--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/16/2007 11:52:22 A.M. Pacific
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's one I caught in the last week of Sept. at
the
World Famous San Diego Zoo:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/flamingo/index.html
K10D, SMC M*67 400mm F4 ED
--- Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beautiful! Nice detail, lovely color on that :o)
rg2
Thanks, Rebekah ;-]
-Brendan
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!
Just some fun stuff experimenting with trailing
curtain flash. Enjoy!
http://www.primelensphoto.com/trailing_curtain/index.html
K10D, AF-540FGZ, DA*16-50 zoom.
-Brendan
Shape Yahoo! in your own image.
Nice one, Bruce.
-Brendan
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken this past Saturday in Pt Reyes near San
Francisco. We actually
went to see some of the wildlife and at the end of
the day on the way
back, we were confronted with the scene. I have
rendered it just as
we saw it.
Thanks, Frank.
It's fun to mess around and experiment with the 540.
-Brendan
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just some fun stuff experimenting with trailing
curtain flash. Enjoy!
http://www.primelensphoto.com
Pretty good, Paul. Not bad for the A400 5.6 (your tele
converter is better than mine, damn you...).
And now I'm off to the garage to get a hammer. I'm
going to beat myself in the head repeatedly in order
that I never conjure up images of you naked.
-Brendan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
I just don't get it. What's so tough about hooking a
camera to the computer via a cable?
-Brendan
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's now a 2GB SD card that also does WiFi
transfers.
http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008022.html
So your lowly K110D can now have a capability once
Why would I do that? I would just pop in another card.
-Brendan
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try doing that across a dance floor.
-Adam
Brendan MacRae wrote:
I just don't get it. What's so tough about hooking
a
camera to the computer via a cable?
-Brendan
--- Adam
MacRae wrote:
Why would I do that? I would just pop in another
card.
-Brendan
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try doing that across a dance floor.
-Adam
Brendan MacRae wrote:
I just don't get it. What's so tough about
hooking
a
camera to the computer via a cable
Message -
From: Brendan MacRae
Subject: Re: For those who miss CaNikon's Wifi
capabilities
I just don't get it. What's so tough about
hooking a
camera to the computer via a cable?
I haven't looked at the article yet, but if it can
transfer on the fly, it
would be quite handy
).
-Brendan
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Ok, so I pop in another card and hand the full one
to
my assistant selling dye-sub prints to guests.
Then go shoot some more.
-Brendan
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if you've got an assistant at the dye-sub
printer selling 8x10
usually find a few
seconds to pop in a new card without missing anything
of significance.
-Brendan
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And during the interim you just missed the best shot
of the day, but don't
worry, you won't know it anyway. ;-)
Tom C.
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL
--- graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being able to transfer your images directly to the
laptop your assistant is
using to print and sell the images without having to
stop shooting is a money
making benefit for event photographers.
True enough. But whether or not there is a real time
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan,
You're right: you just don't get it. I didn't either
until I saw what
people were doing with it and how it could be used.
Now I get it ...
This is quite common for technologies that incite a
paradigm shift in
the *way* you
--- Paul Crovella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations on your incredible foresight. But
keep in mind that just because you
can't figure out out to utilize a tool doesn't mean
the tool isn't useful.
Cheers,
Paul
I just want to know whether WiFi images transfer
really saves time.
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a paradigm shift for event and news/sports
photographers, especially those who use remote
cameras. You can now have the shot on the editors
desk within seconds of it happening (rather than
minutes/hours with lost shooting time). And remote
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forget it, Brendan. It's obvious you just want to
reiterate your
opinion, not understand the uses or possible
advantages of the
technology.
Not at all. In fact I found Adam's last post very
informative. The post where you mentioned
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a paradigm shift for event and news/sports
photographers, especially those who use remote
cameras. You can now have the shot on the editors
desk within seconds
--- Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Event photography is like making love - position is
important but
timing is everything.
stan
Well said!
-Brendan
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://www.primelensphoto.com/Halloween_2007/large-5.html
http://www.primelensphoto.com/Halloween_2007/large-11.html
and my fav:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/Halloween_2007/large-8.html
Just a couple family snaps from yesterday. Pretty much
right out of the camera.
-Brendan
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geekIf he's evil, shouldn't his lightsaber blade
be red?/geek
Now I don't feel so bad since I was thinking the same
thing.
-Brendan
Christian wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/Halloween_2007/large-5.html
Thanks, the 540 is great flash.
