On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 07:12:03PM -0500, Walter Hamler wrote:
I'm a fan of photo vests as well. They look a little geeky, but they work
well if you just want to carry a couple of lenses and some small bric-brac.
Thanks Bill. Now there is an option I never even considered. I will check to
a friend of mine is in the market for a new camera.
He doesn't need a DSLR, but will occasionally want
to print at A4 or larger.
Money isn't a big factor in the deal (although I
don't think he's ready to spring for a Leica :-);
I remember one or two of you (Godfrey?) seem to be
pretty satisfied
I rather doubt that the 60-250 will be available in six-seven months.
In any case, if you want to rely on auto-focus, you should get the
K10D - with the more powerful focus motor it will operate faster than
any of the earlier models, even before the DA* SDM lenses come along.
I've shot kid's
I think (and hope) that's a bit of an overestimate.
I'd guess that 2x the (current) price of the K10D is
the upper end of the price range, and it may even end
up just a little cheaper than that. After all, the
FA* 80-200/f2.8 (with a larger front element than a
60-250/f4) didn't cost that much.
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:43:21PM +0100, Henk Terhell wrote:
Well, that will be another reason to keep my *istD as backup. See also
the critical notes on the absence of support of TTL in the newer Pentax
models, and the underexposure of P-TTL of the K100D built-in flash in
the article by
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:55:31AM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
I'm using W2K All the power of WinXP, just as stable, No stupid
Microsoft tricks. (At least no more stupid Microsoft tricks than
Win98). It works well, with no muss or fuss. A rarity in the high
tech
It's a great resource for techniques (and some good recipes, too).
It's probably one of our most-referenced books. Other standbys
are Jacques Pepin's two-volume book, the Time-Life cookbook series,
and Marion Cunningham for baked goods.
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 03:30:23PM -0600, Gonz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 01:08:05PM -0500, graywolf wrote:
While we are talking about this kind of stuff. What about folks who take
the stroller inside the store. When I was young no one did that. If?
they took the kid in with them they picked carried him/her. Now you go
in the store and
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:54:33AM +1100, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 08/01/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the issue with cell phones is that many people let the phones rule
them. If it rings it must be answered.
Its a tool as such the user should be in control not
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:52:54PM +, Cotty wrote:
On 7/1/07, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
While we are talking about this kind of stuff. What about folks who take
the stroller inside the store. When I was young no one did that. If?
they took the kid in with them they picked
Not just Japanese vehicles ...
One of my friends calls my BMW Z4 the largest Bluetooth hands-free
headset he's seen for a long time
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 08:43:45PM -0500, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Its Ford way of catching up. My understanding it will have the capabilities
of Bluetooth systems
Yep. Now I 'only' get 1-2 unsolicited sales calls a week.
If I only got one every two months it wouldn't be a problem.
Mind you, that still doesn't get rid of the biggest source
of unwanted calls (especially in the late evening) - our
phone number is one simple digit transposition away from
the
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 07:11:31PM +1100, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 08/01/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mind you, that still doesn't get rid of the biggest source
of unwanted calls (especially in the late evening) - our
phone number is one simple digit transposition away
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:52:42AM +1100, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 09/01/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess a lot has to do with what you do with your car.
My 31 year old son is looking for a new vehicle is having a hard time
considering any without Blue tooth
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 04:56:56PM -0600, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jan 8, 2007, at 16:39, Cotty wrote:
On 8/1/07, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
One wonders if the PalmOS-based Treo700 has the same limitation...
Palm based Treos are the 650 and 680. I have the 650 and
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:07:41PM +0100, Thibouille wrote:
I think those are nice example but they do not generate any buzz in my brain.
