I don't think it would be a Limited candidate.
It would probably be more suited to a DA* nomenclature, IMO.
2007/3/9, Henk Terhell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A DA 28/2.0 would be more expensive and therefore fit in the range of
limited lenses. There doesn't seem to be room in current Pentax ranges
for
No way Ken, not a Z1P. I wouldn't call it a pretty camera but noway is it ugly.
I'd vote for A3000 or SFX, not sure.
We should make a poll: prettiest and ugliest Pentax camera :)
2007/3/9, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3/08/07 6:43 PM, K.Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are not
In this case, all else is NOT being held equal. FourThirds viewfinder is
smaller and/or fainter due to smaller sensor size.
Once again the faster lens just compensates for that handicap, no gain.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Pentax-Discuss
PDML ers,
Since its Friday I'll post a shameless plug on my eBay auction items
for K-mount telephotos lenses ending on Sunday.
Tokina AT-X 400/5.6:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemih=005sspagename=STRK%
3AMESE%3AITviewitem=item=150098938936rd=1rd=1
Pentax K/500/4.5:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:29:39 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote
On Mar 8, 2007, at 4:04 PM, John Whittingham wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:32:07 +0100, Henk Terhell wrote
A DA 28/2.0 would be more expensive and therefore fit in the range of
limited lenses. There doesn't seem to be room in
I will. The question is, where? Both N* and C* do still have 28/2.8
lenses at affordable prices and there is a C* 28/1.8.
For Pentax there is of course a Sigma 28mm F 1.8 EX DG Asf Macro but
that looks about the size of my DA 16-45.
Meanwile I use the FA 35/2 (excellent) and Sigma 24/2.8 (but it's
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:57:55 -0500, Doug Franklin wrote
John Francis wrote:
But I don't carry the 250-600 and the 300/f2.8 at the same time;
one stays back at base. Even then by the end of the day I'm beat -
with the 25-600, the 80-200, a couple of bodies, and a few more
other
...and another 'default-jpg' quality complaint.
For the rest, a good opinion.
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/pentax/k10d-review/index.shtml
__
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:06:34 +0100, Henk Terhell wrote
I will. The question is, where? Both N* and C* do still have 28/2.8
lenses at affordable prices and there is a C* 28/1.8.
For Pentax there is of course a Sigma 28mm F 1.8 EX DG Asf Macro but
that looks about the size of my DA 16-45.
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:47:53 -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote
I'm kind of liking this. But most interestingly, it shows off the
capabilities of the DA 12-24 and the K10D.
No argument there Paul, very impressed. I can feel LBA setting in 8)
John
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:13:39 +0100, John Whittingham wrote
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:47:53 -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote
I'm kind of liking this. But most interestingly, it shows off the
capabilities of the DA 12-24 and the K10D.
No argument there Paul, very impressed. I can feel LBA setting in
I got the Sigma AF Super Wide II 24/2.8 which is a convenient small
lens, as replacement of my FA 35/2 (of which I also won't part) for
digital. Some pics of the Sigma lens have disappointed me but I may not
have given it a fair chance yet.
I would prefer a light weight 28 mm when hiking.
Henk
It is the desire of most civilised societies to have the freedom to
express their views, and there is no fault here. What there is, is a
difference of cultural exchange. In America, it is part and parcel of
the culture to express a view even if that view does not necessarily
move the discussion
On 8/3/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
LOL ... My eyes filled in the missing t ... thanks for the laugh,
Cotty. ;-)
:-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
thanks. I've just now republished the main Staithes site,
so it would
help if you could check that too - it's derived from large raw
files
rather than dinky camera jpegs.
http://web-options.com/Staithes2007/
Thanks for pointing the problem out and helping to resolve it.
Boris Liberman escribió:
Hi!
I've decided I'd buy a monopod. My choices are basically
Slik 350 and
Manfrotto 680.
I have a Manfrotto 479-4B plus 234 RC head and a Slik Easypod. Both of
them are good, but the Manfrotto is more solid and can also be used as a
self-defence weapon if needed.
Do you suffer from TLS? (Tiny Lens Syndrome)
If so, Sigma has the cure:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030805sigma200500mm.asp
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:16:56 -0500, Bob Shell wrote
Do you suffer from TLS? (Tiny Lens Syndrome)
If so, Sigma has the cure:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030805sigma200500mm.asp
Bob
Brings on BFO lens syndrome.
John
Here's the 3018 at Adorama, $51:
http://www.adorama.com/BG681.html?searchinfo=bogen%20monopoditem_no=3
On 3/8/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I recall, the 3018/3218/whatever-it-is that I have was between US$
100 and 150, at least four or five years ago.
