-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: Sunday, 24 October 2010 4:08 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
On 23/10/10, paul stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
it's time for Bill to act like an adult, and it's time for list
members
006 740
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
frank theriault
Sent: Sunday, 24 October 2010 10:13 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:58 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO
Great question John!
Tanya Love
Photographer
www.lovebytes.com.au
m: 0458 006 740
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John
Sessoms
Sent: Sunday, 24 October 2010 10:54 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
How far
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
We need a PDML time out corner.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
October 2010 2:44 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: OT: new camera
that's quite easy. People are free to do whatever they want as long as they
don't infringe other people's rights to the same thing - my freedom to swing
my fist stops where your face begins.
Where words are concerned
On 30/10/10, Tanya Love, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, those yanks won't get that! A fanny pack isn't funny to them. On
the other hand, it's not lost on us Aussies, I *know* what a fanny is and
I really don't think you are part of said pack! lol.
Yeah but I wanna be ;-)
--
Cheers,
On 30/10/10, Tanya Love, discombobulated, unleashed:
Bill *could* have been exclaiming in a high pitched feminine
voice
There are many many things in this world that I can easily imagine. This
is not one of them.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 10/24/2010 7:06 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Exactly. Of course since this right of expression extends to all, we
are all free to point out bigotry and abominable behavior when it
occurs. And if the person who made the nasty comment can't handle the
fact that his conduct was duly noted, then he
On 10/24/2010 10:02 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
I didn't find it the least bit entertaining. Sorry, but verbal abuse is not my
thing.
Paul
I totally agree, Paul. You're quite right.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On 10/24/2010 8:42 PM, Bob W wrote:
why? isn't pompous twittery also an inherent trait? If you limit other
people's right to say things you don't like, someone else will limit your
right to say things they don't like. We all know where that leads.
B
It is pretty much impossible to limit
Using hate crime for this diminishes the use of the phrase when it
is actually warranted. We're talking about a snarky remark expressing
dislike (uncivil but in bounds) expressed in an unacceptable way.
Just to note, there has been an expected response. Folks used their
own freedom of speech to
Y'all may be right on that, but hate speech of that type directed publicly at a
single named individual is, IMO, a greater offense that hate speech that
applies to nameless groups of individuals. It's moot here since Godfrey doesn't
seem at all ruffled or intimidated by it. Some individuals
I'm not excusing the offense. I'm just saying that people being
people are more likely to do bad things with words, especially on a
keyboard. My point is, to use the old phrase, hate the sin not the
sinner.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Y'all
Finally, like Hari Seldon said I exercise restraint and this has nothing
to do
funny that because his brother Hari Krishna said The sun is Kali, and I am
what I am.
Which kind of brings us full circle in a cosmic sort of way.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Bob W wrote:
Finally, like Hari Seldon said I exercise restraint and this has nothing
to do
funny that because his brother Hari Krishna said The sun is Kali, and I am
what I am.
But his band The Seldon Scene was the foundation for a whole new music empire.
Concerning the foul language, I think that it should be common agreement
that Igor, I and partially Bob W are the biggest. If Igor and/or I start
with Russian Mat, it won't be pretty at all. And Bob, given his
multilinguinity :-) will be our deputy :-).
On the serious note, I still fail to
On 10/23/2010 6:41 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Using the F word to describe a gay male is equivalent to using the
N word to describe a person of color. Both indicate intolerance,
which is the definition of bigotry. Both are grossly unacceptable on
any forum. Of course, when Robb erupts into
On 10/24/2010 2:12 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
There are those that Bill never abuses, even when they disagree with
him, apparently they have gained his favor. That's fine. But I'm not
going to tolerate his nastiness, and I don't think anyone else should
have to either. If he wants to behave like
On 10/24/2010 3:28 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
It's easy to get angry on forums, but some posts go beyond anger.
