I'm selling my ist-D because you know why :)
It is still under european warranty (until sometimes in May) and has
been insured.
It comes with the battery grip.
Everything in VERY good state and has been used normally: a few
thousands pictures, not more.
I have no use for my CF cards so I
Take a looke at this, please:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/278532339/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.11/493 - Release Date: 10/23/2006
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Very nice, once again proving that you can make very good photos with
obsolete lenses.
Jens Bladt wrote:
Take a looke at this, please:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/278532339/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no
Quoting Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have no use for my CF cards
Noo
D
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
more than 10,000 exposures. No crack
whatsoever. Will play very nicely with the 40MZ2 also for sale.
Price: 100 euros.
*ist-D + DBG1
-
In very good state. Has been bought in may 2005. It came with a 2
years warranty so warranty is effective as we speak. No flash charging
problem
I'll link you to my craig's list ad.
http://atlanta.craigslist.org/ele/212419130.html
We can talk about price. Especially if you don't want the lens or other
stuff.
Don't give me a hard time about the pictures. My good digital was off on
some modeling gig. BG
Bellsouth is still blocking
G'morning.
I'm posting this a day early because I have to make a quick decision as to
if I am going to ship the camera to Pentax for repair or not.
The built-in flash is not working. Once I pop it up, it gives a depleted
battery display, and won't allow the shutter to fire. Luckily I never use
It's a linear 2-step process Charles.
1. Take pictures
2. THEN delete.
Tom C.
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Pentax ist D delete button won't work
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:16:05 +1000
Dear All,
I
Dear All,
I have a Pentax ist D camera, when I press the delete button, the button
goes in but nothing happens. Just wondering if anyone else has had this
problem.
Regards
Charles Wilson
Sydney Australia
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
which is bad ;)
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Nothing of that sort here.
Of course the multidirectional pad is difficult but well, that's the
same on all D AFAICT.
Dis it came suddenly?
2006/9/10, Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dear All,
I have a Pentax ist D camera, when I press the delete button, the button
goes in but nothing
Hi all,
I was looking at the features of the Pentax DSRL and I have noticed
that only *ist D has the useful program lines setting in P-mode,
which allow you to choose between MTF priority, hi-speed, and depth of field.
Is it right?
Why this nice feature is not present in later cameras?
I hope
marco ferrari wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking at the features of the Pentax DSRL and I have noticed
that only *ist D has the useful program lines setting in P-mode,
which allow you to choose between MTF priority, hi-speed, and depth of
field.
Is it right?
Why this nice feature
The others (DSx and DLx) do have the same... pict modes are just that
after all..
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thibouille wrote:
The others (DSx and DLx) do have the same... pict modes are just that
after all..
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
Pict modes are similar, but not the same. No pict mode will use lens MTF
data for example.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
*ist D has the useful program lines setting in P-mode,
mf which allow you to choose between MTF priority, hi-speed, and depth of
field.
mf Is it right?
mf Why this nice feature is not present in later cameras?
mf I hope it will be present in the new K10!
mf regards,
mf marco
--
PDML Pentax
be to send the camera for repair
(flash upgrade again), which you have to do anyway.
Lood luck, whichever fate you wish to your *ist-D ;-)
Patrice
Tom C a écrit :
I suspect I'll need to send it in for a repair soon. In the last couple of
weeks it has, intermittently upon power up, started
How old are your batteries? I've found most *istD weird behavior is
due to old batteries. Doesn't matter if they're not dead. If they're
almost dead, the camera freaks out.
Paul
On Aug 25, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Tom C wrote:
I suspect I'll need to send it in for a repair soon. In the last
Thanks, I may give that a shot!
Tom C.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or
numbered.
From: Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: *ist D
@pdml.net
Subject: Re: *ist D Losing it's Mind
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:57:26 -0400
How old are your batteries? I've found most *istD weird behavior is
due to old batteries. Doesn't matter if they're not dead. If they're
almost dead, the camera freaks out.
Paul
On Aug 25, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Tom C wrote
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: *ist D Losing it's Mind
I suspect I'll need to send it in for a repair soon. In the last
couple of
weeks it has, intermittently upon power up, started acting strangely.
Any
push of any button or turn of any wheel will actuate the shutter
That exact thing happened to mine last year, just once though. Taking
out all batteries including the one screwed into the bottom of the
camera, for several hours, fixed it.
