Thanks Igor,
This one:
http://www.muddypawz.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/w1_100701_7D2042.jpg
Camera Model: Canon EOS 7D
Image Date: 2010:07:01 14:13:31
Focal Length: 200.0mm
Aperture: f/5.6
Exposure Time: 0.0003 s (1/3200)
ISO equiv: 500
This one:
wendy beard wrote:
I don't update as much as I should, but I usually post the best shots
from events. I'm pretty pleased with the latest set of dockdogs images
http://www.muddypawz.net/blog
Those are just *terrific*, Wendy! Love 'em all.
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I don't update as much as I should, but I usually post the best shots
from events. I'm pretty pleased with the latest set of dockdogs images
http://www.muddypawz.net/blog
personal site
http://www.beard-redfern.com
Wendy
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:32 PM, John Celio n...@neovenator.com wrote:
Wendy,
Some great photos are there!
The first one is simply spectacular!
If you don't mind, - what were the exposures for the 1st and the 3rd
photos (with the jello-like frozen water)?
Thanks for sharing!
Igor
Wed Jul 21 13:20:20 CDT 2010
wendy beard wrote:
I don't update as much as I
My so-called blog has evolved (devolved?) into a photoblog. Still the
occasional other thing, but 98% images. No fixed posting schedule, and
no promises either.
Also, generally if a shot is good enough for me to blog, I PESO it here
as well.
Blog URL: http://nuspi.blogspot.com/
RSS:
that it will be held against me.)
Igor
PS. To everybody on the list: please, do not be afraid to provide
constructive critique for my photos - publicly or privately.
On Jun 29, 2010, at 8:58 PM, William Robb wrote:
--
From: Doug Brewer
Subject: Re: Feed Us
Check out www.photosig.com
It's a critique site that is based on constructive critique of
pictures, and other members can vote both the pictures and critiques
as helpful or not.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On Jul 1, 2010, at 6:39 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 7/1/2010 6:00 PM, eckinator wrote:
2010/7/1 Tim Øslebymaritim...@gmail.com:
Cormorant could work as a magic stop code, unless the motif is a cormorant.
How about SM as an acronym for people who wants rough critique ;-p
Sure...
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:15 -0400, Doug Franklin
jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
On 2010-07-01 18:31, Brian Walters wrote:
Back on topic - the debate about 'no holds barred' critiques of images
comes up regularly and never seems to get resolved. Surely if someone
post an images and says
2010/7/2 Tom C caka...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:39 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
wrote:
So the masochist says to the sadist: Hurt me, Hurt Me. The sadist answers;
No.
Mark!
Going by the bumper sticker rationale, not a Mark either, first heard
that one in 1985
2010/7/1 Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com:
When I post something, I usually say that Comments, Criticisms,
Suggestions and Abuse are all Welcome, which is my way of saying
please don't be kind. I spent 5 years in the Marine Corps, so I've
been abused by professionals; it is unlikely
Le 02/07/10 10:40, eckinator a écrit :
2010/7/1 Daniel J. Matyoladanmaty...@gmail.com:
When I post something, I usually say that Comments, Criticisms,
Suggestions and Abuse are all Welcome, which is my way of saying
please don't be kind. I spent 5 years in the Marine Corps, so I've
been
2010/7/2 Madame RD romd...@orange.fr:
Inspiration, anyone?
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/81027441/
wish i'd had this one when I used to teach English ! just the kind of
things you never find in regular textbooks though it might come in handy
;
vice versa, a guy from
Tom C wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:39 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
wrote:
So the masochist says to the sadist: Hurt me, Hurt Me. The sadist answers;
No.
Mark!
Tom: Is P.J. a sadist?
Mark: Beats me
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 7/2/2010 5:58 AM, eckinator wrote:
2010/7/2 Madame RDromd...@orange.fr:
Inspiration, anyone?
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/81027441/
wish i'd had this one when I used to teach English ! just the kind of
things you never find in regular textbooks though it might come
On 2010-07-02 8:43, P. J. Alling wrote:
You can count to 10 in German and sound like you're cussing someone out.
