re: OT Shock horror

From: mike wilson Apparently, Norway is out of butter. But that's not the shock, horror. Look at the prices for bits of stuff people found at the back of their fridge. http://www.finn.no/finn/torget/tilsalgs/resultat?sort=5&keyword=sm%F8r Cue the "Let them eat blubber"

RE: OT Shock horror

> > Apparently, Norway is out of butter. But that's not the shock, horror. > Look at the prices for bits of stuff people found at the back of > their > fridge. > http://www.finn.no/finn/torget/tilsalgs/resultat?sort=5&keyword=sm%F8r > > Cue the "Let them

OT Shock horror

Apparently, Norway is out of butter. But that's not the shock, horror. Look at the prices for bits of stuff people found at the back of their fridge. http://www.finn.no/finn/torget/tilsalgs/resultat?sort=5&keyword=sm%F8r Cue the "Let them eat blubber" puns. -- No f

Re: FS Friday - a couple of Pentax things - whadda shock, eh?

Ann's price on the Sekonic is a very good price. If I had not just purchased one of these two weeks ago ... Sincerely, Collin Brendemuehl http://kerygmainstitute.org "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose" -- Jim Elliott -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L

Re: FS Friday - a couple of Pentax things - whadda shock, eh?

On 7/22/2011 00:50, Bong Manayon wrote: The Lehman Brother's apron is still there... :-) One is -- I've sold two of them ann On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Ok - the Sekonic light meter is on ebay... this is the link http://cgi.ebay.com/Sekonic-FLASHMATE-L-308BII-

Re: FS Friday - a couple of Pentax things - whadda shock, eh?

The Lehman Brother's apron is still there... On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > Ok - the Sekonic light meter is on ebay... > > this is the link > http://cgi.ebay.com/Sekonic-FLASHMATE-L-308BII-used-but-near-mint-/190557813875?pt=US_Light_Meters&hash=item2c5e217c73 > > > The

FS Friday - a couple of Pentax things - whadda shock, eh?

Ok - the Sekonic light meter is on ebay... this is the link http://cgi.ebay.com/Sekonic-FLASHMATE-L-308BII-used-but-near-mint-/190557813875?pt=US_Light_Meters&hash=item2c5e217c73 The 30 has been spoken for. the Pentax FA50, shown below, has tentatively been spoken for. Has one flaw - arrow po

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

This is very unlikely and highly improbable, Mike. On 6/22/2011 17:15, mike wilson wrote: Ann, apparently, does not love me. Maybe I need to buy some of those blue pills and Rolexes that are cluttering my spam folder. On 22/06/2011, Boris Liberman wrote: On 6/21/2011 10:37, Ecke PDML wrote:

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

2011/6/23 John Sessoms : > From: Ecke PDML > >> HAR! the imomrtal spirit of the list loves me... > > But you're still not getting our Bud Light! As long as you let go my Eggo... =) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from t

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

From: Ecke PDML HAR! the imomrtal spirit of the list loves me... But you're still not getting our Bud Light! - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3718 - Release Date: 06/21/11 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

Did you mean immortal or immoral? On 6/22/2011 6:34 AM, Ecke PDML wrote: HAR! the imomrtal spirit of the list loves me... 2011/6/22 Boris Liberman: On 6/21/2011 10:37, Ecke PDML wrote: I love this list... The question is - whether the list loves you. It most certainly may and can... And prob

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

We both seem to be missing numerous posts. Only about 65 so far today. On 22/06/2011, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Ann seems to be having difficulty receiving email. Message her > directly with your kind offer! > > On Wednesday, June 22, 2011, mike wilson wrote: >> Ann, apparently, does not love m

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

KEH.com usually has a few in the 65-100 dollar range, currently the only one they have is $114.00, but I expect that price will fall. if you can wait. On 6/20/2011 10:29 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: I saw one for $74 on Buy.com but it was apparently bait and switch. I'd like to give my loan