Variations like Elevator/Lift are more notable and Through / Thru is
like touching Reset button of my computer. Same with Night/Nite ... I
feel like those
Ford are very aware of the problems with large doors and
tight parking spaces. A few months ago I went along to
the first public showing of two new variants of the Ford
GT - an open-top version, and one with doors that opened
just like the ones on the Mustang you show. The benefit
quoted for
Recent discussions here about Lens Identification, and
inquiries about the cumulative frame counter, prompted
me to revise my little program to peek around inside the
various IFDs, MakerNote tags, etc. in a Pentax file.
I've now added the ability to find the original contents
of a MakerNote tag
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:49:25PM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote:
Digital Image Studio wrote:
Excellent John, thanks for sharing that. Now if I begged would you
consider a rewrite of your little app halfsize so that it could be
used to work with the K10D PEF/DNG files? It's become so much a
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:39:39AM +1100, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Excellent John, thanks for sharing that. Now if I begged would you
consider a rewrite of your little app halfsize so that it could be
used to work with the K10D PEF/DNG files? It's become so much a part
of my RAW work-flow
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:16:45AM +1100, Digital Image Studio wrote:
I do like to twiddle mine occasionally, just to remind me of the good
old days :-)
Mark ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
with the source code in C or C++, I'll see
if I can build it for Mac OS X.
G
On Jan 9, 2007, at 2:24 PM, John Francis wrote:
Recent discussions here about Lens Identification, and
inquiries about the cumulative frame counter, prompted
me to revise my little program to peek around
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:38:08AM +1000, jim wrote:
Have found a site that has for sale several new lens for sale such as
Pentax - SMC P-A 15mm F3.5 Lens for $3.146 aus
Pentax - SMC P-A 50mm F1.2 Lens for $1.582 aus
Pentax - SMC
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:29:05PM -0700, Mike Hamilton wrote:
On 1/10/07, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/purchase/rebates_offers/
Ken
I thought, coming from you Ken, that this might apply to Canada also.
Not that I need any more encouragement. That
of
successfully using
a big lens.)
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Finally got my K10D. but(update)
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:38:08AM +1000, jim wrote:
Have found a site that has for sale several new lens for sale
such as
Pentax
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:20:52PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Francis Subject: Re: Finally got my K10D. but(update)
http://www.panix.com/~johnf/gallery/images/sdwap615.jpg
That is an incredibly surreal picture.
Isn't
but your technique is great to get
what you got in those situations. Well done!
Kenneth Waller
(owner of a 600mmFA who's aware of some of the issues of successfully using
a big lens.)
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Finally got my K10D
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:04:42PM +0100, Jan van Wijk wrote:
Hi John,
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:06:40 -0500, John Francis wrote:
There's a zip file, with sources, for anyone who wants it at:
http://www.pdml.us/raw/ShowTags.zip
Compiled it without any modifications for the OS/2
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:50:42PM +, Cotty wrote:
On 11/1/07, Tim ?sleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
Correct me if I'm wrong. I've only been here a year and a half.
Wow, seems more like ten.
Only if you count in dog years ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:28:46PM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote:
John Francis wrote:
http://www.pdml.us/raw/ShowTags.zip
Good. I thought I knew how to write platform-independent portable
code by now, but it's nice to receive independent confirmation.
Has some minor issues
it.
If anyone has a Samsung DSLR, I'd like to know about that, too.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:24:05PM -0500, John Francis wrote:
A summary of what I've discovered about the Pentax tags
can be found here:
http://www.pdml.us/raw/index.html
A (Windows executable) version of the program I use
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 04:03:01PM -0500, Ed Keeney wrote:
John,
From my K100D...
MakerNote: PentaxModelID 5 4 1 @0x00012B9C 76700
Is that what you needed?
That's exactly what I needed. Thanks.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:25:41PM -0500, Mat Maessen wrote:
On 1/12/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone has a DS2, K100D or K110D, I'd like to know what
value is stored in the PentaxModelID tag (TagType 5).
From my *istDS2, firmware 1.02:
MakerNote: PentaxModelID
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:43:05PM -0500, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/cars/
for a look at what I think is the wildest car at this years North American
International Auto Show - the Holden Efi jy.
