Just one more reason to not watch CBS, they're completely lacking in
credibility. How the hell do they do their research,
do they actually talk to any real experts, say someone who knows
something about information theory, or physics, or optics,
no they find Ken Rockwell, who runs a Popular
My God, they're all driving on the wrong side of the road!
Ryan Lee wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3107166size=lg
Any comments appreciated :)
Cheers,
Ryan
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of
It needs a little more time to develop it's own ecosystem.
Rob Studdert wrote:
Hi Team,
Another PESO shot today testing some lights:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP0734.jpg (~267kB)
And for the really depraved:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP0734big.jpg (~1.25MB)
Ooh, that's just opening a can of worms...
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Congratulations to all the UK members of the list on the impending
marriage or the Heir-a-parent to the English throne!
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the
No but I felt very insulted, it ignored my Pentax entirely and attacked
the guy walking past with the Canon
Powershot Pro1, I'd have shot a few photos but my buffer was full...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has SG-1 been alerted yet??? Do we need to call the Asgard???
This appeared in front of the
It's a sculpture, at least I think it is...
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What the heck is that thing?! It doesn't look like a real bug at all, but
some sort of mechanical or toy model.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter J. Alling
This appeared in front of the local library...
http
Unfortunately I've seen it happen...
Cotty wrote:
On 10/2/05, wendy beard, discombobulated, unleashed:
there was even some mad reporter from the local TV
station interviewing the
sculptures
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/39567008
That's a cameraman - the reporter would
Yep, they both have scratches from dingbat technicians.
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
Got my black MX back from the CLA.
It's mechanically nice now.
But the dingbat tech slipped with the spanner on the top of the
wider knob.
So there's a big scratch on the top.
Anyone got a black one of these posts
Yes, a noseless pretty girl... I may have nightmares.
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:52:39 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, yes that is very silly, very silly indeed.
Well, I for one appreciated the article.
It's about as relevent to me as noise
But Frank, they're not substandard...(wait for it), ... for you.
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:43:10 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Kenneth Waller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, please define 'substandard'.
Easy:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=381188
cheers,
frank
I have two black MX's both have the same problem that you describe from
the came cause.
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
Peter J. Alling
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:45:47 -0800
Yep, they both have scratches from dingbat technicians.
I don't get it.
Collin
You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up
Damn you for your enablement Robb...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Tom C
Subject: Re: PESO: Automaton
Bill you forgot to tell him to get the FF 15 mega-pixel digital back
for the K and M series. You can't forget about that.
Lenses are truly where it's at.
You can never
Nothing very special just a pleasant photo. Possibly a bit to much
contrast.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_simplesunset.html
Technical Detail:
Pentax *ist-D ISO 800 @ 1/90sec
SMC-Pentax M 85mm f2.0 @ f2.0
I really miss the grid screen in my LX...
--
I can understand why mankind
Yea, that's right. I'm going to put my $1000+ digital camera, not to
mention a lens that worth a few hundred more, into an underwater housing
that doesn't seem to have a depth rating? How much you paying me?
David Nelson wrote:
G'day y'all,
Saw a mention of this on the pentax.de website, so
No there are no power contacts in the *ist-D or Ds, but that's not why
it's crippled. It's crippled because
there's no aperture simulator lever. Power zoom hasn't been fully
supported since the z/pz-1p.
Martin Trautmann wrote:
On 2005-02-09 13:56, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Martin Trautmann
Grain is unrelated to the sharpness of the lens. It's a characteristic
of the film and processing procedure.
Feroze wrote:
Hi All,
Using films of an ISO 400 to 80, I'm trying to figure out if there
would be more grain visible when using a lower quality lens or a zoom
versus a decent prime.
Christian wrote:
Peter J. Alling wrote on 2/9/2005, 12:47 PM:
Yea, that's right. I'm going to put my $1000+ digital camera, not to
mention a lens that worth a few hundred more, into an underwater housing
that doesn't seem to have a depth rating? How much you paying me?
