William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Werid artifacts
At 11:28 AM 5/06/2008, William Robb wrote:
Please see:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/weirdness.html
Shot with the k20 and 70mm LTD.
ISO 100, f/7.1 at 1/400th.
The sun
Shadows on buildings look better in San Francisco for some reason:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2008/06/04/San-Fran-Shadows
-T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
willdo-1 wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Werid artifacts
At 11:28 AM 5/06/2008, William Robb wrote:
Please see:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/weirdness.html
Shot with the k20 and 70mm LTD.
ISO
It's underexposed. The colors of the sky are in the left part of the
histogram. If you adjust exposure in the raw converter it makes things
even worse. The left part of the histogram has less data and a smooth
gradient like this sky makes this visible
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:28 AM, William Robb
I really want to master the basics.. and then take pictures
as great as
Bill!
that shouldn't take very long.
Thanks Bob.
Compliments from you are few and far between.
:o)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
K10D mirror noise was called among some photographers a sneezing mouse
but I never heard my K20D from away. Is it louder or same to K10D. When
camera is held against the face you sense it with entire skull and
internal ear and I can't judge whether its loud or silent. It's not that
painful as
K200D is competitive IMO although this isn't a real low-end body: 490€
is OK to me.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The masses? probably not, they'll be set with the 18-55 and 50-200.
But they'll likely not buy Pentax right now since Pentax lacks a
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/04 Wed PM 11:50:55 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New to the group - you will be groaning with frustration soon!
- Original Message -
From: Jo Lueck
Subject: New to the group - you will be
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/04 Wed PM 10:01:58 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: smc PENTAX-DA 17-70mmF4AL[IF] SDM
2008/6/4 P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The composite elements were a spherical glass component with an optical
plastic
No. I didn't see them last night, but I looked at it on my 12-inch
laptop. Now I'm looking at it on my desktop monitors and I can see
some purplish radiating bands, probably some kind of diffraction or
prismatic effect. Could be a result of atmospheric conditions or even
shock waves from
No.
On Jun 5, 2008, at 12:32 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Diagonal round banding of sorts...
Weird indeed. But why to be bothered? Wasn't life smooth and free of
artifacts 10 years ago? 20 may be?
;-)
Boris
William Robb wrote:
Please see:
I have to say that after 7000 frames with the K20D I haven't
even noticed what kind of sound it makes. So, evidently, I don't find
it annoying.
Paul
On Jun 5, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Roman Melihhov wrote:
K10D mirror noise was called among some photographers a sneezing mouse
but I never
Great light and back ground.
Love the bits of wet web in the shot.
I thought you had to leave the 180 behind.?
Dave
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another shot from the Mountain last weekend:
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
K20D, Sigma 180/3.5
Hi gang.
The folks putting together the Town Planner Calander asked me to
submit a few more photos
and they are using two more for it.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7191842 for April,
and one that is not on the net, but of a team of horses using old
wheat cutting tools.
This one is
William Robb wrote:
Please see:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/weirdness.html
Shot with the k20 and 70mm LTD.
ISO 100, f/7.1 at 1/400th.
The sun was well out of the picture.
Wow. Great picture! I really like this kind of minimalistic,
near-abstract thing.
The weird things you
Love all but the be-jeweled spider web. Otherwise, a terrific rendering
including background.
Jack
--- On Wed, 6/4/08, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 33-1/3% Better Trillium
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday,
Good stuff. Cover contender is especially nice.
Congratulations!
Jack
--- On Thu, 6/5/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Slightly OT. They want two more photos
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net, Harry Bolton [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Barb
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
W Ho!
Congrats, Paul. You guys have had the best team all year long, you
certainly deserved to cap off a wonderful season with The Cup.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
Not here it isn't. It's about $200 over the Sony A200 kit at base
price ($850 vs $650), and the Sony an be had on sale under $500 on
occasion. The Sony offers everything the K200D does except AA
batteries and sealing and adds a usable buffer, faster AF and better
batteries.