That is one ugly vehicle. It makes a Gremlin look
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:13:27PM +0200, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
John, you're the man! I just ran your program on one of the first files
I shot with K10D and it showed the Tamron lens id properly. So,
everything is cool and working, and obviously it is only a matter of
proper software
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:37:57PM -0500, Doug Brewer wrote:
Been having fun. Some of you may enjoy today's entry.
http://www.drivingtheflies.com
You are seriously disturbed.I like that in a person.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:17:04PM -0500, Bob Shell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Y. Rowe wrote:
Photobucket does not claim any ownership rights in any User Content
that you
choose to post to the Site. After posting User Content to the Site,
you
continue to retain all
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 01:02:19PM -0500, Bob Shell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2007, at 12:44 PM, mike wilson wrote:
126 format, I believe. Came in a cassette, like 110. My first
camera, an Agfamatic given to me when I was about 8, used this.
It's nothing to do with Windows.
The Mac version will probably be a command-line (shell)
program, and will need to be run from a command prompt,
just like the Windows version, and just like the version
for Linux.
If you're not happy with command-line utilities, and
expect everything to run with
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:58:34PM +0100, Bertil Holmberg wrote:
Looks like the K10D brought back something very Pentax - the MTF - or
Modulation Transfer Factor.
The excellent DCWatch Longterm Test #5 covers this in detail with
many example images taken with the DA 40, FA 43, and DA
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:00:34PM -0500, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:25:41PM -0500, Mat Maessen wrote:
On 1/12/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone has a DS2, K100D or K110D, I'd like to know what
value is stored in the PentaxModelID tag (TagType 5
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 07:40:00AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jan 14, 2007, at 4:15 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm surprised. I'll have to see how my Extreme III compares to my 150X
Transcend. (I don't have it yet.) I know my Sandisk Ultra II cards
don't seem to be a lot slower
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 07:15:48AM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm surprised. I'll have to see how my Extreme III compares to my 150X
Transcend. (I don't have it yet.) I know my Sandisk Ultra II cards
don't seem to be a lot slower in the camera than the Transcend card.
Paul
The last time
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 12:08:17PM +0100, Thibouille wrote:
I do not see any build quality on my particuliar DA 50-200.
It feels certainly beter built than ma DA 18-55.
Wow. I'd seen quite a few put-downs of the 18-55, so I was
very pleasantly surprised when I actually got one. It might
not
Good luck, Shel.
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 05:32:17AM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The doctor called me yesterday and wants me to go into the hospital for
some tests. I'll be leaving in a couple of hours and will be away for a
short while. I usually don't put my business on the internet, but
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 10:38:55AM -0500, Mark Cassino wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.equiman.com/cgi-bin/ubb/Forum8/HTML/022168.html
This is from an Equine BB i moderate.
Sometime they ask about were to get processing done.
I ~could~ be wrong, but check out the replies
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 07:00:27AM -0500, Bob Shell wrote:
On Jan 14, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
I found this link on photo.net and of course there is *no Pentax* gear
involved ;-)
Enjoy some funny photographer shots :
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 02:04:26AM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The kit lens is relatively worthless, due to the number available.
Put it on the shelf for the day you sell the camera.
I think it's a little better than that. I've got one as a stop-gap
until the DA* 16-50/f2.8 is available,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:07:41AM -0800, Rick Womer wrote:
Oddly, the K10D compresses the PEF files but not the
DNG files.
Not too odd. Compression (of any kind) was only added at the
last minute; as little as a month before the final release of
the camera there was no compression of either
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:15:26AM -0700, Mike Hamilton wrote:
On 1/15/07, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PEF = 10 GB
DNG = 16 GB
Yikes!!! I'd better get a new hard drive! And a few more SD cards!
