I own similar kit with 35/55/200 lens + 120/220 inserts.
So only 120 macro missing.
I would like to get only these 120 macro lens :)
Gasha
eckinator wrote:
2010/8/9 Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com:
Not sure why you don't want to deal with Ebay.
I offered my two lens Pentax 645 kit to
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, guys. I really don't want to sell it, but I kinda need the
cash. If it doesn't generate any interest within the next couple days
it's going to KEH. Or maybe eBay. Probably KEH, because I just don't
want to
2010/8/9 Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com:
Not sure why you don't want to deal with Ebay.
I offered my two lens Pentax 645 kit to KEH.com and they offered me a
total of $260 for everything. I put the same gear up for sale on Ebay
and netted $950 after expenses. $700 is worth a little bit
eckinator wrote:
2010/8/9 Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com:
Not sure why you don't want to deal with Ebay.
I offered my two lens Pentax 645 kit to KEH.com and they offered me a
total of $260 for everything. I put the same gear up for sale on Ebay
and netted $950 after expenses. $700 is
Just be sure that you don't meet anyone alone handling that amount of
cash. There have been a couple cases in the town next to mine where
several people were mugged for a couple hundred when they responded to
a TV for sale.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
2010/8/9 David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com:
Just be sure that you don't meet anyone alone handling that amount of
cash. There have been a couple cases in the town next to mine where
several people were mugged for a couple hundred when they responded to
a TV for sale.
Ouch. I guess
Wow. That's quite a deal with 4 lenses.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi gang. I need to sell my 645 kit. Included are the manual focus
body with front and rear caps, 120 and 220 film magazines with
holders, A200/4, A120/4 Macro (best lens ever,
I had the money, I'd buy the whole kit then hunt up a 645D body in a
heartbeat. That would be a splendid kit and would start a new line of
work.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow. That's quite a deal with 4 lenses.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 4:00 PM,
If I wasn't already invested in my Mamiya 645 stuff, I'd be digging up
cash right now. That's a steal for a kit that good. If you have any
interest in shooting MF, snap it up now.
-Adam
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
I had the money, I'd buy the
Yep. Wish I had the bucks to grab this.
Doug Brewer
dougbrewer.posterous.com
On Aug 8, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow. That's quite a deal with 4 lenses.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi gang. I need to sell
Thanks, guys. I really don't want to sell it, but I kinda need the
cash. If it doesn't generate any interest within the next couple days
it's going to KEH. Or maybe eBay. Probably KEH, because I just don't
want to deal with eBay.
On 8/8/10, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
Yep. Wish I had
Brian, you evoked some rather grim associations also related to the
WWII. So one may say, you've hit the bull's eye with this viewer...
Boris
On 12/10/2009 1:21 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
G'day all
Another one from my trip to Western Australia.
At Geraldton there is a memorial to the sailors
In a message dated 12/10/2009 3:21:38 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
supera1...@fastmail.fm writes:
G'day all
Another one from my trip to Western Australia.
At Geraldton there is a memorial to the sailors who were lost off the WA
coast when the HMAS Sydney II was sunk in WW2. It's a
Hi Boris
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:29 +0200, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
wrote:
Brian, you evoked some rather grim associations also related to the
WWII. So one may say, you've hit the bull's eye with this viewer...
Thanks - it was an unexpectedly emotional experience for my wife and me.
Thanks, Rick. Also Jack and Dave.
Comments appreciated.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:28 -0800, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com
wrote:
I like this. The silhouetting
Impressive shot!
Jack
--- On Thu, 12/10/09, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm
Subject: PESO - 645 Seagulls
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 3:21 AM
G'day all
Another one from my trip to
Very nice. The blue sky back ground works well here.
For a second i thought you might have been in Geraldton Ontario, but
the biggest boat in the local lake would fit in a truck bed:-)
Dave
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
G'day all
Another one
I like this. The silhouetting works well, and you chose an angle that gives a
sense of motion.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Thu, 12/10/09, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm
Subject: PESO - 645 Seagulls
To: Pentax-Discuss
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
G'day all
Another one from my trip to Western Australia.