I've lost my cool on forums before, and regretted it. I've apologized
both onlist and offlist (simultaneously) when I've overstepped
civility. It's a win-win resolution. Apologies were
On 10/23/2010 9:38 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
For example, last month I picked up a friend at the airport, and
Candice greeted me with Yo, niggah!. When a black woman calls a
white jewish man, who is a close friend niggah, she gets a laugh
and a hug.
I recently learned about existence of work
On 10/23/2010 4:28 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
For me, what this pro-grade body nets as advantage (other
than its improvements in image stabilization, viewfinder quality,
resolution, etc over my existing equipment, is it's responsiveness
and noise control.
Oh! So, my assumption is approved by
On 10/23/2010 11:02 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
The first time you do it, it can take a bit of work, but it's quite
easy. The tricky bit is with the shim behind the screen, getting it
to stay in place, or go back in place. The screens come with a
tweezer for holding the screen, but I'd recommend
On 10/23/2010 10:17 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I guess I should avoid beans with my huevos rancheros in the future,
eh? ]'-)
'Huevos' sounds awfully close to the certain Russian word which as an
old joke goes is actually a basis for all fences. First the word is
written, then the fence is
On Oct 24, 2010, at 12:22 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 10/23/2010 11:02 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
The first time you do it, it can take a bit of work, but it's quite
easy. The tricky bit is with the shim behind the screen, getting it
to stay in place, or go back in place. The screens come
On Oct 24, 2010, at 12:14 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 10/23/2010 9:38 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
For example, last month I picked up a friend at the airport, and
Candice greeted me with Yo, niggah!. When a black woman calls a
white jewish man, who is a close friend niggah, she gets a laugh
Concerning the foul language, I think that it should be common agreement
that Igor, I and partially Bob W are the biggest. If Igor and/or I start
with
Russian Mat, it won't be pretty at all. And Bob, given his multilinguinity
:-) will
be our deputy :-).
On the serious note, I still fail to
On 24 October 2010 19:21, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
the only person who could enforce a ban is Doug, so calling for bans is
silly. Personally I'm not in favour of banning anything. People should try
to be as polite as possible, and as polite as they would be in real world
company. If
On 10/24/2010 10:21 AM, Bob W wrote:
the only person who could enforce a ban is Doug, so calling for bans is
silly. Personally I'm not in favour of banning anything. People should try
to be as polite as possible, and as polite as they would be in real world
company. If they can't be polite - and
the only person who could enforce a ban is Doug, so calling for bans
is silly. Personally I'm not in favour of banning anything. People
should try to be as polite as possible, and as polite as they would be
in real world company. If they can't be polite - and we all have our
moments -
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:21:33 +0100
Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
If they can't be polite - and we all have
our moments - then everyone else has the right to ignore them if they
want to.
you forget people have their self-righteous moments too :)
and it's not even the first time in my
On Oct 24, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Subash wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:21:33 +0100
Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
If they can't be polite - and we all have
our moments - then everyone else has the right to ignore them if they
want to.
you forget people have their self-righteous moments
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 02:51:08 -0700
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Subash wrote:
http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2007-February/057146.html
Thank you Subash. It's nice to know that somebody on this list can
write something approaching decent
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:58 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
Show me where anything in that sentence isn't true Frank?
You may not like the choice of terminology, but it doesn't indicate bigotry,
only contempt,
On Oct 24, 2010, at 4:21 AM, Bob W wrote:
Concerning the foul language, I think that it should be common agreement
that Igor, I and partially Bob W are the biggest. If Igor and/or I start
with
Russian Mat, it won't be pretty at all. And Bob, given his multilinguinity
:-) will
be our deputy
How far should tolerance of intolerance extend?
From: Steven Desjardins
I'm never happy to see anyone just go away. Tolerance extends in many
directions. We're never stronger for losing someone, even if that
strength is the result of patience on our part. Maybe I'm sensitive
to this because I
and clarity and
consistently check his thread comments. I very much value his perceived respect
for my thoughts and work. His leaving the list would be sad indeed.
