I knew there would be something I wouldnt' want :-)
thanks!
ann
On 2/24/2016 12:51 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The 1400 is a good printer, but uses dye based inks. That reduces the permanence of
its output and means that it is more likely to experience clogging (smaller
nozzles). The inkset i
The 1400 is a good printer, but uses dye based inks. That reduces the
permanence of its output and means that it is more likely to experience
clogging (smaller nozzles). The inkset is also not ideal for B&W printing
because it lacks the multiple gray inks of the K3 pigment-based inkset.
G
> O
Looks like I could get one of these reasonably -
but would I want to?
I'm already thinking about next years big calendar -- I really want to
make 13 x 19 again ...
and do some serious printing too..
The 24oo I was gifted was good but it died.
There are several on ebay ... under $200
what do
>
> > I thought he lived in Toronto. You mean he has a place in
> Ontario too?
>
> Toronto recently declared itself a fully autonomous city-state.
>
> cheers,
> frank
Smart move. Soon it will be just like Padua.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/lis
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Bob W wrote:
> I thought he lived in Toronto. You mean he has a place in Ontario too?
Toronto recently declared itself a fully autonomous city-state.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Bob W wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:02 AM, ann sanfedele
>> wrote:
>> > Um how about "Dave Brooks Photography"
>> > then focusing on Ontario as a sub head.
>>
>> Hum, thats something to ponder, thanks Ann.
>>
>>
>> > Why limi
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:02 AM, ann sanfedele
> wrote:
> > Um how about "Dave Brooks Photography"
> > then focusing on Ontario as a sub head.
>
> Hum, thats something to ponder, thanks Ann.
>
>
> > Why limit it to "rural" ?
>
> Frank has the urban covered.:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:02 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> Um how about "Dave Brooks Photography"
> then focusing on Ontario as a sub head.
Hum, thats something to ponder, thanks Ann.
> Why limit it to "rural" ?
Frank has the urban covered.:-)
Dave
>
> I've not se
Um how about "Dave Brooks Photography"
then focusing on Ontario as a sub head
why limit it to "rural" ?
I've not seen your starting post...
Hope it works out well --
ann
Bob W wrote:
In a message dated 4/22/2009 7:40:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jsessoms..
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:40 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Bob W wrote:
>
>
>>
>> How about "Looking at the Arse-end of Nowhere"? That should bring the
>> customers in.
>
> So you've seen rural Ontario then?
Sure sounds like he has.
Dave
>
> ;-)
>
> cheers,
> fra
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Graydon wrote:
> I can see how they might not want to use Dick's Bolt for that purpose,
> though.
If i need a bolt, I'm going to Dicks place for sure.
Dave
>
> -- Graydon
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:38:27PM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
> - Original Message - From: "Graydon"
>> -- Graydon, who is kinda relieved there isn't a cartographer out there
>> able to make stuff like that up.
>
> An old friend of mine was a cartographer in Australia before coming to
- Original Message -
From: "Graydon"
Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
Technically, it's an Indian Reservation, not a town.
Admitting without prejudice the technicality, from the map's point of
view, it was a very town-like dot.
That would represent the band
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: OT Opinions needed
How about "Looking at the Arse-end of Nowhere"? That should bring the
customers in.
That's Sarnia's Indian name.
VW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 02:34:22PM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
> - Original Message - From: "Graydon" Subject: Re: OT Opinions
>>>> Is there really -- or were the road atlas makers laying traps for
>>>> illicit map copiers -- a town of Pheasant Rump
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Bob W wrote:
>
> How about "Looking at the Arse-end of Nowhere"? That should bring the
> customers in.
So you've seen rural Ontario then?
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@
- Original Message -
From: "Graydon"
Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
Is there really -- or were the road atlas makers laying traps for
illicit map copiers -- a town of Pheasant Rump?
http://www.sicc.sk.ca/bands/bpheas.html
If I'd had to take a bet on that, I&#
> In a message dated 4/22/2009 7:40:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> jsessoms...@nc.rr.com writes:
> > "Focused on rural Ontario"
> > "Focusing on images of rural Ontario."
