I am still puzzled by the Pentax review process. I just had three
images that were held under review for 2 weeks after others
submitted at the same time were declined. Yesterday, all three were
declined, and one that was submitted less than 2 weeks ago was
approved.
Ann, I suggest that you
Dan...
Intersting point about the thumbnails... while I might rescan to get a
better
quality file (and/or not go the route of scaling them down myself just
for my submissions)
I'm not inclined to crop anything, especially from this collection, just
to get in that gallery. Nor
would I change
Replying to myself to edit this comment:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I'm glad that the thumbnails are seen in the correct proportion on
that site, though. I don't understand
at all why when a good 90% of photogs (just guessing here, but it
seems so) are producing their original images
in othe
Although the thumbnails are properly proportioned in the voting
process, once an image is placed in the gallery, it gets a square
thumbnail. One of my favorite images, the Garden Walk from Villa San
Michelle on Capri, make the gallery on the first submission. Now,
the thumbnail now on the
ah but your landscape oriented ones are not square nor are mine.
seems jsut to mess up verticals
ann
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Although the thumbnails are properly proportioned in the voting
process, once an image is placed in the gallery, it gets a square
thumbnail. One of my favorite
True.
I find that some of my rejections relate to the purpose of the image.
I had two diner interiors that I really love rejected by Pentax.
That made me take a hard look at them. They were taken for my diner
blog, and both the original exposure and the modifications in
PhotoShop were done
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:52:07 -0500, you wrote:
True.
I find that some of my rejections relate to the purpose of the image.
It helps to always remember that the purpose of the Pentax Photo
Gallery is to sell camera gear.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
[...]
I think that the challenge of getting image that I like in the Pentax
Gallery serves a useful purpose, by making me rethink my decisions
about an image I like and trying to find ways to improve it and give
it broader appeal.
Dan
that's a very worthwhile attitude to take to this
Well, I never discard the original that I made to suit my own tastes
or for my diner blog or travel blog. Different versions for different
purposes.
Re-editing for the PPG is an educational process for me, just like
posting PESOs here are reviewing the comments and suggestions. I am
old enough,
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Well, I never discard the original that I made to suit my own tastes
or for my diner blog or travel blog. Different versions for different
purposes.
Re-editing for the PPG is an educational process for me, just like
posting PESOs here are reviewing the comments and
On 3/6/2011 9:36 PM, Bob W wrote:
whoever rejected those doesn't know a good photo from a bite on the ass.
B
Despite being probably another example of Her Majesty Lingva, I totally
agree with Bob's sentiment. These are excellent photos, Ann. Whereas in
any such gallery like PPG the
Enjoyed them all. You was robbed.,
Dave
2011/3/6 Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
The first 7 photos here were dropped into my Declined folder on the PPG
:-(
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-City-back-in-the-day/5908739_3pLhP
None of the others that you can see
On Mar 8, 2011, at 12:26 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Whereas in any such gallery like PPG the decisions are made just by a few
individuals, whose idea of what a good photograph is may be, well, let me say
- somewhat distorted.
If I had my way it'd be all cat photos.
Dave
--
PDML
The first 7 photos here were dropped into my Declined folder on the
PPG :-(
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-City-back-in-the-day/5908739_3pLhP
None of the others that you can see here were submitted (I hid a couple
from view that were still up there waiting for
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Ann Sanfedele
The first 7 photos here were dropped into my Declined folder on the
PPG :-(
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-City-back-in-
the-day/5908739_3pLhP
I think that tells us
Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Ann Sanfedele
The first 7 photos here were dropped into my Declined folder on the
PPG :-(
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-City-back-in-
the-day/5908739_3pLhP
I think that
Some excellent photos there.
The Pentax Gallery criteria is hard to predict, although over-saturated
landscapes seem to be a shoe-in.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Ann
I rather like the ironic whimsy of the Criminal Courts Building - 1980
with it's unintended admonishment to Lead a clean life.
On 3/6/2011 12:37 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
The first 7 photos here were dropped into my Declined folder on the
PPG :-(
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
Of
Ann Sanfedele
The first 7 photos here were dropped into my Declined folder on
the
PPG :-(
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-City-back-
in-
the-day/5908739_3pLhP
I think that
Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
Of
Ann Sanfedele
The first 7 photos here were dropped into my Declined folder on
the
PPG :-(
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-City-back-
in-
20 matches
Mail list logo