At Geraldton there is a memorial to the sailors who were lost off the WA
coast when the HMAS Sydney II was sunk in WW2. It's a particularly
beautiful
- Original Message -
From: Roman Melihhov
Subject: PENTAX 645 Digital at Photo Imaging Expo 2009 in Japan
http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/2009/200905.html
^^^ I' d seen many announcements recently but still waiting for my DA*
60-250mm SDM to get in stock...
I have a feeling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08070901Hasselblad.asp
Pentax 645D where are you? :D
The 645D was nailed to its perch but now it's pining for the fjords,
so to speak.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Apparently hiding under the bed...
On the other hand the formula Megapixels = Megapirce seems to hold here.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08070901Hasselblad.asp
Pentax 645D where are you? :D
.t
--
You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with
Yeah. I think the $40K price tag leaves a bit of room for other models.
(What is the emoticon for overwhelming sarcasm?)
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/10/2008 8:36 AM
Apparently hiding under the bed...
On the other hand the formula Megapixels = Megapirce seems to hold
here.
[EMAIL
Don't know, but I suppose it would help if I could spell price...
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Yeah. I think the $40K price tag leaves a bit of room for other models.
(What is the emoticon for overwhelming sarcasm?)
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/10/2008 8:36 AM
Apparently
Remember, they sell a couple dozen of these a month. Small production
runs means huge prices.
-Adam
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah. I think the $40K price tag leaves a bit of room for other models.
(What is the emoticon for overwhelming
It seems on a per photo basis, (even a good size commercial operation),
would never amortize one of these over their useful lifetime. For most
studios on a cost per shot basis it's would be less expensive using
film. (Ok, so that's not even back of the envelope calculations but
that's what
I suppose they rent it, right?
On 7/10/08, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems on a per photo basis, (even a good size commercial operation),
would never amortize one of these over their useful lifetime. For most
studios on a cost per shot basis it's would be less expensive using
Most do.
-Adam
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose they rent it, right?
On 7/10/08, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems on a per photo basis, (even a good size commercial operation),
would never amortize one of these over their useful
If you rent it sometimes you don't have it when you need it. But that's
a possibility.
Fernando wrote:
I suppose they rent it, right?
On 7/10/08, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems on a per photo basis, (even a good size commercial operation),
would never amortize one of
High-end commercial shooters can justify 40K for a camera. Some of the best
gross that much in a couple days of shooting. And Hassy doesn't expect high
volume, so that market alone probably absorbs much of their production. Then
there are the ridiculously rich hobbyists who have to have the
What about Mid level commercial shooters, I guess they do with out.
(I'm glad I'm out of that game, I couldn't survive).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
High-end commercial shooters can justify 40K for a camera. Some of the best
gross that much in a couple days of shooting. And Hassy doesn't expect
My guess: full frame and occassionally rent a MF digital, or an old
hassy and a phase one digital back (owned or rented)
On 7/10/08, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about Mid level commercial shooters, I guess they do with out.
(I'm glad I'm out of that game, I couldn't survive).
Mid level commercial photographers do just fine with Canon and Nikon. And if
they get a job that really justifies medium format digital, they can rent
equipment. But a mid level shooter who works for $2000 a day or so generally
doesn't get work that justifies MF expenditure. Some, of course,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mid level commercial photographers do just fine with Canon and Nikon. And if
they get a job that really justifies medium format digital, they can rent
equipment. But a mid level shooter who works for $2000 a day or so generally
doesn't get work that justifies MF
I would think so. But I bet that quite a few wealthy hobbyists buy them as well.
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mid level commercial photographers do just fine with Canon and Nikon. And
if
they get a job
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think so. But I bet that quite a few wealthy hobbyists buy them as
well.