Now you're being just
It showed up.
Bob Blakely wrote:
I've sent two posts to the list well before this test. They still
haven't shown up.
Hell, this post may not show up. (Who'd I write THAT too?)
Regards,
Bob...
From: David Zaninovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fail
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test
--
I can
: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:19:37 -0500
Subject: Re: When will we get image stabilisation for Pentax DSLR?
Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No there are no power contacts in the *ist-D or Ds, but that's not why
it's crippled
It's almost impossible to use a lens and not get some dust onto the
internal elements.
Isaac wrote:
I do plan to get a 28mm eventually. The reason I want a telephoto first is
there are some pictures that I would like to take from the side of the road.
I would really hate to get arrested for
There is no A 135mm f3.5
Isaac wrote:
I've thought about it, but I'm not sure about the extra weight. It may be a
good trade off though. You say a M. What is the difference between that and
the A?
-Original Message-
From: Thibouille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09,
FWIW image-size tracking, zoom clip, zoom effect are missing.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:19:37 -0500
Subject: Re: When will we get image stabilisation for Pentax DSLR?
Peter J. Alling [EMAIL
All I can say is Awww.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Change of pace for me. When I got the new Tokina ATX 400/5.6 AF lens
in, I was doing some tests. I thought I would see how the AF works
and so went outside with the family dog. He was walking along the
sidewalk (not too fast) and it seemed like a good
From the description of the problem I don't think it needs to be
fixed, my 85mm M had the stiffest focusing of
any lens I've owned when I acquired it, (a like new in a box used lens
that has subsequently lost much of it's collectors
item status, in other words I've beat it to hell). Over the
that feature. of the As.
Isaac wrote:
Fair enough. However, I was wondering what the differences in general
between the two lines is. I see both of them for sale, but I have no clue
why one would be preferable. Any insight would be appreciated.
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto
Well, yes that is very silly, very silly indeed.
William Robb wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031message=12155191
William Robb
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners -
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
$60.00 for an M85/2, I think I hate you... A lot.
snip
I also have an M85/2 that I bought for $60 or so, but has a
somewhat stiff focusing ring. The optics are perfect and it
works well, I like its rendering qualities too. I asked about
having it cleaned and lubed, they
This appeared in front of the local library...
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_replicator.html
Technical:
Pentax *ist-D iso 200 1/350sec
smc PENTAX-F 70-210mmF4-5.6
smc PENTAX-F 70-210mmF4-5.6 @ 70mm f4.0
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to
You're right, the shot is interesting, but the title hoovers...
frank theriault wrote:
Yeah, I know, the title hoovers. If you can do better (which you
undoubtedly can), any suggestions will gratefully be considered.
In the meanwhile, let me know what you think:
Frank will like it.
The flare doesn't really detract much from the photo. It might have been
better with a polarizer, or it might just have been different.
I think it evokes a time a place quite nicely as it is...
Rick Womer wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3102193
Last January
Yes.
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:38:51 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank will like it.
Am I that predictable? g
-frank
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
Nuff said...
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
But Costco is running a special on film and slide scanners:
http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?prodid=10039838whse=topnav=cat=s=1
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of
Sorry Frank, it's just you...
frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:53:14 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took my daughter, Erin, out shooting Saturday afternoon. We went
somewhere that neither of us had been before. Quite a pretty area and
we had a good time. I'll try
It's funny, but last year I went to a museum where they wanted me to
check my tripod, as they weren't allowed in.
I pointed out it was a monopod and they let me take it in. (I don't
think they knew what a monopod was).
Cotty wrote:
On 8/2/05, Graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
BTW many
Sounds like you have a sticky aperture on your lens. My 35mm has
developed this problem. All the other lenses seem to be working fine.
You should try a different lens on the camera.
