From: Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/04 Fri PM 04:34:05 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's me. Or, rather, the eight
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adobe, unfortunately, is pretty good at the time expiration thing. Better
than most.
It's even better at the Price -- acute indigestion/heart attack sort of
thing.
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Adobe, unfortunately, is pretty good at the time
expiration thing. Better
than most.
It's even better at the Price -- acute
indigestion/heart attack sort of thing.
Lightroom is much cheaper than Photoshop, and far better in my opinion
for photographers. I never really got on
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: RE: Lightroom 2.0 beta
Lightroom is much cheaper than Photoshop, and far better in my opinion
for photographers. I never really got on with Photoshop, and I haven't
used it at all since I bought Lightroom, but I've used Lightroom a
lot. I
In a message dated 4/5/2008 2:25:15 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lightroom is much cheaper than Photoshop, and far better in my opinion
for photographers. I never really got on with Photoshop, and I haven't
used it at all since I bought Lightroom, but I've used
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 10:24:53AM +0100, Bob W wrote:
Adobe, unfortunately, is pretty good at the time
expiration thing. Better
than most.
It's even better at the Price -- acute
indigestion/heart attack sort of thing.
Lightroom is much cheaper than Photoshop, and
Me too, except that I picked up Lightroom for nothing.
Or to be accurate, I got a free license since I already was a RSP
user. That's what I call a good deal :-)
I haven't tested 2.0 yet. I better get my new puter up running properly first.
MaritimTim
2008/4/5, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:53:30 -0400, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
About the only thing I couldn't do without using an external editor was
selective editing to just part of an image, and LR 2.0 apparently has
that.
Ah - if Lightroom 2 has selective editing I might take a look at the
Couldn't make the sound work from this PC, but it seems like a
reversed Coca-cola Light Break...
Jostein
2008/4/4 Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although my new one might be Woolfhardisworthy.
Mike: Is this an adjective for that famous British Wolf
From: Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/03 Thu PM 10:30:00 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although my new one might
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/03 Thu PM 10:53:58 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:30:00PM -0500, Christine Aguila wrote:
Apparently, a construction company
If you do a validation of a set of files that you know to be good and
generate a checksum, then run the validation again at another time ...
and the checksums match ... the files are good.
If this weren't true, there would be no point to file validation.
Godfrey
On Apr 3, 2008, at 2:05 PM,
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All the words I mentioned are names.
Mike: I know that--and I followed the link. I guess I forgot the ;-)--the
wink, wink, winkicon.
Cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/04 Fri PM 02:41:26 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All the words I mentioned
In a message dated 4/3/2008 2:11:50 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Godfrey,
My point of view is that you haven't validated that you can recover
your pictures from the data until you actually do such, or at least do
a sample. To say the bits and bites are all the same
On 4/4/08, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
I guess I forgot the ;-)--the
wink, wink, winkicon
You have an LX?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's me. Or, rather, the eight days of two hours sleep. The five second
micronaps aren't working.
King Zombie
I'll send you the link to my online photo gallery--that'll put you right to
sleep ;-). Seriously, get some
of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
On 4/4/08, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
I guess I forgot the ;-)--the
wink, wink, winkicon
You have an LX?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 4/4/08, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm sorry to say, I don't get the point of the question here. camera? car?
large-sized winkicon? having-a-brain-fart-in-Chicago, Christine
Soyou've never actually owned an LX then...? You've never actually
experienced that, ahhh,
On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have storage paranoia like you do. Probably the best thing to do
is, back
up to CDs/DVDs, two copies, keep on hard disk. Then go in in one
to three
months or so and see if one can get photos off CDs/DVDs.
In the past week or two
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
he feeling that everything is alright with the world, nothing is too
much?
E...
Dave :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
On 4/4/08, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
I guess I forgot the ;-)--the
wink, wink, winkicon
You have an LX?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
In a message dated 4/4/2008 10:01:56 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Usually, for me, if a disc is bad, it is bad from the beginning.
That's why you should *always* run a verification/validation pass
immediately after burning a CD/DVD, and make at least two
Well, actually, Godfrey, not sure how to do a
verification/validation pass.
And you can't help, as you're Mac and I am PC.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
A read-after-write check should be built into the hardware (albeit
switchable from the operating system).
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
Well, actually, Godfrey, not sure how to do a verification/validation pass.
And you can't help, as you're Mac and I am PC.
I know Nero can be told to verify the data
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:22:33 +0100
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, actually, Godfrey, not sure how to do a
verification/validation pass.
And you can't help, as you're Mac and I am PC.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
well both are PC's really. I add another confusion as i run Ubuntu
On Apr 4, 2008, at 13:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, actually, Godfrey, not sure how to do a verification/
validation pass.
And you can't help, as you're Mac and I am PC.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Marnie -
It really depends upon what you're using to run your backups to disc.
