On Saturday, November 5, 2016, Daniel J. Matyola
wrote:
> From Santa Fe:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18306947=lg
> Comments are invited.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
In the Pentax dpreview forum a commet was made that Pentax has pushed back
new dslr intros to January '08. Apparently Hoya wants to make sure that all
is done right and everything is functioning the way it is supposed to.
DG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Pop Photo's Mike McNamara takes a swing at Nikon (popphoto.com) for not
making the Nikon D40 backwards compatible with older Nikkor lenses. He
finishes by saying: But something doesn't feel right about a new DSLR
that can't autofocus at any light level with a trusty Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D,
or
Listening to all this negativity reminds me of a few years gone by when
tales from the cave were getting everyone riled up. If I recall
correctly, about the time that Ed Mathews and Bill Castleberry were still
participating on pdml, we had the original mr negativity, The
Caveman. Tales
All of you who are disappointed in the k10d because of the dpreview report
should check popphoto.com's report or reread the luminous landscape
report. Pop Photo has long complained about the soft jpeg image quality of
the ist d series. They said that the k10d not only proves Pentax belongs in
Take a look at popphoto.com, the k10d test is in and the claim that with
this camera not only does Pentax become a serious player in the dslr field
but it is an all star player. Take a look.
DG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I have a Sunpack 444D flash that I used with my zx-5n. Is it compatable
with my ist ds?
DG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
How come Steve's website is not showing the K10 PR that was shown on this
site? No one else, including Pentax is either.
DG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I missed the source of the review, please repeat the name of the source of
the KD 100 SR review.
DG
At 03:43 PM 6/18/2006, you wrote:
Thanks, Ken. Great report and good news about the SR. I too wish that
Pentax was not so conservative.
Pentax have been developing this system over so many
Just getting familiar with the my new ds and 16-45 ed DA zoom. Because I
have a innate lazy side, I am wondering what in-camera settings(
saturation, sharpness, contrast) ds owners have found to be the most
satisfactory. Do you stick with the default settings and do any
adjustments post
I got mine a couple weeks ago from Tri State, I noticed they were selling
some on e-bay-buy now- so I went to their web site and there they were,
about $40 usd cheaper. I ordered and the DS was on my door step 3 working
days later.
DG
At 03:29 PM 3/3/2006 +, you wrote:
So what's with Samsung using Schneider lenses on this Pentax/Samsung
combined effort?
DG
At 06:10 PM 2/23/2006 -0800, you wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0602/06022403samsunggx1l.asp
Loos like another rebadged DS2 or DL2. It does say pentaprism, so that
would make it a DS2. Although
Do we have anyone at PMA who can take clandestine photos of the new
offerings, much as someone on this list did when the mz-s and it's short
lived digital counterpart were introduced?
DG
I'm getting familiar with my newly arrived DS and tried out the white
balance settings. The problem is that no matter what setting I put the
white balance on the result, review on LCD screen, all appear to have the
same color cast. I compared these results with my Canon A-70 compact
digital
I just received my DS and 16-45 DA lens. Being new to DSLR I am wondering
if there is a difference in SD cards and which one all of you DS users
recommend.
DG
Will we have any of us at PMA who could report all the goodies back to
those of us unfortunates who are not able to attend?
DG
I've decided to buy my first dslr. From my high school days till now I've
used Pentax slr equipment and presently own a zx-5n and mx with assorted
lenses. In light of the news that Pentax will introduce new dslr models
later this year I decided not to put out the $700 + usd for a ds2 and
The main gimmicky feature they found the Pentax lacking was
RESOLUTION! I find that pretty damn important.
DG
At 08:55 PM 2/11/2006 -0500, you wrote:
Jack Davis wrote on Sat, 11 Feb 2006 05:48:55:
For those who may be curious, or even care, the March '06 issue of Pop
Photo has a
The ist ds2 ranked dead last in resolution behind 2 8megs ( canon d350 and
olympus 500) and 2 other 6 megs ( nikon d-50 and konica/minolta 5d?)
DG
At 10:42 AM 2/13/2006 -0500, you wrote:
dick graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main gimmicky feature they found the Pentax lacking
coming later this year, will have this problem fixed.
