On 18/10/07, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Gotta think like a media person Bill.
If you can't show it on TV, it didn't happen.
Here you go Bob
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7048284.stm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 10/18/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: Not that the Canadians are going to nuke us:-). But there are
some leaks up there in the great northern expanses.
Not likely Paul. Our boat is in dry dock, our helicopter crashed into
the boat, and our sub caught fire.
We're tied up at
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/19 Fri AM 10:01:43 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Starfighters Co. (was: Completely and totally OT: Politics)
mike wilson wrote:
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/18 Thu PM 08:14:36 GMT
Dario Bonazza wrote:
And now, let's discuss WWII planes with a quiz for warbird buffs out there.
Please take a look at www.dariobonazza.com/public/KGP03047.jpg
What's that?
Nose of an early P-51 Mustang? Or maybe a Hawker Hurricane?
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Actually I think Metz makes some controlled flash (small ones
unfortunately) which sould work OK with that. They are supposed to
learn the delay between preflash and actual flash.
Those are obvioulsy made to use an external (small) flash with PS
cameras. But the technology seems to exit.
--
Yes, it's a Merlin.
No, it's neither e Messerschmitt nor another plane developed from a ME109.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: Starfighters Co.
Doug Franklin
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Oh, possibly. But the point is that two megapixels *alone* won't do
anything - there has to be more to it. Lower noise would count :)
I don't expect Pentax to go full-frame yet but I certainly hope they
don't try to cram more than 10 MP into an APS-C sensor. A 1.2-1.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what Adam has told us about the newest sensors, 12
megapixels with good noise characteristics might well be possible
at 1.5.
Could be. But every so often I look at what Nikon's getting from 12
megapixels at full-frame...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
mike wilson wrote:
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/19 Fri AM 09:05:02 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
On 19.10.2007, at 02:36 , Adam Maas wrote:
That depends, if those extra
On Oct 19, 2007, at 1:08 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Presidents should simply commit hara-kiri when their approval rating
falls below 20% and make way for the next joker. GWB could be a
leader and show the way ... History would them remember him well.
I think you just issued an invitation to the
Feels right, Paul.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It wouldn't be logical from a marketing point of view to introduce a
camera that can't use the lenses that you've just introduced. The DA*
60-250 hasn't even seen the light of day yet. Plus, most of the full
frame lenses seem to have been
When SR is turned off, does it automatically center? It must, huh?
Jack
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Oh, possibly. But the point is that two megapixels *alone* won't
do
anything - there has to be more to it. Lower noise would count :)
I don't expect
David J Brooks wrote:
Very nice, and a great idea.
I confess that I only thought of it because the leaden skies threatened
to spoil the classic tourist crap photos I was going to take...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Nope, does not work in the BBPro web pages.
I tried it in several locations in the head, and i still get the save
picture as pop ups.
Dave
On 10/13/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, drop this line into the head of any web page.
body oncontextmenu=return false;
That will do
Mainly for the Ontario PDMLers, but I see the LCBO is having a photo
contest. Five categories, winning submissions published in the Toronto
Star, and a Dslr package as 1st prize. No mention of brand, but its a
full kit, body, lens, flash, cards, reader, bag and printer.
I think I'll submit a few
On Oct 19, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Cotty wrote:
The pecking order is
1. Shitbag
2. Fartbag
3. Sleazebag.
Is there a position for smeghead in your hierarchy?
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Tom,
One thing you are forgetting is that pro-level 645 glass is far more readily
available than the equivalent 35mm glass (outside of the FA Limiteds, the
50/1.4 and 35/2). I can readily get lenses like the 35/3.5 in 645 mount, but
not so much for the 20/2.8 or 85/1.4 in K mount, let alone a
Well, its not street photography, thats for sure.
It is, however, avery lovely and peacefull photo. Love the winding river
Dave
On 10/17/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken this past Saturday in Pt Reyes near San Francisco. We actually
went to see some of the wildlife and at the
On 10/17/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rarely am I thoroughly comfortable with a scene which includes large,
dark featureless areas.