It does periodically freeze, however (I can tell it's on but I can't
affect the camera in any way). By periodically I mean
I have discovered that hue changes with exposure in the *ist D rather a
lot at the red end. Deep reds can come out purple and vice versa. I've
solved the problem by making sure I use several shutter settings and to
do this have sometimes to use aperture settings that are not optimal. I
have
considered the D70 and the
*ist D. I knew the D was the best camera of the bunch
but I found its hand grip much too shallow. I'd have
bought it otherwise.
New Doug
The grip wasn't as good as the DS or the Nikons. But the issue that made
me get rid of it was the buffer size and write speeds
Don -
Is this something you can fix in raw conversion?
http://georgesphotos.net/gallery/796655
These are the screens from the CS2 raw converter, I was thinking the
Calibrate tab (last photo on the page) might be what you're looking
for.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
--
PDML
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, it's notable smaller than the D70
I guess I should have read Phil Askey's preview more
closely.
The *istD had the best noise quality of all the
cameras I've shot with extensively
When I bought my E-1 I also considered the D70 and the
*ist D
Well I finally got tired of the fact that my *ist-D gets more battery
usage from a set of rechargeables than my Ds and did a little test.
It seems that the DS will take quite a few more photos when the battery
indicator reads empty, two or three hundred more in fact. The D is just
about
. Unless I know I have to do some work
that I don't want interrupted and then I install a fresh set and fire
away.
Always have at least one spare, fresh set in the bag ... !
Godfrey
On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:53 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Well I finally got tired of the fact that my *ist-D gets more
will take a look.
--
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
if they are available in Oz.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 12:05 PM
Subject: Further research on NiMH batteries in the *ist-D
A few weeks ago I encountered some of the odd *ist-D
batteries.
Cheers,
Bob
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: Further research on NiMH batteries in the *ist-D
I've just tried changing battery brands, from Energizer to Duracell
I use NiMH batteries to save money on replacements when at home, and
also because they give the best recycle times with my flash units
when I use them. I simply schedule charging one set every week with a
good charger and rotate them through the camera in the process. I
always keep a
The charger is significant in getting the most from a NiMH set. Maha
makes some excellent chargers. This one is well thought of and not
particularly expensive:
Maha PowerEx MH-C204W
http://www.thomas-distributing.com/maha-powerex-mh-c204w-nimh-battery-charger.htm
I use two of these to
A few weeks ago I encountered some of the odd *ist-D behaviour
others have reported - batteries suddenly reporting 'no charge',
but working just fine after switching the camera off back on.
Since then I've been doing a little more research, and this is
what I've found out to date.
First
guy)
-Original Message-
From: Roman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13. mai 2006 09:08
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: *ist D or K10D
To me name doesnt make a camera, camera makes its name and if new 10mpix
DSRL does everything *ist D(S/L) does and has USF/antishake its all
On May 5, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
What is the difference between the automatic flash
mode on the ist D and the flash on mode? The former
puts the letter A next to the lightning bolt on the
top LCD, the latter just places the lightning bolt
there.
I can't tell any difference
Thanks, Godfrey. I'll investigate that.
Unfortunately the ist D manual is poop, and says
nothing enlightening (so to speak).
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's reasonable to think that the D model is similar
in operation,
but I don't have a D instruction manual handy
because there was enough light. If the light
level is low enough, then both modes would behave the same.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, May 5, 2006, 8:24:07 AM, you wrote:
RW Thanks, Godfrey. I'll investigate that.
RW Unfortunately the ist D manual is poop, and says
RW nothing enlightening (so
enough, then both modes would behave the same.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, May 5, 2006, 8:24:07 AM, you wrote:
RW Thanks, Godfrey. I'll investigate that.
RW Unfortunately the ist D manual is poop, and says
RW nothing enlightening (so to speak).
RW Rick
RW --- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED
There's' no sharpness issue as far as I know with the Pentax *ist D. I have
used it for a year and a half and done more than 3 exposures.
Unlike other brands - like Nikon, it has less built-in sharpness. I believe
Nikon D7 does over sharpen, which is not really pretty. It is better to
sharpen
On Apr 23, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/rs-test-image-icc.jpg
It's all in the details ...
It surely is, looking at your Firefox screen dump and comparing it
to my
Firefox screen dump under PS using Proof Colors Macintosh RGB
they look
João Moreira wrote:
I have made some researches and, after I saw Dario's
homepage, I became a little concerned on the sharpness
of the *ist D. Is it really unsharp?