Jack
--- On Sun, 10/24/10, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: new
We need a PDML time out corner.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On 24/10/10, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
the only person who could enforce a ban is Doug, so calling for bans is
silly. Personally I'm not in favour of banning anything. People should try
to be as polite as possible, and as polite as they would be in real world
company. If they can't be
On 24/10/10, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
you're starting to sound like Cotty*
Bob
*I used the C-word...
Them's fighting words.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
How far should tolerance of intolerance extend?
From: Steven Desjardins
I'm never happy to see anyone just go away. Tolerance extends in many
directions. We're never stronger for losing someone, even if that
strength is the result of patience on our part
Oh, new word alert: the Doug-ban.
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:46:36
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
On 10/24/2010
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/23/2010 4:28 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
For me, what this pro-grade body nets as advantage (other
than its improvements in image stabilization, viewfinder quality,
resolution, etc over my existing equipment, is
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Subash pdml.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 02:51:08 -0700
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Oct 24, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Subash wrote:
http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2007-February/057146.html
Thank you Subash. It's nice to know that
From: Boris Liberman
On the serious note, I still fail to see how one's sexual preferences or
any other such preferences of private matter have to do with this list.
Specifically, I am thinking that even mention of one's sexual
preferences should be simply banned by common agreement here.
I
it's Japanese
Oh, new word alert: the Doug-ban.
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:46:36
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: new
the only person who could enforce a ban is Doug, so calling for bans is
silly. Personally I'm not in favour of banning anything. People should
try to be as polite as possible, and as polite as they would be in real
world company. If they can't be polite - and we all have our moments -
then
that's quite easy. People are free to do whatever they want as long as they
don't infringe other people's rights to the same thing - my freedom to swing
my fist stops where your face begins.
Where words are concerned, people have the right to say any damn thing they
want provided other people are
On 2010-10-24 12:43, Bob W wrote:
- one should not have to tolerate lies - but
simply insulting someone as an expression of opinion is something we should
all tolerate.
FWIW, that's my position, too, Bob.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
2010/10/24 Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com:
On 2010-10-24 12:43, Bob W wrote:
- one should not have to tolerate lies - but
simply insulting someone as an expression of opinion is something we
should
all tolerate.
to some extent. i think insulting someone based on an inherent
On Oct 24, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-10-24 12:43, Bob W wrote:
- one should not have to tolerate lies - but
simply insulting someone as an expression of opinion is something we should
all tolerate.
FWIW, that's my position, too, Bob.
Exactly. Of course since this
to some extent. i think insulting someone based on an inherent property or
trait is crossing a line. calling names is fine short of that line IMO but
not
beyond it. i can handle pompous twit as an insult just fine but faggot is
too
much
why? isn't pompous twittery also an inherent trait? If
etc, etc, etc, etc
--- On Sun, 10/24/10, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
Subject: RE: OT: new camera
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 11:42 AM
to some extent. i think
insulting someone based
2010/10/24 Bob W p...@web-options.com:
why? isn't pompous twittery also an inherent trait? If you limit other
people's right to say things you don't like, someone else will limit your
right to say things they don't like. We all know where that leads.
negative. i was only pointing out what I
On Oct 24, 2010, at 5:53 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
How far should tolerance of intolerance extend?
A friend of mine says that there are only two things that the Swedes won't
tolerate, bigotry and gypsys.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Shunning someone for boorish behavior isn't trampling on their
rights. It's merely depriving them of a platform from which to engage
in that boorish behavior ... a platform to which no one person is entitled.