DG
At 10:27 AM 2/13/2006 -0600, you wrote:
The ist ds2 ranked dead last in resolution behind 2 8megs ( canon d350 and
olympus 500) and 2 other 6 megs ( nikon d-50 and konica/minolta 5d?)
DG
At 10:42 AM 2/13/2006 -0500, you wrote:
dick
Let the speculation start now. This site thrives on second guessing
upcoming Pentax products. It seems very likely that it will be an 8 meg
camera with image stabilization, seeing that the new point shoot A-10
offers these specs. It will have a Samsung sensor and, hopefully, a much
At 03:03 PM 2/9/2006 -0600, you wrote:
- Original Message - From: dick graham
Subject: New High End DSLR Speculation
Or lack thereof.
DG
Let the speculation start now. This site thrives on second guessing
upcoming Pentax products.
Now we also thrive on second guessing
How good is the DA 16-45 lens? Is it worth the extra $ purchasing this
over the 18-55 or would the FA 24-90 be a better choice?
DG
Both Adorama and B H have the DS 2 in stock.
DG
As I said in another post, the DS2 is, and has been, in stock at BH Photo
and Adorama.
DG
At 07:59 AM 2/7/2006 -0800, you wrote:
Aaron wrote:
I think part of it is the DL2 -- I really don't know how they compare, but
the
DL2 is 'newer'.
I saw one press release that said the DS2 was back
The UK mag, Outdoor Photography, has a feature that recommends outdoor
photo op locations around the UK along with sample pics from the
areas. They give a map segment and then name the routes to the sites, give
subject recommendations, best time of year and day to shoot, and good
places to
According to dpreview.com the intro of the DL 2 only in Asia and Canada
may be an indication of the intention to sell the future cameras as Pentax
branded in some markets and Samsung in others (namely Europe and the
US). I'm screwy enough that I want my Pentax to say Pentax on it and not
Just read on Yahoo news that Konica-Minolta is shutting down production of
all cameras by 2007. They said this was being done because in todays
digital camera market it became too difficult to timely provide competitive
products. This will slash 3700 jobs which amounts to 11% of their work
Because Konica Minolta started working with Sony last year to develop SLR's
it makes me nervous that Pentax, which has a similar working agreement with
Samsung, will follow suit and drop their point and shoot digitals and sell
the DSLR end out to Samsung. After all Pentax had the about the
While we are looking forward to Photokina on 1/10 and PMA later in
February, pay attention this weekend to the International Electronics Show
in Las Vega. While most of the attention in that show will focus on new
electronic media products there will be new cameras introduced. It would
be
With Photokina and PMA coming up Jan 10 and Feb 26 is it a good idea to
wait on purchasing the ist ds2 until the shows to see what Pentax has up
its sleeve? Any ideas as to what our favorite camera company might
introduce?
DG
I brought the subject of new dslr intro's up because of the very recent
dslr partnership between Pentax and Samsung. I am wondering if Photokina
and PMA come too soon to see any results from the collaboration.
DG
At 10:31 AM 12/20/2005 -0500, you wrote:
dick graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I ordered 2 Optio 60s for our kids last Friday, they arrived this
Tuesday. Very nice service. I've never had a problem with BH.
DG
At 07:44 PM 12/15/2005 +0100, you wrote:
Anyone knows how quick B+H are to ship the orders? My order has been under
processing for three days now. The item is
The S6 is a $300.00 camera, the 60 is an economical ($199.00) 6 meg unit.
DG
At 02:27 PM 10/4/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen two names for the
I have a batch of slides that need scanning and printing. Does anyone have
a recommendation for a lab or scanning and that does a good job and is a
pretty good value?
DG
I sent the original post, but since then have found that while Target and
Wallmart do not offer Pentax film or digital cameras in store in my region,
they do offer them on their web site. Best Buy does not offer Pentax
cameras anymore either in store or on their website.
DG
At 08:38 AM
I'm going to try this again. I have purchased a couple of rolls of Kodak's
Professional Ultra Color Print film and am wondering if anyone has tried
it and what labs do a good job of processing and printing it. Also what
labs do a good job of slide and neg scanning and enlargement printing?