Nick Clark wrote:
Yep! You've got me sussed! I put a roll of XP2 through it yesterday.
I discovered why the
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:21:55 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a damn PC :-P
Sorry :-(
-frank
Why be sorry...
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners -
The F 80-200 is supposed to be built better than the FA. If you can get
either new then I'd go for the F.
Larry Levy wrote:
I've got a chance to buy either a new FA 80-200 4.7-5.6 or a new F
80-200 4.7-5.6 lens for $100. Other than the obvious color and feel,
which should I consider and why?
Now you've done it Robb is gonna show up!
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: GFM correction
If me, you and Brooksie are left alone at PDML Central during the
seminars, there ain't gonna be no beer left when the others get back!
There's beer
Very nice shot.
Rob Studdert wrote:
Hi Team,
Still busy lately however I've another PESO shot last weekend at the end of a
2.5hr journey:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP0489.jpg (~170kB)
Tech: *ist D, ISO800, 1/60s, Prog, Multi-seg metering, 77LTD @ f2.5, hand held
All comments
I think I've told you, I hate you, before haven't I?
Talent and that lens too.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
This is the other shot I took last night along with Jet Trail that I
liked - slightly different than the previous PESO.
Pentax *istD, K 200/2.5, HandHeld, ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f4
I suppose if you win the suite you'll collect quite a large nest egg...
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:41:56 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got some rather nice shots when using your 15mm when we saw the Sue the
Dinosaur exhibit
Sue the Dinosaur.
Is that a
*Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
-- *Benjamin Franklin (Though it's been quoted differently here in
the past).
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:21:55 -0700, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm srrry. Come here big fella and get a hug.
Tom
.
Bruce
Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 6:40:51 PM, you wrote:
ft On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:57:03 -0500, Peter J. Alling
ft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I've told you, I hate you, before haven't I?
Talent and that lens too.
ft Oh, I believe we've both told him on more than one occasion.
ft I like
It seems the subject of a couple of my latest pesos has gotten a job at
the local coffee house...
So Cannon Girl has become Coffee House Girl.
The main purpose for this image is to see what I can do with my Vemer
12mm f8 fish-eye.
First I'll describe the lens, it's a solidly built early 1970's
The metering will be off depending on the position of the polarizer by
up to 1 1/2 stops if I remember correctly.
It's not impossible to work with a liner polarizer on an LX but the
circular are much easier.
Reg Wiest wrote:
It¹s slipped my mind . . . Does the metering system in my LX require
Just in case some of you thought I only shot portraits of girls and
dogs, here's something a little
different, or not depending on your point of view...
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_catportrait.html
Technical Information:
Pentax *ist-D ISO 800 shutter speed 1/30th
SMC-Pentax M
Gonz wrote:
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 03:44:26PM +0100, Thibouille wrote..
* SuperA Grip: Sometimes I'd like to use it without the MotorA and
without the grip, it is a pain. Anybody having a spare one?
* MX MotorDrive: I have no idea about the price but I understand they
are
, as it is not
affected by the half-transparent mirror (it is only determined after
the mirror has moved up).
Regards,
Sven
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 7. Februar 2005 19:57
An: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Betreff: Re: LX/circular or linear polarizer
I think that someone is reading copyright law incorrectly.
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
Folks,
I'm behind on my list reading so I don't know whether this has
already been discussed, but just in case it hasn't ... :
http://newurbanist.blogspot.com/2005/01/copyrighting-of-public-space.html
The
Some time ago I posted a PAW of a dam in a local State Park using the
SMC-Pentax 17mm f4.0 fisheye. The results were fairly good and I
decided to see if I could replicate the shot with my new Vemar 12mm.
I've decided to post the original and the new version just in case
anyone is interested
That depends, some converters and zooms may be good enough together.
I've gotten good results with
the SMC-Pentax F 70-210 f4.0~5.6 with the 1.7 F converter. The
combination exceeded the resolution of
the film I was using when stopped down a bit. I assume that they would
also exceed the
Unsubscribe
[A Haiku]
Where are you going?
