G'day all,
Welcome to 2017.
A great and varied collection to start the new year.
As usual you'll find the gallery here:
http://pug.komkon.org/
(you may need to refresh your browser if you see the previous gallery
there).
Note: The automated submission process usually works well but it's not
Mark, I trusted you... and you...
I took some inexpensive lenses out of the closet, and tried them...
Their quality didn't go up. You mislead /me!
;-)
Igor
Mark Roberts Mon, 09 Jan 2017 07:44:18 -0800 wrote:
Collin B wrote:
The only rough point is the price of good lenses. They've gone up
Interesting shapes and textures.
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 10/1/17 5:48 am, Ken Waller wrote:
Taken last spring - a large Hosta in my yard.
K-3, 300mm f 4.5 SMC FA, f9.0, 1/400, 800 ISO
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329773
Comments appreciated.
Kenneth
Thanks Paul, I appreciate the comment.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Reaching Out'
Nice composition. Excellent render.
Paul via phone
On Jan 9, 2017, at 1:48
The Hobart Rivulet starts on Mt. Wellington and flows down through the
city centre to teh Derwent River. Here in summer it is only a trickle,
but can get more exciting after heavy rain.
https://flic.kr/p/QUQDdX
Pentax K1 and SMC-M series 28mm prime.
--
Philip Northeast
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> Gonz wrote:
>>
>> I would be just as interesting if not more interesting to me to have
>> the Bayer filter removed (is that even possible?). That would make
>> for a cool B camera. don't know if the software would
Thanks Dave. Rather spectacular. A veritable buzz bar.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: David Mann
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 11:28 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Blooming
Our Xmas lily is blooming. Here are two views about 90° apart. There are
still a few
good stuff- like them both and they make me want to be tehre
ann
On 1/9/2017 8:44 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329266=lg
Closer:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329267
(K-5, DA 16-45)
Comments appreciated.
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Those are both wonderful shots, Rick. Really reveals the mood and
ambiance of the place.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329266=lg
>
> Closer:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329267
>
> (K-5, DA
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329266=lg
Closer:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329267
(K-5, DA 16-45)
Comments appreciated.
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Oh yes, well and truly. People seem to either love or hate the scent. I like
it but in the past couple of years they've been making my nose a bit stuffy if
we have them inside.
Cheers,
Dave
> On Jan 10, 2017, at 10:42 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> It's amazing. Does
On 1/9/2017 9:25 AM, Gonz wrote:
Well, this is pretty much the situation I'm in right now. I guess I
could take a leap of faith and try the K-1. The worst that can happen
is that I am not happy and I sell it at a small loss. I'm so invested
in good Pentax glass that it would be a shame not to
On 1/9/2017 10:41 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Christine Aguila wrote:
From the Washington Post! FYI!
I dunno', considering how low the temperatures have been around here the
last few days.
On 1/9/2017 10:52 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
You will be waiting a long time
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Collin B wrote:
There's lots of E-6 out there to shoot.
I'm waiting
On 1/9/2017 9:53 AM, Collin B wrote:
Zos said ...
The K-3 II has pixel shift, better SR (1 stop better), and the astro
tracer built in. It also lacks a pop up flash since that is where they
put the GPS unit. Otherwise they are 100% the same really. If you
didn't need pixel shift or GPS I would
On 1/9/2017 9:09 AM, Collin B wrote:
What's the advantages of a K3II over a K3?
Pixel shift.
And that is a biggie if you are into macro.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On 2017-01-09 8:21 , Collin B wrote:
When I look at almost everyone's digital camera offerings, they're all so
good.
i think the smaller-sensor cameras still need a new sensor technology to
surpass their limits in dynamic range and low light capabilities; plus EVF
display tech could still
David J Brooks wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I forgot to mention that the 28-105 is arguably the sharpest kit lens I've
ever used. I picked it up because I couldn't afford the 24-70, already had
a tammy 28-75, and didn't have a weather proof
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I forgot to mention that the 28-105 is arguably the sharpest kit lens I've
> ever used. I picked it up because I couldn't afford the 24-70, already had
> a tammy 28-75, and didn't have a weather proof standard range zoom.
Nice... I can smell them from here
Jeffery Johnson | Photo Captures by Jeffery
http://www.PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com
/Bringing joy and happiness to lonely and depressed walls across the
planet with wonderful diverse range of photography./
On 1/9/2017 3:28 PM, David Mann wrote:
Our Xmas
It's amazing. Does it have a perfume, Dave?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:28 PM, David Mann wrote:
> Our Xmas lily is blooming. Here are two views about 90° apart. There are
> still a few unopened buds but there are plenty to keep the bees busy.
