you that might
cause parallax problems, compose panoramas that put these
Excellent! Terrific article and car shots.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
My take on the dream cruise, including 20 photos. The one example I posted
here didn't make the cut, probably because the Maserati isn't a typical
dream cruise machine.
Christine,
I am glad that you had a good time in Spain / Catalonia / Barcelona area (where
I live BTW).
And yes, Castells are something unique to watch but unfortunately, as you may
imagine, there has been some accidents in its more than centenary history.
That's why they lately adopted the
A fine group portrait.
I'm ever so slightly perturbed that middle dude's companions are
softer than him. Just observing, Frank. :-)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:59 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I originally started talking to the fellow with the boater; I wanted
to get the
Given the following:
On Aug 17, 2012, at 14:37 , John Sessoms wrote:
Given:
L W M as seen by...
1 2 3 MFb
4 5 6 WFb
7 8 9 LFb
I see OS choices as 4,2,9
GUI development reached its pinnacle with OS/2 v.3.0 Every change since then
has been a step further down a
Ow Ow Ow!! That hurts my head just reading all that stuff!
On Aug 17, 2012, at 15:41 , John Sessoms wrote:
From: Igor Roshchin
They usually enjoy working late, with the people who feel and enjoy the
magic of the night. But they are forced to work from 5am (Ouch!)
That's all the
Aaahh. Much better. I can hear the sea from there.
On Aug 17, 2012, at 19:12 , steve harley wrote:
on 2012-08-17 16:41 John Sessoms wrote
I don't even want to think about what it would have cost me to get a Mac with
those specifications. I don't know if I could get a Mac with those
On Aug 16, 2012, at 22:58 , John Francis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:51:58AM -0500, Walt Gilbert wrote:
I hadn't heard that one before. Knopfler is almost as good a culture
critic as he is a guitarist. Almost.
I'm still trying to get my head around Knopfler's music being used
for a
G'day all
Silver Exfex Pro is a well-regarded Photoshop filter to help with
black and white conversions. This is a legal download that might be
useful to some, but there are a couple of gotchas:
1. It's Version 1
2. You have to register with Nik software, so you can expect to
receive
On 8/21/2012 7:34 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
My take on the dream cruise, including 20 photos. The one example I posted here
didn't make the cut, probably because the Maserati isn't a typical dream cruise
machine.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
G'day all
Silver Exfex Pro is a well-regarded Photoshop filter to help with black and
white conversions. This is a legal download that might be useful to some,
but there are a couple of gotchas:
1. It's Version
Missed this one earlier, but that is a nice mantis shot!
Mark
On 8/15/2012 10:58 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
He just has them folded under and they're kind of hidden from the
angle I was photographing him.
When he got tired of me poking the lens in his face he hopped down
from the rose bush and
On 8/16/2012 11:22 PM, frank theriault wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2012/08/simple-pleasures.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
Great capture, Frank!
Mark
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Out of lurk mode...
Got myself a K-01 :)
http://bong.manayon.net/2012/08/the-pentax-k-01-revisited.html
--
Bong Manayon
http://bong.manayon.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
