I'm trying to get in touch with John Yates. I believe he may be a PDML
subscriber. John, if you're reading this, please contact me off list.
Thanks!
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Dusting off an oldie ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/independenceday.html
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
4.3 ... you guys sure make a big fuss over something that, here, we just
sleep through. We had a 4.3 a few weeks ago and not even the cats were
concerned. I guess it's what you're used to.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob W
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6602677.stm
Paul
Hi Godders ... quite a nice scene. you were working with good light, too.
About what time was it when you were up on Twin Peaks? The lower left
corner seems overly dark and lacking detail on my screen.
Have you ever been to Mt. Davidson early in the AM or just before dusk when
the cross was
Shoot! I got some JCO leakage with this message ;-(( Can't imagine what
I've missed. Please don't fill me in ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Tom C
So? He's arguing a moot point and talking in circles.
We all *already know* that the mathematically calculated DOF for a given
lens
Any reason given for the delay? Previously, was there an actual release
date specified? Is there a link to the DPReview comments and to Ned
Bunnel's coments?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jaume Lahuerta
Well, let's hope it is only to July...in a Spanish website they say that
the zooms
Hi Bill,
I'm glad you chimed in with those pics.
On thing that a lot of people fail to realize is that the bokeh you see on
a small web image tends to smooth out as the photo gets larger. So, if,
for example, the bokeh looks marginally smooth and acceptable on an 800 x
600 pixel web image,
Well, MIke, that's not quite correct. Some of it is, and many of us here
won't eat it either. But there is a lot of beef that is not treated with
antibiotics, hormones, steroids, and which is not produced by being raised
in crowded feedlots in stinking conditions. One just has to know where to
Thanks to everyone who offered suggestions for my roast beef sandwich.
Most appreciated!
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Unfortunately, a lot of our standards are essentially created by
corporate interests and lobbying. There was a time when an Organic label
here really meant something, but a few years ago the standards were reduced
and, for many items, there's not much difference between organic and
regular food
That's not the issue, but, rather, an issue.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/26/2007 10:41:00 AM
Subject: Re: WAY OT, but not inflamatory: Roast Beef Sandwich
P. J. Alling wrote:
I wonder how much of that
OK gang, this may be one of the strangest questions asked on the PDML in
quite a while, and might give the list a few chuckles. Apart from one
sandwich in 1957, I've never had a roast beef sandwich. I've eaten a wide
variety of food in many different countries, but never a roast beef
sandwich.
Good morning, Bruce ...
First, I like that you're experimenting a little, and this was a good scene
to play around with. I like the scene, but am not particularly fond of the
rendering. It reminds me of printing a contrasty scene in the darkroom
using Agfa Brovira #6 (some people will get that
Hi Godders
Great concept. I looked at the pic before reading your entire post, and
though that it was a remarkable situation to capture four planes in such a
pattern Nice idea ;-))
Shel
On 4/23/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I was out for my Saturday morning
walk in Guadalupe River
I suppose I already know the answer, but I thought I'd ask anyway:
Is there any way to generate a small RAW or DNG file either from the camera
or through image editing software? I'm thinking it would be nice if one
could post such a file that's reasonably-sized for web use
Shel
--
PDML
Wasn't it Pentax that came out with the pancake lens?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
This isn't a camera list, is it? It's a culinary society with a
Pentax addiction.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Perhaps I wasn't clear. What I want(ed) to know was if there is some way
to generate a true raw file, in either a format like PEF or DNG either
directly from the camera or by resizing the file in some editing software
(without changing to TIFF or JPEG or any other such format) to make it
Rob,
A few years ago I did something like that using a damaged SMC filter. I
couldn't see any scratches or abrasions, even when using a magnifier.
However, I did ruin a 20mm Super Tak by cleaning it with Kodak lens tissue.
although I couldn't see the scratches. When I brought the lens in for a
Hi Frank,
For the most part, I like the idea. The Asian woman in the background adds
a lot to the photo. Framing is a little too tight on the right, and the
slight tilt bothers me. Not enough to be real interesting, too much not to
be annoying.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank
Often the quality of faster glass is better than that of slower (larger
aperture number) lenses, although that's not always the case. Also, you can
shoot and focus better in low light situations.