The K200D's buffer
- Original Message -
From: Toine
Subject: Re: Werid artifacts
It's underexposed. The colors of the sky are in the left part of the
histogram. If you adjust exposure in the raw converter it makes things
even worse. The left part of the histogram has less data and a smooth
gradient
Dave: Big congrats on the calendar, the photos are terrific---especially
that 2nd one. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net; Harry Bolton [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Barb
Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Yvette Sheppard
Yeah I know, good point on the buffer, this is indeed THE drawback of
that otherwise very nice camera.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not here it isn't. It's about $200 over the Sony A200 kit at base
price ($850 vs $650), and the Sony an be had on sale under
Good stuff. Congratulations.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi gang.
The folks putting together the Town Planner Calander asked me to
submit a few more photos
and they are using two more for it.
What John and Mark said and a little underexposure combined with a
gradient and posterization shows its ugly face.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posterization
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:38 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Toine
Subject: Re: Werid
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Toine
Subject: Re: Werid artifacts
It's underexposed. The colors of the sky are in the left part of the
histogram. If you adjust exposure in the raw converter it makes things
even worse. The left part of the histogram has less data
G'day All,
While GFM was taking place in the U.S. I, along with 4 other locals
snappers, headed down south to Bridgetown for the long weekend.
Just like GFM, it rained for a good portion of the trip, but the sun
did come out at times I managed to snag this (~240kb):
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like John and Marks explanation.
Yeah. It's kind of obvious that they know what they're talking about, isn't it?
But I prefer to think that the object seen moving across the sky is an alien
Put together a gallery of stuff from last week. A few good shots. A few
silly ones.
http://www.robertstech.com/blog/photos/gallery01/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Tim: I like the 2nd one very much. Well seen. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:32 AM
Subject: GESO: San Franshadows
Shadows on buildings look better in San Francisco
On 6/5/08, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the unadjusted camera raw histogram.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/weirdscreen.jpg
Gut feeling, since I can't tell from the screenshot whether you'd clip
the whites too much, is that you could have probably exposed a half
stop
Mark: Beautiful photos. Gives a great sense of the place and climb up.
Really enjoyed seeing your gallery. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:50 AM
Subject: GFM
Mark Roberts wrote:
Put together a gallery of stuff from last week. A few good shots. A few
silly ones.
http://www.robertstech.com/blog/photos/gallery01/
I've photographed the head-bumping rock several times, but I never made
it look that good. Lots of good stuff there, Mark. Hard to
Dave: Lovely. The 2 trees are well placed. The smaller view doesn't do
the scene justice. Larger view--well, as I said, lovely. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:45
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great Frank!
That serious facial expression balanced with shorts, clogs, and a bike
helmet make the scooter driver a classic in BW.
Regards, Bob S.
Thanks, Bob, and thanks to everyone else who commented. It's amazing
how
On Jun 5, 2008, at 1:32, Tim Bray wrote:
Shadows on buildings look better in San Francisco for some reason:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2008/06/04/San-Fran-Shadows
First one is a little too cluttered for my tastes but I like #2 and 3!
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - [EMAIL
Looks like I missed a damp good time. :)
Nice collection, Mark.
Jack
--- On Thu, 6/5/08, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GFM gallery
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, June 5, 2008, 6:50 AM
Put together a gallery
Some, sorry all are fabtabulus Mark.
I really like Leiopate buxifarmy, er i mean Leiophopatj buxtremun,
ack, the white flowers.:-0
The sunrise and moonrise ones are great as is the fog in the valley.
You must tell me how you expose for those. Mine are not quite as good.
Dave
On Thu, Jun 5,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like I missed a damp good time. :)
Nice collection, Mark.
One thing is for sure on that weekend. Rain
Dave
Jack
--- On Thu, 6/5/08, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, i think i like this one.
The nice break between the trees and then the rocks is nice
Dave
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:45 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
While GFM was taking place in the U.S. I, along with 4 other locals
snappers, headed down south to Bridgetown for
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:35 AM, wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perth, Ontario that is.
Just a pleasant scene in the park. I think the lighting makes this one
look a little more special.
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/98005050
Nice building and grounds.
And a gee-gee shot for
Oh, BTW, the Collingwood horse show is going to be in Ottawa this
year, but you may have already known that.:-)
Dave
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:34 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:35 AM, wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perth, Ontario that is.