--
~Nick Wright
On 3/09/07 7:16 AM, Bob Shell, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you suffer from TLS? (Tiny Lens Syndrome)
If so, Sigma has the cure:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030805sigma200500mm.asp
Batteries not included but the camera is.
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bruce Dayton wrote:
It seems that right now, scanned images don't work.
Actually one of my images that is in the Gallery is a scanned image. I
explained why in the notes section and I guess they accepted the reason.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Looks a bit like the grotesque Mamiya lighthouse, not something I
would like to be seen in public with...
Bertil
It does appear to have a larger pentaprism, which means?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Walter Hamler wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
It seems that right now, scanned images don't work.
Actually one of my images that is in the Gallery is a scanned image. I
explained why in the notes section and I guess they accepted the reason.
10 of my accepted images are scans from slides or
John Whittingham wrote:
The main problem here is I usualy travel by motorcycle to race
meets, beats the hell out of sitting in traffic jams, parking
and camping if needed is cheaper and more convenient.
Yeah, you'd look pretty funny pulling a trailer with golf cart with a
motorcycle. ;-)
--
Nick Wright wrote:
Here's the 3018 at Adorama, $51:
http://www.adorama.com/BG681.html?searchinfo=bogen%20monopoditem_no=3
On 3/8/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I recall, the 3018/3218/whatever-it-is that I have was between US$
100 and 150, at least four or five years ago.
It
I have a video head on my monopod. It provides plenty of tilt. Tilt is
necessary when shooting birds high in trees.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 12:16 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I have used monopods for many years without heads.
since the thing only has one leg, its pretty easy
to adjust it as
Yes, most minilab processors are set up for srgb.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Bill Owens wrote:
When I worked in a lab using a Fuji processor, adobe RGB gave me a
terrible
blue cast. Switching to sRGB fixed the problem. This was with the
IstD
Bill
-Original Message-
I loaded a scanned 6x7 image just the other day. No problem.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 1:53 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
It seems that right now, scanned images don't work. I believe it is
reading the exif data and not finding a pentax camera listed. I
originally got one scanned image accepted
Quite impressive. Love the colors here.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 1:47 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:16:52PM -0800, Bill Lawlor wrote:
I posted two photos from my trip to India during January at
www.photo.net/photos/wvl I used my new (aren't they all?) K10D and
F28/2.8
Howdy,
I've been lurking here for years, and it seems that Fridays are the
preferred days to post stuff-for-sale. So, in hoping that I do not
offend anyone, I'll post a careful reference to some Pentax gear that
has become redundant:
Beautiful color. They capture the spirit of the market.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2007, at 7:16 PM, Bill Lawlor wrote:
I posted two photos from my trip to India during January at
www.photo.net/photos/wvl I used my new (aren't they all?) K10D and
F28/2.8
wide open in the night market.That SR really
That helps to know. It had been hit and miss getting the scans to take,
but after uploading a K10D shot, nothing further has been accepted.
Obviously hope they get it untangled soon.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that right now, scanned images don't work. I believe it
I get declines before getting the notes page.
Jack
--- Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
It seems that right now, scanned images don't work.
Actually one of my images that is in the Gallery is a scanned image.
I
explained why in the notes section and I guess
I've had six film scans and one digital accepted.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter Hamler wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
It seems that right now, scanned images don't work.
Actually one of my images that is in the Gallery is a scanned image.
I
explained why in the
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:38:33 -0500, Doug Franklin wrote
John Whittingham wrote:
The main problem here is I usualy travel by motorcycle to race
meets, beats the hell out of sitting in traffic jams, parking
and camping if needed is cheaper and more convenient.
Yeah, you'd look pretty
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:53:38 +0100, Henk Terhell wrote
I got the Sigma AF Super Wide II 24/2.8 which is a convenient small
lens, as replacement of my FA 35/2 (of which I also won't part) for
digital. Some pics of the Sigma lens have disappointed me but I may not
have given it a fair chance yet.
I hit the jackpot at my University's surplus yesterday and rescued
three A28mm/f2.8, a A50mm/f2 and a M50mm/f4 macro that were destined
for the metal salvage yard. I am most excited about the macro lens
because I have read some nice comments about it in the archive.
After some inspection the
On Mar 9, 2007, at 4:16 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
Do you suffer from TLS? (Tiny Lens Syndrome)
If so, Sigma has the cure:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030805sigma200500mm.asp
Huge. But is it ugly?