Some comedian, I can't remember who, used to compare French to German by
saying that you can say anything in French and it sounds like love coos,
and you can say anything in
On Jul 2, 2010, at 1:40 AM, eckinator wrote:
2010/7/1 Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com:
When I post something, I usually say that Comments, Criticisms,
Suggestions and Abuse are all Welcome, which is my way of saying
please don't be kind. I spent 5 years in the Marine Corps, so I've
2010/7/2 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
One of my favorite lines, and one which was borrowed by Charlie Stross in
Iron Sunrise was posted by Geoff Miller in alt.peeves:
Come, Donnie-boy, let us retract the foreskin of ignorance and apply the
wire brush of enlightenment.
--
From: eckinator
Subject: Re: Feed Us Your Photoblog--The Solution
perhaps we should just have a second list fla...@pdml.net so people
could choose which way they want to go =) rule: post to pdml, if you
criticize, respond to flames
William Robb wrote:
Is one allowed to say: Is this the best you can do?
Is one allowed to pass on his disappointment in the photographer?
The Shel fiasco was more or less that.
It may have gotten jacked past that, but my recollection is that it
started
out pretty much that way.
Yes
in making the
photograph--more difficult when the photographer is less clear.
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: William Robb war...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: Feed Us Your Photoblog
On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:45 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
It's always easier to accept honest feedback of others when the photographer
been honest with him/herself about *both* the strengths and weaknesses of
his/her own work. Moreover, the receiver of feedback is not without power
wrote:
--
From: Rick Womer
Subject: Re: Feed Us Your Photoblog--The Solution
Well said, Bill. I would welcome more
constructive commentary, as long as it is respectful.
That doesn't mean that a pile of dogshit is called a golden
egg
William Robb wrote:
Is one allowed to say: Is this the best you can do?
Is one allowed to pass on his disappointment in the photographer?
IMO, even that first question is negatively loaded because it's aimed
at the photographer, not the image. It implies the photographer is
unskilled,
William Robb wrote:
Is one allowed to say: Is this the best you can do?
Context sensitive statement. If I give someone two free punches in a
bar fight, it is mockery. If I know someone really well and have my
arm around him it is encouragement. I think you are thinking along
those lines.
On 2010-07-01 8:35, Tom C wrote:
William Robb wrote:
Is one allowed to say: Is this the best you can do?
Is one allowed to pass on his disappointment in the photographer?
IMO, even that first question is negatively loaded because it's aimed
at the photographer, not the image.
I agree.
Like Bob, I try to look at most if not all of the images posted,
although I comment only on a few. From the images I view I get two
things that are important to me - a photographic learning experience
based on what I like or what I think it would take to improve the image,
and I can
2010/7/1 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
On Jul 1, 2010, at 5:34 AM, eckinator wrote:
2010/6/30 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
It's simple. Your photos suck, but the rest of us rock. But, we're nice
folks, so we let you hang out in the hopes you learn how to use a camera.
My thoughts
On 7/1/2010 1:11 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
Like Bob, I try to look at most if not all of the images posted,
although I comment only on a few. From the images I view I get two
things that are important to me - a photographic learning experience
based on what I like or what I think it would take
This is why I post a large picture (no small thumbnails) and any
writing below it on my photoblog. Check out the image, read the rest
only if you're interested.
Note that many photoblogs work this way or simply have large pictures
with a short description.
-Adam
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:35
I, for one, would appreciate more negative comments on the images I post here.
I post PESOs because I know that I'm not a very good photographer and
I'm trying to improve. [While others here have hundreds of images
accepted by Pentax, they have taken only 13 of the many I submitted,
and I know
On 2010-07-01 15:50, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
In any event, this list would be more useful to all of us --
especially the hacks like me -- if we were all a little more honest
and a little more critical in our comments on images submitted to the
group.