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:49:06 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Dick Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3mp Print Quality
Although I continue to use my ZX-5n, my brother gave me a Canon Power Shot
A-70 digital camera. I use it mostly for candid snaps and portraits. It
has 3.2mp. I have had
Although I continue to use my ZX-5n, my brother gave me a Canon Power Shot
A-70 digital camera. I use it mostly for candid snaps and portraits. It has
3.2mp. I have had 8x10 and 11x14 prints made from this camera and the
results have been good to very good. I have the camera set to very fine
Because I have been out of the loop for a while, I am wondering if some of
you can give me a tip on which lab does a good job of processing Kodak's
new Ultracolor color neg print film and what recommendations you can
give me for a lab that does a good job of scanning and printing archived
As little as a year ago one could go into any discount electronic store and
purchase a Pentax 35mm compact or digital camera. Today, at least in the
upper mid-west, there are no such Pentax cameras to be found. You cannot
find a Pentax camera of any kind in Best Buy, Sams, Walmart or Target
I seem to recall that someone on this list said that Kodak's new High
Definition color print film (ISO 400) is re badged Royal Gold 400. Am I
correct in assuming this or is it a new emulsion?
DG
Okay folks, enough of the news from the Cave. I just got off the phone
with Pentax USA and was informed that the release date for the ist D will
be in 1 to 1 1/2 months. That puts it out to us by mid August -early
September. He also told me the street price would be $1600 USD here in the US.
Which means they are on schedule.
DG
At 04:58 PM 7/16/03 -0400, you wrote:
dick graham wrote:
I just got off the phone with Pentax USA and was informed that the
release date for the ist D will be in 1 to 1 1/2 months.
Old news. They said exactly that several months ago. ;-)
cheers,
caveman
Go to www.popphoto.com and look under their camera test archive. I think
the PZ-1p was tested.
DG
At 10:30 AM 6/19/03 -0400, you wrote:
I finally decided to order a PZ-1p from KEH to either replace or
complement the PZ-1 I've been using for a while.
I know most of the differences and I'll
This is a very intense, emotional time for most of us, no matter which side
of this conflict we fall on. Let's keep the war out of our threads and
stick to the main subject that finds all of us inside this family. That
would be photography and in particular, Pentax photography.
DG
At
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. In my eyes, the ist D is not ugly at
all. Innovative design? Maybe not, but still good looking with a finish
that reminds me of the MZ-S with its leather like grip and black spackled
top plate parts. We still have to wait for performance reports to pass
Okay, who kidnapped Pal? His threads on the ist D are completely un Pal
like, trashing the ist D to the point where either BR sent a special ops
team in to take Pal out or, and I shudder to consider this, the infamous
Who has returned and pirated Pal away and replaced him with
himself.
The ist D looks like what each of us thinks it looks like. I think the
left side of the camera, as you face it, looks like a PZ. The right side
looks like the ist 35 mm film version. From a manufacturing and
marketing standpoint this makes some economic sense. Because the digital
state of
Bruce, don't you know? Scandinavia is Pentax's select focus
group. Besides, my wife, 100% Scandinavian heritage, says the most
beautiful women in the world are Scandinavian! Now what in the h_ll that
has to do with anything I don't know.
DG
At 11:13 AM 2/21/03 -0500, you wrote:
What is
The *ist appears to be the MZ-L/MZ-6 upgrade.
DG
At 08:20 AM 2/20/03 -0500, you wrote:
I don't think that it's very valid to compare probable sales numbers for a
SLR to a PS digital, because of the nature of the market. The digitals
are a way hotter item.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The EOS 1V and F-5 are not currently impressing anybody, with the
exception of National Geo photogs who continue to shoot tons of slide film
and National Geo's weapons of choice? EOS 1V and the F-5!