> > "Focusing on rural Ontario"
> >
> > What say they. Any one of these appeal to you all.??
>
> None of them actually
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:53:42AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
> - Original Message - From: "Graydon"
[snip]
> I assure you the only thing about me that is cultured is sitting
> forgotten in my fridge.
What, no cheese? At all, ever?
(Or, I mean, _technically_, beer?)
>> Is there reall
- Original Message -
From: "Graydon"
Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
The only person I've ever actually *met* from Saskatchewan (that I knew
about) was almost oppressively cultured, in a Shakespeare-quoting,
cello-playing sort of way.
Sounds like Neil Slater.
I
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:59:45AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
> - Original Message - From: "Graydon"
> Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
>> No one who has driven from Manitoba to Toronto is ever going to believe
>> that "just west" part, no matt
- Original Message -
From: "Graydon"
Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
No one who has driven from Manitoba to Toronto is ever going to believe
that "just west" part, no matter how Torontonian they may be, either.
Just a little Saskatchewan humour at work.
J
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Graydon wrote:
> If you're doing something more localized, you might want to figure out
> what the appropriate catch phrase for the locality is; if you'd be
> perfectly happy photographing barn architecture in
> Stormont-Dundas-Glengarry *AND* old mine works in t
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:24:26AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
> - Original Message - From: "John Sessoms"
> Subject: RE: OT Opinions needed
>> None of them actually. If it does need a "catch phrase", it shouldn't
>> be so limiting.
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "John Sessoms"
Subject: RE: OT Opinions needed
None of them actually. If it does need a "catch phrase", it shouldn't be
so limiting.
Rural Ontario is actually pretty big, no matter that the Torontonians would
have you
In a message dated 4/22/2009 7:40:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jsessoms...@nc.rr.com writes:
> "Focused on rural Ontario"
> "Focusing on images of rural Ontario."
> "Focusing on rural Ontario"
>
> What say they. Any one of these appeal to you all.??
None of them actually. If it does need a
From: David J Brooks
Hi all.
Some time over the next month or so, i'm going to change my Gif on my
home page, to reflect less equine and more rural photography.(Guess
what i have decided to stop doing now.:-))
Any way, my mane area of interest is rural landscapes on Ontario. Not
excluding the r
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
>
> - Original Message - From: "frank theriault"
>
>
> Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
>
>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Willi
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:28 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: OT Opinions
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:25 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:14 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
>> "Focus on Ontario—Not"
>>
>> "Our backs to Toronto"
>
> "F%&* You City Slicker Bastards - Enjoy These Photos, Just Stay Away
> >From the Country"
>
> HTH
Little long for the logo,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:28 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "frank theriault"
> Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
>
>
>
>
> "F%&* You City Slicker Bastards - Enjoy These Photos, Just Stay Away
>>
>> From the Coun
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
"F%&* You City Slicker Bastards - Enjoy These Photos, Just Stay Away
From the Country"
A little wordy for a slogan, but it does get the point across in a
disjointed, lacking in
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:14 PM, William Robb wrote:
> "Focus on Ontario—Not"
>
> "Our backs to Toronto"
"F%&* You City Slicker Bastards - Enjoy These Photos, Just Stay Away
>From the Country"
HTH
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Di
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph McAllister"
Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
"Focus on Ontario—Not"
"Our backs to Toronto"
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRI
Keep reading...
On Apr 21, 2009, at 13:58 , frank theriault wrote:
...and now that I've scrolled down the thread I see that Joe and
Christine have already suggested this.
I guess it must be good then, eh?
Joseph McAllister
Pentaxian
http://gallery.me.com/jomac
http://web.me.com/jomac/show.
On Apr 21, 2009, at 13:57 , frank theriault wrote:
"Focused on rural Ontario"
"Focusing on images of rural Ontario."
"Focusing on rural Ontario"
What say they. Any one of these appeal to you all.??