I'll agree, if you'll change the word
On Jul 1, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-07-01 15:50, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
In any event, this list would be more useful to all of us --
especially the hacks like me -- if we were all a little more honest
and a little more critical in our comments on images submitted to
2010/7/1 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
In any case, I think that such a group would be better if it weren't
equipment specific, and that trying to foster that level of open discussion
may not keep the PDML as warm and welcoming to newcomers. We could try to be
more straightforward when
Cormorant could work as a magic stop code, unless the motif is a cormorant.
How about SM as an acronym for people who wants rough critique ;-p
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2010/7/1 eckinator eckina...@gmail.com:
2010/7/1 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
In any case, I think
2010/7/1 Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com:
Cormorant could work as a magic stop code, unless the motif is a cormorant.
How about SM as an acronym for people who wants rough critique ;-p
Sure... sticks and stones will break my bones but whips and chains excite me =)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00 +0200, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/7/1 Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com:
Cormorant could work as a magic stop code, unless the motif is a cormorant.
How about SM as an acronym for people who wants rough critique ;-p
Sure... sticks and stones will
On Jul 1, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Cormorant could work as a magic stop code, unless the motif is a cormorant.
It takes a special kind of person to use cormorant as their safe word.
How about SM as an acronym for people who wants rough critique ;-p
Why do you think that it's
2010/7/2 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
It takes a special kind of person to use cormorant as their safe word.
oh totally but can you envision yourself saying aperture simulator
while heading up the creek?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 2010-07-01 17:25, Larry Colen wrote:
I've seen a few too many examples of people who have just learned
that changing aperture would affect the depth of field pontificating
Have you been reading KR's web site again? :-)
It would be nice if such a group existed, but like most idealistic
On 2010-07-01 18:31, Brian Walters wrote:
Back on topic - the debate about 'no holds barred' critiques of images
comes up regularly and never seems to get resolved. Surely if someone
post an images and says comments, suggestions, criticisms welcome (or
something similar), we are entitled to
I'd say Bill.
Tom C.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:01 PM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/2 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
It takes a special kind of person to use cormorant as their safe word.
oh totally but can you envision yourself saying aperture simulator
while heading up the
On 7/1/2010 6:00 PM, eckinator wrote:
2010/7/1 Tim Øslebymaritim...@gmail.com:
Cormorant could work as a magic stop code, unless the motif is a cormorant.
How about SM as an acronym for people who wants rough critique ;-p
Sure... sticks and stones will break my bones but whips and
On 7/1/2010 6:31 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00 +0200, eckinatoreckina...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/7/1 Tim Øslebymaritim...@gmail.com:
Cormorant could work as a magic stop code, unless the motif is a cormorant.
How about SM as an acronym for people who wants rough
On 7/1/2010 9:11 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-07-01 17:25, Larry Colen wrote:
I've seen a few too many examples of people who have just learned
that changing aperture would affect the depth of field pontificating
Have you been reading KR's web site again? :-)
Oh, please. KR hasn't
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:39 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
So the masochist says to the sadist: Hurt me, Hurt Me. The sadist answers;
No.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On 30/06/2010, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
This is something currently on my mind. I wrote this reply about ten
times and deleted it again. In a nutshell I would love for the
etiquette of this list to make room for more critical comments, I
rarely see anyone saying an image doesn't
I'm manly lurking... real life at the moment is complicated enough...
(including a dead keyboard for a bit) but I'm hopping on
to second Doug Franklin's approach... having been around in the days of
Shel, Dobo, Mafud and the like when
nastiness took up too much space .
I prefer email from the
I confess having some difficulty with blogs.
I wasn't going to say it, but since you broached it. I don't really
want to do all the reading that a blog presumes I do, and I don't like
clicking on the inevitable thumbnail in the blog to get to the larger
version of an image. I find most blogs
Shouldn't that /womanly/ lurking...
On 6/30/2010 11:16 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I'm manly lurking... real life at the moment is complicated enough...
(including a dead keyboard for a bit) but I'm hopping on
to second Doug Franklin's approach... having been around in the days
of Shel, Dobo,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:35:28AM -0400, Tom C wrote:
I confess having some difficulty with blogs.