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Indeed sRGB seems to be the easiest way, if I change Photoshop to Adobe RGB
or PhotoProRGB I get these washed out JPG savings no matter if I choose
SFW or save as -- JPG. I wonder how much information gets lost in press
print with sRGB, the tutorial I saw on the web is quite impressive and show
a
I got a new Pentax K100D with 18-55mm lens yesterday at Hunt's Photo
and Video in Melrose, Mass. It just doesn't work. It turns on,
auto-focuses and the
shutter fires but the pictures come out dark, almost black. The only time I can
get something is if I shoot directly at a light source.
Anyone
Hi gang,
There's a K50/1.2 sitting in the lens cabinet that I've rarely used. I got
it about three years go, it had a good CLA from a reputable repair guy, and
has seen only light service since then. When it came back from the repair
shop I was told that there is a tiny nick on the rear
Hi Thibouille
I share your taste with the SFX series but to be fair, these ugly bodies
have served me very well over the last years.
Maybe it was it's look and size and weight that made them unwanted and
available very cheap second hand. But
the SFXn has some inner qualities.
If we talk about
Superb optics, not so good construction. I own one in AI-S mount, and
love the results, but the aperture ring is balky and the rubber focus
ring grip is shedding.
-Adam
Henk Terhell wrote:
I got the Sigma AF Super Wide II 24/2.8 which is a convenient small
lens, as replacement of my FA 35/2
On Mar 9, 2007, at 12:55 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
... So just get yourself the FA 28mm f/2.8.
..I've seen a few go on the dreaded auction site recently here in
the UK, I got
chance yesterday to use it for the first time on the K10D, it
usualy gets
left at home because of the Tamron
Being a long time lurker, I thought it was time to put some photos
up. Anyway the first one up is on photo.net/photos/pjjdxn..It was
taken years ago with a PZ1p and an 85.F1.4 lens with Fuji 800 asa film..
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I have a range of equipment that I no longer use much scheduled to be
put on Ebay this weekend. Anyone interested in any of these items
should contact me directly via email for more information.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/ForSale-Camera/
Some notes:
- All lenses, cameras are in as
yeah, I didnt like any more truncation of the pool
at all which is why I left the trees in on the left.
Cropping the water on the right seems to force too much imbalance
on the image in foreground/bottom which means even more
cropping to get rid of that.
jco
-Original Message-
From:
Well if I had shot this on 4x5 all that might be possible,
but this is only a 6MP dslr image so the extreme cropping
wont work, just not enough resolution to maintain reasonable
image quality to do that.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030805sigma200500mm.asp
Huge. But is it ugly?
Someone on naturescapes.net suggested it and the Stanley cup were
seperated at birth: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/hockey/cup98/cup03.jpg
Jack Davis wrote:
I get declines before getting the notes page.
I think they're still working out the bugs in their server-side and
client-side scripting. Every image I submit goes immediately into the
Awaiting Submission category due to lack of image data, even if it's
a directly converted
Hi Paul
I assume your Epson 2200/2400 works with sRGB too? Most consumer scanner
or print equipment does, right?
Have you ever tried comparing different color spaces on high end printers?
I wonder how much I would loose -- in print -- with typical mountain
landscapes if I switch everything to
There seems to be an almost lovely clunky functionality to the SFX
series now -- they seem so wedded to their time, a late-1980s, funky
LCD-and-switches style.
I initially thought the PZ-1/PZ-1p series were ugly bulbous plastic
blobs but I later came to love their form factor, ergonomics and
a smaller focussing screen will NOT be dimmer/
fainter just because its smaller. It would only
become dimmer/fainter for a given lens speed
if it is magnified more to match a larger screen
visually.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I found the review to be fair but recommending a 1GB memory card a bit
nonsense.
thanks for the link Jaume.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jaume Lahuerta
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 10:21 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Yet
In a message dated 3/9/2007 7:45:53 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Someone on naturescapes.net suggested it and the Stanley cup were
seperated at birth: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/hockey/cup98/cup03.jpg
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/Sigma/sigma200500mm-big.jpg
Looking forward to further refinement of the program.
All my images that were successfully entered are in ready for review
status.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
I get declines before getting the notes page.
I think they're still working out the bugs in
The advantage of using Adobe RGB or ProPhoto RGB is that the larger
colorspace allows more editing capability without clipping,
preserving the integrity of the image data. With sRGB, you can
rapidly lose data in doing simple curves and other tonal
manipulations. These losses add up in
TH WI, please..somebody?
I'd like to load firmware 1.11, but have not been successful so far.
