Smoking and reflecting. NIce!
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 10:10 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2012/09/the-girl-with-flower-tatoo.html?m=1
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be
Nice. I also like the new website.
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Smoking and reflecting. NIce!
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 10:10 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice, have you tried a BW?
On 9/8/2012 10:10 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2012/09/the-girl-with-flower-tatoo.html?m=1
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher
Or BW everything except the tattoo and its reflection.
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 11:26 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice, have you tried a BW?
On 9/8/2012 10:10 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I don't think I'll do BW, for a number of reasons:
To me the red tatoo is the essence of the photo.
Second, I've decided I don't like the photo as much as I did last
night. I really missed the moment - with her head turned away from
the camera one can barely see the cigarette she's smoking,
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2012/09/the-girl-with-flower-tatoo.html?m=1
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
A touch more contrast, and that would be a beautiful image for me. Love
the eye contact, and the pattern repetition with the spiral potato and
the cast iron support.
D
On 19/06/2012 3:38 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Shot on film using analog (non-Pentax) equipment.
Shot on film using analog (non-Pentax) equipment.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15942432
Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
Thanks, Walt and Frank.
It is one of several interesting works at Grounds for Sculpture, and
outdoor sculpture venue in Hamilton, NJ, just South of Trenton and
near an exit of I-295. In fact, two sculptures have been positioned
along the Interstate, and several others line the roads between the
Wow, that took me a second to realize it was a statue. I particularly
like the placement of the mirror.
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
I finally found a woman who would would pose without any clothes on for me:
Thanks, Steven.
Johnson's works are very realistic. An indoor exhibit hall at grounds
for sculpture has his 3D version of the sailor kissing the nurse on
Times Square an VE Day; it is larger than life, but otherwise very
realistic.
The placement of the mirror amused me when I was there, so I
And I was guessing she was a puppy. Well it is a good pose if you ever
do find a real live girl.
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 17:47:47 -0400
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Girl in the Shower
Message-ID
-0400
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Girl in the Shower
Message-ID:
caomwt1zyldkmdsv9ovmln4haurykjatngmo4tyhf3prunxw...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I finally found a woman who would would pose
Can we all get them for our own showers ? Nice photo Dan..Joe
Thanks, Steven.
Johnson's works are very realistic. An indoor exhibit hall at grounds
for sculpture has his 3D version of the sailor kissing the nurse on
Times Square an VE Day; it is larger than life, but otherwise very
Thanks, Joe.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:29 PM, jn289 jn...@verizon.net wrote:
Can we all get them for our own showers ? Nice photo Dan..Joe
Thanks, Steven.
Johnson's works are very realistic. An indoor exhibit hall at grounds
I finally found a woman who would would pose without any clothes on for me:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15455620
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
That is pretty damned cool, Dan.
The sculptor did a great job in capturing the detail in the figure, and
you did a great job of capturing the detail in the shower mirror.
-- Walt
You didn't happen to get her number
On 4/1/2012 4:47 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I finally found a woman who
---
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Sent: April 1, 2012 4/1/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Girl in the Shower
I finally found a woman who would would pose without any clothes on for me:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15455620
Dan Matyola
http
You figure it out...
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20%20girlinabox.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax A*300mm f4.0
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
Interesting shot, although I would like to see a little more of her face.
Dan
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:31 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
You figure it out...
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20%20girlinabox.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax A*300mm
She's going to die and be put in a pine box because she's smoking a cigarette.
Seriously, I guess you mean that stuck here between the headphones and the
cellphone she's out of touch with the world.
Paul
On Jul 29, 2010, at 1:31 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
You figure it out...
Nice moment, well captured. Good conversion as well.
Paul
On Mar 2, 2010, at 1:46 AM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/4395234619/
critique and comments welcome
--Sasha
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sasha,
I saw this photo earlier, when you posted the photo of the seals.
I liked that photo, but the composition was a bit disturbing to me eye.
I am not sure, - it's probably the combination of the light and
the details, - but I'd like to have some more on the lower side
and probably a bit on
Very nice crisp photo.