But MOST
On Apr 4, 2008, at 14:52, Bran Everseeking wrote:
I burn 2 dvds and two sets of CDs as backup each month. One is a
straight copy of the originals and edits and the other is a compressed
file copy. I also keep copies on my machine and an hidden directory
on
my son's machine ( he has all
On Apr 4, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Well, actually, Godfrey, not sure how to do a verification/
validation pass.
And you can't help, as you're Mac and I am PC.
It really depends upon what you're using to run your backups to disc.
But MOST software has an option to
Don't use the built in software in XP use something like Nero which will
automatically verify the burn, if you ask it to.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/4/2008 10:01:56 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Usually, for me, if a disc is bad, it is bad
In my blissful ignorance, I've always done the verify. I guess that's because
I've always used either the apple sofware or toast. Now I use Toast 9
exclusively. It's excellent. In addition to doing he verify, it automatically
will pick the best write speed if you allow it that option. On my
Charles Robinson wrote:
It really depends upon what you're using to run your backups to disc.
But MOST software has an option to immediately do a verify/compare
between your source files and the burned disc immediately after the
disc is written.
Having been burned before, I never
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
In my blissful ignorance, I've always done the verify. I guess that's because
I've always used
either the apple sofware or toast. Now I use Toast 9 exclusively. It's
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:00:59 -0500
Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is your intent to actually COMPRESS files (which, if they're JPEG
files, won't really happen) or to just park them inside of some
larger file structure which has error-checking and such?
-Charles
the latter.
BTW.
If any existing Lightroom users feel so inclined, Would you be willing
to send me a Lightroom 2 Beta invitation.
That way I can try the program out for longer than 30 Days.
TIA
Cheers,
Dave
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:56 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:04 AM 4/04/2008,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:43 PM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW.
If any existing Lightroom users feel so inclined, Would you be willing
to send me a Lightroom 2 Beta invitation.
That way I can try the program out for longer than 30 Days.
Thou shall count to 30, 31 is RIGHT OUT.
Thanks for all the answers. I think checksums or byte comparisons are best,
but I will look into what my software offers. Actually, never done any
verification, so anything will probably be better than nothing.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I am
In a message dated 4/4/2008 6:44:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW.
If any existing Lightroom users feel so inclined, Would you be willing
to send me a Lightroom 2 Beta invitation.
That way I can try the program out for longer than 30 Days.
TIA
Cheers,
Dave
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 12:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/4/2008 6:44:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW.
If any existing Lightroom users feel so inclined, Would you be willing
to send me a Lightroom 2 Beta invitation.
That way I can
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:44 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:43 PM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW.
If any existing Lightroom users feel so inclined, Would you be willing
to send me a Lightroom 2 Beta invitation.
That way I can
] On
Behalf Of Thibouille
Sent: woensdag 2 april 2008 12:13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lightroom 2.0 beta
However, this is currently an early beta (beta 1) and as such
really is for testing purpose only (but that multiple monitor
support has me very impatient ;)
Those
cheap for existing users.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Henk Terhell
Sent: 03 April 2008 07:29
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Lightroom 2.0 beta
Having just got a new PC, I was about to switch from Elements
Lightroom 2 is a Public Beta at this point in time, probably
reasonably stable but likely to have some bugs. Evaluation period for
those without a key is 30 days, for those with a key it's due to
expire in August. It is not at present compatible with v1.3.1
catalogs, nor are its metadata
On 2/4/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wenn ist das Nunstruck git und Slotermeyer? Ja!...
Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
;-)
Babelfish translated that as:
If the Nunstruck is git and Slotermeyer? !...
Beiherhund the or the Flipperwaldt gersput!
I think the
R. Radermacher
Subject: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of my film scans are stored on CDs, and they still read well.
Keep your fingers crossed.
I've had serious trouble with a whole bunch of CDRs containing my
back-ups of film scan data
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/03 Thu AM 08:19:17 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
At the agency where I work, we received roughly a TB of documentation
last year. Loads of DVDs and CDs
On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
iterative
Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm a trifle horrified
Mark!
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
At 04:47 PM 3/04/2008, Cotty wrote:
On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
iterative
Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word.
I think it's Norwegian for Boring as bat s#!t
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/03 Thu AM 08:47:32 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
iterative
Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word.
You've got
Babelfish translated that as:
If the Nunstruck is git and Slotermeyer? !...
Beiherhund the or the Flipperwaldt gersput!
I think the Nunstruck is definitely git.
I'm done here !!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Tuo kyllä kuulostaa hyvältä!
A-P
Antti-Pekka Virjonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tuo kyllä kuulostaa hyvältä!
Now, that looks familiar. I had the same trouble lately. They said it
was the keyboard. Keybounce or what they call it.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage:
Cotty wrote:
On 2/4/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wenn ist das Nunstruck git und Slotermeyer? Ja!...
Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
;-)
Babelfish translated that as:
If the Nunstruck is git and Slotermeyer? !...
Beiherhund the or the Flipperwaldt
Just try again...
On 4/3/08, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
iterative
Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word.
Reminds me of the good old days of German coastal radio station
Norddeich Radio. One of their routine messages was that owing to
severe weather the pilotage in the Elbe and Weser estuary had been
*temporarily*
lol yeah... It needs practice... :-)
Jostein
2008/4/3, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just try again...
On 4/3/08, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
iterative
Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
, a continuous and iterative process.
Jostein
2008/4/3, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
Subject: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of my film scans are stored on CDs, and they still
PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/03 Thu AM 08:19:17 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
At the agency where I work, we received roughly a TB of documentation
last year. Loads of DVDs and CDs.
We've had important documentation
Tuo kyllä kuulostaa hyvältä!
A-P
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
it's an old Finnish proverb - To cool a colostomy, hire Walter.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
2008/4/3, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
iterative
Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word.
Ach, that's easier than aperture. :-)
Recently sorted out ascertain, but I'm still struggling with superfluous.
The best surprise yet, though, was
Cotty wrote:
On 2/4/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wenn ist das Nunstruck git und Slotermeyer? Ja!...
Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
;-)
Babelfish translated that as:
If the Nunstruck is git and Slotermeyer? !...
Beiherhund the or the Flipperwaldt
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/03 Thu PM 02:01:44 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Reliabilty of CD storage - was: Lightroom 2.0 beta
2008/4/3, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3/4/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
iterative
Holy
iterative
Holy mackerel, I wish I could say that word.
Ach, that's easier than aperture. :-)
Recently sorted out ascertain, but I'm still struggling
with superfluous.
The best surprise yet, though, was Southwark. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
I bet they taught you the tourist
Godfrey, I think I read that those having a key can invite others to
join the beta test till august.
It won't make LR2 any less beta than it is but it removes the 30 days problem.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lightroom 2 is a Public Beta at this point
Put your images into industry-standard formats (TIFF, JPEG, DNG) and
archive the files. Upgrade the storage medium as the medium is
improved by copying the files. Hard drives are the current standard
storage medium.
These formats will be around for many many years. You don't have to
worry
Not sure, I've not had time to read all the literature as yet.
The boss has been using his whip lately.
;-)
Godfrey
On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Thibouille wrote:
Godfrey, I think I read that those having a key can invite others to
join the beta test till august.
It won't make LR2 any less
2008/4/3, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I bet they taught you the tourist pronunciation, didn't they! Ha ha -
it gets them every time. I love it when tourists ask me how to find
their way to 'Suvverk' and 'Lester Square'. I never get tired of that
joke.
If you really want to impress the locals
The backup heaven is Restore. :-)
Jostein
2008/4/3, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I understand the need for archival storage and try to do some.
My main fear is the amount of data I manipulate now and will in the future.
With a large amounts of data, checking the conditions of the back-up
I understand the need for archival storage and try to do some.
My main fear is the amount of data I manipulate now and will in the future.
With a large amounts of data, checking the conditions of the back-up
becomes an issue.
Some of us have encountered problems where the backup hasn't worked
for
I run a drive/file system validation utility about once every month
or two on my archives. It's too much work to do that frequently on
the small capacity media like CD and DVD ... loading and unloading
200-300 of these volumes is days of tedious work ... so I concentrate
doing that for the
2008/4/3, Antti-Pekka Virjonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tuo kyllä kuulostaa hyvältä!
Er'ekke nok nå'a?
Takk
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
I run a drive/file system validation utility about once every month
or two on my archives. It's too much work to do that frequently on
the small capacity media like CD and DVD ... loading and unloading
200-300 of these volumes is days of tedious work ... so I concentrate
doing that for the
Well my point was that I burned some perfectly good CDs on an HP 2100
burner under Win98. I moved that burner to a machine running Win2K,
those CDs were unreadable. They weren't that important so I put them
aside to try some data recovery at a later time. I acquired a DVD
burner, that was
I prefer redundant information.
AlunFoto wrote:
2008/4/3, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I bet they taught you the tourist pronunciation, didn't they! Ha ha -
it gets them every time. I love it when tourists ask me how to find
their way to 'Suvverk' and 'Lester Square'. I never get tired of
Bob Sullivan wrote:
My point of view is that you haven't validated that you can recover
your pictures from the data until you actually do such, or at least do
a sample. To say the bits and bites are all the same implies no other
glitches in the process.
No doubt. The number one most
AlunFoto wrote:
Recently sorted out ascertain, but I'm still struggling with superfluous.