So you have seen photos of me at GFM then.
Dave
I always envision that I could have made out
some detail, however subtle.
Just me.(?)
Jack
---
I do like the light, but the rendering on my system looks a little flat.
As light levels tweak to the shadows highlights, looks better IMHO.
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/19/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken at the beach at Pt. Reyes - The sun was near setting and caused
the soft glow
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6544943
The blue jays are getting braver these days and i can now get about
15' or so away from them.
Taken in the front yard in a bit of drizzle.
K10D, FA 70-200 and cropped a bit in PSCS
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
Contrast levels are always a little tricky - the monitor viewed on has
some impact - too much contrast and you lose subtle detail.
I'll certainly revisit and see if more boost has any negative impact.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, October 19, 2007, 10:22:42 AM, you wrote:
DS I do like the
Bruce,
This version does render much cleaner. A beautiful image and composition!
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Moonrise
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:47:19 -0700
Just got
There is a bit of nonsense in that article, but it seems basically correct.
The thing you do not get from photos is how big the thing is. Without the
weapons pod, the only way I saw one, on the ground it looked like it is on
stilts. I worked on RB-47's and the 58 was almost as long as one of
Firefox 2.0.0.8
Dave
On 10/19/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
Nope, does not work in the BBPro web pages.
I tried it in several locations in the head, and i
Around $2400 for the two year old Canon EOS 5D. Heck if Pentax produced a
virtually identical camera to that, at around that price it would be
fantastic.
Tom C.
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Not entirely correct, the German tanks had better communications gear,
which gave the edge once combat began and a Commander who got to fight
the tank full time, whereas the early T34 had a two man turret with no
radio, the Commander had to aim and fire the main gun and fight the tank
part
If you are in such areas, how would I know? ;-))
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rarely am I thoroughly comfortable with a scene which includes
large,
dark featureless areas.
So you have seen photos of me at GFM then.
Nice capture Dave, but I think its too tightly cropped.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Peso Free loaders
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6544943
The blue jays are getting braver these days and
Ann, finally had a chance to look at the photos for the calander.
There are great.
One question with cafe press. Do you put the calander together using
their software, or just send them photoso and say you want a calander
made.
Dave
On 10/19/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and, uh,
Yes it's a kitten, but I posted a puppy shot so I'm not allowed to complain.
Charles Robinson wrote:
Two disclaimers:
1. Not Pentax
2. Not Art. Just aaaw
..and one warning: Adorable kitten!
With all that out of the way... http://charles.robinsontwins.org/
ann sanfedele wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Two things:
1. Unlike your own town, Newcastle is one word. 8-)
I can rationalize that (aside from being miss typo, second only to
Brooks in that area)
I once had an honorable mention in one of the New York Magazine's weekly
contests
with
David J Brooks wrote:
Cute cat.
Is'nt this why Mike Johnson left the list. Oh that and flowers.
and guns... cute cat.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
I like the feel of this one, however the foreground body of water is
distracting to me, takes away from the rest of the image.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday,
Look for the plaid jacket in amungst the darkness.
Dave
On 10/19/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are in such areas, how would I know? ;-))
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rarely am I thoroughly comfortable
David Savage wrote:
On 10/20/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/10/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I know, even with IS, I can't hand-hold my 300mm F4 and expect
tak-sharp images; much less with the 500.
Give up the coke.
Yeah the caffeine in it is doing you no favours.
From: mike wilson
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Presidents should simply commit hara-kiri when their approval rating
falls below 20% and make way for the next joker. GWB could be a
leader and show the way ... History would them remember him well.
I think you just
This weekend the Orionid meteor shower will be going on. Sunday is also my
birthday, so since I'm going to be staying up late anyway, I figure I might as
well go out and shoot some shooting stars.