DG
At 09:19 AM 2/20/03 -0600, you wrote:
Because for the cost of developing and tooling
In reading the spec list on the *ist ( what idiot within the bowels of
Pentax came up with that horrible name?) I did not see if this camera has
exposure memory lock. Does anyone know if it has that capability? By the
way the info on this and the other new digital cameras is know on the
I still think they could come up with something much better than
*ist. By the way, giving this camera a cutesy name rather than a
letter/number ID is a sure sign that this is an entry to mid level unit. I
can't think of any manufacturer that hasn't given an upper level camera a
letter/number
In an effort to determine if Pentax will be debuting any high level
equipment at PMA, I looked back in the Pentax news archives and found that
the MZ-S, 24-90mm lens and the pro dslr prototype were all announced on Feb
10, 2001. This was only 1 day prior to the first day of PMA, which was
Your right, Mike, it is growing on me, in reverse! I dislike it even
more this afternoon than I did this morning!
DG
02:29 PM 2/19/03 -0600, you wrote:
I agree. The japanese are usually expert in those anonymous letter + number
names. I really hate those Canon F-1, AE-1, AT-1 and A-1
Nice stuff Bruce.
DG
At 04:24 PM 1/20/03 -0500, you wrote:
I tried doing a small photo web site here:
http://home.att.net/~b_rubenstein/Israel/Israel_p/album1.html
All photographs were taken with Pentax gear (lenses and bodies)
BR
Sigma makes another version of the 70-300 AF lens, I forget the letter
designation, that tested much better in Pop Photo than the DL version did.
DG
At 10:55 PM 1/15/03 -0600, you wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:44:10 -0600, Ed Matthew wrote:
My experience with the Sigma 75-300 DL do not
Unfortunately Leine's is now owned by Miller Brewing Co, altlhough the
Leinenkugel Co continues to brew their beer. I particularly like their
Northwoods Lager and Creamy Dark. My wife likes the Honeyweiss.
DG
At 07:10 PM 12/19/02 -0500, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you're
Too bad because your missing out on using a very nice camera. I have a
ZX-5n, and while it is a polycarbonate body, it has a very nice feel too it
and has great simple features that fall easily to hand. This camera has
produced time after time for me over the past 3 years. It's not a
www.naturephotographers.net and www.photocritique.net are both excellent sites!
DG
At 10:30 AM 12/11/02 -0800, you wrote:
When you say photography websites are you thinking just in terms of sites
that discuss technique, or sites that include member galleries, or sites
that go into great
I have slides that need proper storage. Presently they are in their
original boxes, numbered and titled. I have two rolls of slides in plastic
sleeves. The processor sent them that way. Over time I think the slides
in the processor plastic sleeves have acquired some scratches from removing
The Pentax UK statement indicated that most of the cuts in the 35mm camera
line were going to come in the compact camera area. This only makes sense
as they have several different compact 35's that overlap each other.
DG
At 11:22 PM 10/31/02 +0100, you wrote:
Henry wrote:
I don't believe
Today you responded to a list member saying that it appears that the new
bodies seem to be aiming toward a mid level chassis. Yesterday, in
responding to Shaun's question about not hearing anything about the film
flagship, you said: Yes we have. Pentax UK say they will make 3 slr's
and I
Pal, thanks. I think my thick head understands know.
DG
At 09:05 PM 11/1/02 +0100, you wrote:
Dick wrote:
Today you responded to a list member saying that it appears that the new
bodies seem to be aiming toward a mid level chassis.
I didn't. I said A (not three) new body built on a new
The latest issue of Pop Photo has a little discription of the new Portra
400UC. In it Kodak claims that while it has increased color saturation
over VC skin tones remain true.
DG
At 12:30 PM 10/30/02 -0500, you wrote:
Kodak has a new print film, Portra 400UC (ultra-color):
I have not used it on anything wider than a 28-70mm lens and rarely at the
28mm setting.
DG
At 05:21 PM 10/25/02 -0700, you wrote:
Hey gang-
Hope this gets through... a whiles back, there was a
discussion of flashes that could be used on the ZX-5n.
One of the William's and Dick Graham both
Ritz Camera Stores uses the Fuji Frontier system to make quick prints from
slides. I have found that the results are quite good. There is some loss
of detail and color saturation, but all in all quite acceptable. By the
way I've only had 4X6 prints made there and they charge $1.00 per print.
With all due respect to you, Bob, it appears that this particular duck
caught some of Paal's lead. By the way, is your middle name Bruce or The
Who ?
