On Dec 20, 2004, at 11:45 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Unfortunately attempting to eliminate image noise/grain via the use of
edge
masks gives quite poor results compared to the better dedicated noise
removal
tools. I use edge masking techniques after grain removal on occasion
but it is
really image
Hi,
snip
The sparrow population in England has collapsed in recent years.
Perhaps they all evolved into something exotic and we never noticed.
snip
Don't be silly, Bob. There's no such thing as evolution.
Opps, sorry. Perhaps they were all intelligently redesigned.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Interesting, but could such a thing be used to eliminate the reduced
frame size of the average dSLR?
On Dec 21, 2004, at 4:29 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Similar to the bundled fibre concept which allowed the implementation
of NPC
Polaroid backs however with a twist, or a squeeze I should say :-)
From my previous post to this thread,
large arrays of small CCDs might be assembled with minimal or no
interruption at the boundaries between chips. If it's economical to
implement, this concept could bypass the low yield problems that make big
CCDs cost so much more than several small CCDs
On Dec 21, 2004, at 9:53 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
large arrays of small CCDs might be assembled with minimal or no
interruption at the boundaries between chips. If it's economical to
implement, this concept could bypass the low yield problems that make
big
CCDs cost so much more than several
A few days ago, I think this discussion came up, about how worthy it
was to consider using a digital camera to convert slides, etc. I just
last night discovered the following web page. It's pretty interesting.
:-)
http://www.andromeda.com/people/ddyer/photo/slide-transfer.html
--
-Jon Glass
Okay, one for the engineers on the list.
Do you know what the screw size is for a typical Pentax K mount lens -
the kind that hold the actual K mount bayonet flange onto the rear of the
lens?
I appreciate that lengths may vary according to lens, but the width and
the thread type seem to be
On 20/12/04, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2973964
Interesting. I like the composition, although I wish I saw the face or
at least the head of the guy in the center of the frame.
That's actually Frank having an 'out of body' experience.
On 21/12/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thought I'd do something seasonal, so here it is.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_Front_Door.html
Strangely likeable. You enjoy a blue cast ? Even the ribbon is bluey.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know what the screw size is for a typical Pentax K mount lens -
the kind that hold the actual K mount bayonet flange onto the rear of the
lens?
There are 2 I am aware of - CNL-D2.0x2.5 and CNL-D2.0x3.5 (width length).
Almost
all lenses use
No snow?
Maris
Peter J. Alling wrote:
I thought I'd do something seasonal, so here it is.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_Front_Door.html
As usual comments are welcome but may be completely ignored.
I was playing with the *istD and the M35/2 the other night. I hadn't
used this lens in low light for quite a while and wanted to see how it
performed at big aps. I shot this wide open under tungsten light. Kind
of fun and nicely seasonal:
Hi Peter
it does not work for me this way:
- because the left sign on the wall is not completely visible
- because it has a red tint here on my monitor
- it's not sharp enough
- the details are not interesting enough (for me)
greetings
Markus
I thought I'd do something seasonal, so here it
Hi Juan
a nice shot, looks like a part of a road movie to me.
Bigger size would impress me even more ;-)
thanks for showing it.
Markus
http://www.jbuhler.com/blog/archives/0149.html
Not street stuff, but I kind of like the colors. I took it from the
car in Wyoming in September, on my way to
I have a tulip hood (52mm) that came with a Sigma
28mm f2.8 macro that fits the K24. I had to grind
the hood just a little on the inside of the tulip where
it affects image corners to avoid vignetting, but didn't
need to remove anything from the outer parts. Works
well.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi
Hi Jon
interesting stuff and since scanning in high resolution for a lot of slides
is so slow,
I would be nice to just use a digicam. But if the slides are not in very
good condition -
dust and scratch free and intact colors - this is, sadly no way for me.
Somebody has to invent an ICE-Filter
Hi Paul
lovely and colorful Kitsch :-)
thanks for showing it.
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 12:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: On the Mantle
I was playing with the *istD and the M35/2 the other
On 21 Dec 2004 at 8:58, Jon Glass wrote:
In my case, I'm mostly concerned about reducing red channel noise from
skies from my digital camera, so I would suppose that a simple masking
and performing this on just the sky would not be too much of an issue.
Yes generally much simpler than edge
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very, very nice. I like the .htm better. More saturated colours, I believe.
Exactly the same image, actually (the HTML just calls up the JPG file).