Superfluous is properly pronounced extra. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Temporarily... An awful word to pronounce for us Germans. Usually
sounded as if someone had just fed them a glowing hot potatoe. :-))
vorübergehend ... hmmm, I see what you mean. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Godfrey,
My point of view is that you haven't validated that you can recover
your pictures from the data until you actually do such, or at least do
a sample. To say the bits and bites are all the same implies no other
glitches in the process.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/3/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although my new one might be Woolfhardisworthy.
Mike: Is this an adjective for that famous British Wolf whistle or Wolf
call British construction workers are famous for?--Heard a funny BBC radio
story on the way to work
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although my new one might be Woolfhardisworthy.
Mike: Is this an adjective for that famous British Wolf
whistle or Wolf
call British construction workers are famous for?--Heard a
funny BBC radio
story on the way to work today. Apparently, a
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:30:00PM -0500, Christine Aguila wrote:
Apparently, a construction company by the
name of Wimbley (sp?) has banned the famous Wolf whistle.
Wimpey, at a guess.
(Often jokingly regarded as an acronym for We Import More Paddies
Every Year - many of the construction
lol!!! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not at all surprised that the construction workers are in broad
agreement with such a policy - they are terribly enlightened over
here, as this documentary proves:
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wimpey, at a guess.
yes, I think that was the name! Cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
At 05:18 PM 3/04/2008, mike wilson wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm a trifle horrified
I'm a trifle lover.
Mtrifle...om nom nom nom
Cheers,
D
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On Apr 3, 2008, at 8:46 PM, David Savage wrote:
At 05:18 PM 3/04/2008, mike wilson wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm a trifle horrified
I'm a trifle lover.
Mtrifle...om nom nom nom
No pudding for you, young man!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
At 10:04 AM 4/04/2008, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Apr 3, 2008, at 8:46 PM, David Savage wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm a trifle horrified
I'm a trifle lover.
Mtrifle...om nom nom nom
No pudding for you, young man!
Awww
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Hi!
I hope this is not a Fool's Day joke:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom/.
Anyone tried this thing?
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
I didn't tried it yet but I'd suggest reading here about the whole stuff:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom/lightroom2_b1_releasenotes.pdf
In short, it has quite a number of very nice additions (I imagine
Godfrey's face reading those specs xD ) and if all goes well in the
release, IMO
On Apr 2, 2008, at 3:13 AM, Thibouille wrote:
I didn't tried it yet but I'd suggest reading here about the whole
stuff:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom/lightroom2_b1_releasenotes.pdf
In short, it has quite a number of very nice additions (I imagine
Godfrey's face reading
Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In short, it has quite a number of very nice additions...
Am I the only person on this planet missing support of offline media in
Lightroom? I see the oddest (well, in my opinion) enhancements made, all
the time, but no support for offline media which, again
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In short, it has quite a number of very nice additions...
Am I the only person on this planet missing support of offline media in
Lightroom? I see the oddest (well, in my opinion) enhancements made, all
the time, but no
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by offline media?
External hard drives, DVD etc.
I simply can't keep everything from 25+ years on the built-in drives of
my computer. So, some of it has to be stored externally and I need my
asset management software to keep track of
On Apr 2, 2008, at 8:32, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by offline media?
External hard drives, DVD etc.
I simply can't keep everything from 25+ years on the built-in drives
of
my computer. So, some of it has to be stored externally and
I guess I'm missing the point here. I use PhotoShop and ACR for all my photo
management. I have five hard drives. If I click on a thumbnail, the photo
opens. The RAW file is always in the same folder. I do work on a Mac, but I
doubt that makes a difference.
Paul
-- Original message
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by offline media?
External hard drives, DVD etc.
I simply can't keep everything from 25+ years on the built-in drives of
my computer. So, some of it has to be stored externally and I need my
asset
He's referring to drives or DVD's not currently mounted. Support for
offline media would allow you to view image thumbnails for images on
drives not currently connected (and also would indicate which
drive/DVD they're stored on). Other than the awful sharpening in
Lightroom 1.x, this is probably
On Apr 2, 2008, at 6:12 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In short, it has quite a number of very nice additions...
Am I the only person on this planet missing support of offline media
in
Lightroom? I see the oddest (well, in my opinion) enhancements
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do work on a Mac, but I doubt that makes a difference.
So do I.
If you get along with 5 hard drives, you just don't have enough picture
files. :-)
The problem some of us are having is that we have so much stuff that we
need to keep some of it (the vast majority in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I'm missing the point here. I use PhotoShop and ACR for all my photo
management.
Photoshop and ACR will work fine accessing network drives. Lightroom won't.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
I do back up to DVD. I have several hundred in storage. My five drives give me
over two terabytes of space. They're about 70% full now. I'll add another 500
gigs soon. I keep very few backups on drives, save temporary backups for
important jobs. The general backups are almost exclusively on
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