Like the others, I think using the word focus or any of it's
derivatives is a bit cliche, but
How about:
"No CN tower in any picture"
vw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:58 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, frank theriault
> wrote:
>>
>> Like the others, I think using the word focus or any of it's
>> derivatives is a bit cliche, but that being said, rather than
>> "focusing on rural Ontario", how about just "f
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:57 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
>
> Like the others, I think using the word focus or any of it's
> derivatives is a bit cliche, but that being said, rather than
> "focusing on rural Ontario", how about just "focus on rural Ontario".
> A bit simpler and more direct.
...and
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 6:52 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Some time over the next month or so, i'm going to change my Gif on my
> home page, to reflect less equine and more rural photography.(Guess
> what i have decided to stop doing now.:-))
>
> Any way, my mane area of interest is rur
Well, I´m rather late but I´d just point you the need to provide a
secondary motto in french, with letters at least 60% of the size of the
main, english text...
Serious, make mine Focus on rural Ontario/ Phocus rural Ontario.
LF
David J Brooks escreveu:
Hi all.
Some time over the next month
How about 'Pictures from the place north & south of Michigan'? ;-]
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
Well, I like the suggestion Focus on Rural Ontario. Cheers, Ch
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
Well, I like the suggestion Focus on Rural Ontario. Cheers, Christine
I don't think we're in Toronto anymore, Toto!
might work too.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
Well, I like the suggestion Focus on Rural Ontario. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
To: "Pentax Discuss" ; "Barbara Brooks"
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 5:52 AM
Subject: OT Opinions needed
Hi all.
Some time over t
On 18/4/09, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>VW
I see ze saurkraut is vorking vell for you.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Drop the "ing" - Focus on Rural Ontario
On Apr 18, 2009, at 04:29 , paul stenquist wrote:
Focusing on rural Ontario
On Apr 18, 2009, at 6:52 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Hi all.
Some time over the next month or so, i'm going to change my Gif on my
home page, to reflect less equine and more ru
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:10 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "David J Brooks" Subject: OT Opinions
> needed
>
>
>
>>
>> "Focused on rural Ontario"
>> "Focusing on images of rural Ontario."
>>
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
Subject: OT Opinions needed
"Focused on rural Ontario"
"Focusing on images of rural Ontario."
"Focusing on rural Ontario"
What say they. Any one of these appeal to you all.??
"Ontario: T
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: OT Opinions needed
Any way, my mane area of interest is rural landscapes on Ontario.
Tacky.
Cotty nailed it.
Just thinking on the hoof.
Or just being a horse's ass. :-)
VW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:40:41AM -0400, David J Brooks scripsit:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
> > Or how about:
> >
> > "Pix of Hicksville Ontario"
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > Dave the helpful.
>
> Since you have D700, I'll let that go.:-)
>
> Its Hooterville, BTW
"Outside
2009/4/18 David J Brooks :
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
>> Or how about:
>>
>> "Pix of Hicksville Ontario"
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Dave the helpful.
>
> Since you have D700, I'll let that go.:-)
>
> Its Hooterville, BTW
Hehehe!
DS
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.n
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Paul Sorenson
wrote:
> Here's my shot at it...
>
> "Rural Ontario Images"
> "Images of Rural Ontario"
> "Documenting Life in Rural Ontario"
>
> -p
Humm. That third once's not to bad.
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:50 AM, David Savage wrote:
> Or how about:
>
> "Pix of Hicksville Ontario"
>
> :-)
>
> Dave the helpful.
Since you have D700, I'll let that go.:-)
Its Hooterville, BTW
Dave
>
> 2009/4/18 Paul Sorenson :
>> Here's my shot at it...
>>
>> "Rural Ontario Images"
>> "Imag
Or how about:
"Pix of Hicksville Ontario"
:-)
Dave the helpful.
2009/4/18 Paul Sorenson :
> Here's my shot at it...
>
> "Rural Ontario Images"
> "Images of Rural Ontario"
> "Documenting Life in Rural Ontario"
>
> -p
>
> Bran Everseeking wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:52:17 -0400
>> David J
Here's my shot at it...