I'm watching the price on the Buffalo 2TB setup. That's 1TB fully
mirrored (which
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 02:51:56PM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Once I get it sorted out, I'll think about whether I want to put in
the time to wrap this into a useful UI, etc. It is a largish effort
as I will need to unwrap all the code that extracts the data and
separate it into
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 07:59:13PM +1000, jim wrote:
Just tried a Sigma 28-90 3.5-5.6 AF zoom (macro) and show tags reported the
following.
DNG Data: Lens Identification63 1 2 @0x032C 3 44
SIGMA 18-50mm F3.5-5.6/12-24mm F4.5/Tamron 35-90mm F4 AF
Maybe a small
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 07:28:36PM +1000, jim wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:51:56 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Under lens ID part, it has correctly picked up both a 80-320 zoom and a
tamron 28-300 zoom.
I have tried an A lens and all it said was a series lens.
It really said A series
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 04:12:53PM -0500, K.Takeshita wrote:
On 1/15/07 3:05 PM, John Francis, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True. But some of them just show a group of photographers at work.
I don't see what's particularly noteworthy about a truck fitted out
with a multi-tier photographer
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 04:59:32PM -0500, Christian wrote:
John Francis wrote:
Every year at this time, while I'm watching the Dakar rally from the
comfort of my own living room, I wonder whether it might be fun to be
out there as one of the event photographers. Then sanity prevails
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 05:39:33PM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Twenty-five years ago I had a chance to ride with Stig Blomquist in
his Saab rally car. I got quite a few shots of him driving on a dirt
test course in the Saab proving grounds. I'll have to see if I can
find them.
Paul
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 06:41:28PM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote:
John Francis wrote:
I want to get dust trails, blurred wheels, cars coming over jumps, ...
Lots of practice panning at slow shutter speeds and knowledge of the
course. :-)
Yeah. I think I'm beginning to get the hang
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 05:33:22PM +1000, jim wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:18:01 -0500, John Francis wrote:
That depends on what the camera does. ShowTags just reports what the
camera has put in the various fields. If the camera fills in the
focal length (which I believe the K10D does
, the second at an 1/8th. You'll find
numerous other slow shutter pans on the same page.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3633673
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3708948
Paul
On Jan 16, 2007, at 2:15 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 06:41:28PM -0500, Doug
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 08:17:19PM +, Peter Lacus wrote:
Howdy all!
I've tried Photoshop CS2 today to develop some RAW files and the results
were (probably as expected) the best so far. While smoothness remained
about the same as with SilkyPix (very positive), Camera RAW extracted a
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:41:04PM +0100, Jostein ?ksne wrote:
Hi gang,
Sorry about the unavailability.
Ken Waller's submission dropped into the database just now, so it must
be working.
thanks for the patience.
Should we re-submit emailed entries using the auto-pug form?
--
PDML
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 03:46:36PM -0800, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Thanks Godfrey and Thibouille...
The lens is attractive but expensive for my standards...and I still don't
feel confident enough to make such an investment in a reduced circle lens (at
least until Pentax states that they would
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 06:54:44PM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote:
John Francis wrote:
I want to see how the K10D handles panning with a 1/10 shutter speed.
It might not work. There again, it might do something interesting.
Unless the cars are virtually at a standstill, I wouldn't expect
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 07:59:10PM -0500, John Francis wrote:
If Pentax do ever come up with a 36x24 K-mount body I fully expect
it to operate in a cropped 24x16 mode if you mount a DA lens.
It could even offer a choice of crops: 24x16, 16x24 (for portrait
shots without having to rotate
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 02:51:56PM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Once I get it sorted out, I'll think about whether I want to put in
the time to wrap this into a useful UI, etc. It is a largish effort
as I will need to unwrap all the code that extracts the data and
separate it into
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:30:25PM +, Peter Lacus wrote:
Peter, Mike,
Please write on the chalkboard in front of the class.
Ken Rockwell is a bonehead.
10,000 times. There isn't that better.
mike wilson wrote:
Of course!