What are good settings for shooting such things? Shutter speed, aperture, ISO,
noise reduction
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:46:48PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
A few days ago Mike J had a really interesting historical tale of
camera marketing and product lines:
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2007/10/in-the-early-19.html
Apropos of nothing: I just love
Bruce Dayton wrote:
If you will look closely, the photo is not tilted - the horizon is
really out at the ocean - it is faint blue but is there.
The seeming tilt is because the beach slopes down towards the ocean
and the body of seems like it should be the horizon. It is deceiving
that it seems
Good eyes, that is correct - the photo is not tilted.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, October 19, 2007, 1:35:52 PM, you wrote:
BO It looks to my eyes that the water in the extreme background is horizontal,
BO but the beach has a slope to it.
BO Bill
BO -Original Message-
BO From:
From: Kenneth Waller
I think he's on track to be our worst president ever
Worse that Hilary's husband?
By far ... even worse than Nancy's or Plastic Pat's ... or even Barb.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
So where does 'Turd Gnat' fit in the order?
--
Bruce
Friday, October 19, 2007, 10:37:40 AM, you wrote:
mw Cotty wrote:
On 19/10/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thought Cotty was the only one able to bestow shitbag status on a list
member. I'm feeling that my exclusive club
From: Evan Hanson
I think he's on track to be our worst president ever, but yeah he
deserves kudos for doing to right thing.
Yeah, I can accept that. Let me know then if he ever does.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
I, too, would only ware a plaid jacket in dark featureless areas.
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/_IGP3061_001.jpg
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/20/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look for the plaid jacket in amongst the
I didn't say that the photo was rotated (although it might be).
It just give me a sensation that it is due to the strong, sloping
foreground lines.
Godfrey
On Oct 19, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
It looks to my eyes that the water in the extreme background is
horizontal,
but the
Bill Owens wrote:
It looks to my eyes that the water in the extreme background is horizontal,
but the beach has a slope to it.
That's the way I saw it too.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Roman Melihhov wrote:
I remember how it all started with K10D. Lotta rumors, unrealistic
expectations, even though it can shake itself shame it still doest do
the laundry. At the end it was good tool that does its job well and
helps achieving excellence in photography. Now another round,
It looks to my eyes that the water in the extreme background is horizontal,
but the beach has a slope to it.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ann
sanfedele
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:27 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject:
About 1.5 years ago, at the very last moment I decided not to place
my bid on e-bay for a Pentax 1.7x AF which I would have won for ~$150
or less if I placed that bid.
In the last 2-5 months I saw them going on e-bay for about $300 or so.
This morning one was bought for $610.
Tom,
You know Hoya management? Can you introduce them to the rest of us?
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
May be, but relative comparisons like that don't necessarially fly
with those holding the purse strings.
I just can't see Hoya
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pentax basically ignored the 35mm market for several decades and did
have a respectable MF presence. Where has that gotten them to today?
I think it is wrong to think medium format. Medium format used a certain
film type that
May be, but relative comparisons like that don't necessarially fly
with those holding the purse strings.
I just can't see Hoya management, more pragmatic than the former
Pentax mgmt., going down a risky road with a 645D.
Tom C.
On 10/19/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So did Mamiya.
They're not really cameras anymore. They're optical computers. We think of
the LX as a camera circa 1980. We should think of the latest crop of digital
cameras as circa 10:30 AM.
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Look at the K10D. :-) While I appreciate the low price, it's got to be
hard to make money on a body that depreciates by 50% in one year. It
makes me wonder if they are still in the production line. Some of the
stores selling at $999
Tripod
ISO 800 or 400 if light polluted
A 20 - 31 mm lens most likely is the best choice. Over 50mm means
you'll be cutting out too much sky and you don't know exactly where
the meteor may fly through the frame. Too wide and the image of the
meteor is likely to be to small to make a good
From the Writer's Almanac 10/19/2007
It's the anniversary of the surrender that effectively ended the
American Revolutionary War, in Yorktown, Virginia, in 1781. That
summer, the British had expected Washington to attack New York City.