"Rural Ontario Images"
"Images of Rural Ontario"
"Documenting Life in Rural Ontario"
-p
Bran Everseeking wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:52:17 -0400
David J Brooks wrote:
"Focused on rural Ontario"
"Focusing on images of rural Ontario."
"Focusing on rural Ontario"
Wha
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:52:17 -0400
David J Brooks wrote:
> "Focused on rural Ontario"
> "Focusing on images of rural Ontario."
> "Focusing on rural Ontario"
>
> What say they. Any one of these appeal to you all.??
The "focus" seems really cliche to me.
though so does "Rural Ontario as Scene"
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:19 +0100, "Bob W" wrote:
> [...]
>
> Why not just tell it like it is, without being cutesy? "Photographs of
> rural
> Ontario" sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
>
> Cheers,
> Bob
> Dumping on other people's lawns
What Bob said.
Cheers
Brian
+++
Focusing on rural Ontario
On Apr 18, 2009, at 6:52 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Hi all.
Some time over the next month or so, i'm going to change my Gif on my
home page, to reflect less equine and more rural photography.(Guess
what i have decided to stop doing now.:-))
Any way, my mane area of i
>>>Any way, my mane area of interest is rural landscapes on Ontario.
>>
>> Tacky.
>
>Cotty nailed it.
Just thinking on the hoof.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
2009/4/18 Cotty :
>
>>Any way, my mane area of interest is rural landscapes on Ontario.
>
> Tacky.
Cotty nailed it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the dire
>Any way, my mane area of interest is rural landscapes on Ontario.
Tacky.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listin
On 18/4/09, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>"Focusing on rural Ontario"
That one.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml
[...]
>
> I plan on having a collage type gif with a "catch phrase" probably
> written underneast the gif.
>
> I'm looking at these so far.:
>
> "Focused on rural Ontario"
> "Focusing on images of rural Ontario."
> "Focusing on rural Ontario"
>
> What say they. Any one of these appeal to you al
Hi all.
Some time over the next month or so, i'm going to change my Gif on my
home page, to reflect less equine and more rural photography.(Guess
what i have decided to stop doing now.:-))
Any way, my mane area of interest is rural landscapes on Ontario. Not
excluding the rest of Canada, but i do
Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> Ann,
>
> Check the processing forums at photodotnet. You might also search
> through the large format forums. Kentmere is mentioned frequently.
Thanks Scott -
I was hoping for a quick nod or nay from one of
"us" -
this is for a friend, not me. I was going to
suggest
Ann,
Check the processing forums at photodotnet. You might also search
through the large format forums. Kentmere is mentioned frequently.
On 10/28/05, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone use this stuff?
> I have a friend who asked me to ask.
> He is going to be taking an advanced
Anyone use this stuff?
I have a friend who asked me to ask.
He is going to be taking an advanced printing
independent study class. I never heard of this
paper myself
T I A
annsan
Along that line, I recently framed a real nice old Pentax LX ad for my
office. It looks great on the wall. I think I'm going to do a grouping of
three different Pentax ads once I find two other nice ones. Actually I didn't
exactly frame it, I just put it behind glass with one of those floatin
> Thanks for putting up the 28/1.9 blow up and the 35-85 ads, I love
> seeing that stuff.
Yeah, I do, too, Steve. That's why I still have "that stuff" - .
By the way, I have saved quite a few of my favorite ads, Pentax and
3rd-party (especially VS1) from the 70's and 80's, and I ought to do
som
"Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wanna try that 43-86! ;)
Sounds like a Pentax Limited focal length range. :)
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
Hmmm. One of my Super Programs is in the shop again for the same reason as
before: I've damaged the autodiaphragm mechanism. And what lens is stuck in
it and must be removed by the repair shop? The Vivitar Series 1 90-180/4.5
Flat Field Macro Zoom. Coincidence?
Fred wrote:
The fact that they
"JamesRel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does this lens come in screw mount and/or K-mount?
Both.
If in K-mount, does it have any electrical contacts like a PK-A lens? Or is
it just like an old K lens?
It's just like an old K lens.
