Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-05-01 Thread ERNReed
In a message dated 4/30/2002 5:37:13 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I like seeing the shutter speed in the viewfinder. The only cameras I can think of that I use that don't do this are the Spotmatic and the pre-Spotmatic bodies. and the K1000. ERNR My photographs

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-05-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ERNReed added: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I like seeing the shutter speed in the viewfinder. The only cameras I can think of that I use that don't do this are the Spotmatic and the pre-Spotmatic bodies. and the K1000. Which is why I stuck in the that I use bit. :-) I thought the

RE: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-23 Thread Alexander Krohe
I wrote: However, the apparent viewing distance of the f-stop window is such close (by far closer than the viewing distance of the screen) that the f-stop number is factually invisible during shooting. Lukasz replied: - Your post is really puzzling to me, for I see the

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-23 Thread Aaron Reynolds
I like uncluttered viewfinders. I very much like my Pentax 67's non-metering prism, because there's nothing in there but picture. -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax

RE: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexander Krohe wrote: The apparent viewing distance of the f-stop window is such close (by far closer than the viewing distance of the screen) that the f-stop number is factually invisible during shooting. Apparent viewing distance of the readouts is an important ergonomic factor, one

Re[2]: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-23 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, yes please. And if it can call a taxi at the same time that'd be great. --- Bob mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, April 22, 2002, 8:58:46 PM, you wrote: would you like it to beep you: bob, there's a great photo you are about to miss, grab the camera and run to the intersection of A

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-23 Thread T Rittenhouse
discussion group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Viewfinder Information Been watching Foghorn Leghorn on the Cartoon channel again, haven't you? VBG I would have figured you for a roadrunner watcher myself. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Shel Belinkoff
There's been a fair amount of discussion and commentary about the quality and amount of information available through various Pentax viewfinders. Apart from exposure information, what information do you look for and find important. Speaking for myself, all I care to see is a simple display

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Christian Skofteland
I'm sort of a minimalist. I own a LX and MX and their viewfinders, while different, provide the only information I need: Shutterspeed, Aperture and the little flashy light thingies that tell me I'm getting a correct exposure. (obviosly the LX's flashy light thingies indicate some other things

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread David Brooks
Begin Original Message From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:10:45 -0400 To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Viewfinder Information There's been a fair amount of discussion and commentary about the quality and amount of information available through various

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Brendan
I like the MZ-3 display ( except in bright light ), it gives shutter, aperture, over under and use flash warning when back lit or shutter drops below 1/focal length. I don't find the display annoying since when I'm in manual I don't even notice it's there. I find displays with the af points that

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, I like it to say That's a great photo, Bob. Press the shutter...NOW!. Apart from that I'm becoming more of a minimalist (or should that be 'less of a minimalist'? Is that a paradox? Perhaps 'less of a maximalist' is best). Whatever. I've always appreciated the efficient simplicity of the

RE: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread ukasz Kacperczyk
] Subject: Re: Viewfinder Information Shel wrote: - There's been a fair amount of discussion and commentary about the quality and amount of information available through various Pentax viewfinders. Apart from exposure information, what information do you look for and find important

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Shel Belinkoff
And what facts are those, Friday? Bill D. Casselberry wrote: SuperProgram - ... just the facts, ma'am! -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html - This message is from the

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread frank theriault
Hi, Lukasz, Funny, with regard to match-needle versus LED (at least in the MX), I'm the opposite of you: In bright sunlight, I find it much easier to see the match-needle in my Spots; sometimes the led's of the MX can be washed out in bright sunlight (you may remember we had such a discussion

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread frank theriault
Hi, Lukasz, I'm with you on this one: I've had no trouble reading the f-stop in the MX viewfinder. With the possible exception of when the ring is between stops, and the numerals aren't in the lttle viewer's area. No problem moving the ring 1/2 stop one way or the other, to see where I am,

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Mishka
at the moment. yes, sometimes even meter lights are obtrusive and annoying too. - Original Message - From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:37 PM Subject: Re: Viewfinder Information And, to answer Shel's original query, on a manual focus

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Frantisek Vlcek
SB So, what do you look for and prefer, and why? 1) aperture, either tru window or electronically (as I have now only manual pentaxes and other cameras - it's tru a window) 2) shutter speed. I love the match needle metering as on LX or K2DMD (two different incarnations of it though), but would

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mishka wrote:would you like it to beep you: bob, there's a great photo you are about to miss, grab the camera and run to the intersection of A and B... NOW! I recall when the Japanese camera companies agreed upon a set of icons to signify the basic 20 or so messages, such as film empty and

RE: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread TM
In response to this thread- I prefer to have shutter speed, aperture and exposure info in the viewfinder, LCD/LED is fine- never had a problem with that, even in direct bright sunlight, but I'm not a prodigious photographer, so I haven't been in situations like that very often. Taka - This

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread T Rittenhouse
I demand, DEMAND, I say, a reliable way to frame and focus, and would prefer that anything else they stick in there not get in the way of those. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto - This message is from the

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Matt Bevers
I also have no trouble with the f-stop reading in the MX viewfinder, and I'll agree that the LEDs are a bit hard to see in bright light. Would a rubber eye-cup help this problem? As for info, I see shutter and f-stop being a bare minimum, especially useful, if like me, you are just starting.

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread wendy beard
At 14:40 22-4-2002 -0400, you wrote: From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] There's been a fair amount of discussion and commentary about the quality and amount of information available through various Pentax viewfinders. Apart from exposure information, what information do you look for and

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Here! Here! (or is it Hear! Hear!?? T Rittenhouse wrote: I demand, DEMAND, I say, a reliable way to frame and focus, and would prefer that anything else they stick in there not get in the way of those. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread frank theriault
Hi, Matt, Since we were (I think) talking about the MX, what other info could you possibly display, on a mechanical camera? regards, frank Matt Bevers wrote: As for info, I see shutter and f-stop being a bare minimum, especially useful, if like me, you are just starting. -- The optimist

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Mishka
This is a bit offtopic. A friend of mine got a Nissan Z300, 20-something years old. Used to be very luxurious, now a piece of junk. Anyway, it has a woman voice for a friendly reminder whenever anything goes wrong. Last time he drove me from New Haven to Boston (almost 2hrs drive), a pin on the

Re: Re[2]: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Alan Chan
I think over time, my favorite viewfinder has been the MX with a plain grid screen. Quite minimal and not in the way. Aperture, shutter speed, simple meter (match diode or needle) and that about covers it. Somehow I have never liked the LED setting of the MX. It's just not very user friendly

Re[4]: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread Bruce Dayton
Alan, The LED's were what caused me to buy an MX in the first place. I was using an Olympus OM-1 at the time and was shooting quite a bit of lower light stuff. I couldn't see the black needle very well and started looking around for alternatives. At that time, I really like those glowing

Re: Viewfinder Information

2002-04-22 Thread camdir
There was a talking camera at one point, by Minolta, perhaps, or Olympus. I remember reading that the Japanese woman's voice was that of the president's secretary. The Minolta AFS-V (-voice)...road firumu..use frash and possibly one more message rens crap - yes it is, isn't it. Cute. Kind