But when he learned that he might be able to capture the
So did Mamiya. Pentax is a lot more healthy.
-Adam
Tom C wrote:
Pentax basically ignored the 35mm market for several decades and did
have a respectable MF presence. Where has that gotten them to today?
Tom C.
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
BH
http://tinyurl.com/2j7rz8
Tom C.
That's a lot of camera sales!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
mike wilson wrote:
BTW, wind your sound up and listen to the Merlin at full blast here. Don't
play the Corsair one at the top, it will make you feel ill.
http://www.aviationshoppe.com/Sounds1.html
There used to be a tractor pull car here in the US that had either
five or seven Merlins
Mafud? (whoops)...
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:48:15 +
colostomy bag?
--
On Oct 19, 2007, at 3:09 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Possibly with 14bit RAW's
Do you think that would be possible?
I know you (or was it someone else?) have been saying the light
collecting capability of sensors has been improved lately, but in
order
to achieve a higher bit count, a better
Pentax basically ignored the 35mm market for several decades and did
have a respectable MF presence. Where has that gotten them to today?
Tom C.
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax:
I have been waiting for more information on this. I expect Ned is
pretty busy these past couple of weeks, and of course he's been in NY
for the past week with the PhotoPlus Expo.
Personally, I don't really need more high end products ... my
photography doesn't require a whole lot of more
On Oct 19, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Mark Erickson wrote:
All,
This may have already been discussed, but I think it's pretty
significant.
Ned Bunnell, an occasional poster to the Pentax forum over at
DPReview, was
recently promoted to President of Pentax Imaging in the USA.
Good bet?
12MP, 5fps, improved AF system, ~20 RAW buffer, 1-2 stops better
high ISO noise. ISO200-6400 native. New shutter with 1/8000 and
1/250 sync.
Possibly with 14bit RAW's and Live View. Hopefully all stuffed into
a K10D body (I like the K10D body)
Sounds like a good
All,
This may have already been discussed, but I think it's pretty significant.
Ned Bunnell, an occasional poster to the Pentax forum over at DPReview, was
recently promoted to President of Pentax Imaging in the USA. There's a nice
congratulations thread over at DPReview.
In a response in
From: wendy beard
On 10/18/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry, but I just don't see it.
I'm sure more than one person has taken photos of Belgian shepherds, and
when you zoom into the image, the dog on the T-shirt has ears that look
different from your Tyra image.
Adam Maas wrote:
Roman Melihhov wrote:
I remember how it all started with K10D. Lotta rumors, unrealistic
expectations, [ ... ]
Roman.
Good bet?
12MP, 5fps, improved AF system, ~20 RAW buffer, 1-2 stops better high ISO
noise. ISO200-6400 native. New shutter with 1/8000 and
Cotty wrote:
On 19/10/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sounds like a good prognostication to me.
Sorta like a wet dream.
Nah, it's just the A700 sensor's capabilities, with the possibility of
some of the D300/40D features arriving (14bit RAW, Live View).
-Adam
--
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I agree. And I also noticed that the true horizon isn't rotated. It's
a Gordian Knot.
Paul
and the funny thing is... I didn't see the ocean horizon the first time
around - talk about messed up eyes
ann
On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I didn't
On 2007-10-19, at 21:20, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've heard that it was designed as a D-FA lens for full-frame coverage
(but optimized for digital with the latest anti-reflective coatings)
and the designation was changed to DA because it has no aperture ring.
We'll see what the score is when it
Exactly. And in order to keep the size reasonable, the image circle is usually
no larger than it has to be. Of course, the difference in size is reduced at
longer focal lengths.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The center of a lens has
On Oct 19, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Oly's had a Pro Support Services for some time, Adam. It's just darn
hard to qualify for it ... You have to prove that something like 80%
or more of your income comes from the use of Olympus brand camera
equipment. I have three friends who are
Whoa! That's from years ago! Stop scaring me!