It must be the black background that makes it appear different.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like it. The highlights in the water are very nice. And the beadis
form interesting shapes. I could be even happier without that dark
area in the upper right, but it's a good shot.
Thanks. Oddly enough, I never would have thought of composing this shot
*without* that
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks totally unlike anything Mark Roberts would ever do LOL.
And what higher compliment could there be? ;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:17:04 -0500, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/pages/0656.htm
shudder
;-)
Mark,
Clearly, you PS'ed my eyes 1/2 shut, to create the illusion that I'd
had a few beers that evening, which is
On 21 Dec 2004 at 2:44, Peter J. Alling wrote:
I thought I'd do something seasonal, so here it is.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_Front_Door.html
As usual comments are welcome but may be completely ignored.
'Tis the season to be jolly... maybe you should ask Santa for a
Thanks for the info.
I've bunch shot periodically over the past 2 1/2 decades that need converted
and my folks have a few thousand that were shot in the 50s 60s with the old
Kodak Pony 135.
In that vein, yesterday my son came home with this neat little Elmo unit. Put
a Carousel slide tray on
Your welcome. Thanks for commenting.
Paul
On Dec 21, 2004, at 7:02 AM, Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Paul
lovely and colorful Kitsch :-)
thanks for showing it.
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 12:37 PM
To: [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Jon Glass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
. But this is fascinating
information. :-) Thanks.
I should point out that it's my speculation, not information from any
source. It's my amalgam of two existing concepts.
One concept is that more than one
On 22 Dec 2004 at 0:34, Anthony Farr wrote:
Unless the cost of big chips can be reigned in the Schott solution,
implemented as I speculate, could have better economy
Indeed, using the Fused Fibre Optic components an 8MP 1.6x APS sensor could be
transformed to cover the area of a 24x36mm
2. David, can't you limit the output of your flash as I can here with the
Metz's and the Pentax AF280T.
Then flash would work in auto mode even closer than 50cm. What close up
distances are talking about,
less than 20 cm?
Yes, around 20cm, f22, flash at full power, handheld,
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan
Subject: Re: FA77 aperture need help
I have a feeling that yours is stopping down a bit far.
Thanks William. I checked my pic again and somehow the wide angle
effect seemed to
affect the proportion a little. Does this picture look closer to
your
- Original Message -
From: Raimo K
Subject: Re: What a Rack!
That would be good news for us motorcyclists.
And very bad news for the Inuit.
William Robb
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Cotty wrote:
On 20/12/04, Ryan Lee, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxs5i/
Took a while didn't it!
They seem to like it.
I wonder what they would say if they didn't. I know what image
quality is good but not great means; is it normal
Ok, I am now hooked on autofocus with 16-45/4, what are my options for
extending that to pentax telephoto zoom with constant f4. Is
any other brand producing something like that if there is no pentax solution
available ? I already have constant f2.8 80-200 but it
is manual focus and it is
Last chance before eBay:
Pentax SMC K 24mm f/2.8 lens. Excellent plus, really beautiful and
hardly used condition. One of the (many) really nice primes of the
original K series!
http://homepage.mac.com/wilensky/eBay/SMCK_24_kit.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/wilensky/eBay/SMCK_24_top.jpg
Makes judging quality easy then, don't it...
Cotty wrote:
All my pro quality prints are completely jet black.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up
That dog needs to be groomed...
He looks a bit worried, as if 'someone' was going to steel his burger.
You did a good job in getting detail in a very black object however.
I think that everyone who uses digital cameras should read (or re-read),
everything about the Zone system.
Don Sanderson
Is F70-210/4-5.6 my best option ? If that only was constant f4. :)
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 9:55 AM
Subject: hooked on AF
Ok, I am now hooked on autofocus with 16-45/4, what are my options for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graywolf wrote:
LOL!
Okay, call me simple minded, but I don't get it. Jet black prints? That's humorous??
If it's photographic and it's not black it's not 'professional'...
LOL!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
Hi,
What do you think about a Pixma IP4000? It also uses BCI6 cartidges, btw.
Alex Sarbu
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 07:57:53 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I am in the market for a new printer to print off a few images
Shouldn't that be 'pair' of racks...
It looks a bit over sharpened to me, (and I certainly know how to over
sharpen a print), though it could just
be the resolution. Otherwise a very nice capture.