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

Ann seems to be having difficulty receiving email. Message her directly with your kind offer! On Wednesday, June 22, 2011, mike wilson wrote: > Ann, apparently, does not love me.  Maybe I need to buy some of those > blue pills and Rolexes that are cluttering my spam folder. > > On 22/06/2011, Bor

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

Ann, apparently, does not love me. Maybe I need to buy some of those blue pills and Rolexes that are cluttering my spam folder. On 22/06/2011, Boris Liberman wrote: > On 6/21/2011 10:37, Ecke PDML wrote: >> I love this list... > > The question is - whether the list loves you. It most certainly m

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

HAR! the imomrtal spirit of the list loves me... 2011/6/22 Boris Liberman : > On 6/21/2011 10:37, Ecke PDML wrote: >> >> I love this list... > > The question is - whether the list loves you. It most certainly may and > can... And probably should too... > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PD

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

On 6/21/2011 10:37, Ecke PDML wrote: I love this list... The question is - whether the list loves you. It most certainly may and can... And probably should too... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, plea

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

AFAIK the II has it, but the DA-L has no QS and platic bayonet. 2011/6/21 mike wilson : > On 21/06/2011 09:37, Ecke PDML wrote: >> >> I love this list... >> >> 2011/6/21 mike wilson: >>> >>> On 20/06/2011 16:29, Ann Sanfedele wrote: I saw one for $74 on Buy.com but it was apparently bait

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

Sweet. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Ecke PDML" Subject: Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens I love this list... 2011/6/21 mike wilson : On 20/06/2011 16:29, Ann Sanfedele wrote: I saw one for $74 on B

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

On 21/06/2011 09:37, Ecke PDML wrote: I love this list... 2011/6/21 mike wilson: On 20/06/2011 16:29, Ann Sanfedele wrote: I saw one for $74 on Buy.com but it was apparently bait and switch. I'd like to give my loaner sigma lens back to owner hey that rhymes! my old manual lenses aren'

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

I love this list... 2011/6/21 mike wilson : > On 20/06/2011 16:29, Ann Sanfedele wrote: >> >> I saw one for $74 on Buy.com but it was apparently bait and switch. >> >> I'd like to give my loaner >> sigma lens back to owner >> >> hey that rhymes! >> >> my old manual lenses aren't wide enough...

Re: WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

On 20/06/2011 16:29, Ann Sanfedele wrote: I saw one for $74 on Buy.com but it was apparently bait and switch. I'd like to give my loaner sigma lens back to owner hey that rhymes! my old manual lenses aren't wide enough... cant afford a wide angle prime.. with an 16-55 and my 55-300 I'm go

WTB (what a shock!) 18-55 DA KAF lens

I saw one for $74 on Buy.com but it was apparently bait and switch. I'd like to give my loaner sigma lens back to owner hey that rhymes! my old manual lenses aren't wide enough... cant afford a wide angle prime.. with an 16-55 and my 55-300 I'm good to go without too much weight I actual

Re: Quite a shock from the BBC

On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:37 -0500, "Mark Roberts" wrote: > I was just listening to the news on the BBC and heard a report about > the Indian student who was killed in Australia last month. I almost > jumped out of my seat when I heard his name: Nitin Garg. Some people > here may remember we had a PD

Re: Quite a shock from the BBC

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > I was just listening to the news on the BBC and heard a report about > the Indian student who was killed in Australia last month. I almost > jumped out of my seat when I heard his name: Nitin Garg. Some people > here may remember we had a PDML

Re: Quite a shock from the BBC

I remember him Dave On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > I was just listening to the news on the BBC and heard a report about > the Indian student who was killed in Australia last month. I almost > jumped out of my seat when I heard his name: Nitin Garg. Some people > here may

Quite a shock from the BBC

I was just listening to the news on the BBC and heard a report about the Indian student who was killed in Australia last month. I almost jumped out of my seat when I heard his name: Nitin Garg. Some people here may remember we had a PDML member by that name a few years ago. Not the same Nitin Garg

