I vote for Surprise, since thats what were gonna get without a theme
anyways.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It occurs to me people are not thinking we are missing a theme by your
original title so I added a bit of emphasis :)
Oh I know, we could all send something in and Addie could make
You're right, that sounds like a very interesting concept.
It sounds alot like the way the US is in the Northeast, where I lived
for 10 years and had to get used to the rather strange (to me) social norms.
In the south US, where I grew up, you pretty much knew everybody you ran
into everyday
Not only that, the proof can be seen in ebay. Just look at all the film
SLRs being sold with a normal 50mm 2.0 lens. I would wager that DSLRs
are no different.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think your giving the bulk of the current market too much credit.
Dave
On 12/16/06, J. C.
Just as I suspected. I'll bet its the same pretty much everywhere. I
know of at least 7 people personally in my area with DSLRs, only 1 of
them has more than two lenses and one has two. The rest all have 1
lens. The person with more than two is a pdml subscriber so I met him
through the
I saw the article in NG also, but the person in the article is some type
of Museum director or something like that. Is that what Boz does?
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Thanks, Cameron. I may or may not get by a bookstore to look at the
article. What role does Boz have
No, there seemed to be a glitch from about 11:30 am central std time usa.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Doug,
I've had no list mail for several hours. Did JCO somehow manage to
unsubscribe me?
Best,
Paul
--
Someone handed me a picture and said, This is a picture of me when I
was
Try downloading it using the My computer and clicking on the actual
drive name. I think you are having problems because you said they are
RAW files and you are trying to get them through Photoshop. If
Photoshop doesnt recognize the raw format, it may not let you do the
normal downloading.
Sir, you have insulted the gentle people from the state of Texas. Be
prepared to bring your Canon to GFM. I shall bring mine, a 44mag that
is. 20 paces?
;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/12/06, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Let's see, 6 foot 5 inches and lugs around a big
Well they made shooting Britons a misdemeanor, so we had to shoot
*something*!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Gonz wrote:
Sir, you have insulted the gentle people from the state of Texas. Be
prepared to bring your Canon to GFM. I shall
I second that, i.e. the Calphalon hard anodized. I bought a set as
Calphalon started to change over to teflon, and its the best stuff I've
ever seen (well seasoned).
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would you suggest breaking it in and seasoning it?
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
You have to:
1) get the firmware that allows the green button operation
2) enable, through the menus, the shutter to fire in non-A position
3) set it to M
4) focus, press the green button to set the speed, and fire the shutter
repeat #4 for every new metering situation, otherwise just fire the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, you're missing something in your comparison. The mirror. SLR
wide angle lens designs are very different from RF designs. Leica SLR
lenses actually have one of the longest register distances and Canon one
of the shortest. And Leica couldn't go FF on the M
Sports Illustrated's most interesting sports pictures of the year, enjoy:
http://tinyurl.com/y3ojlx
rg
--
Someone handed me a picture and said, This is a picture of me when I
was younger. Every picture of you is when you were younger. ...Here's
a picture of me when I'm older. Where'd you get
When Powell's brother informed the list that he had passed away, he
closed his message with Go out and take a picture in his memory... or
take your camera apart - that is what he would have done.
I had been wanting to take some pictures in his memory, but could not
find a proper subject. When
tried to post a peso, seems to have been lost in the ether...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I like it, but I much rather prefer the other pic with the cuda and the
other car.
rg
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Here's another cruiser on Woodward. Again, shot with the FA 35/2, f8,
1/8th second, ISO 400. To my mind this shows the wider lens/ slow
shutter swish pan effect to better advantage
Juan Buhler wrote:
GOD
I knew he used a Pentax, but I didn't know he was on this list.
Oh, He has an LX-D with a 5-3000mm/f0.2 Limited. Black.
People without faith say that that camera doesn't exist...
But is it black and white?
:)
j
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
Like em very much. Esp 6948.
rg
Juan Buhler wrote:
Yesterday I went to Union Suqare in San Francisco with the M100/2.8 on
the istD. I shot with the lens wide open and the camera on program
mode. I tried to keep my usual shooting distance, which was kind of
difficult given how long the lens
I like her expression. Nice lighting. I would prefer a cooler white
balance tho, its a bit too warm for me.
rg
Michael Spivak wrote:
Any critique are welcom (as always)
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/BrideContest/CRW_4495_4.jpg
Michael
Frank,
I prefer the original. Or actually, somewhere in between to be quite
honest. The improved version is overly sharpened and saturated,
leaving many of the details and tonal range messed up, IMO. Nice pic tho.
rg
frank theriault wrote:
As a result of an off-list discussion, I
MARGARET CORNETT wrote:
I'll swear it's getting even worse here in the U.S. I have a friend who
was involved in one of those automobile accidents where a bunch of
people forced him into a rear-end collision so they could rip off his
insurance. Since then he installed a video system in his
Except for mathematical induction, which is a valid way of proving a
theorem. :)
rg
Bob W wrote:
That's not a valid or a rational conclusion. You are using induction, which
is fraught with problems, and is not 'truth preserving'. In other words,
even if all the premises are true, the
Very cool. Like the way you stopped the water at the perfect moment.