If you shoot JPEG, there something left to be desired, as in-camera JPEG
conversion is good, but not the best around (Canon
at the time. Conversely, how many DS/DS2/DL owners might prefer
the D now that they've had and used their cameras for a while.
Shel
João Moreira wrote:
Another question: is the *ist D worth the $600.00 over
the *ist DL? What are the extra features?
Subject: Re: *ist D
For my needs (I have a DS) the additional cost of the D wasn't worth it.
The DS/DS2 has a number of features that even some D users would like, and
the D has some features some DS/DS2/DL users might like. I sometimes
wonder how many of the D owners would have purchased a DS had
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/24 Mon AM 08:15:48 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: *ist D
For my needs (I have a DS) the additional cost of the D wasn't worth it.
The DS/DS2 has a number of features that even some D users would like, and
the D has
Hi Mike,
IIRC, there's no difference in the bodies of the DS/DS2 and the DL/DL2, so
my comments should be valid (as far as opinions go) for the S and the L
series. I'm open for corrections, of course, since there's no L here with
which to make a direct comparison.
It's been a while since I
like
$200, and I didn't pay anything like list for the DS.
João Moreira wrote:
Gentlemen
I think it is the right time for me to move from my
ZX-5n to digital.
I have made some researches and, after I saw Dario's
homepage, I became a little concerned on the sharpness
of the *ist D. Is it really
On 22 Apr 2006 at 9:55, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thanks for the additional samples. It is always interesting to me to
see how the various browsers render our work. I updated my JPEG to
include current FireFox on Mac OS X rendering too ... FireFox does
not honor profiles, they use their
On Apr 23, 2006, at 9:12 PM, João Moreira wrote:
... I have made some researches and, after I saw Dario's
homepage, I became a little concerned on the sharpness
of the *ist D. Is it really unsharp? If so, is it
something Photoshop can fix (I mean, do you always
have to use Photoshop to fix
of the *ist D. Is it really unsharp? If so, is it
something Photoshop can fix (I mean, do you always
have to use Photoshop to fix the sharpness of all your
photos)? By how many points (in average)?
And what about the colour rendition? It is completely
different from the *ist D to the Fujifilm
On Apr 21, 2006, at 9:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a screen capture of your page with Safari, however. It's
rendered in sRGB:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/rs-test-image-icc.jpg
Both the two profiled images are darn close, the unprofiled sRGB
deviates just a little from a correct
The guy that wrote those articles is Chris MacAskill, President of
Smugmug, the photo sharing service.
He's done a bit of research on this topic to help his customers get
predictable results.
I think the bottom line is, if you use Adobe RGB it will look washed
out when viewed with a windows
On Apr 22, 2006, at 3:17 PM, George Sinos wrote:
I think the bottom line is, if you use Adobe RGB it will look washed
out when viewed with a windows based browser that expects sRGB.
That's why all my posted web photos have been converted to sRGB. AND
have an sRGB ICC profile embedded.
G
On Apr 21, 2006, at 12:49 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Regardless, so many monitors are uncalibrated, or poorly
calibrated, the
only time including an ICC profile really matters is if the viewing
monitor
is properly set up.
As far as web images is concerned, the browser also has to support
As far as web images is concerned, the browser also has to support
colour management. I only know of two that do (they use ColorSync).
One of those was discontinued long ago.
Which is the currently available one? I'm much interested.
On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:01 PM, Thibouille wrote:
As far as web images is concerned, the browser also has to support
colour management. I only know of two that do (they use ColorSync).
One of those was discontinued long ago.
Which is the currently available one? I'm much interested.
Safari.
Ahh, another benefit of SFW which I forgot - the 4-up view which allows
comparison between different sizes.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Mann
As far as web images is concerned, the browser also has to support
colour management. I only know of two that do (they use ColorSync).
Here's a short quote from the page linked below:
The box of crayons you're given for displaying photos on the web is
called sRGB.
There are other color spaces, such as Adobe RGB (1998), but no
Windows-based browser can display them correctly. The Macintosh
browsers Safari and Internet Explorer
I've read the article and tried to divine what was meant in the
statement The Macintosh browsers Safari and Internet Explorer can,
but only under unusual circumstances not seen in everyday browsing.
The article does not state what is meant by that or what 'unusual
circumstances' are being
Godfrey -
Windows browsers simply ignore profiles. Here are two more articles.