. . .
And finally maybe, somewhat rudely, but not intended so, I find a blog
a bit akin to watching someone's home movies. They tend to mean much
more to the creator than to the audience . . .
, June 30, 2010 8:35 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Feed Us Your Photoblog--The Solution
I confess having some difficulty with blogs.
I wasn't going to say it, but since you broached it. I don't really
want to do all the reading that a blog presumes I do, and I don't
Tom C wrote:
I confess having some difficulty with blogs.
I wasn't going to say it, but since you broached it. I don't really
want to do all the reading that a blog presumes I do, and I don't like
clicking on the inevitable thumbnail in the blog to get to the larger
version of an image. I find
A large part of my daily work consists of writing blog entries for
various clients. Don't plan on doing more of that for entertainment.
PESOs are fine by me.
Paul
On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I'm manly lurking... real life at the moment is complicated
enough...
And just to circle back... :-)
If you (the royal you) want me to look at an image, I'd prefer it to
be introduced as a list post as opposed to imbedded in a blog.
My personal preference of course.
Tom
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
Tom C wrote:
I
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
Well Tom, you have worded my feelings exactly. Blogging and twitter just
seem like so
much information I don't want to hear about. I don't have enough time as it
is to want to
sift through all the 'noise' to
Well I find it pretty easy to filter the PDML noise. If the subject
line doesn't interest me I delete it.
The blog though, makes me click on the link and see the text of the
blog. I'm not making a big deal of it, I just overall am not enamored
with the whole blog concept, twitter, Facebook, etc.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
The blog though, makes me click on the link and see the text of the
blog.
No, that's the whole point of a feed reader. To aggregate the text
and photos from any number of blogs and other sources into one place.
If someone posts
And what about the text blog?
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
The blog though, makes me click on the link and see the text of the
blog.
No, that's the whole point of a feed reader. To
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
And what about the text blog?
I don't understand the question. I thought we were talking about photography.
If you subscribe to a blog that's mostly textual, the text appears in
your feed reader. (Some blogs publish the whole
My main malfunction (on this topic at least) is that I prefer not to
see the text and general confusion I find associated with many
blogs(in general). It wasn't that I wanted to aggregate the contents
of blogs all into one spot, or that clicking to see an image is much
of a problem, it's more
Not really a blog as I don´t write anything, and also I guess you already know
about it as I annoy you with the PAW every week, but the link is in the
signature. .-)
DagT
http://www.thrane.name
Den 28. juni 2010 kl. 21.32 skrev John Celio:
Traffic's been kinda slow lately, so I figure now
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
My main malfunction (on this topic at least) is that I prefer not to
see the text and general confusion I find associated with many
blogs(in general).
Fair enough, I just see that as being orthogonal to the mechanism of
delivery
P. J. Alling wrote:
Shouldn't that /womanly/ lurking...
hehe I didnt get that until I re-read what I wrote
but.
Shouldn't that be? / Shouldn't that be ?/womanly/lurking ?? :-0
ann
On 6/30/2010 11:16 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I'm manly lurking... real life at the moment is
On Jun 29, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
That is an interesting subject, but the photo would be better if you
included the subject's head, had him in focus, and reduced the exposure by 2
stops or so.
Mark
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML
I much prefer a single link to an image, or a gallery of thumbnails,
as opposed to an image thumbnail surrounded by a lot of text.
If you'd taken a look at the links people have provided so far, you'd
have noticed that none of them present images as thumbnails, and most of
them don't require
On 2010-06-30 13:57 , John Celio wrote:
Blog: a frequently-updated website featuring lots of text about whatever
topic the blog covers (be it politics, sports, or the author's growing
collection of fruit bat stool samples). May include photos, videos or
other media, but is mainly text.
this
Whats a verb or two between friends.
On 6/30/2010 3:15 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Shouldn't that /womanly/ lurking...
hehe I didnt get that until I re-read what I wrote
but.
