scuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 5:53 AM
Subject: Camera Brand Pros & Cons
Thought this might be interesting fodder for some. I find the
"analysis" lacking much depth however.
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=5404&news=what+brand+should+I+
On 18/09/2013 2:30 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Then how come I never seem to find nekked nubile blond women?
You haven't figured out how to use a search engine?
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please v
bject: Camera Brand Pros & Cons
Thought this might be interesting fodder for some. I find the
"analysis" lacking much depth however.
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=5404&news=what+brand+should+I+buy+into+market+anlysis
Regarding what he says about Pentax: W
It's a thoughtless generic article because the target audience are
thoughtless generic people.
On 9/17/2013 10:40 AM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
Thought this might be interesting fodder for some. I find the
"analysis" lacking much depth however.
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=54
Thought this might be interesting fodder for some. I find the
"analysis" lacking much depth however.
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=5404&news=what+brand+should+I+buy+into+market+analysis
A thought-less and absolutely generic article considering todays
advanced manufacturing
People tend to find what they're looking for.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Darren Addy
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 5:53 AM
Subject: Camera Brand Pros & Cons
Thought this might be interesting fodder for some. I find the
"ana
Thought this might be interesting fodder for some. I find the
"analysis" lacking much depth however.
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=5404&news=what+brand+should+I+buy+into+market+anlysis
Regarding what he says about Pentax: Weakness = "kit lens"? I thought
that Pentax was co
This is a really good list. Well considered, good solutions and bound
to cause some gnashing of teeth ...
http://blog.mingthein.com/2012/07/02/common-photographic-mistakes-by-beginners-amateurs-and-pros-and-how-to-avoid-them/
http://goo.gl/aCrHA
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
Mark Roberts wrote:
Whenever I can't think of a better reason for keeping a shot than how
cheap and easy it is to do so, I know that's a photograph that isn't
worth keeping.
Needs keeping. In next year's book.
That was easy.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mai
Wow! This thread really took off while I wasn't looking.
In any event, it has been an extremely informative one. I wish I had
time to reply to each person who responded, but I do thank you all for
the many thoughtful answers. This has been a very educational thread
for me -- lots of foo
On 5/10/10, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Don't listen to Frank or Cotty is a good start.
Now we know where you loyalties lie, eh Frank!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Walt, here are my few pixels.
Personally, I don't do montages, collages and other digital art forms.
No specific reason except that I'd like to better myself as a
photographer, not as a graphic artist.
I don't have any specific /system/ as to how to decide which image to
save and which to di
ct images
is a waste in time and effort.
my $.02 worth.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Walter Gilbert"
Subject: Out of curiosity: A question for the pros
As I hasten to stipulate at every opportunity, I'm
On 10/5/2010 8:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:30 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:57:04AM +1000, Tanya Love wrote:
I know this is an opposing view to what most have posted here, but it works
for me. And when I am shooting 2-3000 frames
Just try to add an interesting background to a good foreground shot in
color in a chemical darkroom. It was difficult enough to do in B&W,
Photoshop's a snap.
On 10/5/2010 4:59 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thanks, P. J.
Good point about storage. I guess I still think of hard drive space
a
I should think that would be one of the best times to take pictures.
Pretty shots of pretty places are easy...
On 10/5/2010 6:27 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
The PAW project came about as a result of the same thing we tend to do here
(talk about equipment rather than taking pictures...but I blam
--
From: "Tanya Love"
Subject: RE: Out of curiosity: A question for the pros
I concur. There is no point in keeping stuff just because it is cheap to
do
so. It may only equate to 1TB per year, but it is also a whole lot of
filing, c
mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Mark
Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, 6 October 2010 10:47 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Out of curiosity: A question for the pros
Mark said:
Whenever I can't think of a better reason for keeping a shot than how cheap
and easy it is to do so, I
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>> By this time next year, it'll be about half that. If my time is worth any
>> money at all, it's practically not worth the time to go through the bother
>> of deleting them.
>
> Whenever I can't think of a better reason for keeping a shot t
Larry Colen wrote:
>
>On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:30 PM, John Francis wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:57:04AM +1000, Tanya Love wrote:
>>>
>>> I know this is an opposing view to what most have posted here, but it works
>>> for me. And when I am shooting 2-3000 frames every week, the storage spac
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
> On 6 October 2010 11:03, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> That's a bit extreme, in my view (I find a lot of shots that didn't
>> come out as I envisaged prove quite useful later), but I delete a lot.