Haven't you learned by now?
Unsubscribe! Have not.
Chris Ellis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipped for brevity
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot
Exposure compensation, that's the ticket.
Brian Walters wrote:
G'day all
I recently picked up a nice SE (Special Edition?) version of the ME on
Ebeagh. It's in great condition apart from an exposure meter anomaly
which I can live with for now.
As far as I was aware, the only differences between
Ebay is unpredictable, $570.00 is the highest I've ever seen one of them
go for but I've also been surprised
when they've gone for a lot less.
Greg Lovern wrote:
A K85/1.8 just sold on eBay for US$570.00. Does it usually sell for that
much?? If so, I guess I'll forget about ever having one...
Very, nice the shot in the air is spectacular, but the one on the ground
has personality.
Joseph Tainter wrote:
With another couple of PESOs I could:
--finally buy the FA 600 f4; or
--post another couple of URLs to PDML. Which should I do?
The FA 600 can wait a while longer. Here's the URLs:
The M* and A* 300's are still quite pricey.
John Forbes wrote:
Also, the long wait for a Pentax DSLR resulted in some defections to
other brands, which depressed demand for Pentax glass between say
2002 and 2003, while putting quite a lot of used lenses onto the
second-hand market.
That
Schroeder. Besides Bush in spite of his mangled syntax is more of a
politician than to have said this, he'd have let Rummy say it.
John Forbes wrote:
Peter, what are you talking about? You need to quote the message
that you are replying to. The way in which meesages are forwarded
here is
2005 18:38:16 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Schroeder. Besides Bush in spite of his mangled syntax is more of a
politician than to have said this, he'd have let Rummy say it.
John Forbes wrote:
Peter, what are you talking about? You need to quote the message
that you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New to plain text messages, this is my first attempt to get in the group. So
here goes!
I guess you made it.
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners - two things
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:47:05 +1300, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. That'd also solve the
problem of getting out-of-focus fisheye images.
Out-of-focus is a problem?
always curious,
frank
Not for you...
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
A sled can be steered, a tobaggon is un-steerable. (Yes, I know you're
supposed to lean but I say it's un-steerable).
Keith Whaley wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hey, Frank Have a GREAT weekend. You seem so excited I'm sure
it's gonna be a super time. What's the difference between a
The way color film ages is from a greenish cast to magenta. If it's
been in the fridge all this time the aging
process has been retarded, but it will still have a magenta cast of some
kind. It may also be a bit fogged.
If this a professional film then it will be a bit more magenta than an
-0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip the aging
process has been retarded snip
We don't say retarded any more. It's preferred that we say that
it's chronologically challenged.
cheers,
frank,
Chief Petty Officer (with the emphasis on petty),
Political Correctness Police
--
I
You've been bitten by the fisheye bug, you'll be looking for wider and
wider lenses and more bizarre compositions to
satisfy you new cravings. Your DOOMED. Seriously nice set of photos
thought.
frank theriault wrote:
Got back my first roll of colour just now. From the corner grocery
minilab,
Since you can get the M lens for between 125 and 199 I doubt you save
anything...
Nick Clark wrote:
Does this mean it's identical optically to my SMC-M 40mm f2.8, so I can save a
fortune buying the new one?
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Lindamood, Mark[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Second,
I think there was a higher auction for an LX system with the winder the
motor drive a pair of battery packs the battery grip 2 or three
different finders and a whole bunch of lenses, all described as like new
or in box which ended for higher but this is well, amazing.
Feroze wrote:
Anybody
www.lavasoft.de
for Adaware.
http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html
Spybot search and destroy.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Despite my protestations that I'm safe from worms
and viri cause I'm so smart about
downloads, email, and have a lazy old dial-up
that no one would want to disrupt,
I have
Theres a story involved with each of these.