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Please check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenneth Waller wrote on 12/19/2004, 9:00 PM:
Please check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
All of a sudden, I can't see these pics any more.
I see the web page and the caption but no pic. Not
even a red x or
I've been relatively pleased with the performance of the FA 80-320/4-5.6. It's
an inexpensive consumer zoom, but the results are quite acceptable to my eye.
Paul
Is F70-210/4-5.6 my best option ? If that only was constant f4. :)
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic [EMAIL
The slight bluish tint makes it look cold to me. A poor substitute for snow, I
admit. But then renting a snow machine is so damn expensive. I like it just as
it is.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 21
Two days late this time, sorry, I had medical things on my mind. To which I can
now say that all of you claiming I don't have a brain are wrong. I had a picture
taken of it yesterday, so know there it is still there.
--
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
Posted every
Nicely done. I love simple road shots.
Perhaps a theme for a future PUG???
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 21, 2004 2:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: And now, something completely different
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, David Zaninovic wrote:
Is F70-210/4-5.6 my best option ? If that only was constant f4. :)
In the past year I went full circle from *SMC* F70-210 - Stigma
70-300 Macro S - Pentax FA80-320 - SMC A 70-21-/4 - SMC F70-210.
In the process I returned two broken SMC-Fs (one from
Tuesday, December 21, 2004, 3:57:36 PM, Rob wrote:
RS On 22 Dec 2004 at 0:34, Anthony Farr wrote:
Unless the cost of big chips can be reigned in the Schott solution,
implemented as I speculate, could have better economy
RS Indeed, using the Fused Fibre Optic components an 8MP 1.6x APS sensor
Hi Paul ...
I kind of like this. The softer focus lends a nice touch - almost a glow -
to what might otherwise be a rather mundane shot.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was playing with the *istD and the M35/2 the other night. I hadn't
used this lens in
A few years ago when I got a ZX-5n I was cautioned by the salesman to check
flash voltages.
I emailed Vivitar to check out the 283 I had purchased a year
earlier. There are no serial numbers on these units. There are stamped
with the country of origin. I was told that the units made in
This is really getting old...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I'm away untill January 12th
Your email has been forwarded to my web mail address and I will pick
these up from time to time. If its urgent please contact Joan Reed for
Chest Clinic stuff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Sonya Johnston for lung
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
You have a small problem, in that you have a 25mm gap around
the useful 85mm FL (35mm equivalent) between that and the 16-45. I
believe it's Joe who will chime in with vigour here :-)))
Yeah... it'd be nice if Pentax released something like the Nikon 18-70mm
DX. I had
Frantisek wrote:
I am sorry I don't understand why the ISO would increase? Am I just
tired today (i.e. dumb) g ?
You're capturing light from a larger area, so more light hits the
sensor, so you can use a lower ISO setting.
I'm not sure I'd have chosen to describe this as effectively increasing
Thanks Shel,
The glow is also a natural attribute of these rather high quality handblown
glass ornaments under soft tungsten light. But you're right the limited depth
of field is also an advantage here. At such a short shooting distance, only the
eyes are in focus.
Paul
Hi Paul ...
I kind
On 21/12/04, Graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
Two days late this time, sorry, I had medical things on my mind. To which
I can
now say that all of you claiming I don't have a brain are wrong. I had a
picture
taken of it yesterday, so know there it is still there.
You and me belong in the
perfectly acceptable ???
I think you just coined a brand new oxymoron.
:)
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Steve Jolly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: hooked on AF
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
You have a small
You have to figure that it will cost at least $100.00 to have it cleaned
professionally. The internal rubs may be something
worse than a poor cleaning job, it could be element separation. The
question becomes is this lens worth so much that you
are willing to throw away that much if it can't
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Steve Jolly wrote:
Yeah... it'd be nice if Pentax released something like the Nikon 18-70mm
DX.
Theoretically* I would rather they did a 45-135 (67.5-202.5 equiv) or
something, to match the 16-45's characteristics (around 3x zoom,
constant f4, good quality) and complement
No.
David Zaninovic wrote:
Thanks. What about P-TTL ?
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: TTL with K and M on D
David Zaninovic wrote on 20.12.04 17:34:
Will TTL flash work
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
perfectly acceptable ???
I think you just coined a brand new oxymoron.
Perfectly qualifies acceptable, not whatever acceptable qualifies. Cf
maybe right.
Kostas
A pixel that records a high light value even in the dark, (well that's
the best concise description I can give without a lot of further
thought. just remember there are no absolutes).
