John wrote:
>On 10/23/2017 08:03, Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Sandy Harris wrote:
>>>
>>> Internet entrepreneur shocked that copyright owner sued him for
>>> stealing their work
>>>
>>> https://www.diyphotography.net/internet-entrepreneur-shocked-copyright-owner-sued-s
That's an interesting question, is it slander or libel if you publish a
video defaming someone. Either way it would be hard to defend against
as the evidence has been published...
On 10/23/2017 12:15 PM, John wrote:
On 10/23/2017 08:03, Eric Weir wrote:
On Oct 23, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Sandy H
After you shut this crook down, perhaps you should offer pdf versions of
your out-of-print books on your own site!
BTW, I noticed this on the bottom of the website to which you provided a
link:
"Copyright Disclaimer:This site does not store any files on its server. We
only index and link to conte
That's exactly what I was going to write as well.
I've seen this done with several different books/audio files, etc.:
fake promises of a desired resource without one actually available.
I've never figured out what was the ultimate purpose: malware or
ad-click-views (or maybe a credit-card-relat
On 10/23/2017 08:03, Eric Weir wrote:
On Oct 23, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Sandy Harris wrote:
Internet “entrepreneur” shocked that copyright owner sued him for
stealing their work
https://www.diyphotography.net/internet-entrepreneur-shocked-copyright-owner-sued-stealing-work/
What a jerk. And he
Seconding what others have noted: there probably isn't an actually link
to your book there. I saw the same thing with my snow flake book. I
could click into the links all day long but aside from the occasional
malware download or effort to get a credit card number, I never found a
link to the b
as Mark said in one of his posts, there probably isn't a PDF to download
of the book -- there certainly isn't a legitimate
one anywhere. The book was published in 1992 and never put into
electronic form... If someone has a PDF they would have had to scan each
page... selections from the book a
> On Oct 23, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Sandy Harris wrote:
>
> Internet “entrepreneur” shocked that copyright owner sued him for
> stealing their work
>
> https://www.diyphotography.net/internet-entrepreneur-shocked-copyright-owner-sued-stealing-work/
What a jerk. And he goes on for 13 minutes, being
Internet “entrepreneur” shocked that copyright owner sued him for
stealing their work
https://www.diyphotography.net/internet-entrepreneur-shocked-copyright-owner-sued-stealing-work/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
You could still send DMCA takedown notices to the "legitimate" web hosts Mark
identified; fastly.com, hawk.host and reflected.net.
I'd also consider reporting them the appropriate government agency.
https://www.usa.gov/stop-scams-frauds
On 10/22/2017 22:21, ann sanfedele wrote:
I'm not going
I'm not going to do anything.. cf the rest of the posts on this thread
that Mark wrote especially
a
On 10/22/2017 10:00 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
You still own the copyright. So it's not legal, however I don't know
if you have a practical recourse. It would probably cost more to sue
the indiv
Sweet of you to do all that looking into... I'll just let it go.. but
it was startling at first
ann
On 10/22/2017 9:46 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
IT's really awful because when you get to that first page they certainly
have the rigth cover and the "review" might
be real b
You still own the copyright. So it's not legal, however I don't know if
you have a practical recourse. It would probably cost more to sue the
individual publishing the PDF than you'll ever recover in damages.
On 10/22/2017 10:56 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
I found this link, below, while I was
ann sanfedele wrote:
>IT's really awful because when you get to that first page they certainly
>have the rigth cover and the "review" might
>be real but something someone wrote when the book came out ... it was
>certainly reviewed and sold a few thousand copies within months .
>
>of course I did
The review by "ValDon" that this thing quotes -is-real I googled the
quote, it looked familiar -
it was an Amazon customer that bought the book in 2012. So it looks
like they are trolling
Amazon for stuff to grab.
I have to say that after reading the first article about take down
notice wr
IT's really awful because when you get to that first page they certainly
have the rigth cover and the "review" might
be real but something someone wrote when the book came out ... it was
certainly reviewed and sold a few thousand copies within months .
of course I didnt click the download..
sig
oy --
Mark (especially)
thanks for all the help! I figured you would be the one to get to the
bottom of it...
scary when it comes up so near the top of the google search!
I'll definitely start where you suggested. might run by you what I write .
I'll do it soon, but perhaps not tonight - home
OK, this looks bad. It appears to be a well-organized scam of some
kind.
Here's the page that lists your book:
https://livrobook.xyz/free/register.php?id=080651356X
But when you click the DOWNLOAD link it takes you to a redirect at
valvemedia.com... that directs you to a different site every time!
Mark Roberts wrote:
>Mark Roberts wrote:
>>ann sanfedele wrote:
>>>I found this link, below, while I was googling the name of my new
>>>calendar and book page to see if
>>>just googling "Ann Sanfedele Calendars and Books" would take you to the
>>>right place to buy the Paris book and the new ca
It's a violation of your copyright. You can file a DMCA Takedown Notice.
https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&q=how+to+file+a+dmca+takedown+notice&oq=How+do+I+issue+a+DMCA+takedown+notice&gs_l=psy-ab.1.1.0i22i30k1l2.2402.2402.0.8180.3.2.0.0.0.0.155.155.0j1.2.00...1..64.psy-ab..1.1.154.0...
Mark Roberts wrote:
>ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>>I found this link, below, while I was googling the name of my new
>>calendar and book page to see if
>>just googling "Ann Sanfedele Calendars and Books" would take you to the
>>right place to buy the Paris book and the new calendars - so I could
>>
ann sanfedele wrote:
>I found this link, below, while I was googling the name of my new
>calendar and book page to see if
>just googling "Ann Sanfedele Calendars and Books" would take you to the
>right place to buy the Paris book and the new calendars - so I could
>tell people to do that , ins
Ann, find a You tube copyright lawyer.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 22, 2017, at 8:42 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> That's my feeling, too - take a look at the link, Stan, when you get a
> chance..
> I dont' want to contact them without getting some more legal opinions on this
> sigh
> ann
That's my feeling, too - take a look at the link, Stan, when you get a
chance..
I dont' want to contact them without getting some more legal opinions
on this
sigh
ann
On 10/22/2017 11:19 AM, Stanley Halpin wrote:
Doesn’t matter if free or with a charge. Your copyright means that nobody can
Doesn’t matter if free or with a charge. Your copyright means that nobody can
reproduce without your permission. Right?
I didn’t follow the link, but does the thief have a site that includes popup
ads? So he/she is getting paid per page views by his/her advertisers? Which
would mean that he/she
I found this link, below, while I was googling the name of my new
calendar and book page to see if
just googling "Ann Sanfedele Calendars and Books" would take you to the
right place to buy the Paris book and the new calendars - so I could
tell people to do that , instead of providing link in f
26 matches
Mail list logo