Good thing you didnt take that in the US, you may have been questioned
by the police. Did you read the discussion about this?
rg
Manuel Magalhães wrote:
Something was missing,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL
I get no path to host.
Its down
rg
Bob Blakely wrote:
The page cannot be displayed
The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site
might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust
your browser settings.
Regards,
Bob...
I have it and seldom use it. Its quite soft most of its range, for me
at least. And I found that the AF seems to hunt quite a bit with it if
the light is less than spectacular. When it hunts, it goes all the way
both ways some times. Needless to say, I dont use it very often unless
I want
Love it Knarf. You've really captured some dynamism there. It looks
just a tad bit overexposed, or the black point doesnt seem to be on target.
rg
frank theriault wrote:
Another CMWC photo, so don't bother looking if guys on bikes ain't your thang.
This is Chris Freeland, Toronto
I dont have it but I have heard complaints that it has too much CA on
the digital. Supposedly fabulous on film.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Any comments on this lens?
Shel
Bob Blakely wrote:
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to clarify. The government outlawed semi automatic firearms. Not
all guns.
Don't worry, they'll finish the job.
Its true. All it will take is some guy going crazy with a bolt action
rifle. Supposedly JFK was assasinated
Bob Shell wrote:
one big indoor photo flea market. The other place I used to really
love, although it wasn't strictly photographic, was B F Enterprises.
They were in an old mill building in Cambridge, Mass., and the place was
floor to ceiling full of industrial and military surplus.
Obsolete - 2. Outmoded in design, style, or construction: an obsolete
locomotive.
This is the definition that we are probably talking about here.
I would add that its no longer useful or usable. For a camera such
as the *istD, this would happen when you were no longer able to:
1. retrieve
Actually, sensors are more sensitive to the angle of incidence of the
light than film, so large sensors are going to make many of the lenses
that used to work well with film on the edges, suck.
rg
Dario Bonazza wrote:
OK, but no different than shooting film with the same Canon glass.
The
Mark Roberts wrote:
Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gonz wrote:
Actually, sensors are more sensitive to the angle of incidence of the
light than film, so large sensors are going to make many of the lenses
that used to work well with film on the edges, suck.
Generally speaking
I've seen some lenses with rectangular shaped cutouts in the back, so
those probably wouldnt work. And then there are hoods designed with the
image rectangle in mind...
Toralf Lund wrote:
Since the full-frame discussion re-emerged yet another time earlier
today, I thought maybe I'd ask, how
dancers is a great shot. it would probably be great in BW too.
rg
Stan Halpin wrote:
I went down to the annual Ethnic Heritage Festival in Swope Park Kansas
City MO yesterday afternoon. My first time there, we are usually out of
town on vacation at this point. About 60 countries/ethnicities
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Let's say you shoot on a Pentax DSLR, with the intention at the start of
converting the image to grayscale. You shoot with a red or yellow or
green filter, with the final BW image in mind. One shoots in Raw. After
converting to TIFF, then converting to grayscale, will
Bob Shell wrote:
On Monday, August 22, 2005, at 06:49 PM, Gonz wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
one big indoor photo flea market. The other place I used to really
love, although it wasn't strictly photographic, was B F
Enterprises.
They were in an old mill building in Cambridge, Mass
Thats hillarious.
rg
George Sinos wrote:
Just a couple of semi-related items:
Warren Buffet and Bill Gates recently ate a local restaurant when
Gates visited town.
I snapped these shots of the Restaurant's tongue-in-cheek marquee.
http://georges.smugmug.com/gallery/763341
Not great art,
Nope, we didnt get it. Send it again.
;)
rg
frank theriault wrote:
Am I getting through? I don't see any of my posts of today in the
archives. When I logged on, for some reason my g-mail sent out
enriched text, and my first two posts were bounced. I re-set for
text-only, and re-sent, but
Adam Maas wrote:
P.J.
See my last post. I've used assembler, I've even hand-assembled.