Just a
Excellent article by security and security technology expert Bruce
Schneier ...
Given that real terrorists, and even wannabe terrorists, don't seem to
photograph anything, why is it such pervasive conventional wisdom that
terrorists photograph their targets? Why are our fears so great that we
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/05 Thu PM 01:50:11 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: GFM gallery
Put together a gallery of stuff from last week. A few good shots. A few
silly ones.
http://www.robertstech.com/blog/photos/gallery01/
Well done.
Howdy!
So I'm shopping for a polarizer again. A year or two ago I asked about
polarizers, but I can't find the thread. Anyway, I ended up with a
fairly inexpensive Sunpak 58mm polarizer from the LCS and a few step up
rings for the smaller lenses. Now the 645 needs one. The filter ring
The phrase Safety Last springs to mind.
I like it. Fun shot.
Cheers,
Dave
2008/6/2 frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://tinyurl.com/68ne98
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SEPjxuhUGYI/CME/0WZb5bQUnAY/s1600-h/may_30_08+004.jpg
This guy takes his scooting very seriously!!
Very nice. The second best thing to being there.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Put together a gallery of stuff from last week. A few good shots. A few
silly ones.
http://www.robertstech.com/blog/photos/gallery01/
--
The biggest thing wrong with the step up plan you use is that lens
hoods are problematic. You should never use a filter without a lens
hood in order to minimize flare. Also, be sure to get multicoating
The sensitivity to LP vs CP can affect both AF sensors and metering
sensors, depending
An interesting theme, well executed.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 5, 2008, at 1:32, Tim Bray wrote:
Shadows on buildings look better in San Francisco for some reason:
David Savage wrote:
The phrase Safety Last springs to mind.
I like it. Fun shot.
Cheers,
Dave
2008/6/2 frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://tinyurl.com/68ne98
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SEPjxuhUGYI/CME/0WZb5bQUnAY/s1600-h/may_30_08+004.jpg
This guy takes his
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Put together a gallery of stuff from last week. A few good shots. A few
silly ones.
http://www.robertstech.com/blog/photos/gallery01/
Looks like a great time, and your photos are (as usual) spectacular.
Thanks!
cheers,
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The biggest thing wrong with the step up plan you use is that lens
hoods are problematic. You should never use a filter without a lens
hood in order to minimize flare. Also, be sure to get multicoating
Looks like the one I was considering isn't multi-coated, and I
that is designed to transport us all to another dimension.
You're already a member of the PDML isn't that extra dimensional enough?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like John and Marks
P. J. Alling wrote:
that is designed to transport us all to another dimension.
You're already a member of the PDML isn't that extra dimensional enough?
True. And the PDML certainly has plenty of weird artifacts.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Frank,
How many takes did HCB get at the guy jumping over the puddle?!!
Good luck is really the intersection of skill, preparation, and opportunity.
Good choice of the critical moment.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:18 AM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008
Sounds like a disease or fungus to me.
Nice to have the wife enjoying photography too.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:-) They enter the world nice and clean but seem to turn to crap
within a few days! It's a shame too, as the blooms
Mark Roberts wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
that is designed to transport us all to another dimension.
You're already a member of the PDML isn't that extra dimensional enough?
True. And the PDML certainly has plenty of weird artifacts.
Mark!
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank,
How many takes did HCB get at the guy jumping over the puddle?!!
Good luck is really the intersection of skill, preparation, and opportunity.
Good choice of the critical moment.
Regards, Bob S.
I once read an
I took some sage advice, and went to fly a kite with my lovely wife.
We had a great time, and our experience was very successful!
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2008/06/04/up-to-the-highest-height/
Shot with the K10D, DA 50-200, adjustments in Lightroom.
Comments, critiques are welcome!
Mike
I have submitted a few photos in the last weeks. To my surprise some
are accepted and if I watch the recent additions they accept loads of
new photos. And more surprising many from non pentax glass. It does
take several weeks before submitted changes to declined or accepted.
Toine
--
PDML
On Jun 5, 2008, at 8:32 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The biggest thing wrong with the step up plan you use is that lens
hoods are problematic. You should never use a filter without a lens
hood in order to minimize flare. Also, be sure to get multicoating
... However,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took some sage advice, and went to fly a kite with my lovely wife.