In my downloads:
DENG_Camera_RAW_3_7 2/21
FWD162B 2/22
k10e111w 3/8
POSE_502_patch er
I haven't tried printing from srgb. I get good results with Adobe 98,
so I'm happy. I have converted files to srgb for minlab processing.
That seems to work fine.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Paul
I assume your Epson 2200/2400 works with sRGB too? Most consumer
- Original Message -
From: Gaurav Aggarwal
Subject: new K100D doesn't work
I got a new Pentax K100D with 18-55mm lens yesterday at Hunt's Photo
and Video in Melrose, Mass. It just doesn't work. It turns on,
auto-focuses and the
shutter fires but the pictures come out dark, almost
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:44:53 -0800 (PST), Jack Davis wrote
TH WI, please..somebody?
I'd like to load firmware 1.11, but have not been successful so far.
In my downloads:
DENG_Camera_RAW_3_7 2/21
FWD162B 2/22
The prettiest camera pentax ever made by far
was the first spotmatic in black (without
the ugly hot shoe every camera since about
'75 now has). The damn thing ought to be
in a museum of fine art for it's sculpture.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a Gitzo I picked up used, it is tall enough for Cotty (g). I love
my Manfrotto (Bogan) tripod but I do not like joint latches sticking out
on a mono-pod. I use it with a Manfrotto (Bogan) medium ball head. I
also use it as a hiking staff at times.
-graywolf
Boris Liberman wrote:
In a message dated 3/8/2007 6:19:46 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Pentaxians
Help,Hope and Crime:
the second test shot with my new K10D and a manual Tamron 90mm macro of a
sprayed wall in the industrial (drug zone) part of Zurich:
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: I Give Up
TH WI, please..somebody?
Hi Jack.
You download the file named k10e111w.exe.
This is an executable program, so run it (double click on a typical Windows
system).
This will extract 2 files.
One is the readme.txt, the other is
One of my scanned images from film has already been accepted in the
gallery. That was a an earlier upload. At this point, it doesn't
seem to want to accept any scanned images. I think the software is
still being worked on and will continue to undergo some problems and
fixes.
--
Bruce
Take the lens cap off.
:-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/9/07, Gaurav Aggarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got a new Pentax K100D with 18-55mm lens yesterday at Hunt's Photo
and Video in Melrose, Mass. It just doesn't work. It turns on,
auto-focuses and the
shutter fires but the pictures come out dark,
I assume that your copying the extracted firmware k10e111w.BIN file
into the root directory of the SD card and not into the DCIM of
100PENTAX folder.
Just checking.
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/10/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TH WI, please..somebody?
I'd like to load firmware 1.11, but have
That wasn't very clearly written. Take 2:
I assume that your copying the extracted *.BIN file from k10e111w.exe,
into the root directory of the SD card and not into the DCIM or
100PENTAX folder.
On 3/10/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume that your copying the extracted firmware
BTW, you might want to try a different browser. Some sites work better
with one browser or another.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Looking forward to further refinement of the program.
All my images that were successfully entered are in ready for review
status.
Jack
He wasn't really kicked out, he bailed out. Mainly because he was treated
badly. The organisation he went with both sucks and blows. They recruit host
families by paying them money. Nothing wrong about that, but if the families
are paid too low, they don't provide the service needed.
But me and
I assume you are referring to the PASDML David?
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Mann
Sent: 8. mars 2007 07:27
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Incognito
On Mar 7,
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:12:19 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote
- Regards the Pentax FA lenses: they all include the box with
original paperwork and caps, the 35mm includes a case and hood as
well. Due to current scarcity on these lenses, the going rate for
them is very near retail list (and
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: Do you suffer from TLS?
Someone on naturescapes.net suggested it and the Stanley cup were
seperated at birth: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/hockey/cup98/cup03.jpg
He wasn't really kicked out, he bailed out. Mainly because he was treated
badly. The organisation he went with both sucks and blows. They recruit host
families by paying them money. Nothing wrong about that, but if the families
are paid too low, they don't provide the service needed.
But me and
Take the camera back to the store from which you purchased it. There are
numerous things that could cause the problem, including user error. Have
to store check out the camera and make sure you know what you're doing.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Gaurav Aggarwal
I got a new Pentax K100D
But you have to Press 1 for English first ;-)
(First I was very puzzled by Shel new signature, and now this cryptic
message. Join PDML and become confused)
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
This is true. I couldn't get the site to work with Firefox so I ended
up using IE.
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/10/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, you might want to try a different browser. Some sites work better
with one browser or another.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Are you serious about the ADHD thing?