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/cf-sd.htm
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:17:45PM -0600, Mike Dausin (PDML) wrote:
rg2 wrote:
Hi Mike, welcome to the list. What part of Austin do you live in?
Hello rg2!
I actually live in Cedar Park right now, but I also lived in Round Rock
for several years while I was an indentured servant
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 07:29:45PM +, Cotty wrote:
On 19/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ladies and gentlemen, as of now it happened several times: the e-mail I
sent out or I received from fellow PDMLers ended up either in my spam
folder or marked as spam by GMail
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:42:28AM +1100, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 20/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He said he already transfered the money to his bank.
Sorry I didn't read that, I still can't find the reference to the
transfer actually.
I did see that reference, so
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 07:15:53PM -0500, cbwaters wrote:
I received the payment for the *ist D Kit yesterday and mailed it off to
Illinois this afternoon.
Unfortunately, the Paypal account is still a little shy of the funds
necessary to acquire the new camera...I'm a LOT closer now though.
And, as I've pointed out before, you want to do that at a different
bank; US banks, at least, are only too happy to take funds out of
one account to pay off overdrafts in a different account.
If you don't have another account at the bank, of course, then you
are going to be paying the bank for
Adorama are good, too.
And I can (unfortunately) testify to their satisfactory
return exchange service; my first AF-540 was defective
(probably damaged in transit - I hate UPS), but I now
have an exchange unit where the wide-angle adapter and
catchlight reflector slide in and out properly.
On
My conclusion is that in the hands of someone who knows what
they are doing even a small-frame 6MP DSLR is more than capable
of delivering the results. I'm not surprised that someone who is
used to group photography can come up with an example like this.
Of course that's not going to stop the
Well, of course. We all know of your penchant for dog's bottoms ...
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:55:41PM -, Bob W wrote:
If somebody offered me the choice between photographing another
wedding, and rolling around naked in an open plague pit whilst licking
a leprous dog's bottom, I would
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:28:51PM +0900, David Savage wrote:
At 05:05 AM 25/01/2007, Jens Bladt wrote:
Phase One just told me that the support for the K10D RAW files won't come
until April 2007 - LE version 3.7.7
What do you guys do?
Shoot .dng use Photoshop.
The K10D can produce
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 07:38:23AM +0100, Jens Bladt wrote:
Thanks guys.
Photodhop is not the converter for me. It doesn't do batch convertions, does
it?
Even Photoshop Elements can do batch conversions ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:57:17PM -0500, graywolf wrote:
Well, I do not have a DSLR, so you may be correct, but every one I
looked through had this small image with lots of black space around it,
so I naturally thought that they simply cropped the viewfinder to the
reduced image size. But
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:57:27PM -0500, Kenneth Waller wrote:
.1976 seems a recent year
Hell, I've got shoes older than that!
My MX is that old (one owner, since new - still runs well.
I wish the same could be said of the owner ...)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 04:35:59PM -0500, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Interesting reading, well written, that most of us could benefit from.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/next-level.shtml
Kenneth Waller
Interesting, indeed.
So getting a 4F rating would be seen as a good thing?
--
Cut the guy some slack - this is, after all, just part one of
a three-part article. The prescriptive stuff comes later,
as alluded to in the final part of this initial article.
Sure, it's nothing earth-shattering. But it's a reasonable
set of definitions, laying the groundwork for later
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 01:39:46PM -0500, Scott Loveless wrote:
On 1/26/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Gonz wrote:
On 1/26/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only a Lisp bigot would call it an elegant language.
Its IMO one of
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 03:18:07PM -0500, Amita Guha wrote:
On 1/26/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1976 was a significant year for me and I was here for the event - a
spectacular floatilla of old
and new vessels ( although I dislike the warships in this cover photo,
there
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 11:13:06AM +0200, Boris Liberman wrote:
Thibouille, I have a proposal but indeed it requires an approval of
another club member.