/de-lurk
I have been to several Hasselblad function where we get to test drive new
blads. My experience here in Sydney is that the most common users are
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think so. But I bet that quite a few wealthy hobbyists buy them as
well.
/de-lurk
I have been to several Hasselblad function where we get to test drive new
blads. My experience here in Sydney is that
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The medium format discussion on photo.net has some 645 and 6x7
commentary.
Have a look at http://medfmt.8k.com/
It's by the guy who does the Third-Party Lens Megasite, with all the
quirkiness of that site included. And it's still hosted on a free web
hosting service,
them I will forward to you to
help you get started on your project...
Begin forwarded message:
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Pedro Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: December 17, 2005 3:25:17 PM CST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pentax 645 system site???
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
At PMA 2006 it was a mockup, completely non-functional. PMA 2007 had a
working prototype, but it's not a priority since the Hoya merger and
when or if a production model will arrive is unknown.
-Adam
On 1/6/08, Timber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just made some search and found out that 2006's
The 645D was first mooted about 3-4 years ago. It was apparently being
actively developed for a while but it kept being deferred. However, whenever
it looks as if it has finally been canceled, it seems to pop up in rumors again.
I doubt we'll ever see it go to market.
Cheers
Brian
IIRC it was reported as a working prototype. There were rumors of
it's demise after the Hoya takeover. Some still hold out hope, I think
it would be a marketing disaster.
Timber wrote:
I just made some search and found out that 2006's PMA there was a Pentax
645 Digital:
Hi Charles
Quoting Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can anyone tell me what the designation (645) means after a lens.
Will this
lens fit on my digital ist D.
Those lenses are designed for the Pentax 645 medium format system.
As far as I know they will fit the K mount cameras with an
There is a 645 to k adaptor, but they seem to be significantly rarer
than hen's teeth.
Peter
David Savage wrote:
645 = 6 x 4.5cm negative/transparency.
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov 29, 2007 8:11 PM, Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the designation (645) means
645 = 6 x 4.5cm negative/transparency.
Cheers,
Dave
On Nov 29, 2007 8:11 PM, Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the designation (645) means after a lens. Will this
lens fit on my digital ist D.
Regards
Charles Wilson
Sydney Australia
--
PDML
With an adapter. 645 is the designation for one of Pentax's two lines
of medium format SLRs. The lens will work much like an M43 mount lens
on K mount cameras.
Charles Wilson wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the designation (645) means after a lens. Will this
lens fit on my digital ist D.
That should be M42 mount lens, of course.
P. J. Alling wrote:
With an adapter. 645 is the designation for one of Pentax's two lines
of medium format SLRs. The lens will work much like an M43 mount lens
on K mount cameras.
Charles Wilson wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the designation
Charles,
Pentax makes a variety of film format cameras.
The *ist D is a 35mm film format camera, even though no film is involved.
It uses Pentax K mount, 35mm format lenses. (think 24mm x 36mm film)
In a pinch, with a $10 adapter, the Pentax screwmount 35mm format
lenses can be mounted.
Pentax
I have one. They're more expensive than golden goose eggs too.
FYI, 67-645-K mount works too, but you have to play the same game as with
SMCK on K10D (crippled KA2 mount).
Regards,
Bob...
-
Note: No trees were killed in the sending
It is worth to use it, viewfinder especially!
I'm now back to film, because i dropped my K100D and now shutter button
does not fire 95% of time... :(
Gasha
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
...
yet. My kit is the 645 plus three 120 magazines, 45/2.8 and 75/2.8
lenses, case, strap, remote cable,
The P645 viewfinder is good, but I expect that of any professional
medium format SLR.
I was at a talk last night given by Charles Anselmo, who has an
exhibition of his work at the Aftermodern gallery in San Francisco at
present (http://www.aftermodern.com/c_anselmo.php).
His primary camera
When I was in high school I shot with the yearbook's
Mamiya 1000 DTL, and my wife got a DSX 500 for a
college graduation present (I used it a lot more than
she did!).