If that's common it might put me off. I deal a lot with ADHD at work, and my
stepson is a classic case. Bringing a ADHD dog into the family might be a
bit too much.
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
In a message dated 3/9/2007 2:01:43 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is the desire of most civilized societies to have the freedom to
express their views, and there is no fault here. What there is, is a
difference of cultural exchange. In America, it is part and
Try again. URL not found...
Bong
On 3/9/07, J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being a long time lurker, I thought it was time to put some photos
up. Anyway the first one up is on photo.net/photos/pjjdxn..It was
taken years ago with a PZ1p and an 85.F1.4 lens with Fuji 800 asa film..
--
PDML
In a message dated 3/9/2007 8:19:27 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But you have to Press 1 for English first ;-)
(First I was very puzzled by Shel new signature, and now this cryptic
message. Join PDML and become confused)
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain
Drop the ..It from the link.
photo.net/photos/pjjdxn
Dave
On 3/10/07, Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try again. URL not found...
Bong
On 3/9/07, J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being a long time lurker, I thought it was time to put some photos
up. Anyway the first one up is on
In a message dated 3/9/2007 7:16:45 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
best,
Godfrey
==
Sure you don't want to sell the FA 20-35?
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
BRBRBR**BR AOL now offers free
email to everyone. Find out more about
In a message dated 3/8/2007 7:08:15 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I got a number of suggestions on this and did a bit of playing around,
(you can mess around endlessly and never be satisfied).
First both and Tom and Tim didn't like the crop. So I cropped it in
sort
Your call is important to use. Please hold.
Please continue holding.
Your call is very important to use. We'll be right with you. Please
continue holding.
Please continue holding.
Shel
Why in Hell should I have to Press 1 for English?!!!
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Works fine here with Firefox v2.0.0.2.
2007/3/9, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is true. I couldn't get the site to work with Firefox so I ended
up using IE.
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/10/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, you might want to try a different browser. Some sites
Oh...its those two periods after the URL. I thought your site was in
Italy... :-D
Bong
On 3/10/07, Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try again. URL not found...
Bong
On 3/9/07, J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being a long time lurker, I thought it was time to put some photos
up. Anyway
No problem. Still applies with jpeg.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Saturation/Sharpness/Contrast settings at Natural in K10D
Hi Kenneth
I was a gross misunderstanding on my side of the raw processing bypassing
all of these
As well as on ATM machines and, I suppose, other such devices. I think the
Spanish-speaking population of California is, on the whole, approaching
50%, and in some areas even greater. What we used to consider minorities
are now in the majority in many places
Shel
Why in Hell should I have to
Rumors are surfacing that Foveon sensors may show up in non Sigma DSLRs in
the next six months or so. Foveon's design escapes resolution issues that
are intrinsic to Bayer pattern color sensors. I don't see why Pentax has to
stick with Sony forever. Wouldn't it be cool if Pentax tied up with
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New Sony
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:53:17 +
It is the desire of most civilised societies to have the freedom to
express their views, and there is no fault here. What there
Thanks for your comments Bruce and Marnie.
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Falling Water
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:46:32 -0800
Pretty nice. I especially like the thin
Yeah, But at least we know the photographer is real !
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Went back and reshot the damn bird!
Actually, the tree, the bird and the sky are all fake. They're nothing
but pixels!
Paul
On Mar 8,
On 3/9/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your call is important to use. Please hold.
Please continue holding.
Your call is very important to use. We'll be right with you. Please
continue holding.
Please continue holding.
I'm transfering you to our thec department, click,
IMO Foveon has a problem: marketing number.
Only those who know that megapixels isn't the only thing will consider
such a sensor.
Most poeple will notice it is not 10Mpix and will reject it pretty quickly.
Sigma tries to be different than others using Foveon and it is a good
thing from Sigma I
In a message dated 3/9/2007 9:15:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But me and my SO still wants to go. It is on hold, because we are getting a
new dog soon. The SO wants to go to Oxford. I think she has seen one Morse
episode to many ;-)
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just
Sorry Tom, but there's too much going on here for my liking. Isolate
simplify.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Falling Water
Lots of nice weather this morning. A seasonal waterfall appears close to
home in the late winter/early
Yeah it's kind of disorienting. But is the sky real or Photoshop? ;-)
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Construction
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:47:53 -0500
I'm kind of
It might be hibernating.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Peter Lacus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: White Breasted Nuthatch
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5672710size=lg
--
Problem with Your Input
We had a problem processing your entry:
1 - 100 of 362 matches
Mail list logo