DG
At 11:23 PM 10/16/02 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
well, with all due respect to Paal, his predictions are rather like
horoscope. There's an
Bob, my sincere apologies if you took this the wrong way. Absolutely not
intended as an insult, just a light hearted joke. Please don't take it
seriously.
DG
At 08:21 PM 10/17/02 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
Thursday, October 17, 2002, 3:38:39 PM, you wrote:
With all due respect to you, Bob, it
Way to go Paal, keep your ear to the ground and continue getting the real
information to us! Some where Bruce should be getting out the salt and
pepper for some kind of crow eating dinner.
DG
Amen!
DG
At 08:45 AM 10/15/02 -0700, you wrote:
Welcome back.
In a sad way I am glad to hear that OE has trashed some of your
folders. Only glad that it confirms my experiences. I have lost
several folders of emails on several systems using OE. I have since
switched away from it and have
And also not surprising to see big electronic companies, like Sony, trying
to convince us that film is dead.
DG
At 01:11 PM 10/1/02 -0400, you wrote:
This is one report by a non photographer. The information is therefore
anecdotal in nature. If you are looking for meaningful information on
Now this is the stuff I'm talking about, good going Pal! I had to go back
and check to see who the sender was. It looks just like news from the cave.
DG
At 08:00 PM 10/1/02 +0200, you wrote:
Some interesting(?) tidbits from the Pentax universe
Apparently, this years Pentax photokina
The Sunpack 444D is a good third party alternative value. Tilt and swivel
head, femovable diffuser that's good out to 135mm. TTL, auto and manual
with manual adjustment for fill flash. Plenty of power.
DG
At 05:04 PM 9/28/02 -0400, you wrote:
Geez, there are all sorts of Pentax ones and
The last couple of Photokinas we have had a few members of PDML on hand and
giving reports to us, they even talked with the Pentax reps, I
believe. There has been such a lack of information on the list about
Photokina this year am I to assume we had no one on hand? Oh well, might
as well
Over the years this list has always had 1 or 2 devils advocates that we
have had to deal with. Can any of this lists old timers forget the
infamous Who? That wasn't you, Bruce, was it? That's ok, it makes list
life interesting. If we don't like the message in the majority of Bruce's
Speaking of Bruce's dessert, there hasn't been one message today concerning
news out of the opening day of Photokina! Someone must have been there and
can share with us the news or non news.
DG
it to celebrate my birthday
today. I got candles and everything! Pentax did introduce that DSLR today
didn't it?
From: dick graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can any of this lists old timers forget the
infamous Who? That wasn't you, Bruce, was it?
Last week I made that the statement that Pentax had no apparent marketing
and ad plan, that they would go months without an ad placed in the major US
photo mags and that I had never seen 1 ad for the MZ-S. This past weekend I
was watching the Pikes Peak hill climb on ESPN ( for our non US
This was 11/2 ago and the last SLR ad they have run. No MZ-S ad has every
run!
DG
At 10:14 PM 9/17/02 -0400, you wrote:
**Note, I tried this as an attachment but didn't think it would work, and it
didn't :)**
http://members.rogers.com/brad.dobo/images/Pentax.jpg
Ok, this is an ad off the
I must have missed the rumor about Pentax making some big news at
Photokina, probably Pal's info. Could you repeat it?
DG
Looks like a surveyers instrument in Canon colors!
DG
At 09:40 PM 9/12/02 +0100, you wrote:
http://www.pentaxcanada.ca/eng/products/sur_eth100.html
Don't be so quick in condemning Sigma consumer grade lenses. Check out
Toni Lankerd's stuff on www.photocrituque.net , look under list by
photographers ,especially the third one down ambience. Toni is a long
time PUG contributor and a field editor for the e magazine Nature
Photographer. She
the
70-300APO (for the money), and I think the 28-135 is reasonably well
regarded but anyone who tells you they love the 28-80 is either lying or
doesn't know what they are talking about.
-Original Message-
From: dick graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 September 2002 15:29
And is on sale at both Adorama and BH for $129 USD.
