You're thinking of the 2000P...a completely different animal from the R2000.
Different ink set, different print engine.
http://t.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/ProductQuickSpec.jsp?oid=8987utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
-p
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 18, 2015, at 7:35 AM, Paul Stenquist
No. You're wrong. The R2000 is still in production.
http://t.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/Product.do?BV_UseBVCookie=yessku=C11CB35201
-p
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 18, 2015, at 6:24 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Do you mean the R 3000? The 2000 has been out of production
Yep. The R2000 is apparently the successor to the high gloss printer. The R3000
is the K3 ink printer and successor to the 2880. For Ann, who prints a lot of
BW, the R3000 would be a better choice.
Paul via phone
On Apr 18, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Paul Sorenson pentax1...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you mean the R 3000? The 2000 has been out of production for at least ten
years.
Paul via phone
On Apr 18, 2015, at 2:30 AM, Paul pentax1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ann -
I would agree with Mark C re: to get the exact output you want you can best
do it by printing your own images. Not
That must be a new version of it. The original was a big beige boat and
succeeded the R 1200.
Paul via phone
On Apr 18, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Paul Sorenson pentax1...@gmail.com wrote:
No. You're wrong. The R2000 is still in production.
We're on opposite ends of the spectrum, Bruce. I love prints. I'm estimating
that this R2400 printer has made on the order of 11,000 prints (in all sizes)
since I bought it in October 2005. It's still working beautifully.
This year in particular, I've been on a two fine prints per week
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I will probably go for the 3880 (or the next version of the wide printer)
when my 2880 dies. But I can print 13 x 19s affordably with the 2880 inks. My
cost per print is about $3. But I would like to print bigger.
I will probably go for the 3880 (or the next version of the wide printer) when
my 2880 dies. But I can print 13 x 19s affordably with the 2880 inks. My cost
per print is about $3. But I would like to print bigger. The 2880, which is
very similar to the 3000 and preceded it, is my fourth Epson
Yes. The R3000 is probably a better choice for b/w, what with three separate
shades of black ink. Then again if budget is a consideration the R3000 is
about $250 more expensive.
But...the R2000 does do a great job with b/w, but then I'm careful to use
software and the correct icc profile to
Bad link to the P600 info. Here it is
http://www.redrivercatalog.com/infocenter/articles/epson-surecolor-p600-review-introduction.html
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 18, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Paul Sorenson pentax1...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. The R3000 is probably a better choice for b/w, what with
Actually, it's just the opposite...the it's when you DON'T print that
the ink dries and plugs up the nozzles
-p
On 4/18/2015 1:33 PM, John wrote:
If you make a LOT of prints the nozzles quite as likely to dry up.
I go to Costco for anything 12x18 ($3.99) or smaller use a local
pro-lab for
I don't think I've experienced a nozzle clog in the last four or five years. If
I'm going to let someone else print, I might as well let them shoot the pics as
well. But that's a personal thing. Profiles are simple. There's one for nearly
every sheet. I use Epson Ultra Premium Luster almost
Oops!
On 4/18/2015 2:53 PM, Paul wrote:
Actually, it's just the opposite...the it's when you DON'T print that
the ink dries and plugs up the nozzles
-p
On 4/18/2015 1:33 PM, John wrote:
If you make a LOT of prints the nozzles quite as likely to dry up.
Line should read:
If you make a
Don't forget having a color profile for each type of paper you're going
to use. And having to create a NEW profile for each of your papers every
time you change an ink cartridge.
If you make a LOT of prints the nozzles quite as likely to dry up.
I go to Costco for anything 12x18 ($3.99) or
thanks everyone for input... given my circumstances, I'm certainly going
to accept Godder's offer of Free R2400 - well, in fact, I already have
accepted off list so when he gets his new one set up
I'll acquire the old one.
As to the profile stuff, the R220 just asks me what specific paper I'm
The R 2400 is excellent. Good for Godders.
Paul via phone
On Apr 18, 2015, at 4:21 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
thanks everyone for input... given my circumstances, I'm certainly going to
accept Godder's offer of Free R2400 - well, in fact, I already have
accepted off list
Hadn't heard about the P600, but I'm not shopping. I too have found the paper
profiles excellent.
Paul via phone
On Apr 18, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com wrote:
In ten years of using the R2400, and some years when I didn't print for
six-seven months, I've had
In ten years of using the R2400, and some years when I didn't print for
six-seven months, I've had to clear the nozzles due to a serious clog twice.
Pigment-ink printers are much less likely to clog than dye-ink printers because
pigment particles are much larger, which requires that the nozzles
Ann -
I would agree with Mark C re: to get the exact output you want you can
best do it by printing your own images. Not only do you have more
control over the process, you have a wider range of paper surfaces from
which to choose. Plus...it's most impressive when you can report that
the
Boy that's the truth! (about cheap printer , expensive ink)
I dont' expect to be making _lots_ of big prints... I love my R220 -
very little problem with the one I have currently, although the previous
one was a lemon...
My prints are better than most of what I got from Bay photo through
for wider format epson inkjet printer
Ann,
I have no reviews, and I'm virtually never one to stand between
someone and spending their money on a new toy but, frankly, I'm not
sold on the economics of purchasing large format printers. Unless
something has changed recently, inkjet printers are a Royal
definitely recommend the Epson line.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: looking for wider format epson inkjet printer
Ann,
I have no reviews, and I'm virtually never one to stand
/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Subject: Re: looking for wider format epson inkjet printer
Ken, yes I want another Epson stylus photo.. my current one is the R220
The Epson stylus Photo p2000 sounds right so I could print on 12 x 18
paper
Ann,
You want the Epsons that use their K3 pigment ink set. I've had my R2400 since
October 2005 and it's still going strong. I have been planning to upgrade to
the new P600 model soonish, at which point I'll give you my R2400. It's got
another couple of years of service in it, still makes
Hi Ann -
I use an Epson 3880 (previously used a 3800 which broke after about 10
years). It is configured to print up to 17 x 22 inches, but can print up
to 17 x 36 with the right paper and settings.
Ink for the larger Epson printers in considerably cheaper than for the
smaller inkjets. I
Ann,
I have no reviews, and I'm virtually never one to stand between
someone and spending their money on a new toy but, frankly, I'm not
sold on the economics of purchasing large format printers. Unless
something has changed recently, inkjet printers are a Royal Pain the
Ass. Of course, it depends
On 4/17/2015 10:05 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I don't think I can do this too soon, but I wish I had a way to make
my own 11 x 17 or 12 x 18 prints
reviews? suggestions?
ann
I'm using a Canon, Pixma iX6520, yea, I know it's not an Epson, but as
long as you use Canon paper, or something
The business model of inkjet printers has always been to give you the
razor in order to sell you the high-priced razor blades. The low
printer price is designed to seduce.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:25 PM, P.J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/17/2015 10:05 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Damn, the spell checker really screwed me this time...
On 4/17/2015 11:25 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
On 4/17/2015 10:05 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I don't think I can do this too soon, but I wish I had a way to make
my own 11 x 17 or 12 x 18 prints
reviews? suggestions?
ann
I'm using a Canon,
Well yes it's like the original marketing plan for razor blades, but if
you search around one can get pretty good deals on ink. I've also found
that if I'm printing 8x10 and up my costs per print is pretty much the
same or better than going to a good lab, with about equal results.
On
30 matches
Mail list logo