That's an Epson Stylus 4800. It's a real beast.
-Brendan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/1/2007 10:30:58 A.M. Pacific
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/Halloween_2007/large-5.html
Yeah, that's my sis in law, the Jedi. We went out and
Snow White had the light sabre for most of the evening
which was a pretty funny sight.
-Brendan
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/Halloween_2007/large-5.html
http
ROTFLMAO!:
Lastly it's probably worth pondering the point of
this product, do people really have problems plugging
their cameras into a USB cable / placing the card in a
card reader / placing the camera on a dock?
Is dpreview reading this list?
(sorry, couldn't help it!);-]
-Brendan
---
Good on ya, Mark.
Congrats. I remember that one. Good job.
-Brendan
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cryptic subject line, eh?
Can't say more right now but I'll reveal the
meaning shortly. :-)
Here's the deal:
I was convinced I was going to end up with
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DPReview is primarily consumer oriented, and
these
cards are little more
than cool toys for the consumer (My like thw WiFi
mode on the Nikon
Coolpix P3 I used to have). A pro
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thibouille wrote:
Maybe let's imagine the following situation:
You have lots of pics to take and you can't take
the time to change
cards otherwise you might lose a couple important
shots.
I can imagine a fast enough wifi sd card (eye-fi
seems
of this device are
exaggerated.
Tom C.
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Eye-fi SDCard reviewed.
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 23:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DPReview is primarily consumer oriented, and these
cards are little more
than cool toys for the consumer (My like thw WiFi
mode on the Nikon
Coolpix P3 I used to have). A pro user might see
some actual benefit.
-Adam
I think you'll need to
--- Paul Crovella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geez, you're right. It's a wonder they ever even
went digital at all.
It's only a wonder if you agree that wired image
transfer to WiFi transfer will bring about the same
sea change as film to digital certainly has.
I don't. But, perhaps I'm just
Oh, P.J., we're wy past that at this point! Take a
look at some prior posts.
:-]
-Brendan
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While everybody's arguing about the desirability of
this capability
maybe they should read the dpReview the product,
that Thibouille posted
not too long
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Life's little Irony, I'm primarily a film shooter.
-Adam
lol!
;-]
-Brendan
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
PDML
--- Paul Crovella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Relax, Brendan, I'm just mocking you.
Your arguments have been the same dismissive whining
that's plagued every step of
technological progress - but what was so hard about
the way we *used* to do things?
It's little more than a tantrum about
assistant.
Have you never seen them handing over a fresh
camera and reloading?
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/2/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thibouille wrote:
Maybe let's imagine the following situation:
You have lots
photo is special. Were you at
work for these?
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/1/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/Halloween_2007/large-5.html
http://www.primelensphoto.com/Halloween_2007/large-11.html
and my fav:
http://www.primelensphoto.com
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan,
Can you say photographer's assistant.
Have you never seen them handing over a fresh camera
and reloading?
Regards, Bob S.
Yeah, in fact that was my point, Bob.
-Brendan
__
Do You
because they
had forgot to get the film. It
was also the first time I delivered digital images,
scanning the negatives.
Digital would have made that so. much
easier. But decent digital cameras
were about $10,000 back then.
Brendan MacRae wrote:
--- Paul Crovella [EMAIL
There was something written on her shirt?
How did I miss that?
grin
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jack. I shot this bowling alley for the
owner's web site, and
couldn't resist posting a pic of the young lady with
the grab your
balls t-shirt. It was a fun
I love the shot of Siobhan. There's a line below her
left eye however. You may want to remove that.
I love her name, too. My daughter Teagan was going to
be a Siobhan. But then, no one in America would spell
nor pronouce it correctly.
Teagan is bad enough it turns out.
-Brendan
--- Derby Chang
Wasn't someone just looking for something like this?
http://tinyurl.com/yqh65z
I have no idea whether it rotates or not.
-Brendan
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
PDML
--- Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KICK HIM WHEN HE'S DOWN!
KICK HIM WHEN HE'S DOWN!
KICK HIM WHEN HE'S DOWN!
I wouldn't normally do this, but since my accident,
it's too hard to kick
'um when they're up!
Sorry Brendan, but every large list must have it's
monthly whipping boy
bad.
I grieve over them long winter evenings.
-- Philip Marlowe (Humphrey Bogart)
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He says it is for an FA but that looks like an A
lens pictured in
the
ad.
On Nov 3, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Brendan MacRae
wrote
I like to congratualte you on your choice of, uh hem,
angle.