Dave
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/4395234619/
critique and comments welcome
--Sasha
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/4395234619/
critique and comments welcome
Soft and pretty and happy.
Wonderful photo!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Nice photo.
Improvements? Main light is at 7 O-clock which puts nose shadow over
eye. Would be improved with the main light to 10-11 O-clock.
I'd also prefer the eyes be sharp, rather than the close hair.
You've got a cute model there. I'd employ her often!
Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
On Tue, Mar
Cute :-)
--
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 2 March 2010 01:46, Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/4395234619/
critique and comments welcome
--Sasha
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks for your constructive feedback!
--Sasha
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Cute :-)
--
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 2 March 2010 01:46, Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/4395234619/
critique and comments welcome
--Sasha
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Mar 1, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/4395234619/
critique and comments welcome
Nice job. It works well in BW.
--Sasha
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tamoneki/3943471922/
pentax k10d, da* 16-50
Both long-limbed creatures look beautiful.
Like the next one a lot too.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tamoneki/3942696247/in/photostream/
D
--
der...@iinet.net.au
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tamoneki/3943471922/
pentax k10d, da* 16-50
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika
lukastr...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tamoneki/3943471922/
pentax k10d, da* 16-50
Lovely shot, but is the poor dog a little lost in all that darkness? -T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hello and welcome, and Shalom.
Struan Donald wrote:
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
http://flickr.com/photos/mr_stru/2322023174/sizes/m/
ISO 200, f/10, 1/100 sec
K100D, kit lens
Rather a grabbed shot so cropped square to hide the originally wonky
I like it a lot, for the mood, I believe.
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 23:00 schrieb Struan Donald:
Hi,
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
http://flickr.com/photos/mr_stru/2322023174/sizes/m/
ISO 200, f/10, 1/100 sec
K100D, kit lens
Rather a grabbed shot so
* at 11/03 18:24 -0600 William Robb said:
Hi,
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
http://flickr.com/photos/mr_stru/2322023174/sizes/m/
ISO 200, f/10, 1/100 sec
K100D, kit lens
Rather a grabbed shot so cropped square to hide the originally
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome to the list. A nice pic and a good start.
You could straighten the horizon a little more with a bit of
clockwise rotation. I realize the path the girl is on is slightly
uphill, but the horizon isn't quite
* at 11/03 22:01 -0400 Paul Stenquist said:
Welcome to the list. A nice pic and a good start.
Thanks
You could straighten the horizon a little more with a bit of
clockwise rotation. I realize the path the girl is on is slightly
uphill, but the horizon isn't quite aligned. I'd also burn
Hi,
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
http://flickr.com/photos/mr_stru/2322023174/sizes/m/
ISO 200, f/10, 1/100 sec
K100D, kit lens
Rather a grabbed shot so cropped square to hide the originally wonky
horizon although not the totally blown highlights :(
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Struan Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
Good one to start with -T
http://flickr.com/photos/mr_stru/2322023174/sizes/m/
ISO 200, f/10, 1/100 sec
K100D, kit lens
Rather a grabbed
Nice composition, the lens shows a bit of flare. You could stand to
brighten the mid tones, (with a curves adjustment), and increase
contrast a bit.
Struan Donald wrote:
Hi,
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
* at 11/03 15:41 -0700 Tim Bray said:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Struan Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
Good one to start with -T
Thanks
Struan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Struan Donald wrote:
Hi,
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
http://flickr.com/photos/mr_stru/2322023174/sizes/m/
ISO 200, f/10, 1/100 sec
K100D, kit lens
Rather a grabbed shot so cropped square to hide the originally wonky
horizon although not the
* at 11/03 18:47 -0500 P. J. Alling said:
Nice composition, the lens shows a bit of flare.
Thanks. I've noticed the kit lens is a bit prone to flare.
You could stand to brighten the mid tones, (with a curves adjustment),
and increase contrast a bit.
I'll have a try at that. Thanks for the
Welcome, Struan. You caught a very nice mood. Good composition as well.