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What's a hot pixel?
Shel
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
Ah, the idealism of youth and the cynicism of old age, in one package...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Christmas enablement.
On 20/12/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'll wait for the istDn.
How old are you Bill?
Young enough to hope it
It can damage electronics as well, I guess they weren't trying very hard
to kill the memory card. (Especially if they are fogging developed film).
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
It also states you have to be carefull with film, as it can fog developed and
non-developed film.
I always thought it could
Could be the meter switch contacts inside the camera. I had that
problem with one of mine.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Wondering if there are any hints as to quirks with the MX. Picked on
up for my daughter the other day. She shot about half of one roll
with it last night and the light meter went
I grew up in a very poor town, and the doctor was so poor he couldn't
afford a cat scan. In fact, he couldn't even afford an x-ray machine.
He'd hold his patients up to the light ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You and me belong in the same club Graywolf. I had a
On 21/12/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
I grew up in a very poor town, and the doctor was so poor he couldn't
afford a cat scan. In fact, he couldn't even afford an x-ray machine.
He'd hold his patients up to the light ...
LOL. That was a strong light!
Cheers,
Cotty
IMHO, Something that can only be deemed as acceptable
should never be associated with the word perfect
in any way, shape, or form... So sue me
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Funny, that's about what I heard as well.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Christmas enablement.
On 20/12/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Young enough to hope it happens in my lifetime, old enough to fear
otherwise..
Actually if it's an
But what's the fun in that?
Tom C wrote:
I suspect it should have said exposed and unexposed film.
Tom C.
From: Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Tests Show Memory Cards Safe In X-Rays
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:36:45 +0100
It also
Nice composition, I like it.
frank theriault wrote:
I was at a party, and there were some people break-dancing. I went
into the hallway, and found these two practicing, with some observers:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2973964
Comments welcome.
thanks,
frank
--
I can understand
Um...
You guys actually belong to a club where it's necessary to *prove*
that you have a brain?!?
Jostein :-)
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: PDML Mini-FAQ
On 21/12/04, Graywolf,
Which begs the question, what could Frank have possibly sent Shel, the
mind boggles.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Faces are nicer and more interesting to look at than asses ;-)) I'd love
to see some of the other frames you shot.
Your package arrived today. Haven't opened it yet ... Thanks!
Shel
Actually HP already has software for intelligently stitching picture
segments together. It might be feasible.
Anthony Farr wrote:
Judging by the picture, it also seems that large arrays of small CCDs might
be assembled with minimal or no interruption at the boundaries between
chips. If it's
The thought never crossed my mind, honest..
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I may be getting a recently CLA'd KX from a list member. I've never had a
K camera, or even used one, until quite recently, when the Kamera gods
smiled upon me and proffered a KM. So, for you KX fans and
Frequently!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PDML Mini-FAQ
Um...
You guys actually belong to a club where it's necessary to *prove*
that you have a brain?!?
Jostein :-)
You trying to make me feel good about the perceptiveness of Americans?
frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:47:48 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Trivia time: It's the animal on the Canadian quarter, if you can find
a quarter with an animal on it.
William Robb
Alan, give up, surrender, they have your name on a list...
Alan Chan wrote:
Hi those with this lens, could you check with your lens and see if mine was
stopped
down too much at f2.5 setting (1 click from maximum)? A few slides shot with
this
lens came back underexposed. I need to know if it's a
ECS -English Cocker Spaniel, ACS American...
Don Sanderson wrote:
ECS or ACS? You lost me. :-(
Don
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 9:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: safe Flash Sync Voltages
ECS or ACS?
SNIP
--
So that's where we got the idea...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: frank theriault Subject: Re: What
a Rack!
It's amazing how many people (Canadians, that is) think that it's a
moose on our quarter...
Do you have a count now on the number of quarter backs there are now?
If he's anything like my Cocker unless he thinks you're playing, (in
which case it becomes a Tug of War), he just lets you take
anything out of his mouth, then looks hurt...
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:48:35 -0600, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the critter
On 21/12/04, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
You guys actually belong to a club where it's necessary to *prove*
that you have a brain?!?
Actually I modified mine using parts from a porn star and a travel agent.
Now I don't know weather I'm coming or going...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
He might be going deaf, it's a common enough occurrence in Cockers, and
he is getting to that
age, and it often makes them appear to be less intelligent.