;-)
-Brendan
--- Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_11/07_11_dive/01.htm
With the marvellous Voigtländer 180/4. Sharp, sharp,
sharp.
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Were you shooting with the grip? The two e-dials can
sometimes interfere with each other (see grip manual
memo, pg. 14). Although, this sounds like something
else.
Occassionally when I shoot in Av mode with the grip
on, the e-dials freeze up because one is in between
click stops on either the
Good one, William.
I even like the soft motion blur near the front of the
engine. It works.
-Brendan
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while back, the railroad company decided to
ressurect a steam locomotive
for some reason. Anyway, it did a cross country tour
and passed through
I like 'em both. Pretty lady.
In the first, did you have room to cheat her away from
the wall a bit? That's the only thing I would've
changed (except maybe adding more of the pattern from
the blinds, if that was possible... just for something
different).
I like the natural hair light in the
Fun stuff, Dave.
Good job with a challenging subject. BTW, I really
like the shot you got with the fisheye zoom directly
into the sun. Awesome!
-Brendn
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
As the subject says, the RBAR was in town I met up
with some local
snappers headed
Yuriy,
That's a good shot for Velvia. My take on Velvia is
that for a lot of folks it produces overly saturated
colors. For me, I think it works well for many
different subjects but likely not the best choice for
portraits. Having said that, I know that many fashion
photogs have used it for
That works!
Good idea.
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Experimenting with mixed lightbox and flash macro
stuff...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/pentax-macro/content/index.html
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Does anyone do product shots on dark (black)
reflective material that produces good, even
reflections?
I'm currently stumped working on a shoot for a local
company. I have to shoot some video components on
black (easy enough) but I'd like some good natural
reflection from the surface they rest
Ah, yes! But does Kodak still make the Tmax direct
positive developing kit?
Love those b/w slides.
-Brendan
--- Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kodak taketh, and Kodak giveth.
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/bw/tMax400.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.17.14lc=en
--
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19791376/displaymode/1107/s/2/framenumber/13/
Is that a Pentax?
I can't tell.
-Brendan
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo!
Max,
This was the topic of a thread a few months ago. I
believe Paul spoke to someone from Quantum and they
had not as yet tested the two together.
It may be time to check back in with Quantum.
-Brendan
--- max mcrae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody know if it's okay to used the Quantum Turbo
It's the TR Power Pack III.
I agree. With fresh batts in the flash and power pack,
there's a noticeable difference in cycle times (I like
to use lithiums in the flash itself).
I'm still jonesing for the Quantum Turbos, though. I
sent off an email to them (again) the other day so
we'll see if
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well so far, I have been using the TR Power Pak III.
I have shot 3
weddings with it so far. It works fairly well. I
did find a setting
on the flash to have it use both the Power Pak and
internal batteries
together to charge. Gives it just a
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will the TR II work, too? The AF400T power pack.
No. Only the power packs III will work with the 540's.
-Brendan
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play
So, I had three prints entered in the photography
competition at the Nevada County Fair. One of my
landscapes got a second place in the Professional
category and another got Best in Show for Pro Color
Photos.
This is the first time I've ever displayed my work
outside of circles of friends, the
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan MacRae wrote:
So, I had three prints entered in the photography
competition at the Nevada County Fair. One of my
landscapes got a second place in the Professional
category and another got Best in Show for Pro Color
Photos
Thanks, Godfrey.
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations! Excellent to hear!
G
On Aug 9, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
So, I had three prints entered in the photography
competition at the Nevada County Fair. One of my
landscapes got
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool. Congrats!
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Thanks!
-Brendan
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
, all
over the place.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/fair/index.html
-Brendan
--- syb vis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No I have not seen it yet.
Where can I find them? Sorry, I am always a bit more
fanatic to see
awardwinning pictures...
Syb
2007/8/10, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks for all the kind words everybody.
-Brendan
--- Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First time I see the photos. Wow!
On 8/10/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, here are the three I entered.
The orchid got the Best in Show award. The bridge
shot
was a last minute
Love the shot of Lincoln.
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two pics from tonight, one from last night. All with
the K10D and the
FA 50/1.4:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6305607size=lg
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6305604size=lg
These really convey a sense being there.
Thanks, Paul.
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The shots I printed for the Zoom Gallery show are
now posted on
photo.net. I had a tough time making a final choice.
Almost put it to
a vote on the PDML, but didn't have time.
Really like the roadster pic.
Good one.