IAC, of course you can compensate with longer exposures or slower shutter
speeds.
Shel
[Original
I've used this lens and can attest to the good image quality @ $75.00
it's a good deal.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Joe Wilensky
FS: Pentax K version of Vivitar Series 1 28mm f/1.9 VMC lens.
Original wide-angle hood by Vivitar is included.
Lens is in bargain condition by KEH
Bill,
Anecdotal evidence based on experience doesn't mean squat. It's not
scientific. Greywolf is absolutely correct in his contention LOL Of
course, over the years, in many areas, we've seen the scientific evidence
means less than squat.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb
The
Better in what way? I'm not sure that the general opinion is that digital
is better than film. There are any number of people here who, even though
they use digital, believe otherwise, at least for certain situations.
Further, what has better got to do with making a pic that could not or
would
In my case it was more than dust, but something more akin to a haze or a
film. Yeah, there was a little dust in there as well.
Apart from the dust, my theory about the haze is that there may be
something in the lens, like lubricants, that emit some gas or evaporate
slightly (we've all
Looks like I'm going to need tighter filtering, but, as long as I saw this
...
JCO, the thread has moved from your specific comment through the general
rendering of the 85mm lens bokeh to some general comments about bokeh.
It's no longer about YOUR specific comments. Threads and discussions on
I tend doubt that - can you substantiate your claim. In talking with
people at a couple of labs here, they say the most popular subject they get
are babies and - believe it or not - cats.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The mos popular subjects of all (for
Norm,
There was a time when you came on the list and discussed photography,
posted and shared pics, and participated in some general discussions. Now,
it seems, most of your posts are childish (woof woof), which, compared to
posts by other people, seem to fit in pretty well with some of the
LOL Indeed - I got lotsa cat pics
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Digital Image Studio
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
... In talking with people at a couple of labs here,
they say the most popular subject they get
are babies and - believe it or not - cats.
Available captive targets, been
Subject: Re: MSNBC Poll: Is JCO really an asshole?
Shel, you are correct, please accept my public apology.
Sometimes wisdom is drowned out by frustration.
Norm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Norm,
There was a time when you came on the list and discussed photography,
posted and shared pics
Hi John - it's great that you were able to save these kittens. IIRC, you
and Wendy have about seven cats of your own ...
I sent the pi and some and info about them to a couple of friends who also
foster cats and have associations with adoption agencies, just to spread
the word.
Thanks for
Having owned and used all of these lenses, and given the cost factor, I'd
go with the 43mm in a heartbeat.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: AlexG
I am going to order a couple of lenses. Having used an M42 50/1.4 it
is a lens I cannot live without. Low-light silver bullet.
I saw the DA
Regardless, put in a set of known, good, fresh batteries. It's the least
expensive and easiest way to start the diagnosis process.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/21/2007 9:15:20 AM
Subject: Re: ist D mirror hanging
I've heard about reading. I saw an ad for it on television. Sounds like
phun ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Digital Image
I bet you have a nice comfy chair too, good for reading in ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Check out space blankets which can be found at places like REI. I've
used 'em when camping. What's especially nice about them is that they're
very light and can be folded into a very small package, They're waterproof
too. Plus, they have a reflective side or coating which can be used to
fill
JCO wrote:
True, but anyone who actually doesnt give a shit
about having beautiful music or cinema
in their home IS without a doubt UNcultured...
===
Well, let's get real. YOU were, and are, essentially talking about gear. A
lot of people don't give a shit about
I can't believe JCO actually posted that! My Gawd! I'll have to read the
full content of THAT message in the archives.
Hey, JCO, get yourself some crayons and your books can have pretty pictures
as well.
Shel
[Original Message]
No, you have full right to stare at a blank wall
every
Not always - my niece had a musical coloring book LOL
Shel
Reading is reading and listing to music
is listening to music, and watching films
is watching films.
JCO
Mark!