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Canon 1D series, Leica M8.
One never needs new lenses. You only have to think creatively and
use the lenses you have. You might not be able to do *exactly* what
you used to do, but for many that's not really such a terrible thing
to deal with... ;-)
Photographers shouldn't be so
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Given the reports on Hoya's management priorities, I can't see them
allowing
Pentax to embark down a road on a niche-market, low-volume product.
According to Pentax and subsequently Hoya they want to be niche maker
concentrating
Mafud? (whoops)...
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:48:15 +
colostomy bag?
--
Nicely done!
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So here's one from a couple of years ago:
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7d504802.htm
ist-D and 43 Limited.
Adjustments in Photoshop for color/levels/curves, but the
impressionistic effect is caused by photographing the
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Beach Scene
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:27:28 -0400
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @
May be, but relative comparisons like that don't necessarially fly with
those holding the purse strings.
Tom C.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor
Pentax basically ignored the 35mm market for several decades and did have a
respectable MF presence. Where has that gotten them to today?
Tom C.
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from
I can't see non-645 owners jumping to a 645D in masses. The 645D would be a
low volume seller compared to a 24 x 36 FF body. If used glass is so
readily available, Pentax would not be making money there.
OTOH, if a 24 x 36 FF priced-within-reason body was released, a large number
of current
I like the ethereal look of the rocks and the light. I find the foregound
confuses my eye though and I think the person is small and soft which tends
to detract.
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Mafud? (whoops)...
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:48:15 +
colostomy bag?
--
BH
http://tinyurl.com/2j7rz8
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
123
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
You can keep Elvis Stoiko. :-)
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:07:58 -0600
- Original Message -
From:
The Canon 1D series are 1.3x crop, as is the Leica M8 and the
(discontinued) Leica DMR for the R8/R9.
-Adam
Tom C wrote:
Is there any camera on the market that has a 1.2/1.3 crop at the moment? It
would not make sense to me to shoot for somewhere between APS-C and FF. You
wouldn't *need*
BH
http://tinyurl.com/2j7rz8
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
From the Writer's Almanac 10/19/2007
It's the anniversary of the surrender that effectively ended the American
Revolutionary War, in Yorktown, Virginia, in 1781. That summer, the British
had expected Washington to attack New York City. But when he learned that he
might be able to capture the
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:32:52 +0800
On 10/20/07, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:32:52 +0800
On 10/20/07, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Beach Scene
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:27:28 -0400
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @
Given the reports on Hoya's management priorities, I can't see them allowing
Pentax to embark down a road on a niche-market, low-volume product.
The simple fact is that 645 format MF cameras are off the radar of the vast
majority of the camera buying public.
It would be a stupid business
On 10/20/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any camera on the market that has a 1.2/1.3 crop at the moment? It
does not make sense to me to shoot for somewhere between APS-C and FF. You
wouldn't *need* new lenses of course...
Leica M8 is 1.33 or so.
--
Sandy Harris,
Nanjing, China
You can keep Elvis Stoiko. :-)
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:07:58 -0600
- Original Message -
From:
Roman Melihhov wrote:
I remember how it all started with K10D. Lotta rumors, unrealistic
expectations, even though it can shake itself shame it still doest do
the laundry. At the end it was good tool that does its job well and
helps achieving excellence in photography. Now another round,
Tripod
ISO 800
A 20 - 31 mm lens most likely is the best choice. Over 50mm means you'll be
cutting out too much sky and you don't know exactly where the meteor may fly
through the frame. Too wide and the image of the meteor is likely to be to
small to make a good impression.
Aperture, bigger
Is there any camera on the market that has a 1.2/1.3 crop at the moment? It
does not make sense to me to shoot for somewhere between APS-C and FF. You
wouldn't *need* new lenses of course...
Tom C.
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To:
1 - 100 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