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to go for a crisper look tonight. Switched
to the FA 35/2
so I could get closer and used the 540 Pentax flash
in trailing
curtain synch mode. Exposures were 1.4 second.
Paul
Here's a DC of another type...on water.
The Tahoe Yacht Club puts this on every year. This was
my first.
Overall, it was a bit of a bust. I'm not happy with
the digital pics. Nothing against the K10D...it was
user error. I filled an SD card at ISO 800...DOH!
Also, it was really crowded, the
Thanks all for the nice comments.
Yes, for web viewing or small prints these would be
fine. I edited these in Aperture. I tweaked most of
them to properly set the highlights in the histogram
and adjusted the brightness.
-Brendan
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks
Ahhh...nice. I haven't been to Vancouver Is. since I
was a kid. Your pic also reminds me of camping in the
Santa Cruz mountains.
Good work.
-Brendan
--- Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2007/08/17/forested-trail-pacific-rim-
national-park/
Once again,
Really nice work, Bob.
Some of your lighting is really striking. Very
flattering and yet dramatic.
Your product shots and still lifes are quite good,
too.
-Brendan
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been a member of Flickr for a while but only
recently was
motivated to put up a
Nice work, Mark.
I went fishing with my Dad today and nearly caught a
young gopher snake who would've made a nice picture
with the W10. He decided to go under an old tree stump
instead.
-Brendan
--- Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally managed to get a few shots of a five lined
Good stuff, Bruce.
Looks like I'll order one after all.
-Brendan
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Three shots to give you some feeling about the lens.
K10D, DA* 16-50/2.8 @ 50mm, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/350 sec @ f/3.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4882.htm
K10D, DA*
Mark,
The shots with the mice...soft focus in front of the
subject at minimum focus distance? I take it that shot
was wide open?
Curious.
-Brendan
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the weekend's hikes on Grandfather Mountain.
Mostly in horrible
mid-day light but they'll still
Good stuff, George.
Now if I could only find the 16-50 in stock anywhere.
-Brendan
--- George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are a few portraits selected from work I did
for a recent class.
They were all shot with the K10D and various Pentax
lenses.
The earlier photos were shot with
http://www.primelensphoto.com/malts.jpg
Let's just say it was a very nice evening, neat, if
you will. An old high school chum was passing through
so we decided to celebrate.
And for those who care:
K10D, Av, ISO 100, 540 bounced off the ceiling.
31mm LTD, 1/50, f8. Tweaked in Aperture.
41 believe it or not!
Only that bottle of Balvanie never made it into my
living room. Maybe when I go visit his place in So.
Cal.
-Brendan
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats the next number i that sequence,
15-18-17---:-)
Dave
On 8/30/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL
--
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What, no Glen Rothes?
G
On Aug 30, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Brendan MacRae
wrote:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/malts.jpg
Let's just say it was a very nice evening, neat,
if
you will. An old high school chum was passing
Never had it. Ah, but there be time, my man! Now if
only I could have money for malts and lenses I'd be
set.
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What, no Glen Rothes?
G
On Aug 30, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
http://www.primelensphoto.com/malts.jpg
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: 67 lens question
The 67 I've bought is coming without a lens and
I'l looking for
recommendations about a choice of normal lens. I
seem to recall that
the 105/2.4 is better regarded than the 90/2.8,
but I think I'd still
Great stuff. Wonderful gallery. I'm sure they were
happy with those. No really cliche shots in the bunch.
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A large gallery of my favorites from the last
wedding I shot:
http://photo.net/photodb/folder.tcl?folder_id=760032
Paul
--
PDML
Beautiful, John. Dramatic sky.
-Brendan
--- John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just sorting through some of the images I took in
Wales, this is one of the
ones I like the most, Pentax K10D Sigma 10-20 @
10mm, f/8 @ 1/640 sec,
ISO200, RAW (DNG), SR=on, ACR, CS3.
So, after my fruitless search for the 16-50mm f2.8
over the last coupe of days (except for the 5
available from the guy in Tokyo on eBay, for
$1,185.00US), I decided to take a deep breath and not
worry about it for now.
I took a drive down to a local camera shop in
Sacramento to pick up a couple
Actually, it was Pardees. I had called Camera Arts but
they were out of the white backgrounds.
I like Action Camera. I've given them a quite a bit of
business over the last year. I bought my supports, a
nice used 165mm f2.8 for the 67 and even ordered a new
center column for my Bogen through
Godfrey,
You really nailed it on this one. Stunning photograph.