The cameras handled well and were unusual in having
both spot and averaging metering. The glass seemed
good (I still have 50/2
No, can't help there. The 1000 DTL is the only one I've used.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/brianwalters
Quoting Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank
Thanks, Brian. Too bad...I would like some more feedback--specific
feedback, that is--on the Mamiya Z Series.
Glen
On Sep 2, 2007, at 3:20 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
No, can't help there. The 1000 DTL is the only one I've used.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian
From:
Glen Tortorella
Hi Steve,
I just searched at KEH for the outfit you have mentioned. The
outfit price is $394 in EX and $514 in EX+. When they makes these
designations, they mean that both the camera and lens are in this
condition? If so, this camera and lens stand to be in better
Thanks, John :-) It is great to hear they are conservative with
their condition ratings. Everyone on the lis seems to agree.
Glen
On Sep 2, 2007, at 10:50 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From:
Glen Tortorella
Hi Steve,
I just searched at KEH for the outfit you have mentioned. The
outfit
Thank you for your thoughts, Adam. Medium format is an intriguing
option. I will continue to ponder the matter. How do you like
handling the 645 (i.e. the feel of it)? Is it more of a tripod
only type of camera, or may one take good hand-held shots with it?
Does the design include any
The handling of the 645N and 645NII are superb (Better than my Mamiya's,
Although I do like the Mamiya 645AFDII even more), the original 645 is
IMHO compromised by the use of the ME Super 2-button interface (I'm not
a big fan) but still handles well overall. Build is plastic-covered
metal,
Thank you for the detailed responses, Adam. The 645 series sounds
like it would be an excellent choice for me. I think I would tend
toward the original 645, as it can be had for less money and it is a
manual focus camera. With the various questions I have asked, you
have been very
Hi Adam,
I see you mention your Mamiya, but I forgot to ask: have you ever
tried Mamiya's 35mm cameras? Overall, what do you think of them?
The ZM, which I believe was their last 35mm, looks interesting. I
gather it might be tough to find one in nice condition, as black
camera bodies
I can say one thing, the earlier M42 Mamiya bodies were crude
bricks compared to Pentax Spotmatics.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Glen Tortorella
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 2:06 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re
Mamiya seems to have changed lens mounts on their 35mm cameras the way
you're supposed to change tooth brushes, and the earlier lenses were
often completely incompatible. Good luck find lenses for the later
bayonet mount cameras, though when you do find them they are inexpensive.
The shutter
- Original Message -
From: Glen Tortorella
Subject: Re: The 645 (and Mamiya)
Hi Adam,
I see you mention your Mamiya, but I forgot to ask: have you ever
tried Mamiya's 35mm cameras? Overall, what do you think of them?
The ZM, which I believe was their last 35mm, looks interesting
I bought a 645 and a 75 mm f2.8 lens for about $500 a few years ago from
KEH (before film really started to go away. I checked KEH and you can
do better now. My 645 body was a bargain one and it's in great
condition. (Bargain is a rating level for KEH) I wouldn't hesitate
to buy one in this
On Sep 1, 2007, at 7:09 AM, Glen Tortorella wrote:
... How do you like
handling the 645 (i.e. the feel of it)? Is it more of a tripod
only type of camera, or may one take good hand-held shots with
it? ...
Adam's contributed on this already, but I have to say that one of the
reasons I
, September 01, 2007 2:55 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The 645 (and Mamiya)
- Original Message -
From: Glen Tortorella
Subject: Re: The 645 (and Mamiya)
Hi Adam,
I see you mention your Mamiya, but I forgot to ask: have you ever
tried Mamiya's 35mm cameras? Overall
Thank you, Godfrey, et. al. :-)
Glen
On Sep 1, 2007, at 3:59 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 1, 2007, at 7:09 AM, Glen Tortorella wrote:
... How do you like
handling the 645 (i.e. the feel of it)? Is it more of a tripod
only type of camera, or may one take good hand-held shots with
From:
Steve Desjardins
I bought a 645 and a 75 mm f2.8 lens for about $500 a few years ago from
KEH (before film really started to go away. I checked KEH and you can
do better now. My 645 body was a bargain one and it's in great
condition. (Bargain is a rating level for KEH) I wouldn't
Hi Steve,
I just searched at KEH for the outfit you have mentioned. The
outfit price is $394 in EX and $514 in EX+. When they makes these
designations, they mean that both the camera and lens are in this
condition? If so, this camera and lens stand to be in better shape
than yours, as
Usually they rate the package as a whole when you buy an outfit.