Perhaps you could pair with John Francis and come up with nice GUI and
may be handful of extensions for his program that analyzes Pentax
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 06:44:00PM -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I also recall that the -D does not provide the option of a
displaying a histogram after taking a shot. It's available, but only
after poking through a menu or something.
Or something. Just push the Info button.
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:40:22AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I don't care about beauty, I
care about readability and understandability.
I find well written, well formatted Lisp to be quite readable. Same
for C, Pascal, BASIC, and even FORTRAN up
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:22:24PM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jan 27, 2007, at 10:08 AM, John Francis wrote:
... Mind you, the important qualifier there is well-written. ...
Aside from the fact that I think you're the *only* person who ever
said to me that they found C++ easy
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 02:09:51PM +0100, Tim ?sleby wrote:
So far, I've decided I'll be using Elements as my backend. The only downside
that is significant is the lack of batch processing capabilities.
Elements has batch processing capabilities. They are somewhat limited
(you can't write
ExifTool.
http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/index.html
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 05:35:16PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Anyone know of an EXIF editor that will allow you to insert/edit *all*
the EXIF tags? I'm looking for something to do this and everything that
I've tried so
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:13:02PM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Well, my hat's off to both you and Boris.
C++ is simply impenetrable to me. I find it a seriously damaged,
bloated language with too much overloaded stuff added to support high
level features . . .
I'd agree with that.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:03:39AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The way I set mine up is:
P: EV comp front, P-shift rear
Tv: EV comp front, Shutter rear
Av: EV comp front, Aperture rear
Since these are my most used auto exposure modes, I want them all to
operate the same
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:31:11AM +0100, Thibouille wrote:
Mmm I might program just that but it will not come before a time and
would be specific to Pentax (at first, at least).
BTW anybody knows where to find EXIF specifications ?
Well, the two most obvious things to do would be:
1) Try
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 07:41:59AM -0800, Jack Davis wrote:
I'm braced for the 60~250 USM price, which I'm afraid, will be scary.
That may make your decision easy. 8-0
I believe I read awhile back that the intended availability date of
three USM lenses was this March.(?)
Since revised; only
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 07:32:09PM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote:
Patrick Genovese wrote:
Yes [a DFA 120-300 f2.8] would be like carting a howitzer
Since my normal at the track kit contains the Pentax 16-45/4,
50-200/?, 200/2.8 and 300/4.5, plus a Sigma 400/5.6, a monopod, and
other stuff, I
I've used one. There's no doubt it's a nice lens, but I never
felt I needed the extra speed over my 28-105. But I'm sure that
if I shot more in the shorter focal length range I'd think again.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 09:32:41PM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Wow! I didn't even know that lens
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 10:46:20PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
We had a Springer for 12 years. Mostly he was a pretty laid back dog.
It's in the nature of terriers to bite, more so than any other group.
William Robb
I'd reckon Corgis to bite more than terriers. Mostly, of course, it's
just
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:40:34PM -0400, Mat Maessen wrote:
On 3/14/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the last few days I've had some problems where LR crashes my
whole PC. It seems to happen during long-running processes, such as
importing, and uploading to the website. That is,
It's never necessary to load Zoom Browser et al. onto your machine.
The only part of the installation that you might have needed on an
old machine (one running Windows 98, say) would have been drivers
for whatver you were using to connect the camera to the computer.
It would have been possible to
TMI ...
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:30:14AM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
Well, my head's never been ok. Just ask my ex wife - but that's another
story.
Regards,
Bob...
-Original Message-
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: I'm Back!
On 9/3/07, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 05:09:21PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
Hey Dario, now you're not the only one with motorcycle racing photos in
the gallery!
:-P
Are you sure those are permitted under the terms of the gallery? Or do
you really have written permission from any people in the photograph?
- I bought more RAM specially for Lightroom.
The system doesn't hang though - it switches off the power.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Francis
Sent: 15 March 2007 13:16
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
601 - 700 of 5970 matches
Mail list logo