Re: Shock

That just goes to show that it is truly the person behind the camera that makes the difference much more than the equipment itself. Very impressive work, Cotty! -- Best regards, Bruce Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 12:57:11 AM, you wrote: C> Thanks Bob. Believe it or not, I was using a borrowed ent

Re: Shock

On 31/3/09, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed: >Great vid - I can understand why you're so excited about this. Thanks Bob. Believe it or not, I was using a borrowed entry level camera that seriously restricted creative freedom. I can do a lot better than that. The subject of photographers intrig

Re: Shock

Cotty, that is a brilliant video, in every way! Both the mountain and your subject really shine through. Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Tue, 3/31/09, Scott Loveless wrote: > From: Scott Loveless > Subject: Re: Shock > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > D

Re: Shock

And... As we come down to the wire, the state of my finances precludes my investment in this year's GFM. I am quite disappointed. Wrapping up the last of my stolen equipment with purchases and insurance paybacks has screwed my plans. But, by this time next year, I will have set aside the f

Re: Shock

In a message dated 3/31/2009 3:07:18 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, cotty...@mac.com writes: I haven't swapped the K15 back. I'm concentrating on video. Here's something to whet your appetite.. Timely, wouldn't you say ;-) hint hint -- Che

Re: Shock

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Scott Loveless wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Cotty wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Timely, wouldn't you say ;-) hint hint >> >> T - 5 hours!  Well, maybe.  Probably longer. > > You comin

Re: Shock

Scott Loveless wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Cotty wrote: Timely, wouldn't you say ;-) hint hint T - 5 hours! Well, maybe. Probably longer. You coming along this year, Scott? Here's the URL again: http://www.grandfather.com/plan

Re: Shock

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Cotty wrote: > > > Timely, wouldn't you say ;-) hint hint T - 5 hours! Well, maybe. Probably longer. -- Scott Loveless Cigarette-free since December 14th, 2008 http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ -- PDML P

RE: Shock

> > I haven't swapped the K15 back. I'm concentrating on video. Here's > > something to whet your appetite.. > > > > > > > > Timely, wouldn't you say ;-) hint hint Great vid - I can understand why you're so excited about this. Bob -- PDML

Re: Shock

Cotty, I am speechless... Thank you very much for sharing with me your work. Best regards, Manuel On 09/03/31 23:06, "Cotty" wrote: > On 31/3/09, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> I saw that thread, just didn't know that was taken with the *istDs - I >> thought it was a Frank

Re: Shock

On 31/3/09, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed: >I saw that thread, just didn't know that was taken with the *istDs - I >thought it was a Frankenlens on a Canon body. He's Canadian, we'll allow him that ;-) Franky, I sold my Canon gear about a year ago. 1DmII, 2 L zooms, flash, Quantum

Re: Shock

frank theriault wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:59 PM, mike wilson wrote: frank theriault wrote: Okay, so it's been three days, wassup? Wassup is that you have gone blind. From the "Dame Helen" thread. http://gallery.me.com/cottycam#100027 BTW, thanks for pointing that out to me

Re: Shock

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:59 PM, mike wilson wrote: > frank theriault wrote: >> >> Okay, so it's been three days, wassup? > > Wassup is that you have gone blind.  From the "Dame Helen" thread. > > http://gallery.me.com/cottycam#100027 BTW, thanks for pointing that out to me. She ~was~ very p

Re: Shock

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:59 PM, mike wilson wrote: > frank theriault wrote: >> >> Okay, so it's been three days, wassup? > > Wassup is that you have gone blind.  From the "Dame Helen" thread. > > http://gallery.me.com/cottycam#100027 No, I'm not blind. I saw that thread, just didn't know th

Re: Shock

frank theriault wrote: Okay, so it's been three days, wassup? Wassup is that you have gone blind. From the "Dame Helen" thread. http://gallery.me.com/cottycam#100027 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDM

Re: Shock

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Cotty wrote: > I actually took some shots with Pentax camera today! > > *ist Ds and 18-55, and A*85/1.4.  About 10 minutes before I was due to > leave for the shoot, I figured I'd take the A*85 but of course - it > still had a Canon mount on it. That came off and I

Re: Shock

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 03:55:44PM +, mike wilson wrote: > Cotty wrote: > > >Just finished processing - jpegs up on a page tomorrow evening. You'll > >like the subject :-)) > > Cormorants _again_? Cormorants dancing ballet with cats. -- The fastest way to get your question answered on the

Re: Shock

Cotty wrote: Just finished processing - jpegs up on a page tomorrow evening. You'll like the subject :-)) Cormorants _again_? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and fo

Re: Shock

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Cotty wrote: You'll > like the subject :-)) Is it ice cream, i like ice cream. Dave > > -- > > > Cheers, >  Cotty > > > ___/\__ > ||   (O)  |     People, Places, Pastiche > ||=|    http://www.cottysnaps.com > _ > > > > -- > PDML P

Re: Shock

On 27/3/09, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: >You hooked up with Vix for some more pictures? Better. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.

Re: Shock

- Original Message - From: "Cotty" To: "pentax list" Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 6:02 PM Subject: Shock Just finished processing - jpegs up on a page tomorrow evening. You'll like the subject :-)) You hooked up with Vix for some more pictures? Wil

Shock

I actually took some shots with Pentax camera today! *ist Ds and 18-55, and A*85/1.4. About 10 minutes before I was due to leave for the shoot, I figured I'd take the A*85 but of course - it still had a Canon mount on it. That came off and I managed to find its original K mount, but only 3 screws

Re: MZ-D Shock

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Sandy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Non-technical idiots conflating 'Large sensor interchangable lens >> digital' with 'DSLR'. This sounds like a description of the rumoured >> Zeiss Ikon Digital RF. > > Meanwhile, ove

Re: MZ-D Shock

On Wed, 14 May 2008 12:07:56 -0500, Bob Sullivan wrote: >Samsung/Microsoft are working the bugs out of chips and software. So where would the ALT,CTL,Delete buttons go? James -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from

Re: MZ-D Shock

Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Non-technical idiots conflating 'Large sensor interchangable lens > digital' with 'DSLR'. This sounds like a description of the rumoured > Zeiss Ikon Digital RF. Meanwhile, over on the Olympus OM list (which has as many off-topic posts as this one :-), I not

Re: MZ-D Shock

P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well lets see, they stole the picture of another manufactures prototype > to represent the new product, and claimed it would be compatible with > Leica lenses. Either the translation is completely Fd up or Aigo > should be using their press releases

Re: MZ-D Shock

Cotty wrote: > Have a look at the third product down on this Chinese Engadget page and > tell me I'm dreaming... > > > > Deja vu or what? > > for ref: > > Oh yes! Identrical! ;-

Re: MZ-D Shock

Op Wed, 14 May 2008 18:20:42 +0200 schreef P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I do like the transformer camera further down the page, though :o) > Well lets see, they stole the picture of another manufactures prototype > to represent the new product, and claimed it would be compatible with > Lei

Re: MZ-D Shock

Non-technical idiots conflating 'Large sensor interchangable lens digital' with 'DSLR'. This sounds like a description of the rumoured Zeiss Ikon Digital RF. -Adam On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given the short register distance of a Leica M mount

Re: MZ-D Shock

Shouldn't we send this over to the Pentax 'THE SKY IS FALLING' list with a short note. Pentax/Hoya/Samsung are making an end run into the full frame DSLR business. This is an early production sample of the K1. The copy about Leica lenses is just a smoke screen. Look at that lens mount. It's a Pen

RE: MZ-D Shock

Do you want soy sauce with your hat? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Cotty > Sent: 14 May 2008 11:47 > To: pentax list > Subject: MZ-D Shock > > Have a look at the third product down on this Chinese >