-- Walt
why? isn't pompous twittery also an inherent trait? If you limit other
Boorish is putting it mildly. It DOES fall under hate crime (which includes
insults and verbal abuse). I think hate crime is a clear line that we don't
traverse on this list. Pompous gas bag is not a hate crime. Faggot is. I would
prefer the way William F. Buckley introduced Norman Mailer
On Oct 24, 2010, at 10:06 AM, eckinator wrote:
2010/10/24 Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com:
On 2010-10-24 12:43, Bob W wrote:
- one should not have to tolerate lies - but
simply insulting someone as an expression of opinion is something we
should
all tolerate.
to some extent. i
On Oct 24, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 24, 2010, at 10:06 AM, eckinator wrote:
2010/10/24 Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com:
On 2010-10-24 12:43, Bob W wrote:
- one should not have to tolerate lies - but
simply insulting someone as an expression of opinion is
El 24/10/2010 22:02, paul stenquist escribió:
I didn't find it the least bit entertaining. Sorry, but verbal abuse is not my
thing.
Paul
Very well said, Paul.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
If someone insults you then you should be big enough to deal with it -
we're all
grown-ups, and it's just an email list.
Oh MARK !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
Subject: RE: OT: new camera
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: drd1...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
Oh, new word alert: the Doug-ban.
Is it all percussion or does it have woodwinds strings in it too?
-Original Message-
From: Boris
On Oct 24, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: drd1...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
Oh, new word alert: the Doug-ban.
Is it all percussion or does it have woodwinds strings
From: Jeffery Smith
Boorish is putting it mildly. It DOES fall under hate crime (which
includes insults and verbal abuse). I think hate crime is a clear
line that we don't traverse on this list. Pompous gas bag is not a
hate crime. Faggot is. I would prefer the way William F. Buckley
introduced
From: Larry Colen
On Oct 24, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: drd1...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
Oh, new word alert: the Doug-ban.
Is it all percussion or does it have
Still, I prefer him over today's far right. But, yes, he was breathtakingly
full of himself.
Jeffert
On Oct 24, 2010, at 7:01 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
OTOH, Buckley had his own moments of pompous gas baggery and boorishness. No
actual civility from either side here.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Boorish is putting it mildly. It DOES fall under hate crime
(which includes insults and verbal abuse). I think hate
crime is a clear line that we don't traverse on this list.
Pompous gas bag is not a hate crime. Faggot is. ...
Let's not go off the
On Oct 24, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
However, it is obviously not a hate crime.
Really? Does one have to use that word while committing an armed robbery or
punching the recipient?
Gay bashing has become a very hot button issue in the US, particularly in the
past month, as has
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
On Oct 24, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
However, it is obviously not a hate crime.
Really? Does one have to use that word while committing an armed robbery or
punching the recipient?
Well, yes, that's
Learn the joy's of manual focus. Autofocus is for wimps.
On 10/23/2010 10:39 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I do a significant amount of shooting theater productions, and the shutter lag
is a major issue for me, as is sensitivity/dynamic range. The E-5 is
significantly improved here, or is it
Political correctness has officially run amuck here. Hate crime?
Pulllease Someone's sensibilities being bruised is not a hate
crime. Bill Robb, made a truthful statement in as offensive a manor as
he could. So what. I've put both Godfrey and Bill on my kill list at
different times
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't filter you, Robb. I simply ignore you.
MARK!!
Sorry. I won't be able to include this quotation because I
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, with that one, I'm out of here. It's been fun, guys, until now.
These things flare up for a bit and go away. I hope you stick around
- your contributions have been valuable.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:21 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey good one liner from the pompous twit faggot.
Too bad it is, apparently, not true.
Attack his words and ideas?
Fine.
Attack his sexual preference?
Completely out of line.
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't filter you, Robb. I simply ignore you.
MARK!!
Sorry. I won't be able to include this
On 23/10/10, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
I agree totally, and so do my wives.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
I agree totally, and so do my wives.
you wouldn't say that if you were a bigot.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
On 23 October 2010 23:55, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 23/10/10, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
I agree totally, and so do my wives.
They should probably just kiss and make up.
