ERNReed added:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I like seeing the shutter speed in the viewfinder. The only cameras
> > I can think of that I use that don't do this are the Spotmatic and
> > the pre-Spotmatic bodies.
>
> and the K1000.
Which is why I stuck in the "that I use" bit. :-) I thoug
In a message dated 4/30/2002 5:37:13 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I like seeing the shutter speed in the viewfinder. The only cameras
> I can think of that I use that don't do this are the Spotmatic and
> the pre-Spotmatic bodies.
and the K1000.
ERNR
My photographs
ussion group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:38 PM
Subject: RE: Viewfinder Information
> Been watching Foghorn Leghorn on the Cartoon channel again, haven't you?
> I would have figured you for a roadrunner watcher myself.
-
This message is from the Pentax
Alexander Krohe wrote:
"The apparent viewing distance of the f-stop
window is such close (by far closer than the viewing
distance of the screen) that the f-stop number is
factually invisible during shooting."
"Apparent viewing distance" of the readouts is an important ergonomic factor, one
I like uncluttered viewfinders. I very much like my Pentax 67's
non-metering prism, because there's nothing in there but picture.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Us
I wrote:
However, the apparent viewing distance of the f-stop
window is such close (by far closer than the viewing
distance of the screen) that the f-stop number is
factually invisible during shooting.
Lukasz replied: -
Your post is really puzzling to me, for I see the
f
< Japanese woman's voice was that of the president's secretary.>>
The Minolta AFS-V (-voice)..."road firumu..use frash" and possibly one more
message "rens crap" - yes it is, isn't it. Cute.
Kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http
This is a bit offtopic.
A friend of mine got a Nissan Z300, 20-something years old. Used to be very
luxurious, now a piece of junk. Anyway, it has a woman voice for a "friendly
reminder" whenever anything goes wrong.
Last time he drove me from New Haven to Boston (almost 2hrs drive), a pin on
the
Hi, Matt,
Since we were (I think) talking about the MX, what other info could you possibly
display, on a mechanical camera?
regards,
frank
Matt Bevers wrote:
> As for info, I see shutter and f-stop being a bare minimum, especially
> useful, if like me, you are just starting.
> --
"The optimi
Here! Here! (or is it Hear! Hear!??
T Rittenhouse wrote:
>
> I demand, DEMAND, I say, a reliable way to frame and focus, and would prefer
> that anything else they stick in there not get in the way of those.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss M
At 14:40 22-4-2002 -0400, you wrote:
>From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>There's been a fair amount of discussion and commentary about the
>quality and amount of information available through various Pentax
>viewfinders. Apart from exposure information, what information do you
>look for
I also have no trouble with the f-stop reading in the MX viewfinder, and
I'll agree that the LEDs are a bit hard to see in bright light. Would a
rubber eye-cup help this problem?
As for info, I see shutter and f-stop being a bare minimum, especially
useful, if like me, you are just starting. I'
I demand, DEMAND, I say, a reliable way to frame and focus, and would prefer
that anything else they stick in there not get in the way of those.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
-
This message is from the Pentax
In response to this thread- I prefer to have shutter speed, aperture and
exposure
info in the viewfinder, LCD/LED is fine- never had a problem with that,
even in direct
bright sunlight, but I'm not a prodigious photographer, so I haven't
been in situations
like that very often.
Taka
-
This messag
"Mishka" wrote:would you like it to beep you: "bob, there's a great photo you are
about to miss, grab the camera and run to the intersection of A and
B... NOW!"
I recall when the Japanese camera companies agreed upon a set of icons to signify the
basic 20 or so messages, such as "film empty"
SB> So, what do you look for and prefer, and why?
1) aperture, either tru window or electronically (as I have now only
manual pentaxes and other cameras - it's tru a window)
2) shutter speed. I love the match needle metering as on LX or K2DMD
(two different incarnations of it though), but would
the moment. yes, sometimes even meter lights are obtrusive and annoying too.
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: Viewfinder Information
> And, to answer Shel'
Hi, Lukasz,
I'm with you on this one: I've had no trouble reading the f-stop in the MX
viewfinder. With the possible exception of when the ring is "between stops",
and the numerals aren't in the lttle viewer's "area". No problem moving the
ring 1/2 stop one way or the other, to see where I am,
Hi, Lukasz,
Funny, with regard to match-needle versus LED (at least in the MX), I'm the
opposite of you: In bright sunlight, I find it much easier to see the
match-needle in my Spots; sometimes the led's of the MX can be washed out in
bright sunlight (you may remember we had such a discussion h
And what facts are those, Friday?
"Bill D. Casselberry" wrote:
>
> SuperProgram - ... just the facts, ma'am!
>
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html
-
This message is from the
ECTED]
Subject: Re: Viewfinder Information
Shel wrote: -
There's been a fair amount of discussion and
commentary about the quality and amount of information
available through various Pentax viewfinders. Apart
from exposure information, what information do you
look for and find
Hi,
I like it to say "That's a great photo, Bob. Press the
shutter...NOW!".
Apart from that I'm becoming more of a minimalist (or should that be
'less of a minimalist'? Is that a paradox? Perhaps 'less of a
maximalist' is best).
Whatever. I've always appreciated the efficient simplicity of the
I like the MZ-3 display ( except in bright light ), it
gives shutter, aperture, over under and use flash
warning when back lit or shutter drops below 1/focal
length. I don't find the display annoying since when
I'm in manual I don't even notice it's there. I find
displays with the af points that l
Shel,maybe its because i'm use to seeing the
info in the D1 viefinder ,but i like to see
my Shutter and my F stop at least,and mode i'm
in when using this type of camera.Withj the SF-1
i can see my shutter but no f stop.To do this i have
to keep the camera pointed to the subject and view
the top l
I'm sort of a minimalist. I own a LX and MX and their viewfinders, while
different, provide the only information I need: Shutterspeed, Aperture and
the little flashy light thingies that tell me I'm getting a "correct"
exposure. (obviosly the LX's flashy light thingies indicate some other thing
25 matches
Mail list logo