Tom C. (listing to the music)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Let's have a contest ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
PS I can think of much worse personal attacks than GW's
At 09:39 PM 21/04/2007, you wrote:
FUCK YOU GRAYWOLF,
IF YOU CANT BOTH ARGUE
ANY OF MY POINTS IN POSTS AS TO ACTUALLY BEING
INCORRECT OR WHY, THEN SHUT THE
Is that supposed to be funny, or is it your sincere opinion?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob Shell
I thought cats were useless by definition.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sheesh! Most people usually ignore me, now I'm getting flowers. I'm
deeply troubled by this recent turn of events
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
...and another:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/IMGP3390.jpg
My, isn't Shel a popular fellow ;-)
--
PDML
Frank, I like this one quite a bit. Clearly you didn't use a Pentax
ghostless filter for this shot.
Shel
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5868563
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
For those who care, it's back after I straightened out the problems on the
web page.
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/distortion.html
So, I'm walkin' along and I see this guy making faces at his reflection in
a store window. I strike up a conversation and then get to take a couple of
snaps.
Does this stem from your insecurities about posting puns?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault
So are you going to petal them elsewhere?
Nah, I'm just going to leave it for now...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
You really have a prickly attitude. You need a rosier outlook. It seems
you're always vining about one thing or another. Anyway, this isn't
geranium to the original thread.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault
On 4/19/07, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Does this stem from your
Is that comment stamen from your insecurities?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault
Or I could just pistil whip him...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
This thread is the pits! However, Norm, it's good to see you raison to the
occasion.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Norm Baugher
Mark, you're such a prune...
Norm
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does
Ann ...
Maybe I missed something here, but Viva Zapata (that is what you were
looking for, right?) is available from numerous US sources on DVD. Here's
one ... http://tinyurl.com/3bdzq5
I don't quite understand why you decided to buy from a foreign source on
eBay.
Shel
[Original Message]
Yes, I feel so ... special ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
I see my flower for shel has brought about a bouquet of responses.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sounds like something Yogi Berra would say would say ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault
I have yet to hit my stride yet...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
IIRC, there are numerous stores in San Francisco's Japan Town that sell
multi-regional DVD players.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Tom C
Because they don't sell non-region 1 DVD players at retail outlets in a
country where 999,999,999 DVD's out of every 1,000,000,000 DVD's sold are
S! You'll upset the world economy LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: (Scott Loveless)
OMG! Someone call the cops!
And make sure you tell them about all those illegal gray market lenses at
BH, too.
-- Original message --
From: Tom C [EMAIL
That's odd. I have friends in other parts of the world who have such
players, easily purchased in retail establishments in their cities. For
example, a couple of friends in Tel Aviv have region free DVD players.
And, as I said in an earlier post, they are readily available at numerous
outlets
http://www.rinkworks.com/said/yogiberra.shtml
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault
I think my favourite (among so many!) Yogi Berraism was (when asked
about a certain restaurant):
Nobody goes there anymore, it's always too crowded.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hey, Norm, I'm pretty much like Godders and mark. No cable, an old, old
set used only for watching DVDs and one PBS station, which is pretty much
all the reception I could get from where I was located. 'Twas just fine
for 20+ years. Now, because of my new location, I can get several
stations,
Bigger is better - even an 8x10 sized image on an 11x14 sized sheet is
better. But I've always been of the impression that prints that fill an
11x14 sheet in the long dimension are the minimum way to go. There are
always exceptions, of course.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mike Hamilton
It seems that JCO does ... sheesh! Sio much noise about watching TV and
DVDs.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Digital Image Studio
Does anyone really have to watch TV?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Godders,
What's with the elliptical shape of the truck's rear wheels?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/19b.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
LMAO
Hi Frank, no, it doesn't work, but getting the hang of flash is sometimes
difficult with new gear. Why am I laughing? Well, it's not at you or the
pic, but for the longest time I've contended that since the advent of the
popularity of digital many photogs who were shooting documentary or
Regardless of the rationale Frank, you've shot and posted a flower pic.
I've done it as well since I started shooting digital. I'm not making a
critical judgement, just an observation - and people are doing it because
it's so easy to do, and because flowers may be nice to photograph, and
because
It's more up your alley, but I don't care much for it. Not much substance
... others, I'm sure, will find it to be a very fine photo.
Regardless of my feelings about a couple of pics, it's good to see you
posting and photographing again, and experimenting with the new medium.
