On 12/31/2019 11:38 AM, Richard Klein wrote:
"Wi-Fi 6" is the latest standard, and one of the noted improvements they
made with that standard was it's ability to communicate with many devices
simultaneously. If you're going to upgrade now, look for Wi-Fi 6.
I think David Cogen's series of
"Wi-Fi 6" is the latest standard, and one of the noted improvements they
made with that standard was it's ability to communicate with many devices
simultaneously. If you're going to upgrade now, look for Wi-Fi 6.
I think David Cogen's series of Decodr videos on Youtube covers it:
Since you have two partitions, and not two physical drives, (if I have
understood it correctly) you can safely ignore that message.
It talks about performance because it thinks you have two distinct drives.
With two drives you can read/write on both in the same time, so having those
large files
that means you have your image files on D already.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 1:19 AM
Subject: RE: OT - A computer Question...
*eek* I changed my PS Scratch disks as suggested
or the data partition, but can't see any difference in
performance.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 4:11 AM
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
the more free space on a drive, the less likely a drive
In a message dated 3/28/2004 5:53:12 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The number one culprit behind file fragmentation is Internet Explorer's
Temporary Internet files. Especially if you don't delete them each time you
close the browser.
My favourite configuration of drives is
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
I've never used PS. But from people are saying it must use one
LARGE scratch
file. What is the purpose of this? Some sort of buffering
Marnie asked:
I've never used PS. But from people are saying it must use one LARGE
scratch
file. What is the purpose of this? Some sort of buffering? For memory
control?
Making it faster? Or providing a workspace? Like the edit/paste space that
the Windows Clipboard provides?
Marnie aka
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: OT - A computer Question...
Jostein, how can you tell when PS is using the scratch file?
tan.
Um...
Distinctive grunts from the box
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography
Subject: RE: OT - A computer Question...
how can you tell when PS is using the scratch file?
The hard drive runs pretty much continuously.
William Robb
On 28 Mar 2004 at 16:13, Herb Chong wrote:
it always does, even on tiny files. it backs up what is in memory so that if PS
runs out of space in RAM and there is a copy on disk, it doesn't have to write
it to disk again. you find out things like this reading the Photoshop Plugin SDK
On 29 Mar 2004 at 9:31, Rob Studdert wrote:
The general rule of thumb is don't assign your PS scratch disk to the same drive
as your Windows swap file resides on.
Further to this if any Windows users wish to assess their actual physical hard
drive speeds in order to assess where to assign
Since they put the paging file on the FAT partition, I remember that
there may be a legitimate reason to set up
a machine with a NTFS and FAT partition. Supposedly there is a
performance gain from using FAT for that
purpose. Just how much is a question since I never notice a perceptible
Large reversable history among other things.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/28/2004 5:53:12 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The number one culprit behind file fragmentation is Internet Explorer's
Temporary Internet files. Especially if you don't delete
Hi Tanya
The C: drive is the system drive and holds all temporary files and by default and
memory swap file. If you are saving yor images to it then it will very quickly fill
up. The reason for partitioning a drive into two or more logical drives is to keep the
data separate, so if I were you
i don't know who configured your computer, but i can't imagine a restore
drive being more than about 5 or 10 GB. 60 GB is ridiculous. it says 90%
free, so it is even more ridiculous. take the computer to someone that has
and knows how to use the current version of Partition Magic and have them
resize the two partitions to be about 80G for your C drive and everything
else for your D drive.
Herb
I am not an IT expert, but my understanding is that the drives should not
be kept at such big sizes. Especially the OS and ones that have progs on
them. They get fragmented easily -
... BUT, the C: is formatted as NTFS and
the D: is FAT32 - Can anyone explain THIS?
The plot thickens...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 28 March 2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
i don't know who
Message -
From: mapson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
I am not an IT expert, but my understanding is that the drives should not
be kept at such big sizes. Especially the OS and ones that have progs on
them
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 8:48 PM
Subject: RE: OT - A computer Question...
Oh, AND this probably makes a huge difference in what all of this means
and
I should have posted it originally... BUT, the C: is formatted as NTFS
and
the D: is FAT32 - Can anyone explain THIS?
At 10:41 AM 28/03/2004, you wrote:
the more free space on a drive, the less likely a drive will have file
fragmentation. with NTFS, the cluster size stays at 4K all the way out past
200GB. if Tanya continues to shoot RAW at the rate that she describes, she
will shoot about 4-6 GB of images each
(i.e scratch) Meant i.e. restore. Usually I let my typing mistakes go by, not
worth bothering to correct. But that mistake made what I said slightly
confusing.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-specific things on the C drive all the time.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: mapson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
BUT why would you want to have so much space on your C. Have
10-20Gb
Hi!
Tanya, my humble suggestion to your problem would be like this:
1. Get yourself a small, say 20 GB HD and make it your system disk.
Doing so would mean re-installing your OS and s/ware but this can be
done, I hope.
2. Take the whole of the 100 GB HD you have and partition it to your
liking.
.
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 28 March 2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
i don't know who configured your computer, but i can't imagine a restore
drive being more than about 5 or 10 GB. 60 GB
Seems that whoever set up your machine has made it difficult
for you. However, it should be fairly simple to change the
location of the paging file. I think I did that on my Win
XP machine.
BTW, if you have enough memory and disk space, having the
paging file and the scratch disk on the same
In a message dated 3/27/2004 9:48:43 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First, the partitioning is done for two reasons, first to hide the recovery
information, It used to be that recovery disks were included with the
computer. People keep losing them, and when they need them,
27 matches
Mail list logo