>> Good photographers have to be ruthless editors of
Rob Studdert wrote:
>On 6 October 2010 11:03, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> That's a bit extreme, in my view (I find a lot of shots that didn't
>> come out as I envisaged prove quite useful later), but I delete a lot.
>> Good photographers have to be ruthless editors of their own work.
>
>Editing does
On 6 October 2010 11:03, Mark Roberts wrote:
> That's a bit extreme, in my view (I find a lot of shots that didn't
> come out as I envisaged prove quite useful later), but I delete a lot.
> Good photographers have to be ruthless editors of their own work.
Editing does not equal deleting.
--
Ro
Tanya Love wrote:
>A great photographer who took me under his wing years ago (see
>www.chunglee.com), once said to me "the measure of a great photographer is
>the size of his/her waste paper bin".
Quite right.
>Meaning anything that isn't as
>perfect as you envisaged it should go in the bin
T
On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:30 PM, John Francis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:57:04AM +1000, Tanya Love wrote:
>>
>> I know this is an opposing view to what most have posted here, but it works
>> for me. And when I am shooting 2-3000 frames every week, the storage space
>> and time it would take
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:57:04AM +1000, Tanya Love wrote:
>
> I know this is an opposing view to what most have posted here, but it works
> for me. And when I am shooting 2-3000 frames every week, the storage space
> and time it would take to keep the "average" shots, would be ridiculous.
2000
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 06:15:07PM -0400, David J Brooks wrote:
> Walter, I keep just about everything i shoot, unless its totally OOF
> then i'll delete it.
I regard deleting digital images much as I would regard shredding negatives;
it's an irreversible step, and one that offers no real benefits
I agree with you as a working professional, Tanya. Work one is doing
for a client, or on spec., is certainly different than the work an
artsy-fartsy photographer does (like me). With few exceptions, if it
doesn't meet the clients expectations or is not special to you for
your own portfolio,
that helps!
Tan. :)
Tanya Love
Photographer
www.lovebytes.com.au
m: 0458 006 740
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Walter Gilbert
Sent: Wednesday, 6 October 2010 3:38 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Out of curiosity: A ques
An excellent example, Mark!
I attended college in San Francisco, and had some very respected
luminaries as teachers in the craft of photography.
I was told, and remember this was in the days of film, to not expect
more than one or two good shots per roll of 35 mm.
Do not expect to get mor
The PAW project came about as a result of the same thing we tend to do here
(talk about equipment rather than taking pictures...but I blame that on
Photokina). Kyle Cassity on the Leica Users Group came up (half-jokingly) that
the LUG people should use their cameras rather than just talking abou
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:15 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Walter, I keep just about everything i shoot, unless its totally OOF
> then i'll delete it.
>
> I have a lot of photos that i consider "just a bit OOF" but find i can
> use them in the annual fair photo contest as the slight flaw does not
> s
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> I see what you mean.
>
> Now, how do I learn to be GOOD? :)
Don't listen to Frank or Cotty is a good start.
Dave
>
>
> -- Walt
> On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Bob W wrote:
>>
>> that's how you learn to be better.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> PDML P
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> I see what you mean.
>
> Now, how do I learn to be GOOD? :)
Don't listen to
>
>
> -- Walt
> On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Bob W wrote:
>>
>> that's how you learn to be better.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.ne
Walter, I keep just about everything i shoot, unless its totally OOF
then i'll delete it.
I have a lot of photos that i consider "just a bit OOF" but find i can
use them in the annual fair photo contest as the slight flaw does not
show up.
The example you have shown woudld be a forsure keeper in
I'm not too proud to say that's the greatest thing I've seen in a
long time.
And here I sat thinking that the whole "cormorant" thing was just some
simple, quirky idiosyncrasy of the PDML list. Little did I know!
Thanks for the info and the guffaw (a word which, if I'm not mistaken,
is de
Walter Gilbert wrote:
> what do all of you real photographers do with images that may
>be flawed, but still have some redeeming qualities to them. For
>instance, a shot that's too poorly focused to rescue with sharpening
>tools and so forth, but does capture a sense of action that is somewhat
can't help you with that - sorry!
>
>I see what you mean.
>
> Now, how do I learn to be GOOD? :)
>
>
> -- Walt
> On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Bob W wrote:
> > that's how you learn to be better.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailm
Thanks, P. J.
Good point about storage. I guess I still think of hard drive space as
coming at a rather high premium -- and also, there's the fact that I'm
not the most well-organized person in the world. I tend to scatter
copies of images in various forms hither and yon, throughout my dr
Thanks for the input, Jeffery.