The distance to the subject gives it a spacious feel that works.
As has been mentioned, the mid tones could lightened to bring up some
detail.
Jack
--- Struan Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I figure the best way to
- Original Message -
From: Struan Donald
Subject: PESO - girl on a bike
Hi,
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
http://flickr.com/photos/mr_stru/2322023174/sizes/m/
ISO 200, f/10, 1/100 sec
K100D, kit lens
Rather a grabbed shot so cropped
Welcome to the list. A nice pic and a good start.
You could straighten the horizon a little more with a bit of
clockwise rotation. I realize the path the girl is on is slightly
uphill, but the horizon isn't quite aligned. I'd also burn in the
sky, first with the midrange tool, then with the
On 7/10/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/gwc_b.html
Shel
Lovely, Shel!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi!
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/gwc_b.html
Shel, you're at your best here... Julia concurs.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/gwc_b.html
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
To paraphrase Mark Twain, talk of your demise has been greatly exaggerated!
Nice photo.
On 7/10/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/gwc_b.html
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I've looked at this a couple of times - trying to decide my feelings.
The look of the girl holding the cane is very penetrating - the look
of the lady on the right (mother?) seems a half hearted patronizing
smile. Quite contrasting - and maybe that keeps me looking at it. It
is almost as if it
Outstanding Shel, I love it!
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 3:04 PM
To: PDML
Subject: PESO - Girl With a Cane
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/gwc_b.html
Shel
OOF head in foreground is a problem. Don't see a solution.
Jack
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/gwc_b.html
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I like how they seem to be fighting for your attention
russell
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 7/10/2006 1:11:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/gwc_b.html
Shel
===
Excellent, Shel. What was that table setting all about when you can produce
this?
Marnie aka Doe :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: PESO - Girl near a window
I must admit, my feelings about the cleansing of your model, John,
likely have to do with what I try to do with my photography: at the
rist of sounding completely pretentious (who, me
mw That's only according to the latest fashion, which decrees that all
mw imperfections (for which you can read character) should be removed
mw by photographic means if cosmetic surgery has not managed it previously.
mw Boring, boring pictures. I much prefer the original, I'm afraid.
Mike, you
Frantisek wrote:
mw That's only according to the latest fashion, which decrees that all
mw imperfections (for which you can read character) should be removed
mw by photographic means if cosmetic surgery has not managed it previously.
mw Boring, boring pictures. I much prefer the original, I'm
mw Absolutely agreed. Soudns like an interesting book. BTW, I was not
mw wanting to denigrate the work done to the picture. Just the point of
mw it. 8-)
Neither me :-) I have myself had to do such work for some clients
(wedding portraits), and I can appretiate how hard to do it is
sometimes
Frantisek wrote:
mw Absolutely agreed. Soudns like an interesting book. BTW, I was not
mw wanting to denigrate the work done to the picture. Just the point of
mw it. 8-)
Neither me :-) I have myself had to do such work for some clients
(wedding portraits), and I can appretiate how hard to do
I've responded to Butch privately on this. What he did, and especially
his explanation of it, is very interesting to me and very helpful. I am a
complete novice at this, and find the huge number of tools available even
in the cut-down versions of PS to be rather intimidating. It is good
On Apr 4, 2005 7:49 AM, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've responded to Butch privately on this. What he did, and especially
his explanation of it, is very interesting to me and very helpful. I am a
complete novice at this, and find the huge number of tools available even
in the
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: PESO - Girl near a window
I must admit, my feelings about the cleansing of your model, John,
likely have to do with what I try to do with my photography: at the
rist of sounding completely pretentious (who, me? LOL), I try
On Apr 4, 2005 7:11 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you were in the glamour/beauty game, you'd be singing a diffent tune.
Butch's interprtation made some notable improvements to the picture,
providing that a glamourous picture of a pretty girl was the intent in the
first
I think that Bruce was using my pic as a platform to show what COULD be
done, rather than saying that it was what SHOULD be done. I can see
myself using some of the tools he demo'ed (he sent me a rather fuller
explanation of what he did than he gave on the list) in some
circumstances. If
Hi guys
Here's my take on John's image. The first link is his original the second is
the manipulated image.