--
Rob Studdert (Digital
Cotty wrote:
On 23/10/10, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
I agree totally, and so do my wives.
kram... err mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
AMEN
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:31 AM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:21 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey good one liner from the pompous twit faggot.
Too bad it is, apparently, not true.
Attack his words and ideas?
Fine.
Attack his
As naive as it may sound, I bought my Olympus E-1 (my first dSLR) based on its
(1) sturdiness [read: not a plastic body], and (2) LACK of a pop-up flash. I
had a pz1p fpr a while, and found the pop-up flash to be annoying when I was
just trying to grab a shot in lower light conditions and
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:52 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
... Equipment often gets in the way of Photography. ...
So true. That´s why I concentrate on size, convenience and non-intrusive
equipment and how it
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
A pro grade camera is a camera built to different (higher) standards
of durability and robustness. It's designed to be able to take a
beating in adverse conditions and extended heavy use. Pentax has never
really made
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 October 2010 23:55, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 23/10/10, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
I agree totally, and so do my
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 October 2010 18:43, Jaume Lahuerta jlah...@yahoo.com wrote:
Interesting discussion...
If Canikon comes out with their own 'Nex'-like...I am afraid that all those
buyers will be attracted again by their powerful brands
thank you for your opinion. ;-)
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:52 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
... Equipment often gets in the way of Photography. ...
I do a significant amount of shooting theater productions, and the shutter lag
is a major issue for me, as is sensitivity/dynamic range. The E-5 is
significantly improved here, or is it simply not a problem with the E-5?
The K-x has not been an issue with dynamic range/sensitivity for me, and
Note that I do consider the E-5 to be an excellent choice for someone
who is invested in the 4/3rds system as it marries the E-3's generally
excellent body design (and the only good viewfinder in the 4/3rds
system) to the greatly improved imaging chain of the PEN's. IMHO it's
simply too little,
I'd have to ask what mode are you in, my experience with the K-x is it
does not have significant shutter lag except in LV mode (where the lag
is simply awful, LV is almost unusable on the K-x in my experience).
It does however have an AF system which struggles in low-light so if
you're shooting in
Cotty wrote:
On 23/10/10, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
I agree totally, and so do my wives.
If you hate lots of different groups is that poligotry?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Jeffery Smith
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 10:40 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
I do a significant amount of shooting theater productions, and the shutter
lag is a major issue for me
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 23/10/10, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
I agree totally, and so do my wives.
If you hate lots of different groups is that poligotry?
Excuse me, that should be polygotry,
I shot last month mostly in aperture priority mode to keep the aperture fairly
wide (2.5 or so) and increase shutter speed. I did run into some AF focus
issues that I thought might be the result of multipoint AF, so I tried to
restrict both AF and exposure readings to a center spot. I've got a
--
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
Show me where anything in that sentence isn't true Frank?
You may not like the choice of terminology, but it doesn't
Who cares? I'm visualizing the wives.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 October 2010 23:55, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 23/10/10, frank theriault,
No that, Realllybigotry.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 23/10/10, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
I agree totally, and so do my wives.
If you hate
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:00:47AM +1100, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 23 October 2010 23:55, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 23/10/10, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
I agree totally, and so do my wives.
They
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
Show me where anything in that sentence isn't true Frank?
You may not like the choice of terminology, but it doesn't indicate bigotry,
only contempt, which is not the same thing.
William Robb
AM, William Robb wrote:
--
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
Show me where anything in that sentence isn't true Frank?
You may not like the choice
-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Jeffery Smith
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 10:40 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
I do a significant amount of shooting theater productions, and the shutter
lag is a major issue for me
On 23/10/10, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
IMHO there's no place for bigotry on this list - or anywhere else.
I agree totally, and so do my wives.
If you hate lots of different groups is that poligotry?
Excuse me, that should be polygotry, shouldn't it?
or jammygittery
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