I've been curious about the PAW project, having seen references to it in
subject lines on the list in the past. I just assumed it was an
individual effort. Maybe a kind soul will explain it to me sometime.
Now, I've at least put together the fact that PAW s
Thanks, John.
That's just about as close to a verbatim description of my thinking as
it gets. I have gone back over the past couple of days and found some
shots that I wonder why I didn't do something with before. The reason,
of course, is because I didn't have any idea how to make them l
I see what you mean.
Now, how do I learn to be GOOD? :)
-- Walt
On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Bob W wrote:
that's how you learn to be better.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link d
From: Walter Gilbert
As I hasten to stipulate at every opportunity, I'm pretty new to
photography, and I have what may seem to be a stupid question. So,
please indulge me.
That said, what do all of you real photographers do with images that may
be flawed, but still have some redeeming qualiti
Apply some blur, some motion striping and call it art...
Hell, I seldom throw anything out, (unless it's just silly, like 100
pictures of a doorknob), storage is cheap, and you never know when a
great idea for combined images will strike you.
Somewhere on film I have a very nice photograph
I would post it and say "how do y'all like the bokeh in this shot?" Dealing
with focus and shutter lag when trying to photograph a flying bird (not to
mention my poor reflexes) have convinced me never to even try them with my
current equipment. So, you'll never hear me criticizing another one's
> As I hasten to stipulate at every opportunity, I'm pretty new to
> photography, and I have what may seem to be a stupid question. So, please
> indulge me.
>
> That said, what do all of you real photographers do with images that may
be
> flawed, but still have some redeeming qualities to them.
As I hasten to stipulate at every opportunity, I'm pretty new to
photography, and I have what may seem to be a stupid question. So,
please indulge me.
That said, what do all of you real photographers do with images that may
be flawed, but still have some redeeming qualities to them. For
in
rs,
> Bob
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of David Savage
> > Sent: 03 July 2006 03:10
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
> >
>
had.
I can hardly believe it's all done by teeny-weeny little pixies!
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David Savage
> Sent: 03 July 2006 03:10
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Pros and
You should be happy with it. I've heard very few negative comments.
Dave
On 7/5/06, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As far as I remember that's about what I was getting a few years ago.
> Maybe not even that. However, I've boned up a bit on the Epson R800
> and it looks like a pretty good pr
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell"
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
>
> I said "three or four times" because some of the dye sub printers I
> have tested do not apply a UV topcoat.
I've only worked with the dye subs that
On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:23 AM, William Robb wrote:
> Four times, actually. Once for each colour, and then a fourth time
> for the
> UV overcoat. Each time, the paper is partially ejected from the
> printer, and
> then drawn back in.
I said "three or four times" because some of the dye sub prin
> >
> > From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > The cost of paper and inks for the Epson R800 doesn't seem to be
all
> > that different than for the Oly P440. I have assumed that one set
of
> > inks would last for 100 A4 prints. Whether that is true or
> not I don't
> > know - my last lot would
t
> Subject: Re: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bob Shell"
> Subject: Re: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
>
>
> >
> > On Jul 3, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Bob W wrote:
> >
>
mike wilson wrote:
> The outlaws (who, for some reason, are making a lot of prints at
> the moment) using a consumer Epson, get 8-9 A4 prints from a
> colour cartridge.
On my Epson 820 I get about 20 8" x 10" prints from a color cartridge.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell"
Subject: Re: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
>
> On Jul 3, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Bob W wrote:
>
>> Why are dye-subs more prone or more sensitive than inkjets to dust?
>
> The paper goes back and forth in the
One thing to consider is that you're pricing Epson Premium Glossy
paper, one of the most expensive surfaces available from Epson, and
you're pricing directly from the Epson website ... in other words, at
retail list prices. Other choices at lower price abound. With the Oly
P440, you don't h
On Jul 3, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Bob W wrote:
> Why are dye-subs more prone or more sensitive than inkjets to dust?
The paper goes back and forth in them three or four times, so three
or four times the opportunity for dust to settle on the surface.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.
>
> From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The cost of paper and inks for the Epson R800 doesn't seem to be all
> that different than for the Oly P440. I have assumed that one set of
> inks would last for 100 A4 prints. Whether that is true or not I don't
> know - my last lot would never have laste
Thanks Dave. I'll save that for later.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David Mann
> Sent: 04 July 2006 07:42
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet
On Jul 4, 2006, at 6:45 AM, Bob W wrote:
> What do others think of this as an example to evaluate the printers?