Also, please let me know if the links don't work for you. It was a PITA to
get a URL for the page.
Comments appreciated
Butch
On Apr 3, 2005 5:18 PM, Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys
Here's my take on John's image. The first link is his original the second is
the manipulated image.
Also, please let me know if the links don't work for you. It was a PITA to
get a URL for the page.
Comments
Sorry, gentlemen!
http://www.johnpforbes.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/htm/_IGP0688c.jpg
John
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:10:22 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:55:30 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, someone probably needs to come right out and say it -
G'day John
That was certainly worth the wait g
Very nicely done, the exposure overall tone is spot on. The pose
feels a little awkward though, but as I struggle with people pic's
feel free to tell me where to stick my opinion on that score :-)
Dave S
On Apr 1, 2005 4:13 PM, John Forbes
On 1/4/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sorry, gentlemen!
http://www.johnpforbes.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/htm/_IGP0688c.jpg
John
Nice light. Chin too near the bottom of frame - needs a looser crop,
vertical IMO
.02
Best,
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Hi John ... The pic is nicely rendered, the lighting is pretty good
(perhaps a bit bright for the subject, but I don't know what mood you were
striving for), the pic has a decidedly reddish tint (hue?) to it which
makes it interesting but perhaps too red, the pose is a little odd -
perhaps even
Beautiful woman. I find the pose interesting. It's not what one would
call a natural pose, but it is evocative and glamorous. More typical
of fashion photography than portraiture. My only nit is that it appears
to be oversaturated. The shadow areas have become very red and are too
sharply
Thanks, David, Shel, and Bruce, for your comments,
The picture was shot as a jpeg, cropped, and slightly adjusted, in
Irfanview (which is probably why Shel prefers that program to view it).
Being a tight-fisted Scot, I have been resisting buying PS CS (I have
Elements 2), but I suppose I am
On Apr 1, 2005 8:56 AM, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, David, Shel, and Bruce, for your comments,
The picture was shot as a jpeg, cropped, and slightly adjusted, in
Irfanview (which is probably why Shel prefers that program to view it).
Being a tight-fisted Scot, I have been
Much better. The shadows look quite natural in the original. It could use some
mild tint adjustment, but this version is quite good as it stands.
Paul
Thanks, David, Shel, and Bruce, for your comments,
The picture was shot as a jpeg, cropped, and slightly adjusted, in
Irfanview (which is
By the way, with RAW and the PSCS converter, you could do more. First, the RAW
conversion will be somewhat more detailed and sharper. You could fine tune some
of the color, but adjusting the different values seperately. The gradation
between shadow and open areas would be smoother in the
Part of the color problem, it seems, is that the image has an embedded
profile of Adobe RGB, not always the best choice for web display. You
might be able to get away with Elements 3, although I'm unsure how it
handles RAW files. Y'might want to go to the Adobe site and explore that
possibility.
When shooting JPEG you're shooting 8-bit color, RAW gives you 12-bit. That
probably contributes to your observation.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 4/1/2005 6:43:30 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Girl near a window
... First, the RAW
On my monitor the original comes over as rather dull, and I was trying to
inject a bit more puch by upping the saturation and contrast. Perhaps I
was a little heavy-handed.
Also, the colours are not very faithful to the actual situation; the
background wall is a pale blue (not painted by
Striking image! It really jumps out at you. Pretty girl and nice
lighting. Image might be a touch too bright. The pose is interesting
- not quite sure what to think...almost like she is trying to decide
how she wants to pose, or is waiting for something.
With this nice light and beautiful
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 02:56:22PM +0100, John Forbes wrote:
Being a tight-fisted Scot, I have been resisting buying PS CS (I have
Elements 2), but I suppose I am just going to have to bite the bullet and
do so if I am going to get the best out of my pictures. And also shoot
RAW.