Mac Browsers, Can You Believe Your Eyes?
http://blogs.smugmug.com/great-prints/2005/06/27/mac-browsers-can-you-believe-your-eyes/
Why ICC profiles don't fly on the Internet,
On 21 Apr 2006 at 15:58, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
In extensive testing with one of my good buddies from another list,
we found that embedding an sRGB profile in an sRGB rendered image
helped consistent color rendering even on the brain-dead-with-respect-
to-color-management Windows
Hi, Rob ...
Good to see you back on the list.
Godders didn't say accurate rendering, just consistent. Maybe he can
elaborate further.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 4/21/2006 5:29:43 PM
Subject: Re: ist D - PE4 questions
Sorry, George, but I disagree you and with this guy. My testing
demonstrated otherwise.
Of course, it must be true because you got it from the internet.
LOL !!!
Who is the author anyway? I don't find an author's name or credential
anywhere. He badmouths Bruce Fraser, who credentials in
On Apr 21, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
In extensive testing with one of my good buddies from another list,
we found that embedding an sRGB profile in an sRGB rendered image
helped consistent color rendering even on the brain-dead-with-
respect-
to-color-management Windows
On Apr 21, 2006, at 6:05 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Godders didn't say accurate rendering, just consistent. Maybe he can
elaborate further.
Exactly.
He worked on a Windows system, I worked on Mac OS X, and we both
applied the same colorimeter to several reference images in 8
different
On 21 Apr 2006 at 19:41, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The results were surprising, and quite conclusive. Consistency of
rendering was always enhanced when an ICC profile was embedded. For a
measly couple of worth of data, particularly when some folks want to
post 200Kbyte image files for
On Apr 21, 2006, at 8:14 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 21 Apr 2006 at 19:41, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The results were surprising, and quite conclusive. Consistency of
rendering was always enhanced when an ICC profile was embedded. For a
measly couple of worth of data, particularly when some
On 21 Apr 2006 at 20:25, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 21, 2006, at 8:14 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 21 Apr 2006 at 19:41, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The results were surprising, and quite conclusive. Consistency of
rendering was always enhanced when an ICC profile was embedded. For a
On Apr 21, 2006, at 8:36 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Maybe you could use my test images:
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/ICC_test.html
I could if I had the colorimeter; it belongs to Ernesto and he's on
the other side of the world at present.
This is a screen capture of your page
On 21 Apr 2006 at 21:08, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
This is a screen capture of your page with Safari, however. It's
rendered in sRGB:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/rs-test-image-icc.jpg
Both the two profiled images are darn close, the unprofiled sRGB
deviates just a little from a
Hi Rick,
When using SFW, the color profile that goes along with the pic is often
stripped out. In PS at least, there's a check box which allows the user to
either include or exclude the color profile. Check that in PE 4.0 - my
guess is that the program would have the same feature.
Shel
2. Several photos looked great when I opened them, but
when I ran Save for Web they brightened considerably
and lost saturation and contrast. That didn't happen
in PE2. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Sounds like you haven't converted to the sRGB colorspace.
-Ryan
to share with those on broadband.
Bottom line, think bigger...space is cheap.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/20/06, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last evening I was going through pix taken with my
new-to-me ist D with my new Photoshop Elements 4, and
two questions arose:
1. I was shooting in Hyper
Hi Bob,
Perhaps you're misunderstanding SFW. It's a much finer approach to saving
than Save As. There are 100 different increments that can be used as
opposed to only 12 in PS (and, I'm guessing, Elements.) Not only can you
better fine tune the file size and quality, but you can choose to
For displaying pictures on a web page, full size 2000x3000 pixel
images are terrible. Scaling by browsers is often way off and renders
them into garbage, many browsers don't scale either. Then a viewer
has to meander scrolling around the image to see it ... A very poor
way of showing your
new-to-me ist D with my new Photoshop Elements 4, and
two questions arose:
1. I was shooting in Hyper-Program/aperture priority
mode (having used the thumbwheel to select the
aperture). The EXIF data (File/File info/Photo data)
includes the aperture but not the shutter speed. In
PE2 both
Bob,
I use Save for Web when I'm posting PUGs, or posting
PESOs on photo.net. Both require jpgs with the
metadata stripped--i.e. saved for web. The original
scanned files on my computer are TIFFs; at the moment
the ist D output is highest-quality jpgs, but I'll
probably give RAW a try
://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4339343
ist D, DA 16-45, f/11 @ 1/180, ISO 400, jpg, slightly
cropped in PE2.
Comments invited.
