on 2014-10-30 9:48 Sandy Harris wrote
I am trying to put together a lightweight kit for travel. Looking at
web reviews, I'm inclined to think the Sigma 10-20 f3.5 is a lens I
want. However, the Pentax 15mm is considerably lighter and reportedly
very good.
i am looking for comments on those two l
Am 03.11.14 12:30, schrieb Alastair Robertson:
You do get a starburst effect - perhaps that's what you mean?
Yes, and definitely some of the more crude kind. Certainly more than
what I'd want in my pictures.
It's not as pronouced in your shots but what I'd seen in the Pentax
Photo Gallery
Ralf
I don't see much flare in the night pictures I have taken with the 15
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/gnjd82fijffi9lt/AACBX9s4oEpWajDqKbM-MYjta?dl=0
You do get a starburst effect - perhaps that's what you mean?
Admittedly most of these are at dusk rather than night and there does
seem to a little
Am 30.10.14 16:48, schrieb Sandy Harris:
I am trying to put together a lightweight kit for travel. Looking at
web reviews, I'm inclined to think the Sigma 10-20 f3.5 is a lens I
want. However, the Pentax 15mm is considerably lighter and reportedly
very good.
I have the Sigma and it's quite dece
On 02/11/2014 7:50 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
Rob Studdert wrote:
I have the Sigma 10-20/3.5 lens, it's pretty damned good, ...
That all said it's
neither particularly light or small so maybe not great for travel
unless you really need the versatility that the zoom affords.
Yes, and neither tha
Rob Studdert wrote:
> I have the Sigma 10-20/3.5 lens, it's pretty damned good, ...
> That all said it's
> neither particularly light or small so maybe not great for travel
> unless you really need the versatility that the zoom affords.
Yes, and neither that lens nor the Pentax 12-24 is cheap ei
Late to the party here Sandy, I have the Sigma 10-20/3.5 lens, it's
pretty damned good, I managed to produce some pretty spectacular
images using it. It's known to be a bit soft at the edges at 10mm but
it's not insurmountable,10mm is extremely wide. That all said it's
neither particularly light or
Sandy,
Got the DA15mm Pentax and it's wonderful -
Small enough to carry in your pants pocket,
great flare resistance, Pentax lens quality.
Here's a shot from last December with the sun in the frame.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17624225&size=lg
My go to kit right now is the DA60-250/4
Sandy Harris wrote:
>I am trying to put together a lightweight kit for travel. Looking at
>web reviews, I'm inclined to think the Sigma 10-20 f3.5 is a lens I
>want. However, the Pentax 15mm is considerably lighter and reportedly
>very good.
I tried out a Sigma 10-20 once and found it had barrel
Pentax 12-24/4 is very good and not unwieldy.
Paul via phone
> On Oct 30, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Sandy Harris wrote:
>
> I am trying to put together a lightweight kit for travel. Looking at
> web reviews, I'm inclined to think the Sigma 10-20 f3.5 is a lens I
> want. However, the Pentax 15mm is con
I am trying to put together a lightweight kit for travel. Looking at
web reviews, I'm inclined to think the Sigma 10-20 f3.5 is a lens I
want. However, the Pentax 15mm is considerably lighter and reportedly
very good.
i am looking for comments on those two lenses or on alternatives.
Background, f
11 matches
Mail list logo