> If it's not a good example, what features should be in a photo to get
> a decent trial of a printer's abilities?
If you're going to be printing a lot of B&W, you might as well try a
On Jul 4, 2006, at 1:37 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
> it's also important to shut it down at the end of the
> day using the power switch on the printer, not just turning off a
> power
> strip.
I find that very easy to believe... when I turn off my 2100 with its
power switch, it spends a few seco
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of wendy beard
> Sent: 03 July 2006 18:58
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
>
> > Bob W wrote
> >
> > A4 dye-sub printers seem to be at a reasonably
have them print my Q-60 slide scan, I suppose.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Sent: 03 July 2006 20:15
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Pros and cons of dye-sub and
On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:45 AM, Bob W wrote:
> http://www.web-options.com/Saris.jpg
> because it includes large areas of even tone, but with a lot of detail
> and bright colour, plus shadow detail and subtle tones, rich blacks
> and some highlights.
>
> What do others think of this as an example to
Wendy,
Thanks for your reply. Good plasticky, or bad plasticky? It sounds
like bad to me.
I have found a site which will send me some sample prints; I am also
going to send for some samples from the Epson site. Both sites will
also print samples from my files for me, so I will do that too to get
> I used to own an Olympus P-400
dye-sub printer which printed up to A4
> I'd bought it to do on-site printing at trials. Paper and ribbons were
> very expensive. Plus you had no choice but to buy the Olympus paper
> and ribbon. I could print glossy or matte
> Bob W wrote
>
> A4 dye-sub printers seem to be at a reasonably affordable price point
> nowadays, compared to when I last bought a photo printer. What are the
> pros and cons of each type of printer? I am not particularly
> interested in buying a printer that does larger th
Bob W wrote:
>
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> If I buy an inkjet I will need to buy 2 inkjets, and part of my
> problem is space. I really don't have the space to have 2 lots of
> inksets, papers, printers etc. in the room. Plus I already have a
> laser printer which I use for text, and an old Eps
CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of David Savage
>> Sent: 03 July 2006 03:10
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
>>
>> I second Godfrey's recommendation of the R2400.
>>
>> T
Thanks. The R2400 is more than I want to pay. However the R800 looks
interesting.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David Savage
> Sent: 03 July 2006 03:10
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject:
I second Godfrey's recommendation of the R2400.
Though considering you said you just want A4 size the Epson R800 may be a
better option if you decide to go the inkjet route.
Dave
At 08:53 AM 3/07/2006, Godfrey wrote:
>It's probably more expensive than you want, but the Epson R2400 makes
>superb
Butch Black wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Bob W"
>Subject: RE: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
>
>
>
>
>>Thanks for the replies.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>The reason I will need 2 is that I want to be abl
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> The reason I will need 2 is that I want to be able to print black &
> white as well as colour, and it seems to be considered best to
It's probably more expensive than you want, but the Epson R2400 makes
superb B&W or color prints with no cross-contamination of anything.
It's all done with the standard, OEM Epson K3 inkset. I printed
*everything* for my show using the R2400 from business cards to the
presentation photos o
ked nozzles, didn't like to be
>left unused for what I consider short periods of time, drank too much
>ink, and in uneven amounts so I had to throw away cartridges which
>still had ink in some reservoirs, etc. etc.
>
>--
>Cheers,
> Bob
>
>
>
>>-
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: Pros and cons of dye-sub and inkjet printers
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> The reason I will need 2 is that I want to be able to print black &
> white as well as colour, and it seems to be considered best to
too much
ink, and in uneven amounts so I had to throw away cartridges which
still had ink in some reservoirs, etc. etc.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Adam Maas
> Sent: 02 July 2006 17:05
> To: Pentax
Butch Black wrote:
>Bob W wrote
>
>A4 dye-sub printers seem to be at a reasonably affordable price point
>nowadays, compared to when I last bought a photo printer. What are the
>pros and cons of each type of printer? I am not particularly
>interested in buying a printer that d
Bob W wrote
A4 dye-sub printers seem to be at a reasonably affordable price point
nowadays, compared to when I last bought a photo printer. What are the
pros and cons of each type of printer? I am not particularly
interested in buying a printer that does larger than A4 since I only
rarely need a
Hi,
A4 dye-sub printers seem to be at a reasonably affordable price point
nowadays, compared to when I last bought a photo printer. What are the
pros and cons of each type of printer? I am not particularly
interested in buying a printer that does larger than A4 since I only
rarely need a larger
On 27/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>Ice cream is good during these times
Dave's on the jungle juice ;-))
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discus
> You audio geeks might know about this
and have some suitable advice.