I
Good idea, John, thanks.
I'm downloading it now.
John
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 14:24:03 -0500, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 02:56:22PM +0100, John Forbes wrote:
Being a tight-fisted Scot, I have been resisting buying PS CS (I have
Elements 2), but I suppose I am just
Yes, there are a few more. I'll post some in due course.
John
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 07:54:54 -0800, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Striking image! It really jumps out at you. Pretty girl and nice
lighting. Image might be a touch too bright. The pose is interesting
- not quite sure what
Thanks, Frank. It helps that she's quite nice looking!
John
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:11:07 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005 8:56 AM, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, David, Shel, and Bruce, for your comments,
The picture was shot as a jpeg, cropped, and
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 09:11:19PM +0100, John Forbes wrote:
Good idea, John, thanks.
I'm downloading it now.
It supports the D out of the box; for the DS you need the
ACR 2.4 upgrade. I don't know if the download includes that.
P.S. Nice picture
On Apr 1, 2005 3:15 PM, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Frank. It helps that she's quite nice looking!
John
Yes, she has a sort of Sophia Loren When She Was Younger look about
her. Quite a striking young lady!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
i would crop the left so that the hand was cut off just slightly.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Girl near a window
Sorry, gentlemen!
http
Can anyone explain to me why the Thumbnail of this file
displayed in WIN XP Explorer shows more of the frame than
when I open the file in PS or Irfanview?
In thumbnails or filmstrip view I see part of the window,
a lot of space to the left and black bars top and bottom of
the frame.
If I open it I
i found that applying the default #82 photo filter brings the colors more
into balance. this isn't in Photoshop Elements, i think.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Girl
I really like this one. Of course, I'm a sucker for photos of women,
and you certainly have one here. g The previous technical jargon
about your photo is over my head, so I'll just leave that to the rest
of the list. Don't make us wait too long for more of these!
On Mar 31, 2005 5:25 PM, John
I can't explain it, but noticed the same thing when viewing the thumbnail.
BTW, the window looks more like a book case or book shelves.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Don Sanderson
Can anyone explain to me why the Thumbnail of this file
displayed in WIN XP Explorer shows more of the
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 06:29:17PM -0600, Don Sanderson wrote:
Can a .jpg have a thumbnail 'imbedded' that is different
from the full size pic?
Yes. In fact that's common with files from many of the DSLRs.
there seems to be a de facto standard size of 160x120 for the
thumbnails - a 4:3 aspect
i found that applying the default #82 photo filter brings the colors more
into balance. this isn't in Photoshop Elements, i think.
I've been toying with doing this (adding a lens filter) to help
decrease the noise in extreme while balance situations. From looking at
the RAW data, it seems
This was taken in natural daylight, wide-open with the FA 1:2.8 100mm
macro and *ist D at 1/40. ISO 400.
Comments welcome.
John
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 /
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: PESO - Girl near a window
This was taken in natural daylight, wide-open with the FA 1:2.8 100mm
macro and *ist D at 1/40. ISO 400.
I find it leave me wanting something more...
William Robb
Seems that the highlights are bit blown out. All I'm seeing is a white
screen :-)
Dave S
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:25:16 +0100, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was taken in natural daylight, wide-open with the FA 1:2.8 100mm
macro and *ist D at 1/40. ISO 400.
Comments welcome.
Ok, someone probably needs to come right out and say it -
Where is the URL?
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, March 31, 2005, 2:25:16 PM, you wrote:
JF This was taken in natural daylight, wide-open with the FA 1:2.8 100mm
JF macro and *ist D at 1/40. ISO 400.
JF Comments welcome.
JF John
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:55:30 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, someone probably needs to come right out and say it -
Where is the URL?
Leave it to Bruce to bring some civility to the list...
But, really, John, let's see that url. Your title has me quite
intrigued! vbg
cheers,
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:33:18 -0700, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put up a second version. Curious to know if you think it looks better.
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/gobduo-t.html
There's a link at the bottom of the pic that allows switching between the
two versions for
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