Re: MZ-D Shock

Well lets see, they stole the picture of another manufactures prototype to represent the new product, and claimed it would be compatible with Leica lenses. Either the translation is completely Fd up or Aigo should be using their press releases to fertilize rice fields. I'm betting on the

Re: MZ-D Shock

Given the short register distance of a Leica M mount I simply can't see how a dslr could be possible.. Where would the mirror box fit ? On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:31 PM, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to be the picture of the Pentax K1, (which may or may not have > been a Photos

Re: MZ-D Shock

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have a look at the third product down on this Chinese Engadget page and > tell me I'm dreaming... > > > > Deja vu or what? Nope, its a camera Cotty. Back to sleep now.

Re: MZ-D Shock

Mark Roberts wrote: > Cotty wrote: >> Have a look at the third product down on this Chinese Engadget page and >> tell me I'm dreaming... >> >> >> >> Deja vu or what? > > No deja vu. Just Wishful Thinking + Photoshop + Too Much Free Time

Re: MZ-D Shock

Cotty wrote: > Have a look at the third product down on this Chinese Engadget page and > tell me I'm dreaming... > > > > Deja vu or what? No deja vu. Just Wishful Thinking + Photoshop + Too Much Free Time. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Ma

Re: MZ-D Shock

Bad Photoshopping of a K-1D (aka MZ-D). -Adam On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have a look at the third product down on this Chinese Engadget page and > tell me I'm dreaming... > > > > Deja vu or w

Re: MZ-D Shock

It seems to be the picture of the Pentax K1, (which may or may not have been a Photoshop alteration of the MZ-D), posted on another Camera speculation site modified still further. I translated the text with google for what it's worth here it is. > Map spread on the Internet is the Patriot Aigo

Re: MZ-D Shock

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have a look at the third product down on this Chinese Engadget page and > tell me I'm dreaming... > > > > Deja vu or what? > > for ref: > >

Re: MZ-D Shock

Wow, that sure looks like a MZ-D! Regards, Bob S. On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have a look at the third product down on this Chinese Engadget page and > tell me I'm dreaming... > > > > Deja v

MZ-D Shock

Have a look at the third product down on this Chinese Engadget page and tell me I'm dreaming... Deja vu or what? for ref: -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People

Re: Medium format "speed limit" and shock absorbers...

Thanks everybody for the answers. Now I feel more confident using the 645 hand-held, which I prefer. Andre

Re: Medium format "speed limit" and shock absorbers...

eed limit" is the same as with a 35mm SLR: if 1/60 is fine > with a normal 50mm lens, does the 645 need a faster speed when used > with its normal 75mm lens? > > Is the mirror well "shock absorbed" on the (original) 645 as with, > say, the MX? I had an original 645 with

Re: Medium format "speed limit" and shock absorbers...

#x27;s because you hear the click but feel no > vibration at all in your hands. Amazing! The 645 is also extremely well damped, the mirror action is a complex movement designed to limit shock by reducing inertia at the movement limits. The 645 is very "hand-holdable". Rob Studdert

RE: Medium format "speed limit" and shock absorbers...

you acceptable unsharpness on the film with a 75mm will result in similar accaptable unsharpness using 1/125 sec. at 150mm. I don,t know anything about shock absorbtion - except that the movement caused by chock (mirror/shutter) seemingly results in similar calculations as for camera movements caused by sh

Pentax Recalls *ist D -- Shock Hazard

Not really. That's just to get some attention. Gang, what are we going to do about themes for next year's PUG? Except for Synchronicity I can live with the themes now planned. They just seem rather dull. I have long favored revisiting some old themes. It would be fun to compare then and now.

RE: New Pentax at Photokina shock!!

No, its got as much BS as most of the other stuff ;-) > -Original Message- > From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 05 September 2002 12:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: New Pentax at Photokina shock!! > > > > Yessir, introducing the MZ-B

Re: New Pentax at Photokina shock!!