Rick
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
getting
the hang of this thing. This shot is another in
my
On My Way to Work series; the flowering trees
have
been gorgeous this week in Philly.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4339343
ist D, DA 16-45, f/11 @ 1/180, ISO 400, jpg,
slightly
cropped in PE2
Hi!
Well, Boris, you've flushed out my guilty secret...
I usually set off for work between 8 and 8:15, and
it's a 20-min walk. This past Wednesday my son was on
break from school, and neither my wife nor I had any
early commitments at work, so we slept in a bit, and I
headed for work about
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, Boris, you've flushed out my guilty secret...
I usually set off for work between 8 and 8:15, and
it's a 20-min walk. This past Wednesday my son was on
break from school, and neither my wife nor I had any
early commitments at work, so we slept
Nice capture Rick. It sure screams of spring to me.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: My first with the ist D
After a couple hundred exposures, I think I'm getting
the hang of this thing. This shot is another in my
On My Way
After a couple hundred exposures, I think I'm getting
the hang of this thing. This shot is another in my
On My Way to Work series; the flowering trees have
been gorgeous this week in Philly.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4339343
ist D, DA 16-45, f/11 @ 1/180, ISO 400, jpg
After a couple hundred exposures, I think I'm getting
the hang of this thing. This shot is another in my
On My Way to Work series; the flowering trees have
been gorgeous this week in Philly.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4339343
ist D, DA 16-45, f/11 @ 1/180, ISO 400, jpg
://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4339343
ist D, DA 16-45, f/11 @ 1/180, ISO 400, jpg, slightly
cropped in PE2.
Comments invited.
Rick
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
Hi!
After a couple hundred exposures, I think I'm getting
the hang of this thing. This shot is another in my
On My Way to Work series; the flowering trees have
been gorgeous this week in Philly.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4339343
ist D, DA 16-45, f/11 @ 1/180, ISO 400, jpg
I like the compositional aspects of the shot. I can walk through it on the
path. Nice.
Tom C.
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: My first with the ist D
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
After
miss on the ist D
I took my ist D along to a gathering of my extended
family Saturday. I was able to get some okay pix
using my old TTL Sunpak flash, but...
I =REALLY= miss having the flash shoe over the grip,
as it is on the Z-series cameras, instead of over the
prism. My favorite way of shooting
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 3:02 PM
To: Pentax List
Subject: Z-series feature I miss on the ist D
I took my ist D along to a gathering of my extended
family Saturday. I was able to get some okay pix
using my old TTL Sunpak flash, but...
I =REALLY= miss having the flash shoe
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/05 Wed AM 01:55:00 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
It's okay, Lon, my own camera doesn't display this problem.
You have _no_ hot/dead pixels? Anyone else?
I
: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/05 Wed AM 01:55:00 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
It's okay, Lon, my own camera doesn't display this problem.
You have _no_ hot/dead pixels? Anyone else?
I meant how do you
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/05 Wed AM 10:22:41 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
I don't have any noticeable hot or dead pixels on either of my D
bodies. I think I ran some tests on the first
On Apr 5, 2006, at 3:47 AM, mike wilson wrote:
You have _no_ hot/dead pixels? Anyone else?
No, I wouldn't say that I have no hot or dead pixels -- someone
previously said that the camera's software knows where these pixels are
and compensates in some way. However, I do not get these
Quoting Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Apr 5, 2006, at 3:47 AM, mike wilson wrote:
You have _no_ hot/dead pixels? Anyone else?
No, I wouldn't say that I have no hot or dead pixels -- someone
previously said that the camera's software knows where these pixels
are and compensates in
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/05 Wed PM 12:57:59 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
On Apr 5, 2006, at 3:47 AM, mike wilson wrote:
You have _no_ hot/dead pixels? Anyone else?
No, I
On Apr 5, 2006, at 9:07 AM, mike wilson wrote:
My understanding is that there is software to deal with this in camera
and you can also (_at specific sizes_) produce actions in PS to phix
the problem with, relatively, very little effort.
Yeah, but if I have to get 500 images onto the
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/05 Wed PM 01:17:42 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
On Apr 5, 2006, at 9:07 AM, mike wilson wrote:
My understanding is that there is software to deal
It's not at web image size, it's at the full size out of the camera.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
Date: Wed Apr 5, 2006 9:20 am
Size: 828 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
In that case, you need a solution.
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/05 Wed PM 01:45:00 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
It's not at web image size, it's at the full size out of the camera
501 - 600 of 6322 matches
Mail list logo