-Adam
LOL. That reminds me of the days I used to load a primitive boot
sequence into a PDP (DEC) by the switches in the front, so it could load
the next phase of the boot loader through the paper tape
I've also experienced banding in high ISO images when the battery was
low. Lots more noise too. Plus occasionally it refuses to fire even if
there is no reason why it shouldnt. I like the CRV3s better for this
reason.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With batteries that are in their death throes,
I took mine by removing it from a Creative Muvo2 mp3 player. This was
before they wizened up and made them incompatible with everything else.
I have been using it for about one and half years with no problems.
They do eat batteries quicker tho.
rg
Charles Wilson wrote:
Dear All,
Has
How about:
hot
communication
blue
container
display
tall
creature
technology
history
tragedy
pretend
reflection
sight
surface
knowledge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Descriptive words have work well, it seems.
Some directional terms
Top, Bottom, Left, Right, etc.
Some relative position terms
I saw those in ebay and almost bid. Just to learn how to take lenses
apart, but they went for more than I was willing...
I wonder if you could use some type of high temperature grease, that way
it wont melt down into other components when it gets too warm, like in
the sun.
rg
Don
From another thread:
How about:
hot
communication
blue
container
display
tall
creature
technology
history
tragedy
pretend
reflection
sight
surface
knowledge
rg
Tom C wrote:
Some suggestions just throw out there:
1. What is it?
2. Purple
3. Where am I?
4. 2-toned
5. Panorama
6.
I have the same problem with my FA* 85 1.4. I consistently back focus if
I manually focus, but its pretty close with AF. It looks focused on my
screen but it ends up being back-focused. There is some type of
mis-alignment going on IMO. There are times when I cannot depend on AF
and would
It looks like you back-focused. The small grey shed or garage behind
the house looks more in focus then the center. I have similar problems
with my 85 1.4.
rg
Don Sanderson wrote:
Here is a quick comparison of the Wide Open performance of my
like new SMCP-A50/1.4 and one of my rather
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I wasn't referring to specular highlights, but to areas like you noted on
the dress in Bruce's photograph, (Sorry Bruce, not picking on you or the
photo specifically, just using it as an example), which, BTW, he explained
in the detailed response he sent earlier.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And people can stop sneering at me for not having a Pentax. (Oh, it was very
quiet sneering, but I knew it was there.)
Ok. Sneering ceased. All those folks sending my private sneering
emails, please cease also. ;)
It'll be fun to have a camera in my purse.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I can understand why the lens itself is better,
it just seems that the lens/sensor interface
is much worse when the rear element is so severely
close to the sensor. Maybe this sensor is specially
designed for this lens and isnt flat?
A silicon eye-ball! Now THAT would
I have my own personal archive in my mailer that goes back quite a ways,
but I know there are some old timers here that go back to like 98 or
maybe even earlier than that.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I thought it went back quite a ways. Someone here (Gonz?) recently pulled
up a post from 2001
Bertil Holmberg wrote:
Does anyone have experience of LED lighting panels in photography?
Although there are commercial products available, it should not be that
difficult for the electronics buff to make a couple of panels quite
cheap. White high intensity LEDs are avaialble for about
: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 September 2005 20:35
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PDML Long term Archive
I have my own personal archive in my mailer that goes back quite a ways,
but I know there are some old timers here that go back to like 98 or
maybe even earlier than that.
rg
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Secondly while its true stop down metering CAN BE more accurate
in sufficient light but if the tolerances of the lens apertures
are kept within design parameters and the cam sensor as well , the wide
open metering can work with more than enough accuracy for even
narrow
The point the Godfrey is trying to make is that Pentax Marketing has a
pot of features, each one with a target market segment and a
production/retail cost associated with it. They prioritize these
features according to their market research. If they want to hit a
certain price point, then
very well for them.
Gonz wrote:
using the future
wide open measurement. If you changed the aperture, you pressed the
green button again.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
How might the green button be improved?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Gonz
I'm glad Pentax implemented the green button though
of course, but they could
. That's what
auto-exposure modes are for.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:46:13AM -0500, Gonz wrote:
See my earlier post:
Pentax could have had a pseudo-AE mode if they wanted to with just one
press of the green button per aperture selection if they wanted to. By
taking two measurements, one wide open
to
compensate for when the light changes.
rg
Adam Maas wrote:
That requires a linear aperature mechanism, which only A and later
lenses have (That's one of the major changes between K/M and A lenses)
-Adam
Gonz wrote:
See my earlier post:
Pentax could have had a pseudo-AE mode if they wanted
Yup, I was thinking the same thing.
rg
John Forbes wrote:
Could it not be that you see more cheapo cards because far more cheap
cards are sold than expensive cards?