They usually also list whether it includes caps, manual, etc. I
always want them to include caps, or I buy them separately at the
same time, but manuals are often a different matter entirely. An EXC
rating from them means
Well, others probably have much more experience here but I thought I might
mention that I have a 1000DTL (an old M42 mount camera) that is built like a
tank and, in my admittedly limited use of it, seems to be very reliable. There
is no evidence of the shutter tapering at the high speeds
Thank you for your input, Brian. Do you have any comments on, or
experience with, the newer Mamiya 35mm cameras?
Glen
On Sep 1, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Well, others probably have much more experience here but I thought
I might mention that I have a 1000DTL (an old M42
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
However, that said, I tend to use the 645 on a tripod most of the
time anyway. I like that they put tripod mounts on both side and
bottom ... I fitted mine with a pair of Really Right Stuff tripod
adapters so I can go from portrait to landscape orientation in a
The Mamiya 35mm stuff is a little odd. Mamiya never actually wanted to
get into the 35mm market and were forced to by their US distributor. And
thus their 35mm line never really gelled. There were a few good items,
but by and large it was yet another low-end japanese SLR line a la Ricoh
,
Whew, that's a huge topic to try to approach. I've loved working with
medium format cameras since my grandfather loaned me his 1949
Rolleiflex TLR in late 1967. Can't seem to feel right without one in
the closet, even if I only use it rarely.
Simple things first: the Pentax 645s are very
Good camera, but unless it's a long lens or a zoom, it's overpriced. Check out
ebay.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I went to a somewhat local camera shop today to buy film. In one
of the used cases sat a Pentax
Thank you very much, Godfrey. I agree that this is a huge topic to
approach. With all of the different formats these days, and
available hardware and software for each, it is difficult to
summarize any of them in nutshell-like manner. I have (and will)
check eBay and KEH. I will
Thank you, Paul. Yes, it does look like a very nice camera--with
many different features and modes.
Glen
On Aug 31, 2007, at 4:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good camera, but unless it's a long lens or a zoom, it's
overpriced. Check out ebay.
Paul
-- Original message
Glen Tortorella wrote:
I went to a somewhat local camera shop today to buy film. In one
of the used cases sat a Pentax 645. It looked like it was in nice
shape, and it came with a lens...I am not sure which one, though.
Anyway, they are asking $560 for it.
That's a reasonable price for
With regard to price, this is exactly what I was thinking, Mark. I
have seen similar 645 setups go for $400-$500 on eBay...but you are
right, I would then have to deal with eBay. Things are always a bit
more expensive at camera shops. It is nice, though, to be able to
hold and inspect
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hi all,
I went to a somewhat local camera shop today to buy film. In one
of the used cases sat a Pentax 645. It looked like it was in nice
shape, and it came with a lens...I am not sure which one, though.
Anyway, they are asking $560 for it. I have had at
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Pentax 645 vs. those other guys
A couple of days ago I was about two seconds away from plunking down
the cash for a 645 and three lenses - 45, 75, and 150. Then I started
thinking about landscape photography and the zone system.