Shouldn't that be? / Shouldn't that be ?/womanly/lurking ?? :-0
ann
On 6/30/2010
--
From: Rick Womer
Subject: Re: Feed Us Your Photoblog--The Solution
Well said, Bill. I would welcome more constructive commentary, as long as
it is respectful. That doesn't mean that a pile of dogshit is called a
golden egg, it just means
http://eckinator.posterous.com for now =)
cheers
ecke
2010/6/28 John Celio n...@neovenator.com:
Traffic's been kinda slow lately, so I figure now is the time to post
something like this:
If you've got a photoblog, post your blog's URL and RSS feed URL (if you
have one). Feel free to
It can be hard to keep up with the PDML. How is one supposed to check each of
umpteen photo blogs every day to see if they've been updated?
Ecke has some great shots up that have never been PESOs. Under normal
circumstances I would have missed them completely.
How does one share comments
2010/6/29 Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
Ecke has some great shots up that have never been PESOs. Under normal
circumstances I would have missed them completely.
Thank you Rick, I'll post everything once I get the hang of posterous
and once I'm comfortable with my selections.
Cheers
Ecke
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
It can be hard to keep up with the PDML. How is one supposed to check each
of umpteen
photo blogs every day to see if they've been updated?
With an RSS reader. I currently have 679 subscribed feeds in Google Reader.
679 feeds? Isn't list traffic bad enough? :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
It can be hard to keep up with the PDML. How is one supposed to check each
of umpteen
http://www.crapmanagement.com/
I post a daily photo- plus just a little blah,blah,blah - on my blog...
-c
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Matthew Hunt wrote:
It can be hard to keep up with the PDML. How is one supposed to
check each of umpteen
photo blogs every day to see if they've been updated?
With an RSS reader. I currently have 679 subscribed feeds in Google
Reader.
I wondered the same thing as Rick.
Your reply
It's for times when the list is slow. Wouldn't want to be bored now
would we?
On 6/29/2010 9:03 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
679 feeds? Isn't list traffic bad enough? :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Matthew Huntm...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:16 AM,
http://www.mawz.ca
RSS is linked from there.
Always a photo, often some gear-related musings. It's mostly shot with
Minolta kit these days, but the glass is often Takumars.
-Adam
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:32 PM, John Celio n...@neovenator.com wrote:
Traffic's been kinda slow lately, so I
On 2010-06-29 07:03 , Bob Sullivan wrote:
679 feeds? Isn't list traffic bad enough? :-)
i have a similar quantity in my newsreader; good software makes it
possible to pick and choose what to read; i scan a lot of headlines in
my reader, but read relatively few articles
--
PDML
On 2010-06-29 06:16 , Rick Womer wrote:
How is one supposed to check each of umpteen photo blogs every day to see if
they've been updated?
that's what a news reader is for; lots of people use Google Reader; i
use free Mac software called NetNewsWire
it might be interesting to create a
i know posterous has an autopost feature that lets me push all my
posts to a lot of other sites as well as twitter
alternatively, there could just be a pdml-owned posterous/or any other
blog that supports this feature/ where active list members can be
added as contributors
cheers
ecke
2010/6/29
On 2010-06-29 11:11 , eckinator wrote:
i know posterous has an autopost feature that lets me push all my
posts to a lot of other sites as well as twitter
alternatively, there could just be a pdml-owned posterous/or any other
blog that supports this feature/ where active list members can be
added
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:33 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
however it doesn't seem to sort by latest published; maybe its better when
this page in turn is subscribed to by RSS (which i can't seem do, perhaps
because my reader is in turn synced to Google Reader)
I subscribed to it
2010/6/29 Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com:
I've tried a quick test using Yahoo Pipes, which seems like a good
tool for this. It has 3 RSS sources for testing: My own Flickr
photostream, and the photoblogs of John Celio and Mr. Eckinator. The
three sources are combined with a union operator,
Come to think of it this idea of having one PDML blog hub is even more
brilliant since you wouldn't have to be a member of all kinds of sites
and networks any more. I am not good at maintaining all of these
networks, I have a dead LinkedIn profile, a dead Xing profile, a dead
MySpace account, a
It can be hard to keep up with the PDML. How is one supposed
to check each of umpteen photo blogs every day to see if
they've been updated?