> Yessir, introducing the MZ-BS!!! [snip] a place far far away > [snip] Pal Skywalker [snip] to rise against them. OK, Rob, so is this thread gonna have more truth to it than the usual PDML speculation threads do ??? ;-) Fred

New Pentax at Photokina shock!!

Yessir, introducing the MZ-BS!!! The new Bacon Sarnie from Pentax, also available in kit form with the optional CG10 cheese grater attachment. Fill it with C-31 (Cheddar) or T6 (Tomato sauce) and fire away. We now know the MZ-D is to be scrapped in favour of the MZ-C. The flagship MZ-1 has been

Re: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

What I have a problem with is silly people like you saying such nonsense. Your ridiculous post is frankly, a joke. I HAVE used both machines and in my opinion Macs are not "superior" machines. Also, I have never had to bring any machine of mine to a shop to have it worked on and thinking that P

Re: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

In a message dated 8/2/2002 10:11:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Brendan buddy you speak ill of the Mac, yet you have not used one. No matter > > what anyone says Macs are superior to PCs. I own both, I have used both and > > I'm sorry but I can honestly say that P

Re: Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

Joe wordperfect is outdated even in the PC world. Microsoft Word is the way to go. Another program that originated on the Mac. Oh and, by the way, I have Wordperfect for the Macintosh and my Mac has F-keys. Vic - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://w

Re: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

Brendan buddy you speak ill of the Mac, yet you have not used one. No matter what anyone says Macs are superior to PCs. I own both, I have used both and I'm sorry but I can honestly say that PCs are still a long way from a MAC. That's not to say that PCs are not useful, capable machines. Someon

Re: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

Hi Brendan, Ah! >> So I repeat the challenge! C'mon Brendan, borrow a Mac for a few >> months [snip] >Oh, well, you slightly misunderstand Cotty. I love Macs! I have used them >many times in the past and I can say that they're terrific little machines. [snip] >would love a Titanium no

Re: Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

When they work. I just got a brand-new G4 with everything at work. You can't enable the function keys. Even our tech guys can't figure it out. They're useless to me. > > The newer Mac keyboards have fifteen assignable function keys, labelled F1 > through F15; you can assign them to do anything yo

Re: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

In a message dated 8/2/2002 2:09:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > So I repeat the challenge! C'mon Brendan, borrow a Mac for a few > months > > (Disclaimer: I used a Windows 95 box for a few months as a personal test, > and I use NT machines at work when I'm there

Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

on 08/02/02 10:05 AM, pentax-discuss-digest at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Subject: Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze > 2000 features) > > For me, Macs have two drawbacks, the first a nuisance and the second > fatal: > > 1. No

RE: Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

Both sound like good endorsements FOR Macs!! > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Tainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 02 August 2002 16:10 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! > (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2

Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

For me, Macs have two drawbacks, the first a nuisance and the second fatal: 1. No function keys - once you learn these with a program that employs them (e.g., WordPerfect, see below), they are much faster than a mouse. 2. One can't run WordPerfect, which is the basic tool with which I earn the m

Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

>My opinion of Macs is that there are pretty, well designed, overpriced >status >symbols. While it may be true that "you get what you pay for," it simply >isn't true with Macs (not when you can get a better machine for less in a >PC). I have always owned PC's and have always been happy with th

Re: Cotty Doppelganger Shock

>There's another one! > >And I've recommended he join. > >Kind regards > >Peter You *cannot* be serious! Cotty (b. 1988) ___ Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check out the UK Macintosh ads http:/

Cotty Doppelganger Shock

There's another one! And I've recommended he join. Kind regards Peter - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Re: Merry Christmas from Cotty ;-) (shock: Pentax content)

Good for you, Cotty. There is no greater satisfaction for a photographer than that of making ?ictures for friends. I hope we get to see the shots from the village church. Happy Holidays, Paul Cotty wrote: > It's getting on for that time of night when all good boys and girls > should be heading o