It's reminicent of a shot from an antique fixed focus
lens camera. I suppose it must be hot exhaust fumes
that are blurring out the area just behind the engine
and toward the back and right, but it appears to
produce a shallow DOF
http://www.primelensphoto.com/DA1650.jpg
Came today, just after breakfast.
I will post some pix very soon, but I can tell you
that the autofocus with the K10D is MUCH, MUCH quieter
than that of my FA 24-90mm or the 31 LTD, in fact,
there's literally no comparison. The DA* focuses
quietly enough
Thanks, Godfrey, I'm sure I will. I have two events
coming up near the end of the month that I will be
shooting with this lens.
It's funny, though. I've been so busy shooting other
(paid) stuff lately, I don't know when I'll get a
chance to get out and shoot with it just for fun. So,
no
A couple of those are very nice, Mark. They have a
plein air quality, especially the first one of the
trees and beach scene.
Sorry you got so much rain.
-Brendan
--- Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paradise, Michigan that is...
Just got resubscribed after a week in a little cabin
on
This is my fav out of all of this series.
Good composition and good sky.
-Brendan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And another mustard field. Look hard, it's there.
;-) If I knew how to do
panoramas, today would have been a good day for
one.
Thanks, Marnie.
I love events like that, and not just because I love
cars. There's a picture every ten feet.
-Brendan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/29/2007 9:33:00 P.M. Pacific
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like 2, 7 and 8 the most. 2 is really nice.
It looks like you had some hard decisions on what to
crop based on the very tall nature of the composition
of a few.
-Brendan
--- Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My previous visit to Israel was in 1968. Being 18,
rebellious, and newly
Good lookin' rottie, Bill.
I keep asking my wife if we can get one and she keeps
saying, no.
Telling her that their tails are bobbed like a Corgi's
and that they're short hairs isn't working either.
;+[
-Brendan
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those of you who are not on my
Say hello to Finn Christopher MacRae. Born on Cinco de
Mayo @ 15:57PST.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/finn.jpg
7lbs 6.4 oz, 21 inches long. My wife really had no
pain meds. This wasn't her choice, there just wasn't
time. Her doctor almost didn't make it to the delivery
room...made for an
never easy to go without
sleep for days on end, but I'll manage.
;-]
-Brendan
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - It's a boy!
Say hello to Finn Christopher MacRae. Born on
Cinco de
Mayo @ 15:57PST.
http
me, and I'll sue you is all I
had to say. End of
story. May your Finn be a winner in every way.
Paul
On May 7, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
Say hello to Finn Christopher MacRae. Born on
Cinco de
Mayo @ 15:57PST.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/finn.jpg
7lbs 6.4 oz, 21
the heck!
-Brendan
On 5/7/07, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a great story, thanks!
To be honest, I wasn't worried that the doctor
didn't
make until the very end. We had two nurses and a
respiratory therapist in the room. Plus, I helped
out
with the first one so I
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like I'll be taking over the PUG sometime in
the near future.
I've recently registered http://www.pdmlpug.org for
hosting purposes and
thought I would toss a few ideas to the list in
hopes of getting a bit
of feedback.
Currently
Really nice shot, Christian. You nailed it. Very
interesting pose for him, too.
-Brendan
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in South Texas for three days shooting birds on
a ranch in the Rio
Grande valley.
Here's a quick snap from this morning's shoot:
http://tinyurl.com/362cen
Quite a good gallery, Godfrey. Good conversions.
-Brendan
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working my way through the photos I made in SF on
Friday, I put
together a small set of 12 BW renderings.
http://www.gdgphoto.com/sfstreet/
Comments, critique and thoughts
Gotta get a big lens.
-Brendan
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
K10D, 600mmFA f4.0, 1/160, f4.0, 400 ISO on Gitzo
1548 tripod with Kirk King
Cobra Head.
Comments appreciated.
Kenneth Waller
--
Really solid photograph, Paul.
I can't decide which is better, the creamy background
or the crisp foreground.
-Brendan
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn. The list is going to hell. First it's the
homeless, then
children, now flowers. Can't anyone post some solid
landscapes?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax To Sell Tokyo HQ, Quit Low-Profit Ops To
Lift Corp Value
TOKYO (Nikkei)--Pentax Corp. plans to sell its
Tokyo headquarters and
withdraw from less profitable businesses under
strategies the camera maker
has
crafted to block a takeover bid
201 - 300 of 1210 matches
Mail list logo