As Joe Tainter asked, Ouch! Does it hurt that much to use a Canon?,
the answer is apparently yes,
and it causes permanent lines on the forehead, as we can see in Canon
Girl Revisited...
(Well I struck up a conversation and got a very tight head shot)
All of which is true, but it's very small and has an aperture ring. I
like it on a black MX, (sob), for discrete
photography in certain venues using a fast BW film.
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 3 Feb 2005 at 17:34, John Whittingham wrote:
The DA renders the in-focus wood and rope patterns (low
: Michel Carrère-Gée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 06:39:10 +0100
Subject: Re: DA40 vs M40 (Japanese)
Peter J. Alling a écrit :
I can't read Japanese but I did look at the pictures, I really want
one of those DA lens hoods
for my 40mm M
These are fairly nice, oh hell these are very nice without even
considering the equipment.
When you consider the equipment and technique these are outstanding. I
hate you.
Francis wrote:
Hi
I dropped by a local waterfall today and was experimenting with the
long exposure setting on my
Bars.
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 3 Feb 2005 at 18:27, Peter J. Alling wrote:
All of which is true, but it's very small and has an aperture ring. I
like it on a black MX, (sob), for discrete
photography in certain venues using a fast BW film.
My A50/2.8 tends to be my smallest, most discrete
Interestingly the upc for the *ist-d is correct. I don't know about the
*ist-Ds but the *ist-DLX number is in the same range as the other
two. Some thought went into it anyway.
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
http://www.upcdatabase.com/item.pl?upc=027075076662
I suspect it's just hoax, but who
Same thing in Maine and Rhode Island (Two states in New England a region
of the US for those who don't know...
Butch Black wrote:
On 1/2/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
But, hey, a generation ago, bad meant good. Then phat meant cool.
Why not sick?
In England it's 'wicked'.
Rick Womer wrote:
I haven't gone shooting since our snowstorm 10 days
ago, but this morning I paused on my walk to work.
This was the best of the bunch:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3086810
I'm satisfied, despite the limitations of the 33L.
Rick
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Over the years I've photographed this relic numerous times. Here's one
interpretation ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/forsaken.html
Shel
As usual technically excellent.
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks
), that
might prove dangerous or fatal to a smallish-medium
sized bird dog who has no fear, I thought better of it and just shot the
object of his desire.
Cute, Peter - but , um, 1/4000 ??? typo?
ann
Peter J. Alling wrote:
There's a little back story on this, I was taking my puppy for a walk
when he
I have a 24ft long hallway with a crossing hall almost 20 feet long, I
have about 24 8x10s hanging. Every once in a while I
change a few of them. I have also had a few local shows but I'm not
trying to make money at it, that takes endless promotion
and I'm more interested in making pictures.
It was a brighter day than it looks and taking account the snow...
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I was expecting maybe Orson Welles :)
then I was expecting the puppy going nuts...
Cute, Peter - but , um, 1/4000 ??? typo?
ann
Peter J. Alling wrote:
There's a little back story on this, I was taking my
Yes it is one of my efforts.
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 22:58:38 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was a grab shot of a young girl using her slr taking a grab
shot.
The look of concentration is priceless. I only hope I look more
relaxed.
I can't read Japanese but I did look at the pictures, I really want one
of those DA lens hoods
for my 40mm M.
Alan Chan wrote:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2005/01/17/753.html
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Take
The uses of a lens are limited only by your imagination, I suppose you
could use it as a baseball bat in a pinch.
Mishka wrote:
i have an opportunity to buy a K500/4.5 at a good price. i understand that's
a pretty good lens.
the only thing i am not sure is what it is good for. are there any
This may break the rules but I don't think so. Get a load of this
vivitar 90-180 flatfield zoom... It's a bargain!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=30077item=3870713051rd=1ssPageName=WDVW
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive
Ann, I didn't get the original post. But that's cruel, very cruel. I
don't know who it's crueler for Farnk, Franks roommate, or us. :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!!