Unless you know the sales ratios, you can't form any conclusions at all
from the number of cards coming through your
Yes, the function I am referring to would best suite the Av mode not the
Manual mode.
rg
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I use this HyperManual style all the time. In fact, for both K and FA
lenses, the behavior is the same. For K lenses I turn the aperture
ring and then meter where I want by pressing
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
So now I will ask a question, is the resolution of the istD
series cameras high enough to tell the difference between an
excellent and a slightly better truly exception lens In the APS region it
covers? Or does at some point the resolution become camera limited
and
between the finest
lenses out there, not just see differences between excellent, good, and fair
lenses...
jco
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 4:29 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax K 2.5/200mm
J. C. O'Connell wrote
?
Thanks again,
jco
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 4:51 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax K 2.5/200mm
If you could give me an example, We can try to accomodate it given the
lens options that we have available to our
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
see my last post, engineering dollars?
that cam sensor was engineered 35 years
ago dude. Do you even know what we are
talking about here? Its ONE pot with
three wires on it read by a single A./D channel?
That's freakin' childs play.
Yes, the actual part is insignificant
only see that
now as the only logical motivation for doing what
they did. It wasn't to save money or lower the
selling price because that part isnt expensive
to buy or implement into the system whatsoever.
jco
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September
CAMERAHow much
do you think that parts maximum cost could
have been for that to be possible?
jco
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:44 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Rename request
In a high volume situation, I
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Once marketing gets ahold of the system, the engineers have
lost.
Mark!
This reminds me of one of my favorite Dilbert strips, it goes like this:
Dilbert goes to the curly haired manager and says The power supply in
out product overheats
The curly haired guy goes
Dont even think about bidding on that lens! Its mine, all mine!
MUAHAHAHAHA
rg
Jens Bladt wrote:
If I buy a lens from the USA - from someone who doesn't ship outside USA -
will anyone here lend me a hand?
That is recieve the lens (in the USA) and forward it to me in Denmark? For
a fee, of
Hmm.. wish list:
twice the linear resolution of my D, so 24Mpix, but I'd settle for 12Mpix
auto image rotation
display of ISO setting
20 frame buffer RAW
5 or more fps until buffer full
warp speed CF card write
custom EXIF annotation
filter removal option for BW images direct
removable screens
Yeah, they (american car companies) did that continuously in the 70's
and 80's until quality got so bad that they had to reverse course,
because foreign companies were eating their lunch with higher
reliability cars. A typical savings was replacing a nylon washer (meant
to isolate a
Actually, the high price of lenses on ebay, even for K/M versions,
indicates that there is high demand for them. Why? Not because people
are putting them on their film cameras. Film is dead. ;) Because people
have just bought a *D, *DS, or *DL. That means that those people are
going to use
ROFLMAO!
Doug Brewer wrote:
I have just this moment convened a special assembly of the list
moderators. Upon calling the roll, I can confirm that I am all here and
in total agreement with myself that if I (we) am (are) to continue to
hold fast to my (our) long-standing policy of laissez
pentax comes out with and upgraded DSLR
that supports ALL bayonet FF lens features including
K/M lenses.
jco
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:35 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request
with and upgraded DSLR
that supports ALL bayonet FF lens features including
K/M lenses.
jco
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:35 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request)
Actually, the high
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
ON a rare occasion I agree with you. Get out
the champange! And put this in the record books.
Sports/ACTION is one area where AF is indispensable,
DSLR is almost indispensable and AE helps somewhat
but not nearly as much as digital and AF.
I don't do sports but someone
at all. Don't confuse a non active slow subjects
with quick changing photographic conditions
mainly quick changing LIGHTING.
jco
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 3:58 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: How Pentax Could
LOL. He said it, I just responded accordingly.
rg
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Gonz wrote:
Yup, and thats precisely why the green button solution is ok. We are
talking STILL photography. You have time to compose, press the green
button, and shoot.
I am amazed
Resistance is futile, you will be assimilated.
;)
rg
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Lets see here, Shel believes its better to use
this lense's VALUABLE feature like open aperture metering
and recommends a different body. So would I. But I
will also contend I don't want to lose that SAME exact
I love the images on PUG. But it seems more and more to be lost in the
noise (no offense) of so many PESO, PAW, etc, as others have mentioned.
Feedback on the PUG has gotten quite scarce, and the number of
submitters have diminished as well. In fact, I dont believe anyone
commented on the
http://www.morguefile.com/archive/classroom.php
And its free!
rg
Scott Loveless wrote:
Howdy, gang!