That picture answered my question, he's an ACS, the English variety is
in general a bit calmer.
Don Sanderson wrote:
Thanks Frank, he ('It'
I think that would all depend on relative velocities...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault mused:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:47:48 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Trivia time: It's the animal on the Canadian quarter, if you can find
a quarter with an animal on it.
American.
Pug nose, Bug eyes, Loves hamburgers! ;-)
And he doesn't need groomed, he needs mowed, raked,
scrubbed and polished!
He was given very little care or attention and was pretty
much doomed to the pound.
I was pretty much going to give up on him because of his
not fitting in at my house.
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually I modified mine using parts from a porn star and a travel
agent.
Now I don't know weather I'm coming or going...
You forgot to mention the parts from the meteorologist.
Jostein
Cotty mused:
On 21/12/04, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
You guys actually belong to a club where it's necessary to *prove*
that you have a brain?!?
Actually I modified mine using parts from a porn star and a travel agent.
Now I don't know weather I'm coming or going...
If you
On 21/12/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Actually I modified mine using parts from a porn star and a travel agent.
Now I don't know weather I'm coming or going...
If you wanted to know weather you should have included a meteorologist.
ROTFL
Touche!
Cheers,
Cotty
On 21/12/04, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
You forgot to mention the parts from the meteorologist.
:-)))
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Negative on the deaf, slightest sound outside and he's at the
door raising heck!
I'm starting to think dumb is unfair, just doesn't seem to
have ever had any fair and consistent discipline.
He's starting to understand me and my 'commands' a bit.
He knows I won't hurt him, but knows I'm serious
Wow! I never thought of asking is I could buy a copy for my album. I did think
afterwards that if I had taken my old floppies in with me they would have been
very effectively erased (MRI). In fact I think I now have a magnetic personality
(grin).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot
Oh, he didn't take them down to the shoe store?
(This is one that will tell how old you are, for sure.)
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I grew up in a very poor town, and the doctor was so poor he couldn't
It was late, and I was trying to get the subtle green of the door, I
didn't notice that everything else was blueish...
Cotty wrote:
On 21/12/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thought I'd do something seasonal, so here it is.
Clap! Clap! Clap!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Cotty wrote:
On 21/12/04, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
You guys actually belong to a club where it's necessary to *prove*
that you have a brain?!?
Actually I modified
Wheatfield, it would be interesting to see some side-by-side comparisons
of noise -- *ist D vs. your new toy, same ISO (say, 200), same subject,
same angle of view.
Your wish is my command.
I have a few days off coming up this weekend.
I'll try to post something on either Saturday or Sunday.
We didn't have a shoe store.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 12/21/2004 9:51:16 AM
Subject: Re: PDML Mini-FAQ
Oh, he didn't take them down to the shoe store?
(This is one that will tell how old you are, for sure.)
Stateside they would probably be called countersunk philips head machine
screws. That is without pulling one to look at it (it could be recessed instead
of countersunk). Probably 2-2.5mm.
OK, I just pulled one, it is a recessed binderhead phillips machine screw
graywolf
P.S. More on testing.
It would also be interesting to compare noise at the *ist D's slowest
ISO with noise at the 750's slowest ISO.
Joe
I kicked the blue down a notch or two. Still needs some work but I
think it's a bit better.
Cotty wrote:
On 21/12/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thought I'd do something seasonal, so here it is.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_Front_Door.html
Strangely
The day after I shot the picture. It's still in camera so to speak.
Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote:
No snow?
Maris
Peter J. Alling wrote:
I thought I'd do something seasonal, so here it is.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_Front_Door.html
As usual comments are welcome but may be
After the original post I looked it up. Reindeer is the name of the domesticated
animal, carribou the name of the wild animal. Interestingly enough, no one has
been able to domesticate current carribou. Either those cavemen were smarter
than we are, or the animal was dumber back then (grin).
Like I said, it was a very poor neighborhood. The doctor couldn't even
afford to sterilize his instruments. In the morning he'd take 'em down to
YMCA steam room. It was so poor that the women took in laundry and kept
it. The art museum was a painted turtle. Our Baskin Robbins only had one
On 21/12/04, Graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
Stateside they would probably be called countersunk philips head machine
screws. That is without pulling one to look at it (it could be recessed
instead
of countersunk). Probably 2-2.5mm.
OK, I just pulled one, it is a recessed binderhead
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