I'm going to have to visit his abode to verify this; after all, he is in my
neck of the woods :D
I'm still
It's USA Today how bad could it be?
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Christian wrote:
snip
Then again, coffee is like beer and wine. Everyone has their own
tastes. One person's shit is another's gold.
You mean kind of like this?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/offbeat/2004
He's also selling a 35-85mm varifocus, and a box o' misc. lens parts.
No picture of the 35-85mm but the parts contains what looks
like a 35-85mm body mostly intact. Makes me wonder that the lens
really is.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may break
More like weasel poo, but well, ah...
Christian wrote:
Peter J. Alling wrote on 1/31/2005, 7:08 PM:
Christian wrote:
snip
Then again, coffee is like beer and wine. Everyone has their own
tastes. One person's shit is another's gold.
You mean kind of like this?
http
And those are available?
Bob Blakely wrote:
Astros.
Regards,
Bob...
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Down, Cotty! I can just hear you now, saying A telescope!
Seriously, though: a friend of mine, who will be visiting me
later on this year, plans on bringing his two telescopes with
him -
I expect to see a Buck Rogers style spaceship parked not far away.
Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi gang,
This is a building built in the 30s by a freak
architect called Salamone. He came to Argentina and
convinced government to build several public buildings
in very small towns (3000 inhabitants). He
The focus isn't that bad, better than I did with the girl in the
accountants office. Still the image
is a bit dark, though there does seem to be some detail in even the deep
shadow regions, at \
least on my monitor.
frank theriault wrote:
Something a bit new (for me). I've got several like
About 100 yards from my apartment.
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:18:10 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Title speaks for itself.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_winterscape.html
*ist-D iso 400 1/350sec
SMC-Pentax -FA 43mm f1.9 @ 8.0
--
It's very
for nature.
thanks,
mishka
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:19:52 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The uses of a lens are limited only by your imagination, I suppose you
could use it as a baseball bat in a pinch.
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get
Exfi information 1/4000sec f6.7, 70mm (about 105mm equivalent). DOF was
adequate for my purposes. I'm fine with it.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 13:01:52 -0500, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was expecting maybe Orson Welles :)
then I was
This was a grab shot of a young girl using her slr taking a grab shot.
The look of concentration is priceless. I only hope I look more relaxed.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_canongirl.html
Some technical information:
Pentax *ist-D iso 400. Shutter speed 1/180sec
smc Pentax FA
Well yea, I guess.
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:14:07 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About 100 yards from my apartment.
...which would be in Connecticut?
-frank
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks
If I remember an article I read a while ago correctly Woz was a
proponent of the Lisa, which at the time was a superior platform
and an upgraded Apple ][. There was also the Apple ]I[ which I don't
remember anything about, except that it didn't sell as well
as Apple might have hoped.
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/1/2005 7:48:09 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Initial views of the thumbs would indicate a pretty damn kewl gallery
this month (or as the kids would say nowadays, that's sick, man!)
vbg
cheers,
frank
Sick? That seems weird.
John Francis wrote:
Peter J. Alling mused:
John Francis wrote:
frank theriault mused:
What's FTP?
-frank
It's what you get from FT after he's been drinking.
You know, that's good, I wish I'd thought of that.
It's not *quite* as mindlessly dumb as you seem
Old style FTP is available under your dos box in windows it uses the
classic, i.e. inscrutable UNIX interface. I refuse to buy an extra
software. In Windows ME so I would assume that it's the same in Win2K
and WinXP in Network Places you can set up a virtual drive on a remote
computer using
You were there, Christian, you were there...
Christian wrote:
William Robb wrote on 1/31/2005, 3:22 AM:
tossing Christian to the lions
Now what the hell did I do this time? :-)
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the
501 - 600 of 2603 matches
Mail list logo