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
-
This message is from the Pentax-Disc
Fred,
Thanks for putting up the 28/1.9 blow up and the 35-85 ads,
I love seeing that stuff.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: OT?!
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: OT?! Opinions on VS1 35-85/2.8
> >> however the main attraction of this lens (for me) is the
> >> constant F2.8 aperture throughout the zoom range.
>
> > A constant f/2.8
> Fred, would you have a Modern or Popular Photography tes report on
> the Fujica GS645? It would be around 1984.
No, sorry, Jeff - I only have on hand items that I clipped out of
magazines because they were important to me at the time - I don't
tens to keep entire old issues. Maybe someone else
Geez, I just jump into this thread that's been going for several days,
and I find Shel's selling off ~my~ equipment? ;-) Geez, ya really gotta
keep your eyes open around here!
regards,
frank
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Hi Steve ...
>
> You can't The lens belongs to Frank. I just took delivery o
[Oops - somehow I posted this first to another thread - this is
where it belongs.]
> The baffle scratched and bent in that black thingy on my LX the
> first time I mounted it, didn`t seem to hurt anything, so I just
> left it. I never did file the baffle down, as the damage was done.
> It`s a clo
> Unfortunately my LX has the marks to prove it :-(
Yes, one of my LX's has a couple of "cosmetic" marks on the flat
black paint of its mirror box baffle. After performing the minor
mod to the lens, though, it is not a problem for that LX or any
other.
> No Pentax lens has marked my bodies :-)
Hi Steve ...
You can't The lens belongs to Frank. I just took delivery of it
since the seller wouldn't ship to Canada. I also was wrong about the
focal length. It's a 24~48. Sorry.
Steve Larson wrote:
>
> I wanna try that 43-86! ;)
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This messag
On 14 Jun 2002 at 19:57, Fred wrote:
> > if it hasn't been modified it will still have a protrusion on the
> > rear that will mark the panel above the reflex mirror when mounted
> > on an LX. Otherwise its a great lens albeit big, lower contrast
> > than comparable Pentax glass but very sharp w
Steve`s reading this. I wanna try that 43-86! ;)
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: OT?! Opinions on VS1 35-85/2.8
>
Vivitar did make some gems. Too bad they didn`t continue with it.
I blame Bob Monaghan for my addiction.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:54 PM
Subject
-
From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: OT?! Opinions on VS1 35-85/2.8
> > if it hasn't been modified it will still have a protrusion on the
> > rear that will mark the panel above the
> if it hasn't been modified it will still have a protrusion on the
> rear that will mark the panel above the reflex mirror when mounted
> on an LX. Otherwise its a great lens albeit big, lower contrast
> than comparable Pentax glass but very sharp with a usable close
> focus at the wide end.
S
;Paul F. Stregevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: OT?! Opinions on VS1 35-85/2.8
> I found a couple comments about this lens:
>
> Warren Kato ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), on Olympus discussion site, 10 March 1999:
I found a couple comments about this lens:
Warren Kato ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), on Olympus discussion site, 10 March 1999:
"The Vivitar 35-85/2.8 is an amazingly contrasty lens producing sharp
looking photos. It's part of my "BIG" kit, Series 1 35-85, 135/2.3, 200/3
and Zuiko 300/4.5. All take 72
It's not off-topic to ask about a lens that can be used on a Pentax body.
List members do it all the time.
I was surprised to discover that I've collected no comments on this lens.
It has 12 elements in 9 groups; uses VMC multicoating; can close focus to
10.2 inches; reaches a max. magnificati
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:31 PM
Subject: OT?! Opinions on VS1 35-85/2.8
> Hello all! Been a while since I was on this list (tho thus far I'm mainly
a
> reader, not an active participant in the discussions)
>
> So I was wondering what you folk
Courtesy of the Writer's Almanac:
It's the birthday of the German poet (Christian Johann) Heinrich
Heine, born in Düsseldorf, Prussia (1797). He is most famous for his
poems, such as "The Lorelei," which were set to music by Schubert,
Schumann, Mendelssohn, Brahms, and other German Romantic
co
89 matches
Mail list logo