We had a great time, and our experience was very successful!
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2008/06/04/up-to-the-highest-height/
Shot with the K10D, DA
On 5-Jun-08, at 10:44 AM, frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I took some sage advice, and went to fly a kite with my lovely wife.
We had a great time, and our experience was very successful!
Toine,
When you use the term accepted, do you mean they have been accepted for
review or have been accepted/approved into the Pentax Gallery?
I agree it's taking quite a number of days to get a result from those which
have been accepted for review.
Congratulations on having work accepted for the
On Jun 5, 2008, at 10:56, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Frank,
How many takes did HCB get at the guy jumping over the puddle?!!
Good luck is really the intersection of skill, preparation, and
opportunity.
Good choice of the critical moment.
Regards, Bob S.
I am reminded of a quote I read which
This Sigma sample is truly amazing...
*Muttering to self* Gotta resist, gotta resist...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Another shot from the Mountain last weekend:
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
K20D, Sigma 180/3.5 Macro
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Any day you get a kite to fly is a good day. ;)
Good souvenir of the day.
Jack
--- On Thu, 6/5/08, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO -- Up to the highest height...
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, June 5,
Yes what I meant is approved in gallery.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Toine,
When you use the term accepted, do you mean they have been accepted for
review or have been accepted/approved into the Pentax Gallery?
I agree it's taking quite a number of
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:45 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
While GFM was taking place in the U.S. I, along with 4 other locals
snappers, headed down south to Bridgetown for the long weekend.
Just like GFM, it rained for a good portion of the trip, but the sun
did come
Nice shot! I want a blurred out kite, too. :D
I like the composition of that. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Hamilton
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 11:27 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO -- Up to the highest
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jun 5, 2008, at 8:32 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The biggest thing wrong with the step up plan you use is that lens
hoods are problematic. You should never use a filter without a lens
hood in order to minimize flare. Also, be sure to get
On 5/6/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Put together a gallery of stuff from last week. A few good shots. A few
silly ones.
http://www.robertstech.com/blog/photos/gallery01/
Superb gallery Mark, a few 'Oh wow' shots and a few LOL shots - inspired
me to get my shots downloaded
I'm left wishing I could see either the wife or the kite, although I know
that's difficult to achieve here. Well exposed and rendered.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I took some sage advice, and went to fly a kite with my lovely
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/05 Thu PM 04:09:28 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Werid artifacts
Mark Roberts wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
that is designed to transport us all to another dimension.
You're already a
Mike Hamilton wrote:
I took some sage advice, and went to fly a kite with my lovely wife.
We had a great time, and our experience was very successful!
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2008/06/04/up-to-the-highest-height/
Excellent! I haven't taken a look at your work for quite some time,
Mark,
This is a *great* collection!
My favorite is Big Pile o' Rocks. The human figures
(who are wearing just the right colors) give a
marvelous sense of scale.
I also note the jpeg quantization artifacts similar to
those bedevilling Wheatfield in Moon over Myrtle.
Rick
--- Mark Roberts
Great abstract I'd never associate with S F ;+}
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GESO: San Franshadows
Shadows on buildings look better in San Francisco for some reason:
Congrats Dave !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Slightly OT. They want two more photos
Hi gang.
The folks putting together the Town Planner Calander asked me to
submit a few more photos
and they
Op Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:52:43 +0200 schreef P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Interesting, the lens contains not one but two composite, aspherical
elements, the composite aspherical element was the achillies heel of the
smcp FA 28-70mm f4.0 an otherwise exemplary little lens.
Dario Bonazza
Frank,
How many takes did HCB get at the guy jumping over the puddle?!!
Good luck is really the intersection of skill, preparation,
and opportunity.
Good choice of the critical moment.
Regards, Bob S.
2 apparently. He'd seen it and missed, so went back the next day at
about the same
Nice work Mark !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GFM gallery
Put together a gallery of stuff from last week. A few good shots. A few
silly ones.
http://www.robertstech.com/blog/photos/gallery01/
--
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 apparently. He'd seen it and missed, so went back the next day at
about the same time and it happened again.