>
> I will soon be putting together a Mac - based edit setup with FCP 5 and
> wonder if anyone has any experience with control surfaces. Namely those
> from Yamaha (OX1), Tascam (FW-1884
You audio geeks might know about this and have some suitable advice.
I will soon be putting together a Mac - based edit setup with FCP 5 and
wonder if anyone has any experience with control surfaces. Namely those
from Yamaha (OX1), Tascam (FW-1884 and similar) or Mackie Control
Universal. Hardware
Sid Barras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Too often, what begins as a worthy (or even trivial) discussion evolves into
>arguments over semantics and minutiae...
What??? I hadn't noticed that!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
<< On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Cotty wrote:
> PS: Coulthard WON - go the Brits!>>
A fact that my wife announced to me as she climbed into bed at 5 o'clock (was
it?) on Sunday morning.
Aye, but Barry Sheene died last night too :-( >>
:( vivid memories of cross channel ferries bearing Mr S.
Peter
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Cotty wrote:
> PS: Coulthard WON - go the Brits!
Aye, but Barry Sheene died last night too :-(
Chris
Hi!
>>Is that to day that before I bought my ME Super I was a legal alien
>>here?
C> No, that was yesterday...
C>
C> Cotty
You got me, dude!? (Is it a proper way to react to such a joke? )
I hate it when I make silly mistakes in English that basically come
from the different way of reading
I don't consider myself a pro because my photography revenue is an
insignificant part of my income, but I do shoot cars for magazines. I
use a Pentax 6x7 for most of that work, but shoot some details with a
Pentax LX. Like W. Robb said, it's the glass.
Paul Stenquist
>C> My God, the very last place I would consider ending up on the www is a
>C> professional video cameraman's forum. I come here to the PDML to - relax
>C> - and hang out occasionally with other people who enjoy good old
>C> metal-bodied Pentax gear, and excellent speculation about new digital
>
BL> Is that to day that before I bought my ME Super I was a legal alien
S, not d
BL> here?
My bad...
---
Boris Liberman
www.geocities.com/dunno57
www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=38625
Hi!
C> My God, the very last place I would consider ending up on the www is a
C> professional video cameraman's forum. I come here to the PDML to - relax
C> - and hang out occasionally with other people who enjoy good old
C> metal-bodied Pentax gear, and excellent speculation about new digital
Read these words again, for they are wise:
>Most working photographers earn the same decent living
>as everyone here, which is nothing to write home
>about. These photographers have to put food on the
>table and pay bills just like everybody else. And to
>suggest that working photographers can af
Hi
I'm just curious to see how many pros we have on this list and if they
actually use Pentax equipment in their business? 35mm or larger format,
which models etc. I guess for a pro how does the pentax stable stack up
against the competition. I sorta got the impression that most pro
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: PROS-was:ABORTION-was: Way OT: GUNS, GUNS, AND MORE GUNS.
> Let's see,
>
> Bob is "Piss Face". I'm "Dip Shit". I don't blame you for being
> jealous, Tom.
>
> I'm sure som
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: PROS
> Dr E D F Williams,
>
> Having been certified by Mr. Bruce Rubenstein as "Piss Face",
May I
> recommend, should I not already be there, that you put me in
one of your
> filters. Yup, I
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 01:37 PM, tom wrote:
Can I have a cool name too?
tv
Nope. If you want a cool name, you'll have to earn it. :-)
Dan Scott
om: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: PROS [WAS:ABORTION-was: Way OT: GUNS, GUNS, AND MORE GUNS.]
>
>
> Dr E D F Williams wrote:
> >
> > It would appear that although the title of t
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Blakely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> MORE GUNS.
>
>
> Dr E D F Williams,
>
> Having been certified by Mr. Bruce Rubenstein as "Piss Face", May I
> recommend, should I not already be there, that you put me
> in one of your
> filters. Yup, I volunteer.
C
Dr E D F Williams,
Having been certified by Mr. Bruce Rubenstein as "Piss Face", May I
recommend, should I not already be there, that you put me in one of your
filters. Yup, I volunteer.
All of the photos & negatives that I produce as part of my job belong to my
clients, therefore all is handed
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
