On Thu, Jul 04, 2013, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Anyone have other suggestions for a Linux RAW editor/manager?
Although I've looked through all the replies, I didn't see some of
the Linux solutions out there. Thus I'll
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Anyone have other suggestions for a Linux RAW editor/manager?
Although I've looked through all the
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013, steve harley wrote:
on 2013-07-01 14:33 Aahz Maruch wrote
Well, I do have something very specific in mind. ;-) I'm highly
keyboard-focused, and I have yet to figure out how to easily switch
between multiple terminal windows spread across multiple virtual
desktops. (E.g.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Anyone have other suggestions for a Linux RAW editor/manager?
Although I've looked through all the replies, I didn't see some of
the Linux solutions out there. Thus I'll try to list them here (in
order of my preference):
From: steve harley
on 2013-07-02 8:18 John Sessoms wrote
From: steve harley
on 2013-07-01 17:02 Darren Addy wrote
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I hate to say it, but when it comes to working on photos, the best
version of Linux is OSX.
Not to be
From: steve harley
on 2013-07-01 17:02 Darren Addy wrote
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I hate to say it, but when it comes to working on photos, the best
version of Linux is OSX.
Not to be pedantic, but I believe you meant to say the best version
of
on 2013-07-02 8:18 John Sessoms wrote
From: steve harley
on 2013-07-01 17:02 Darren Addy wrote
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I hate to say it, but when it comes to working on photos, the best
version of Linux is OSX.
Not to be pedantic, but I believe
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, Brian Walters wrote:
LightZone is open source photo editing software that was originally
available as a commercial application. It takes an unconventional
approach to editing, which probably contributed to its demise.
Anyway, the source code was released as open
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:14:35AM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, Brian Walters wrote:
LightZone is open source photo editing software that was originally
available as a commercial application. It takes an unconventional
approach to editing, which probably contributed
I use LightZone, AfterShot Pro (Corel, former Bibble...) and Darktable
under Linux.
LightZone has always been my favorite. It still is.
Darktable is quite capable when you get used to their peculiar (not in
a negative sense) GUI.
AfterShot Pro is very good except for the practically non-existent
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013, Bulent Celasun wrote:
I use LightZone, AfterShot Pro (Corel, former Bibble...) and Darktable
under Linux.
LightZone has always been my favorite. It still is.
Only Darktable is currently supported and its development seems to continue.
There is still some more life
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:14:35AM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, Brian Walters wrote:
LightZone is open source photo editing software that was originally
available as a commercial application. It takes an unconventional
approach to
on 2013-07-01 13:06 Aahz Maruch wrote
For
starters, OSX still doesn't have anything remotely like true virtual
desktops (I strongly prefer multiple desktops with a few windows in
each, often with the same app -- especially terminal windows -- in
multiple desktops, and OSX just doesn't support
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013, steve harley wrote:
on 2013-07-01 13:06 Aahz Maruch wrote
For starters, OSX still doesn't have anything remotely like true
virtual desktops (I strongly prefer multiple desktops with a few
windows in each, often with the same app -- especially terminal
windows -- in multiple
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I hate to say it, but when it comes to working on photos, the best
version of Linux is OSX.
Not to be pedantic, but I believe you meant to say the best version
of Unix is OS X. Linux is a variant of Open Source Unix (as was
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:02:47PM -0500, Darren Addy wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I hate to say it, but when it comes to working on photos, the best
version of Linux is OSX.
Not to be pedantic, but I believe you meant to say the best version
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:02:47PM -0500, Darren Addy wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I hate to say it, but when it comes to working on photos, the best
version of Linux is OSX.
Not to be pedantic, but I
on 2013-07-01 14:33 Aahz Maruch wrote
Well, I do have something very specific in mind. ;-) I'm highly
keyboard-focused, and I have yet to figure out how to easily switch
between multiple terminal windows spread across multiple virtual
desktops. (E.g. five desktops each with three terminal
on 2013-07-01 17:02 Darren Addy wrote
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I hate to say it, but when it comes to working on photos, the best
version of Linux is OSX.
Not to be pedantic, but I believe you meant to say the best version
of Unix is OS X.
i think
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:45:16PM -0600, steve harley wrote:
on 2013-07-01 17:02 Darren Addy wrote
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I hate to say it, but when it comes to working on photos, the best
version of Linux is OSX.
Not to be pedantic, but I
20 matches
Mail list logo
