. As a 100%
crop it doesn't look so bad. In fact, not bad at all. Perhaps there is
reason to hope after all.
I just want good ISO 800.
Maybe I will try a similar photo at ISO 800 with my D and see how they
compare.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: ISO 800
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=20723961
The photo of the watch is the first high ISO image I have seen that
begins to be informative.
I just did a QD Neat Image noise reduction to that file
Extremely qd:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3346/display/7101655
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
This time the GX10 image is at ISO 800 while the *ist D image is at
1600. Again, very quick and dirty.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/535671/display/7101932
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 11/03/06 4:22 PM, Joseph Tainter, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This time the GX10 image is at ISO 800 while the *ist D image is at
1600. Again, very quick and dirty.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/535671/display/7101932
This is an ISO 800 sample (liquour bottles)
http
Hard to see anything from any of them. The contrast is too different.
DagT
Den 3. nov. 2006 kl. 22.22 skrev Joseph Tainter:
This time the GX10 image is at ISO 800 while the *ist D image is at
1600. Again, very quick and dirty.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/535671/display
compared to
the *ist D shot at ISO 800. Looking just at the table, the GX10 shot at
800 looks more like the *ist D shot at 1600. But I think the GX10 image
is also underexposed. Maybe we haven't learned anything more with these
shots.
The GX10 shot is clearly sharper, but I don't know
On 11/03/06 5:07 PM, Joseph Tainter, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what to make of my comparison shots. In the image from the
GX10, the table top appears rather noisy to me, especially compared to
the *ist D shot at ISO 800. Looking just at the table, the GX10 shot at
800 looks more
On 11/3/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an ISO 800 sample (liquour bottles)
http://form.allabout.co.jp/1/210637/1/product/210637_01.htm
I know its too small to make any sort of intelligent judgment, but it looks
OK to me.
Generally, folks in Japan who actually saw IS1000
On 11/03/06 5:59 PM, Ken Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an ISO 800 sample (liquour bottles)
http://form.allabout.co.jp/1/210637/1/product/210637_01.htm
I know its too small to make any sort of intelligent judgment, but it looks
OK to me.
Generally, folks in Japan who
- Original Message -
From: K.Takeshita
Subject: Re: Test: ISO 800 vs. 1600
These are actually Pentax's samples but no EXIF data, and
non-clickable,
unfortunately. But they are now beginning to show ISO800 samples.
It's no wonder they are so slow getting the thing to market
On 11/3/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's no wonder they are so slow getting the thing to market, they are
spending all their time in bars and at amusement parks.
Perhaps Koreans might be a bit more sophisticated? :-).
These are some Samsung stuff with high ISO (800/1600 included
After stating that I don't like the noise you get with higher ISOs, I ended
up shooting a few shots at ISO 800 this afternoon. I'm thrilled that I got
a bee in flight with the manual focus macro.
Anyway, I've done what I can with this noise wise. I'm really pleased with
the capture
Thanks mate, I'll have a look at those.
James
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - ISO 800...but only because I had to
Not bad James.
WRT noise reduction
Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After stating that I don't like the noise you get with higher ISOs, I ended
up shooting a few shots at ISO 800 this afternoon. I'm thrilled that I got
a bee in flight with the manual focus macro.
Anyway, I've done what I can with this noise wise. I'm really
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Jens Bladt wrote:
Hi Chris
I said this.
In this case it is UNDEREXPOSURE, right!
Was it? Sorry, I thought he shot 800 film at 100. Must have been
asleep. :)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Hi everybody,
There are times - very few times - when I hate my LX... and myself.
I was taking pictures of a session of rehearsal with my LX and Z-1p, both
with
T-MAX 400 and the metering set to 800; when the film in the LX went over, I
loaded the camera with a roll of Fuji Neopan, certain that
Hi everybody,
There are times - very few times - when I hate my LX... and myself.
I was taking pictures of a session of rehearsal with my LX and Z-1p, both
with
T-MAX 400 and the metering set to 800; when the film in the LX went over, I
loaded the camera with a roll of Fuji Neopan, certain that
Hi Gianfranco
If I were You (believe me, I've been there) I'd contact Fuji and ask if they
can push it three stops.
Regards
Jens
Hi everybody,
There are times - very few times - when I hate my LX... and myself.
I was taking pictures of a session of rehearsal with my LX and Z-1p, both
with
T-MAX
19 matches
Mail list logo