HCB really was a lucky bastard, wasn't he?
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
frank theriault wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/68ne98
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SEPjxuhUGYI/CME/0WZb5bQUnAY/s1600-h/may_30_08+004.jpg
This guy takes his scooting very seriously!! :-)
Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
That's freaking awesome. I think I could laugh at
P. J. Alling wrote:
Bicycle Helmut, $20.
Motor Scooter $1000.
Plastic Clogs $15
Your plastic clogs are New Balance 801 recovery shoes and typically sell
for about $50 US.
Just sayin'.
Embarrassing the hell out of your family, Priceless...
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do Canadian police not mind having their photos taken?
Or didn't you wait around long enough to find out?
An interesting slice of life - well spotted!
They aren't too thrilled about it. I think I've only taken one or two
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're not sure ~exactly~ what he did, but we're sure he did
~something~ wrong...
Obvious. he/she was driving a Chevy...
That's not a crime in Toronto - although it should be...
;-)
Thanks to everyone who commented on
I don't know personally, however the word from people who tried to get
these repaired by Pentax was that the aspheric lens had delaminated and
couldn't be repaired no parts were available, a cemented group could be
repaired, but it might not be economically feasible slight difference.
It
Thank you so much for making me feel welcome.
So today it was fiddle frenzy.
I tried I really did, but I am struggling...
I took pictures of puppies on the grass and the grass was yellow.
I have not had chance to read anything, this is my bad for sure - I
will set some time aside this
Excellent gallery. I hope I can get over there next year, if only to
prove that not all Brits have legs like bleached pipe-cleaners that
have been painted brilliant white then left out in the sun to bleach a
bit more.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:32 AM, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shadows on buildings look better in San Francisco for some reason:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2008/06/04/San-Fran-Shadows
Very cool!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
In a message dated 6/4/2008 12:03:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
options.com writes:
that shouldn't take very long.
Welcome. I recommend that you find a class locally that will teach you
the basics. It will be much easier in 2 or 3 hands-on sessions than by
reading through
Just because New Balance slapped an N on them doesn't mean they're not
cheap...
Scott Loveless wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Bicycle Helmut, $20.
Motor Scooter $1000.
Plastic Clogs $15
Your plastic clogs are New Balance 801 recovery shoes and typically sell
for about $50 US.
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do Canadian police not mind having their photos taken?
Or didn't you wait around long enough to find out?
An interesting slice of life - well spotted!
They aren't too thrilled about it.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent gallery. I hope I can get over there next year, if only to
prove that not all Brits have legs like bleached pipe-cleaners that
have been painted brilliant white then left out in the sun to bleach a
bit more.
What about
Why I believe that Cotty's legs have been insulted.
Bob W wrote:
Excellent gallery. I hope I can get over there next year, if only to
prove that not all Brits have legs like bleached pipe-cleaners that
have been painted brilliant white then left out in the sun to bleach a
bit more.
Bob
That's not much of a value-add, is it? No, I think calling them
'recovery shoes' rather than 'plastic clogs' is what brings the price
up. And rightly so - who would want to wear clogs? After all, this is
not the 1970s. Or Amsterdam.
Just because New Balance slapped an N on them doesn't mean
Subject: Re: GFM gallery
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent gallery. I hope I can get over there next year, if only
to
prove that not all Brits have legs like bleached pipe-cleaners
that
have been painted brilliant white then left out in the sun
to
- Original Message -
From: Jo Lueck
Subject: Re: New to the group - you will be groaning with frustration soon!
Thank you so much for making me feel welcome.
So today it was fiddle frenzy.
I tried I really did, but I am struggling...
I took pictures of puppies on the grass
On 5/6/08, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
What about sandals and socks? Do you wear sandals and socks? It
seems that Cotty does...
You guys can take a short leap off a big rock
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Yes, but the gaping flaw in my insult is that my legs are also, in
fact, exactly as described.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of P. J. Alling
Sent: 05 June 2008 21:21
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GFM gallery
Why I
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not much of a value-add, is it? No, I think calling them
'recovery shoes' rather than 'plastic clogs' is what brings the price
up. And rightly so - who would want to wear clogs? After all, this is
not the 1970s. Or
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