>
>
haha
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> Gonz wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, you would be stuck using physical colored filters instead of
>> tweaking the B virtually in LR/PS. Like back in the bad ole days of
>> B film. You only get that chance to get it right with
Gonz wrote:
Yeah, you would be stuck using physical colored filters instead of
tweaking the B virtually in LR/PS. Like back in the bad ole days of
B film. You only get that chance to get it right with the physical
filters, lots of chances with the full Bayer filtered image.
That's a big
Yeah, you would be stuck using physical colored filters instead of
tweaking the B virtually in LR/PS. Like back in the bad ole days of
B film. You only get that chance to get it right with the physical
filters, lots of chances with the full Bayer filtered image.
That's a big negative.
On Mon,
Our Xmas lily is blooming. Here are two views about 90° apart. There are
still a few unopened buds but there are plenty to keep the bees busy.
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1035/#peso
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1036/#peso
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Ditto what Bruce said...
(I didn't see your original post - wonder if it will show up later in
my PDML folder... )
ann
On 1/9/2017 2:38 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
This has an appealingly elegant form and composition. A very beautiful
image, Ken.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Ken Waller
Gonz wrote:
I would be just as interesting if not more interesting to me to have
the Bayer filter removed (is that even possible?). That would make
for a cool B camera. don't know if the software would support this
kind of image though (in raw).
My understanding is that the Bayer filter is
I would be just as interesting if not more interesting to me to have
the Bayer filter removed (is that even possible?). That would make
for a cool B camera. don't know if the software would support this
kind of image though (in raw).
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Larry Colen
I forgot to mention that the 28-105 is arguably the sharpest kit lens
I've ever used. I picked it up because I couldn't afford the 24-70,
already had a tammy 28-75, and didn't have a weather proof standard
range zoom.
In decent light, I'm quite happy to leave it on my camera. I don't know
Zos Xavius wrote:
>http://petapixel.com/2017/01/09/kodak-investigating-take-bring-back-kodachrome/
>
>Now they are thinking about kodachrome. I will believe it when I see it really.
They're just stoking the social media rumor machine.
They have no intention of bringing back Kodachrome.
--
I'm waiting for Plus-X...
On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:47:21 -0500, Collin B wrote:
> There's lots of E-6 out there to shoot.
> I'm waiting for Kodachrome's return.
> Then ...
---
Steven Sharpe - The Office Gallery
d...@eastlink.ca
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Ken Waller wrote:
Taken last spring - a large Hosta in my yard.
K-3, 300mm f 4.5 SMC FA, f9.0, 1/400, 800 ISO
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329773
Comments appreciated.
Very well done. I suspect that it would also work excellent as a black
and white. That is not to say
TLDR; summary at end
My plan was to go from the K-5 ii to the K-1, but due to a weird
confluence of events, I ended up with both a K-3 and a K-3ii.
The K-3, K-3 II and the K-1 each have advantages.
In reasonable light, if you don't shoot with wide lenses, the image
quality differences are
Works very nicely as an abstract.
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Taken last spring - a large Hosta in my yard.
> K-3, 300mm f 4.5 SMC FA, f9.0, 1/400, 800 ISO
>
>
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Stanley Halpin
wrote:
> [...] if/when I decide to revisit APS-C, I would absolutely definitely choose
> K-3 over K-3ii.
>
> [...] the K-3ii ditches the pop-up flash
> [...] I have yet to see a reliable add-on I can use to trigger
Excellent composition and color.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Taken last spring - a large Hosta in my yard.
> K-3, 300mm f 4.5 SMC FA, f9.0, 1/400, 800 ISO
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329773
>
> Comments appreciated.
>
> Kenneth
This has an appealingly elegant form and composition. A very beautiful
image, Ken.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Taken last spring - a large Hosta in my yard.
> K-3, 300mm f 4.5 SMC FA, f9.0, 1/400, 800 ISO
>
>
Sure, but with some caveats. If you have zero movement in your scene,
then you are golden. If tree branches sway in the wind, water flows,
grasses move, people, etc, there will be some issues. The K-1 has some
software that helps with this when it processes PS files, but the k-3
never was upgraded
I had the K-3. I sold it (them) and moved from APS-C to the K-1. But if/when I
decide to revisit APS-C, I would absolutely definitely choose K-3 over K-3ii.
Two reasons. I still haven’t become convinced of any real world advantage to
the pixel-shift gimmick. Second, the K-3ii ditches the
Whoah. I never noticed that. Interesting. Their DR and noise
performance is 100% identical from what I can tell. Maybe sony revised
that sensor along the way.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:46 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> The K-3II either has a different sensor or slightly
Nice composition. Excellent render.
Paul via phone
> On Jan 9, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Taken last spring - a large Hosta in my yard.