Rick, the whole idea of an RSS reader is to collect all the blogs (and
other frequently-updated sites) you read into one central location. I
follow
2010/6/29 John Celio n...@neovenator.com:
I don't post PESOs very often because I pretty much lurk here all the
time. It doesn't seem fair to ask people for comments on my photos when
I almost never comment on anyone else's.
This is something currently on my mind. I wrote this reply about
On 2010-06-29 12:58 , Matthew Hunt wrote:
The pipe overview page is:
http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=a2521ccc1cd0ae6146b25b4cbbe1244d
The associated RSS feed is:
http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.run?_id=a2521ccc1cd0ae6146b25b4cbbe1244d_render=rss
good call on using Yahoo Pipes!
Hi Ecke,
This is something currently on my mind. I wrote this reply about ten
times and deleted it again. In a nutshell I would love for the
etiquette of this list to make room for more critical comments, I
rarely see anyone saying an image doesn't work but I do see an
enormous difference in
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
It can be hard to keep up with the PDML. How is one supposed to check each
of umpteen photo blogs every day to see if they've been updated?
Ecke has some great shots up that have never been PESOs. Under normal
I hear you Malcolm, ty for letting me know. Too bad though...
Ecke
2010/6/29 Malcolm Smith malcolmsmi...@btinternet.com:
Hi Ecke,
This is something currently on my mind. I wrote this reply about ten
times and deleted it again. In a nutshell I would love for the
etiquette of this list to make
Is falk lumo a lurker on this list?
i read the name a few times back during the k-7 discussions but don't
remember seeing a single post here so i am a little surprised to see
him in that pipes page
cheers
ecke
2010/6/29 steve harley p...@paper-ape.com:
On 2010-06-29 12:58 , Matthew Hunt wrote:
What happened to Shel?
His comments could be hard to take, but I miss them.
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2010/6/29 Malcolm Smith malcolmsmi...@btinternet.com:
Hi Ecke,
This is something currently on my mind. I wrote this reply about ten
times and deleted it again. In a
On 2010-06-29 16:15, eckinator wrote:
In a nutshell I would love for the
etiquette of this list to make room for more critical comments, I
rarely see anyone saying an image doesn't work[...]
I'll praise a photo in public, but if I'm going to criticize it more
than a little, I'll typically do
2010/6/29 Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com:
I'll praise a photo in public, but if I'm going to criticize it more than a
little, I'll typically do it privately by direct email.
Whenever you see fit in my case, please by all means do.
Thanks
Ecke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I can see why you do Doug.
But don't you think others could learn from those honest comments?
In other words: Please feel free to criticise me in public.
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2010/6/29 Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com:
On 2010-06-29 16:15, eckinator wrote:
On 2010-06-29 17:22, Tim Øsleby wrote:
I can see why you do Doug.
But don't you think others could learn from those honest comments?
Yes, learning can surely occur in these situations, with some caveats
(lots of open minds, civility by all parties, ...). Unfortunately, I've
seen it devolve
On 2010-06-29 15:15 , eckinator wrote:
Is falk lumo a lurker on this list?
heh - probably not, i just looked through my photo-related blogs for
names i recognized or mentions of pentax; i'll take it off
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
--- On Tue, 6/29/10, Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
I'll praise a photo in public, but if I'm going to
criticize it more than a little, I'll typically do it
privately by direct email.
It's all in how it's done.
Incorrect:
That photo is a steaming dungheap so foul that even
He has heath issues.
On 6/29/2010 5:18 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
What happened to Shel?
His comments could be hard to take, but I miss them.
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2010/6/29 Malcolm Smithmalcolmsmi...@btinternet.com:
Hi Ecke,
This is something currently on
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