On Mar 6, 2007, at 9:18 AM, William Robb wrote:
A couple of days ago I was about two seconds away from plunking down
the cash for a 645 and three lenses - 45, 75, and 150. Then I
started
thinking about landscape photography and the zone system. My
thoughts
(the horror) led me to
On 3/6/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Pentax 645 vs. those other guys
A couple of days ago I was about two seconds away from plunking down
the cash for a 645 and three lenses - 45, 75, and 150. Then I started
On 3/6/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 6, 2007, at 9:18 AM, William Robb wrote:
A couple of days ago I was about two seconds away from plunking down
the cash for a 645 and three lenses - 45, 75, and 150. Then I
started
thinking about landscape photography and the
On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:24 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
I don't see how that would be any heavier than packing a view camera
and 8 or 10 film holders along. Or were you implying that I'm smoking
crack..
lol
Note that when I tried out 4x5 and 8x10 view camera work, it lasted
about 10 weeks
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 3/6/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 6, 2007, at 9:18 AM, William Robb wrote:
A couple of days ago I was about two seconds away from plunking down
the cash for a 645 and three lenses - 45, 75, and 150. Then I
started
thinking about landscape
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: Pentax 645 vs. those other guys
I see now that used Sinar F cameras really aren't that expensive.
God, you suck.
If you want a nice landscape camera, look at a Tachihara or one of the other
wood field cameras. They don't
On 3/6/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: Pentax 645 vs. those other guys
I see now that used Sinar F cameras really aren't that expensive.
God, you suck.
If you want a nice landscape camera, look at a Tachihara
If you have access to a MF film scanner you can
bracket and take the best sky, land, and
foreground/background and put them together by
blending channels in Photoshop.
No extra backs or anything needed. Except a sturdy
tripod...but you'll have that anyway.
-Brendan
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL
Scott Loveless wrote:
A couple of days ago I was about two seconds away from plunking down
the cash for a 645 and three lenses - 45, 75, and 150. Then I started
thinking about landscape photography and the zone system. My thoughts
(the horror) led me to consider the possibility of having 5
God, you suck.
No, he /enables/. ;-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
. Radermacher
Sendt: 24. februar 2007 20:07
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Pentax 645 + Carl Ziess Jena lenses?
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have any of you guys experiences with this?
I'm thinking about getting a 645 body for my excellent Pentacon Six lenses
(CZ Jena and Schneider
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralf, judging from your website, you are a Kiev user, rather than a Pentacon
Six user right?
Correct. For the reasons explained there I'm using the Zeiss/Pentacon
lenses on a modified Kiev 60 (MLU, Rollei screen, mirror box flocking
etc.).
Ralf
--
Ralf R.
Should be doable. I know adaptors are available for Mamiya M645's, and
the Pentax isn't all that different in register.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
Have any of you guys experiences with this?
I'm thinking about getting a 645 body for my excellent Pentacon Six lenses
(CZ Jena and
There are adapters available. This is the first one I found after a
quick google search. Ebay item number 170028746628.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Pentacon-Kiev-88CM-Lens-to-Pentax-645-Body-Adapter-NEW_W0QQitemZ170028746628QQihZ007QQcategoryZ30059QQcmdZViewItem
On 2/24/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have any of you guys experiences with this?
I'm thinking about getting a 645 body for my excellent Pentacon Six lenses
(CZ Jena and Schneider-Kreuznach).
Not with the Pentax 645 but I had a Mamiya 645 Pro for a time and used
my Zeiss Jena lenses on it with
://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Ralf R. Radermacher
Sendt: 24. februar 2007 20:07
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Pentax 645 + Carl Ziess Jena lenses?
Jens Bladt [EMAIL
Sendt: 24. februar 2007 20:07
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Pentax 645 + Carl Ziess Jena lenses?
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have any of you guys experiences with this?
I'm thinking about getting a 645 body for my excellent Pentacon Six lenses
(CZ Jena and Schneider
sonnar 300/4 usually goes for $300. for twice that much you can get
p645 300/4 ED IF, which is in a totally different league!
best,
mishka
On 2/24/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralf - actually, I do have a Pentax K-adapter for my P6 lenses, but I have
never used it.
The Sonnor 300mm
1 - 100 of 352 matches
Mail list logo