Shel
[Original
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/distortion.html
So, I'm walkin' along and I see this guy making faces at his reflection in
a store window. I strike up a conversation and then get to take a couple
of snaps. I decided to enhance his silly face by using the 85mm lens close
up and shooting
Woof! Woof Wuf Arrrf
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/18/2007 2:36:01 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Distortion
Was he having a 60's flash-back?
Norm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml
I can't seem to load the page, which is interesting since I seem to be
able to load my own earthlink pages.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/distortion.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hmmm ... how could that have happened? I wonder if while mucking around I
may have inadvertently changed something. BTW, how'd you discover that?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Sorenson
Change the page name to *distort.html* and it'll work.
-P
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Peter
Message]
From: Digital Image Studio
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hmmm ... how could that have happened? I wonder if while mucking
around I
may have inadvertently changed something. BTW, how'd you discover that?
I used the following URL which allowed a free browsing of the web site
directories
/2007 5:59:29 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Distortion
Something appears to have happened at EarthLink.net - I accessed the
image
fine earlier today, but at present it reports Page Not Found
Maris
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Peter,
I'll check on it on my next pass and see if there's some problem
, too. ;}
-P
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yes, I figured how Sorenson did it, and decided that I didn't want
people
to have free access to my web pages. This'll at least slow such things
down a bit. I suppose I've been too lax with even the most rudimentary
security and privacy measures
Awww, shucks ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Something about people shooting more flowers now with digital than
they did with film?
I dunno. Flowers are easy game... and it costs nothing to shoot a
bunch of them ...
Hi Godders,
I'm going to have to look at this one a few more times. My first reaction
is quite positive. The pic has a haunting quality to it, something
dreamlike or surreal. Unlike Maris, I think the woman on the right adds
quite a bit to the feel of the photo. Her presence adds something to
Hi Godders,
To be honest, I didn't really notice that black circle, but now that akaDoe
has mentioned it, I'd agree.
I thought about the pic during the day and realized that what I like about
is that it very much reminds me of that great portrait of James Dean,
Boulevard of Broken Dreams. For
No, not at all. Remember, people were hung up on dust before there were
digital cameras. And, having taken apart a few lenses because I saw huge
dust globs, I was surprised to find how tiny the globs were. At least on
the K 135/2.5, what appears big when you lock thru the front element, can
be
TMI = Too Much Information
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 4/14/2007 9:58:16 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - High on a Hill
In a message dated 4/14/2007 9:48:39 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TMI, Marnie
Shel
Then you've not seen Aaron Reynolds' baseball photos. Quite exceptionally
well done, actually. He only shoots JPEG at the ball park.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J. C. O'Connell
Oh come on, you know as well as I that to get
the same results exposure wise with jpeg as doing RAW
No, that's not Leitz - that's Leica. Read the history of the camera and
the company. Leitz hasn't been involved with Leica for a l-o-n-g time.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 4/14/2007 4:33:07 PM
Subject:
Marnie,
What's to the left of the gazebo? To the left and slightly down hill?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 4/14/2007 2:10:04 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - High on a Hill
In a message dated 4/14/2007 11:53:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL
TMI, Marnie
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 4/14/2007 7:11:02 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's to the left of the gazebo? To the left and slightly down hill?
Shel
==
More hill to the left down to
Cool shot, aka. Your artistic sensibilities are starting to merge nicely
with photographic technology. Pretty soon Bill Robb will suggest that you
get a camera better suited to your vision ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A different way to look at Big Rocks.
Norm, it never ceases to amaze me how articulate you can be.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Norm Baugher
Woof, woo woo woof!
Woof
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Cool idea - although you may get some strange-sounding responses from me
LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/10/2007 5:36:40 AM
Subject: Re: Protection glass / filters
Hey, folks,
While reading this
Many, if not most, ISPs offer free or very inexpensive, space on their
systems for subscribers. I put my pics up on the Earthlink servers and it
works just fine for me. Earthlink allows me to have eight mailboxes, and
each mailbox comes with a certain amount of free space which I use for
hosting
Hi Tom,
I can certainly understand your POV, and far be it from me to dissuade you.
