Adenium spp.

There are at least 6 species in this SA genus. Several common names are in use, esp. Impala Lily in SA & Desert Rose overseas. Natural & horticultural hybridisation has produced many spectacular varieties. This year with the drought conditions in SA, they are flowering very well. Here are some

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

Zos Xavius wrote: People still use firefox? I just switched back to firefox from Chrome. Chrome was causing all sorts of annoying little issues which firefox was free of. The latest version is also quite a bit quicker than Chrome. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

Zos Xavius wrote: >People still use firefox? ANyone who doesn't want to be sucked into Google's world dominating information sink. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

I only use it to login to my second Tumblr account so I don't have to logout and login again in my main browser (Chrome). Pure laziness. :) On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Zos Xavius wrote: > People still use firefox? > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

People still use firefox? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

Doing just fine with 58.0.2 (64-bit) on OSX El Cap. Paul Sorenson wrote: Also no problems with 58.0.2 on Win 10. Maybe the problem lies with the search engine. Do you get the same response browsing to other sites? -p On 2/16/2018 4:22 PM, John wrote: On 2/16/2018 15:02, Bulent Celasun

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

Also no problems with 58.0.2 on Win 10.  Maybe the problem lies with the search engine.  Do you get the same response browsing to other sites? -p On 2/16/2018 4:22 PM, John wrote: On 2/16/2018 15:02, Bulent Celasun wrote: I use Firefox 58.0.2 without problems... on Linux. Are you sure it

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

On 2/16/2018 15:21, Jostein wrote: Same as Bulent here, but on Windows 10 and 7. 58.0.2 is the latest version. Jostein Den 16.02.2018 20:52, skrev John: DO NOT UPGRADE Completely hosed my browser. Cannot browse due to firefox POPUPS. I was running 58.0.1 up until last night.

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

On 2/16/2018 15:02, Bulent Celasun wrote: I use Firefox 58.0.2 without problems... on Linux. Are you sure it is Firefox and not some malware? It may be malware, but if so Firefox 58.0.2 *is* the malware that is causing the problem. I use an anonymizing search engine for my home page.

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

I don’t expect Pentax to be able to compete with Fuji in resources. But Im happy with my gear. It would probably serve me well for the rest of my days, although I will upgrade if I see something I like. Paul > On Feb 16, 2018, at 3:57 PM, Zos Xavius wrote: > > Compare to

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

As with Jostein and Bulent (58.0.2), but on Mac OS X. Works just fine, as did 58.0.1. On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:21 PM, Jostein wrote: > Same as Bulent here, but on Windows 10 and 7. 58.0.2 is the latest version. > Jostein > > Den 16.02.2018 20:52, skrev John: >> >> DO NOT

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Compare to the GFX. In 2017 Fuji released 6 lenses for the system. And that's not even counting all the other lenses they have released in the past year from X mount to cinema lenses. Pentax designed 2 whole lenses for the K-1. The 100-450 and 70-200. And it took them over 2 years just to come up

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Don't forget the K-3 itself is 4 years old now using a sensor that wasn't exactly cutting edge when it came out. A K-3 Mark III with the sensor in the KP was all ricoh had to do. They didn't even need to redesign the body. Done. You know? The one thing every pentaxian has been asking for since the

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

It needed an 85 right out the gate. Instead they focused on yet another 50mm, something which Pentax is certainly not lacking in A flagship full frame camera and not even a single new prime to pair it with, but hey, let's pump out another body. That's just what the market wants! yeah! On

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

Same as Bulent here, but on Windows 10 and 7. 58.0.2 is the latest version. Jostein Den 16.02.2018 20:52, skrev John: DO NOT UPGRADE Completely hosed my browser. Cannot browse due to firefox POPUPS. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

I use Firefox 58.0.2 without problems... on Linux. Are you sure it is Firefox and not some malware? Bulent. - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Pentax released several new zooms with the K-1, and I think that’s a priority in today’s marketplace, particularly for a pro grade camera. On any almost type of assignment where you have to work fast you need the flexibility of a zoom. Most of the the zooms, BTW, are superior to the brand’s

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

On 2/16/2018 12:57, William Robb wrote: It doesn’t appear to have worked out very well. People here and on that somewhat neurotic forum dedicated to Pentax are having kittens because of this “useless upgrade”. This seems to be another case of the more you have, the less happy you are. Ricoh

OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

DO NOT UPGRADE Completely hosed my browser. Cannot browse due to firefox POPUPS. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

They released a FF camera and not a single prime and yet they think this is a priority. Think about that for a minute. Ricoh is milking it pretty fucking hard. On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:57 PM, William Robb wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:29 PM Mark Roberts

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:29 PM Mark Roberts wrote: > Rob Studdert wrote: > > >The K5IIs actually made the K5 useful, I'm still using my mK5IIs, my > >pair of K5 bodies are long gone, their focus speed/accuracy in low > >light was appalling. If these specs are true

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

That was the KP. A camera nobody wanted. All pentax had to do was update the k-3 with a new sensor and improve the AF. A cameras pretty much all of their customers are waiting for. It was so easy. So cut and dry. I've given up on hoping that they ever improve the video. Pretty sad when canon

Re: PESOs -- Monarch of the Daisies.

More like the machine gun I was forced to use turned my catch into hamburger that I couldn't carry home because I forgot my plastic bags... On 2/9/2018 11:50 AM, John wrote: On 2/9/2018 02:27, P. J. Alling wrote: Sadly my focus was on the Daisies... Still, while looking for something else,

Re: PESO: T-Time

" I still have a Kingston Trio album somewhere..." I have one on my iPhone. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly

Re: PESO: T-Time

On 15/2/18, postmas...@robertstech.com, discombobulated, unleashed: >It used to be the MTA many tears ago IE a painfully long time. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and || (O) |Live Broadcast News -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: PESO: T-Time

On 15/2/18, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed: >I wasn't kidding. He isn't kidding about not kidding. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and || (O) |Live Broadcast News -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Yesterday At Local Preserve

I just took another look at the "washed out" eagle sky. That is exactly the sky I recall and still have no urge to darken it. Bluebird sky is often nice and I could have darkened this one obviously, but I actually like the contrast of the Eagle against the sky. Am grateful for any comments you

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

I'm reading it as practically no improvement (plus where the f is the replacement for the K3?) On 16 February 2018 at 13:29, Mark Roberts wrote: > Rob Studdert wrote: > >>The K5IIs actually made the K5 useful, I'm still using my mK5IIs, my >>pair of K5 bodies are long

Re: Yesterday At Local Preserve

Actually I'm going to take another look at your earlier comment to refresh my memory. Later. J Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 15, 2018, at 5:39 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > yes - -pale- blue here too... > > I wasn't criticizing the performance of the camera or

Re: Yesterday At Local Preserve

Thanks much, Paul. J Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 15, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > I see tonality in the sky. Pale blue on my retina 5K monitor and my phone. > Could be improved slightly by masking or selecting and burning in. But I like > it as

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Oh, this is going to piss people off On Feb 15, 2018 9:29 PM, "Mark Roberts" wrote: Rob Studdert wrote: >The K5IIs actually made the K5 useful, I'm still using my mK5IIs, my >pair of K5 bodies are long gone, their focus speed/accuracy in low >light was