> K-3, 300mm f 4.5 SMC FA, f9.0, 1/400, 800 ISO
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329773
>
> Comments
http://petapixel.com/2017/01/09/kodak-investigating-take-bring-back-kodachrome/
Now they are thinking about kodachrome. I will believe it when I see it really.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> It must be Ektaplasm
>
>> On 9 Jan 2017, at 17:39, P. J.
Taken last spring - a large Hosta in my yard.
K-3, 300mm f 4.5 SMC FA, f9.0, 1/400, 800 ISO
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18329773
Comments appreciated.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It must be Ektaplasm
> On 9 Jan 2017, at 17:39, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> Well, it isn't really "Kodak", maybe it isn't really Ektachrome.
>
>
>> On 1/9/2017 10:18 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>> >From the Washington Post! FYI!
>>
>>
>>
The K-3II either has a different sensor or slightly different sensor
masking, as it has a slightly higher pixel count. Not enough to, by
itself, make a "real world" difference in image quality, but it's not
exactly the same. Just very close in pretty much every respect.
On 1/9/2017 10:49
For the purposes of general photography not much. On the other hand,
the K-3 is actually selling for more NIB than the K-3II is where it's
available*...
*A phenomenon I've also noted about the K-5 vs later Pentax cameras as
well. I suppose a NIB K-5 would be a nice collectors item, or not,
Well, it isn't really "Kodak", maybe it isn't really Ektachrome.
On 1/9/2017 10:18 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>From the Washington Post! FYI!
On 9/1/17, Collin B, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'm waiting for Kodachrome's return.
K25 - f/8 and chill for a while
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Zos said ...
>The K-3 II has pixel shift, better SR (1 stop better), and the astro
>tracer built in. It also lacks a pop up flash since that is where they
>put the GPS unit. Otherwise they are 100% the same really. If you
>didn't need pixel shift or GPS I would just pass myself.
Is pixel shift
You will be waiting a long time
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Collin B wrote:
> There's lots of E-6 out there to shoot.
> I'm waiting for Kodachrome's return.
> Then ...
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
>
Absolute truth!
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> It’s not exactly a leap in that i have yet to hear that anyone who bought the
> K-1 has been displeased. You have to spend close to $1000 more to get a DSLR
> that tops it in any significant way.
>
>
There's lots of E-6 out there to shoot.
I'm waiting for Kodachrome's return.
Then ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
The K-3 II has pixel shift, better SR (1 stop better), and the astro
tracer built in. It also lacks a pop up flash since that is where they
put the GPS unit. Otherwise they are 100% the same really. If you
didn't need pixel shift or GPS I would just pass myself.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM,
Collin B wrote:
>The only rough point is the price of good lenses. They've gone up while
>bodies drop.
But on the other hand the *quality* of inexpensive lenses has gone up.
Way up.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Christine Aguila wrote:
>From the Washington Post! FYI!
>
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/06/kodak-says-its-bringing-back-ektachrome-film-and-photographers-everywhere-smile/?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-technology%3Ahomepage%2Fcard_term=.c6c5ac75995d
Only in 35mm format
It’s not exactly a leap in that i have yet to hear that anyone who bought the
K-1 has been displeased. You have to spend close to $1000 more to get a DSLR
that tops it in any significant way.
Paul
> On Jan 9, 2017, at 10:25 AM, Gonz wrote:
>
> Well, this is pretty much
Well, this is pretty much the situation I'm in right now. I guess I
could take a leap of faith and try the K-1. The worst that can happen
is that I am not happy and I sell it at a small loss. I'm so invested
in good Pentax glass that it would be a shame not to try .and. .give.
.them. .one.
When I look at almost everyone's digital camera offerings, they're all so
good.
Even the slowest AF is quite quick & does a fine job.
The features, like geotagging/gps were unimaginable with film.
Pixel shift improves on the in-camera edge processing. Others will follow.
Once we got
>From the Washington Post! FYI!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/06/kodak-says-its-bringing-back-ektachrome-film-and-photographers-everywhere-smile/?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-technology%3Ahomepage%2Fcard_term=.c6c5ac75995d
Cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
What's the advantages of a K3II over a K3?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Thanks, PJ - that's what I'll have to do. I'd call the lens condition
"Good" (because of the small nick on the front element). Wish me luck -
haven't attempted to sell anything on EBay in... probably 10 years at least!
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 9:15 PM, P. J. Alling
I had the same experience when using the new 28-105. This lens has the
focusing ring very close to the body. The lens has manual focus overide
and the ring turns too easy. Quite often I touch it unintentionally
after autofocusing.
On 08-Jan-17 22:04, Gonz wrote:
Question: How is the K-1
62 matches
Mail list logo