I've been considering a slightly more formal means of photographic
education. The local colleges don't really offer much, and I'm rather
restricted on time, so I'm looking at workshops and
And this site tries to make it easy to find courses, quite interesting...
http://www.photographycourses.info/
rg
Scott Loveless wrote:
Howdy, gang!
I've been considering a slightly more formal means of photographic
education. The local colleges don't really offer much, and I'm rather
Colin J wrote:
Samsung's current reputation has been earned by
making low end, low cost consumer items such as
microwave ovens and cellphones..
Huh? If you walk into any high end AV section of an electronics store,
you'll be surprised by how well Samsung's (super) large LCD, HDTV,
Yup, there are a couple of screwheads around here somewhere. ;)
They occasionally like to torment the digi-guys with anti-digital
threads. But honestly tho, they are quite knowledgeable and mostly
friendly, and the discussions can get into some serious optics and
physics. They remind me of
Great shot. I like the girl in the front's look, and the deep
concentration of the one with the eyes closed. Do you live near Austin?
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a photo my wife, Annette, took while we were at the Austin City Limits
2005 festival a few weeks ago. This was opening
Geesh, at least clean the nose hairs off that dental pick before you use
it again! ;)
rg
Don Sanderson wrote:
Hi Dave, (Also sent to the PDML for anyone interested or comments.)
Here's a shot of a lens mount with the adapter ring in place:
http://donsauction.com/pdml/53web.jpg (180k)
I hope that they really have it in stock. At Adorama. Does anyone on
the list have this lens? I'm going out on a limb to buy this, not
knowing its optical qualities, but at the price its at, it better be good!
rg
- Original Message - From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 2:14 AM
Subject: OMG: Just ordered the 12-24
I hope that they really have it in stock. At Adorama. Does anyone on
the list have this lens? I'm going out on a limb to buy
William Robb wrote:
If the guy was taking pornographic pictures of people without their
consent,
you must have weird laws about public decency in the way you dress for the
street.
Where I live, a person who was pornographically photographable in public
would likely be arrested for public
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marnie wrote:
No, she didn't. I did.
Oops, my mistake. I'm very sorry.
While I admit that indeed *some* police officers are criminals, I still
doubt that represents the majority of them in the area where I live.
I wonder if the minorities, young people,
Raimo K wrote:
OK, show me your stereotype of projection.
I have been to the US and would like to come again - but I would like to
be able to take photographs and I´m afraid that some would be improper.
Bails are too high for me.
I see no photographs in your web page that would lead me to
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gonz
Subject: Re: More Texas Photo Issues
So a woman who wears a skirt but no panties can be arrested for public
indecency? Or shorts with no panties? So you would be ok with pictures
of your wife or your daughter circulating
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gonz
Subject: Re: More Texas Photo Issues
Well thats the thing. I have three daughters, and maybe their privacy
is not protected by the government when in public and relating to
these types of situations, but if I caught some
Thats true. I believe that here its enough for someone to trespass on
your property for you to feel threatened. Of course, this is not
taken lightly. If you shoot someone who is simply putting flyers on
your door, you are gonna have a hard time defending yourself, even if
you posted a
Fred wrote:
If you shoot someone who is simply putting flyers on your door, you are
gonna have a hard time defending yourself, even if you posted a million
no tresspassing signs on your property.
It might depend upon what the flyers say...
Thats only true in certain counties. ;)
Fred
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gonz
Subject: Re: More Texas Photo Issues
I agree that if an individual is going to dress to kill as they say,
they will probably get attention, they are just going to have to
expect that. Its hard to tell from the story, but I
...
By all means, marry. If you get a good wife, you'll become happy;
if you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
- Socrates
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Gonz
Well thats the thing. I have three daughters, and maybe
...
By all means, marry. If you get a good wife, you'll become happy;
if you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
- Socrates
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Gonz
Well thats the thing. I have three daughters
Tom C wrote:
Gonz wrote:
Perhaps you dont have a(ny) daughter(s)? :-O
I suspect that no one on this list has access to the photographs in
question, yet the discussion has proceeded in a deliberately
inflammatory way assuming the photographer's rights have been violated
and not his
.
William Robb
- Original Message - From: Gonz
Subject: Re: More Texas Photo Issues
Exactly.
Bob Blakely wrote:
You can't have a reasonable right to privacy anywhere you can't have
a reasonable expectation of privacy. Not law, just logic. If you are
in a place where the expectation
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Gonz
Subject: Re: More Texas Photo Issues
I agree with this pretty much 100%. Its not a dragnet that I'm
advocating
in my position, nor do I advocate unjust accusation, conviction, or
sentencing. I do however, agree
901 - 1000 of 2292 matches
Mail list logo