I'd like to point out one other thing: Once the three or four lines of code
were written, there was no need to write any more code for subsequent pics,
and, had I chosen to do so, I could have set things up just
Hi,
You posted two galleries before the cheapskate thread, both of which used a
horizontal format. One was the window mannequins, the other was mostly (or
completely) of trees, iirc. I thought those were with some template that
you used. In any case, those presentations were simple, direct,
Why would a DSLR require different filters than used on a film camera?
Personally, I think the use of DSLR filters is hype and just a marketing
ploy.
I stopped using protective filters a long time ago, and have stuck with
using good, deep lens hoods. In fact, I've sold most of my protective
Why use a filter if you prefer not to? Just get an old filter, smash out
the glass, and use the ring. Using a filter with a pol my not be
advantageous.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/9/2007 6:39:37 AM
Is he wearing an e-collar - oh, never mind, I see from the url that he
(probably) is.
Shel
William Robb wrote:
Jester had a bit of surgery a couple of weeks ago.
I thought the disembodied head look to be a bit surreal.
No offense taken. Aren't the jays with the crest called Stellar (Steller?)
Jays?
The scrub jays around here seem to be our standard run-of-the-mill jay
LOL
Shel doing the backpeddle LOL
[Original Message]
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yes, it's a standard blue
I don't recall ever seeing one of these, especially in the areas where
Bruce and I live.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Christian
A Blue Jay:
http://www.science.smith.edu/stopoverbirds/birdpixs/images/Blue%20Jay.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
AM
Subject: Re: PESO: Funny Dog Picture
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: PESO: Funny Dog Picture
Is he wearing an e-collar - oh, never mind, I see from the url that he
(probably) is.
I'm not sure if Elizabethan is the proper name for them, I've seen them
- Bird in Tree
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't recall ever seeing one of these, especially in the areas where
Bruce and I live.
A Blue Jay:
http://www.science.smith.edu/stopoverbirds/birdpixs/images/Blue%20Jay.jpg
:-) That's because they don't live in California! Hahahahaha What's
Same here. Even if I look at a gallery, it's usually only a few pics.
Nice sized thumbnails help me to get a good impression of what's posted.
But it's not so much my connection speed that limits my interest. Some
galleries have no theme, others are just to much to digest - too many
pics - and
Bingo! But not just any hood. It really helps to get one that's truly
appropriate for the lens/camera combination, and don't be afraid to
experiment with lenses from different brand cameras or sources other than
Pentax.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mark Erickson
I think it's been said
I like what that lens does ... ;-))
Shel
Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/1000 sec @ f/6.7
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4692a.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
This morning, while cleaning out the back of a closet that had been unused
for a few years, I found a large box on the top shelf. Curious, and
needing the space, I took the box down and upon opening it I found boxes of
K-mount lenses. Every focal length and iteration from the 15mm through a
, 2007 1:05 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Every K-Mount Ever Made, NIB
I hate those types of dreams.
They generally put me in a foul mood for the first half of the day.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/9/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This morning, while cleaning out the back
While not as cheap as Amazon, Buydig (a known good source with free
shipping) is offering the K10D for $847 and change.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/8/2007 8:41:37 AM
Subject: K10D Comes down in price
At Amazon that is. It is now down to $809
Yes, it's a standard blue jay.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/8/2007 3:09:53 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Bird in Tree
On Apr 8, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Ok, ok, it had been quite a while
Hi Bruce - I like this one because it shows a little of the leaves and
habitat. The jay looks as though it could be a little sharper but it's
still pretty good and certainly more than acceptable for many situations.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
What was it last month?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/8/2007 8:41:37 AM
Subject: K10D Comes down in price
At Amazon that is. It is now down to $809 (camera body only). That is a
price drop from last month.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
COUNTRY: USA
LOCATION: Torrance, CA
NAME: Dean`s Camera Repair
ADDRESS: 1055 West Carson Street
PHONE: 310-782-8619
COMMENTS: Dean is as sharp as some of my lenses. He has fixed a Super
Program, and he is working on one (two, cannibalizing one) of my lenses
now. As soon as my LX comes back
Great colors, but the pic could be better framed, and the copyright notice
is huge and distracting.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: ann sanfedele
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2564371#138380377-L-LB
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
1 - 100 of 10531 matches
Mail list logo