DG
At 05:25 PM 9/9/02 +0200, you wrote:
on 09.09.02 16:48, dick graham at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob, Toni also told me that the 28-135 Sigma is much better than the 28-80.
Well, I must admit that photos taken with my Sigma 28-135
For those of us who can't get our hands on the magazine a scan would be nice.
DG
At 01:22 AM 8/14/02 +0200, you wrote:
Right now it's 01:20 AM. Cotty I have been out looking for the perseids
for a while, but now Cotty's in my kitchen preparing tomorrow's dinner! None
of us have been
Fuji reccomends for regular
sunlight. On snow, this is still the 'correct' exposure, but the snow will
be so bright that it will just be a solid mass of white, hence Fuji wisely
reccomends 1/250 f/16 for these conditions.
- Original Message -
From: dick graham [EMAIL PROTECTED
The ZX-5n does also.
DG
At 12:19 PM 7/30/02 -0400, you wrote:
the manual is obscure about it, but if i read it correctly, i can set fill
flash exposure compensation from the flash unit only in P-TTL mode. so, if
i want to use a fill flash of about 1.5 stops under without going to manual
Brad, I believe in Japan, Canada, Europe etc the ZX-L is the MZ-6. It
replaces the MZ/ZX-7.
DG
At 01:43 PM 7/30/02 -0400, you wrote:
I'm just a stupid Canuck, but I've never heard of the ZX-L, can anyone give
me a link to it? It's not on the Canadian Pentax site.
Brad Dobo
- Original
Jostein, top middle photo- plane second from left is a US Navy Corsair used
heavily in the South Pacific theater, plane third from left looks to be a
P-40? used by the Flying Tiger's in Asia and plane on far right looks to me
to ba a P-51 Mustang used extensively to provide escort service to
In the other pics:2nd row far left-Corsair, 2nd row middle pic looks to be
a line of P-51 Mustangs with Allison engines before the switch was made to
the Rolls Royce Merlin power plant, 2nd row far right might be a RAF
Spitfire, 3rd row far left-Spitfire?, 3rd row middle US B-26 bomber, 5th
Shel, welcome home! What goes around comes around and we all hope that you
rebound to great health and new lenses come your way 4 fold.
DG
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
To me high drive speed and fast AF are really not that important unless
your covering sports or other high speed action.
DG
At 11:32 AM 6/12/02 -0600, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Subject: Re: Re[4]: What is the most quiet body?
I must concur with
I believe Shutterbug and Peterson's Photographic mention that the MZ-L is
the replacement for the ZX-7, not the 5-n.
DG
At 05:27 PM 6/4/02 -0400, you wrote:
Speaking of the MZ-S and Z-1P, how does the ZX-L (aka MZ-6) fit into the
picture? This month's Shutterbug mentions that the ZX-L is the
Pal, have you heard anything about when we can expect an updated MZ/ZX-5n,
MZ-3?
DG
At 11:07 AM 5/10/02 +0200, you wrote:
Isn't the MZ-3 discontinued?
The MZ-3 was originally intended for the Japanese domestic market only where
they were going to sell the MZ-5 and the MZ-3, but not the
If one brings his or her right thumb up along side the viewfinder of the
ZX-5n while shooting it helps one see the exposure info much more
clearly. The 5n is a great camera, I would recommend it without hesitation.
DG
At 04:43 PM 5/6/02 -0600, you wrote:
Nitin is right. I forgot that the
While going to the site listed, I stumbled upon this under What's
New: www.luminous-landscape.com/sm-02-04-28. htm. Interesting article on
BW printing techniques. Please take note of one of the lenses he
recommends to start achieving what he calls the glow in BW prints.
Very interesting
The 5n is a terrific camera, it has performed very well for me for the 3
years that I have I have owned it.
DG
At 02:20 PM 4/29/02 -0400, you wrote:
After a couple of weeks of being so busy at work that I took zero
photographs, I decided to give myself an assignment this weekend
in hopes of
Exactly, I failed to notice it was Mikes article.
DG
At 03:59 PM 4/29/02 -0400, you wrote:
Perhaps the lens recommendation is not so surprising when you see the
Author... Mike Johnston.
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo