Speaking of the Pentax Gallery... Anyone heard any murmurs of when it
might actually be going live (out of beta)? It's been a while.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Were they sized correctly? They have to be 600 points tall, not 600
points on the long side. That, of course, is at 72 dpi.
Paul
On May 2, 2007, at 7:50 PM, J wrote:
I submitted a couple of photos taken with a istD camera and they were
not accepted because they could not read the Exif info. I
I assume you mean pixels, not points.
G
On May 2, 2007, at 7:36 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Were they sized correctly? They have to be 600 points tall, not 600
points on the long side. That, of course, is at 72 dpi.
Paul
On May 2, 2007, at 7:50 PM, J wrote:
I submitted a couple of photos
Here's an interesting development with the Pentax Gallery. I posted a
friends' portrait and soon after it was declined. After a while,
looking through some of the different categories, I decided to
resubmit *her* photo under a different category. Originally submitted
it under PORTRAITS
Hello Bong,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:28:40 +0800, Bong Manayon wrote:
I've been doing that and it worked before. Wondering if there's a glitch now.
Seems there IS a problem, I tried uploading two JPG's this morning,
comming from the K10D / ACR and including full EXIF.
It complained about
Thanks. Give me a heads up when you finally succeed uploading and
I'll likewise alert you if things are moving again.
Cheers!
Bong
On 4/13/07, Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Bong,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:28:40 +0800, Bong Manayon wrote:
I've been doing that and it worked
Anyone else had photos stuck in the review queue? I uploaded one last
week and it's still listed as ready for review.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
My last batch I uploaded seemed to have stayed in that status for the
longest time before finally being declined (almost two weeks I think).
There's one more in the review status since about last Tuesday.
Bong
On 4/13/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else had photos stuck in
Yes, for easily a week prior to review.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else had photos stuck in the review queue? I uploaded one last
week and it's still listed as ready for review.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Mark,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:02:33 -0400 (EDT), Mark Roberts wrote:
Anyone else had photos stuck in the review queue? I uploaded one last
week and it's still listed as ready for review.
I had six stuck in there for over a week.
Then, yesterday 1 was accepted, 5 declined.
Seems they are
I uploaded a couple last week. They stayed in the ready for review
for a couple of days. Then they accepted/rejected and put one on
hold. It is still sitting on hold.
--
Bruce
Friday, April 13, 2007, 5:02:33 AM, you wrote:
MR Anyone else had photos stuck in the review queue? I uploaded one
their agency.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery: Uploading problems...?
Anyone else had photos stuck in the review queue? I uploaded one last
week and it's still listed as ready for review.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
changed a thing on my
system this comes after successfully uploading around 70 images.
I was impressed with the quick response both from Pentax their agency.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery: Uploading problems
Hi Bong,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:36:24 +0800, Bong Manayon wrote:
Thanks. Give me a heads up when you finally succeed uploading and
I'll likewise alert you if things are moving again.
Just received an email from the Pentax WEB-agency
saying it should be working now. And it does :-)
Just
That's interesting. I've had this problem ever since I started uploading
images (I'm uploading and editing with Firefox). The screen always darkens and
locks when I click on the 'Edit Info' link. I found the solution is to right
click on the 'Edit Info' link and then choose Open in new Tab'.
Update: After a week of being ready for review, my photo (the
yellow PESO I posted recently) is now on hold :)
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
Update: After a week of being ready for review, my photo (the
yellow PESO I posted recently) is now on hold :)
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
Just got approved. Interesting that it went from Waiting to On Hold t
Approved in a space of a few hours. I can just
Happened to me also. In fact, Carolyn told me she was bringing in
someone else to help with an on hold decision. The person, obviously,
had no artistic sense...declined ;-))
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Update: After a week of being ready for review,
Hi Jan,
It works! I managed to upload something and the one on hold got
declined. Things seems to be moving again. Thanks for your update.
Bong
On 4/14/07, Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bong,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:36:24 +0800, Bong Manayon wrote:
Thanks. Give me a heads up
I've had one on hold for a long time. It was one of the shots from my
NY Times shoot. I haven't shown it here. Will now:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628194size=lg
Don't really care if it makes it in the Pentax Gallery. I'm happy
with what I have up there.
Paul
On Apr 13, 2007
Well, I guess that's progress.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Update: After a week of being ready for review, my photo (the
yellow PESO I posted recently) is now on hold :)
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
Hi,
After a long spell, I added new(old) stuff to the Pentax Gallery, most
were film shots. They were consistent rejected because of lack of
EXIF data blah blah blah ... even with the scanned... box ticked.
Most of my previous shots that were accepted were film photos--this
happening to anyone
from it before submitting. I do that with the
Save for Web Adobe function in Elements or photoshop.
Hope this helps.
--
Bruce
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 11:13:18 AM, you wrote:
BM Hi,
BM After a long spell, I added new(old) stuff to the Pentax Gallery, most
BM were film shots. They were
It did 'til someone advised me to put the final jpg image through save
for the web. I've had no problems since.
Seems it clears the EXIF data.(?)
Jack
--- Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
After a long spell, I added new(old) stuff to the Pentax Gallery,
most
were film shots
jpg image through save
for the web. I've had no problems since.
Seems it clears the EXIF data.(?)
Jack
--- Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
After a long spell, I added new(old) stuff to the Pentax Gallery,
most
were film shots. They were consistent rejected because of lack
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Mark
Roberts
Sendt: 5. april 2007 23:02
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: pentax Gallery: Interesting correspondence
A while back I noticed some errors in the data I had included with
photos I'd had accepted
A while back I noticed some errors in the data I had included with
photos I'd had accepted into the Pentax Gallery. I edited the data to
correct it and the photos went into the awaiting approval queue
again.
And as has happened to others, one of my previously approved images was
rejected. So
for the short reply to your direct e-mail.
Thanks,
John
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 3:02 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: pentax Gallery: Interesting correspondence
A while back I noticed some errors in the data I
Subject: pentax Gallery: Interesting correspondence
A while back I noticed some errors in the data I had included with
photos I'd had accepted into the Pentax Gallery. I edited the data to
correct it and the photos went into the awaiting approval queue
again.
And as has happened to others, one
Mark,
That's an interesting story. Thanks!
They seem to have quite a few different bugs.
E.g. I was trying to supply information for two of the
images I was submitting, and the gallery was refusing to
accept that information - essentially resetting the image upon OK.
Just last night I realized
: pentax Gallery: Interesting correspondence
Hi John,
I understand the gallery's position and decision making process.
However, it would be nice if there were a way of correcting information
without risking rejection. For example, when we first began the
submission process, the range of camera choices
: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 4:10 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: pentax Gallery: Interesting correspondence
Hi John,
I understand the gallery's position and decision making process.
However, it would be nice if there were a way
Carlson, John___PAIC_SO wrote:
Sorry for the shorter reply to your second e-mail. To break it down to
basics, the site administrators are being more critical now than when
they first started reviewing images. This is due to the very large
number of images being submitted (we actually thought we
some errors in the data I had included with
photos I'd had accepted into the Pentax Gallery. I edited the data to
correct it and the photos went into the awaiting approval queue
again.
And as has happened to others, one of my previously approved images
was
rejected. So, just
This pretty much describes my own experience. One thing though is the
realization how much pure Pentax photos I have. For a while I used
a Tokina zoom as my walk around and some of my best shots were taken
with that lens. Recently I have been using a Sigma lens and those
cannot be submitted as
I pulled a few discs to upload that I then realized (in time) were
Mamiya med. format. Honor system..and all.
Jack
--- Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This pretty much describes my own experience. One thing though is
the
realization how much pure Pentax photos I have. For a while I
Hi Bruce,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:03:34 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
This may sound funny, but in some respects, it almost feels like there
is a ratio - at least when you have submitted a fair number. I'm
running about 50% right now and that seems to hold steady. I'm
wondering if those who have
Yes, they're hard to predict, but they're overall mix looks good. In
the hard to predict category, I submitted both of the trailer park
images I showed here a month or so ago. The one where the woman looks
somewhat posed in the lawn chair was accepted. That one was not well
liked here. The
I agree. Seems they go for the highly juiced. I've shamefully found
myself nudging the hue/saturation slider, ever so slightly, while
questioning my moral discipline. 8-/
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still can't quite decide when they are going to accept and reject.
Many
In a message dated 3/28/2007 6:13:09 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree. Seems they go for the highly juiced. I've shamefully found
myself nudging the hue/saturation slider, ever so slightly, while
questioning my moral discipline. 8-/
Jack
No
This may sound funny, but in some respects, it almost feels like there
is a ratio - at least when you have submitted a fair number. I'm
running about 50% right now and that seems to hold steady. I'm
wondering if those who have submitted more than 20 are seeing anything
like that.
--
Bruce
There may have been a reason, Marnie, but there was never an excuse for
it. 8~O
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/28/2007 6:13:09 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree. Seems they go for the highly juiced. I've shamefully found
myself nudging
I've stopped submitting anything for the time being.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Strangeness
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 06:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
I agree. Seems
I'm 4 for 5
Dave
On 3/28/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may sound funny, but in some respects, it almost feels like there
is a ratio - at least when you have submitted a fair number. I'm
running about 50% right now and that seems to hold steady. I'm
wondering if those who
Yep, about 50%.
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Strangeness
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:03:34 -0700
This may sound funny, but in some respects, it almost feels
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Strangeness
This may sound funny, but in some respects, it almost feels like there
is a ratio - at least when you have submitted a fair number. I'm
running about 50% right now and that seems to hold steady
My early submissions were more like that, but as the number grew, they
have seemed to accept about half.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, March 28, 2007, 8:40:21 AM, you wrote:
DJB I'm 4 for 5
DJB Dave
DJB On 3/28/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may sound funny, but in some
Virtually 100% were accepted in the beginning, but the percentage has
reversed itself as I've dug back further into my 'weaker' inventory.
IOW, their assessment seems to track with mine.
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm 4 for 5
Dave
On 3/28/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL
I've pretty much stopped submitting, at least for the time being, but
my hit rate dropped as my count went up.
Paul
On Mar 28, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Virtually 100% were accepted in the beginning, but the percentage has
reversed itself as I've dug back further into my 'weaker'
I uploaded two more recent shots. The flower and the bee (Spring Bee) and
the couple in the Corvette. Someone suggested the Corvette in the Lifestyles
Gallery, which I did.
It was rejected, but the flower/bee was accepted. Go figure. They must have
a ton of flower/insect pics already!! :-)
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Walter Hamler
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:18 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Pentax Gallery Strangeness
I uploaded two more recent shots. The flower and the bee (Spring Bee) and
the couple in the Corvette. Someone suggested the Corvette in the Lifestyles
I still can't quite decide when they are going to accept and reject.
Many of mine that were well liked here were rejected and many that
were not as well thought of have been accepted.
What makes it really tricky is deciding what to submit - since you
can't accurately guess what will be accepted,
mike wilson wrote:
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/03/19 Mon PM 04:12:31 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Response
I finally got an invite and a note from carolyn apologizing for the delay.
HOWEVER, The site was telling me I need Adobe
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/03/21 Wed PM 06:50:40 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the Gallery accepted every shot I submitted and put it in their
Premier
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:56:38 -0700 (PDT), Jack Davis wrote:
Might appear a bit egotistical, but the one I'm thinking of got in to
the gallery, but I had hopes it would make the collection.
Do they decide that on intial approval you think ?
Perhaps they go over the gallery once in a while
to
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:53:23 +0100 (CET)
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:56:38 -0700 (PDT), Jack Davis wrote:
Might appear a bit egotistical, but the one I'm thinking of got
I believe I've only seen the collection shots in the collection.
One of my collection images went in directly. They have had one on
hold for 7 to 10 days. Probably trying to decide whether to decline
or (?)
Jack
--- Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:56:38 -0700 (PDT),
Curious how things will go with your on hold (or anyone else's for
that matter), my photos were either accepted or declined, I never had
one that went on hold.
Bong
On 3/23/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe I've only seen the collection shots in the collection.
One of my
I believe I've only seen the collection shots in the collection.
Not so. I have 5 in the collection which also appear in my gallery.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
I believe I've only seen the collection shots
I had one on hold for several days, then accepted.
No reason given.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
Curious how things will go with your on hold (or anyone else's for
that matter), my photos were either accepted
I'll try to remember to post the outcome.
Jack
--- Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curious how things will go with your on hold (or anyone else's for
that matter), my photos were either accepted or declined, I never had
one that went on hold.
Bong
On 3/23/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL
in my gallery.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
I believe I've only seen the collection shots in the collection.
One of my collection images went in directly. They have had one
on
hold for 7 to 10 days
appear in my gallery.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
I believe I've only seen the collection shots in the collection.
One of my collection images went in directly. They have had one on
hold for 7 to 10 days. Probably
I had a number of shots on hold initially. Some were accepted; some
were declined.
Paul
On Mar 22, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
I'll try to remember to post the outcome.
Jack
--- Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curious how things will go with your on hold (or anyone else's
: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
I believe I've only seen the collection shots in the
collection.
One of my collection images went in directly. They have had one
on
hold for 7 to 10 days. Probably trying to decide whether to
decline
or (?)
Jack
--- Jan
shots in the
collection.
Not so. I have 5 in the collection which also appear in my gallery.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
I believe I've only seen the collection shots in the
collection.
One of my collection
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:49:57 -0500, J wrote:
Has anyone figured out why a photo makes or does not make it into the
gallery...Right now I have 14 photos that have made it in the gallery...
What about subjective interpretation by a few Pentax (marketing) people ?
As others said, It seems they
Yep. Either the people who do the pickin' like 'em or they don't.
Fairly simple. Their taste doesn't correspond exactly to mine, and I
suspect others feel the same way. But, hey, it's their gallery.
Paul
On Mar 21, 2007, at 1:49 AM, J wrote:
Has anyone figured out why a photo makes or does
It's hard to imagine that one factor is not the equipment. K10D with
the most weight.(?)
Jack
--- J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone figured out why a photo makes or does not make it into the
gallery...Right now I have 14 photos that have made it in the
gallery...
--
PDML
K series.
After weeks/months of being too busy, I'm determined to get out and do
some shooting this weekend and I think the Pentax Gallery has played a
major part in motivating me. Come to think of it, it's having shots
declined by the Gallery that's the biggest motivator.
--
PDML Pentax
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/03/21 Wed PM 01:20:14 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
It's hard to imagine that one factor is not the equipment. K10D with
the most weight.(?)
Jack
Anyone managed to get a K1000/M50f2 picture
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the Gallery accepted every shot I submitted and put it in their
Premier Collection it would be a huge ego boost, but I wouldn't learn
anything.
Given that scenario, would you need to?
-
Email sent from
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
It's hard to imagine that one factor is not the equipment. K10D with
the most weight.(?)
Jack
--- J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone figured out why a photo makes or does not make it into the
gallery...Right now I have 14 photos that have made
Jack Davis wrote:
My incidental comment: We've all been dismayed by the inconsistencies
in judging. A photo which may have been honored with a first place
ranking in a well attended inventory of work assembled by a respected
gallery, would reasonably be expected to show well in most judged
kind of
photo. I'm still not sure I like it. But they did.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5754901
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
Date: Wed, 21 Mar
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the Gallery accepted every shot I submitted and put it in their
Premier Collection it would be a huge ego boost, but I wouldn't learn
anything.
Given that scenario, would you need to?
In that scenario, I'd be damn certain that
Jack Davis wrote:
A photo which may have been honored with a first place
ranking in a well attended inventory of work assembled by a
respected gallery, would reasonably be expected to show well in
most judged exhibits.
This statement isn't true on any planet *I've* lived on!
--
PDML
determined to get out and
do
some shooting this weekend and I think the Pentax Gallery has played
a
major part in motivating me. Come to think of it, it's having shots
declined by the Gallery that's the biggest motivator.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
I'm still not sure I like it. But they did.
Different, simple, graphic colorful.
Also well titled VBG
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
Good post.
Ego-wise it's hard to take when a favorite photo gets rejected
Not certain what you mean.(?) Do you want me to put up a example image?
Might appear a bit egotistical, but the one I'm thinking of got in to
the gallery, but I had hopes it would make the collection.
Jack
--- Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
My incidental comment: We've
PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
I'm not dismayed. Surprised by some choices, but that's true of every
selective show or website I've ever dealt with.
Paul
On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Jack Davis wrote
Guess that's my point.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
A photo which may have been honored with a first place
ranking in a well attended inventory of work assembled by a
respected gallery, would reasonably be expected to show well in
most judged
some shooting this weekend and I think the Pentax Gallery has
played
a
major part in motivating me. Come to think of it, it's having
shots
declined by the Gallery that's the biggest motivator.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
?photo_id=5754901
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:26:10 -0400 (EDT)
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yep. Either the people who do
didn't even include the MX (for shame!)
MR and last time I checked, their lens list didn't include the original
MR K series.
MR After weeks/months of being too busy, I'm determined to get out and do
MR some shooting this weekend and I think the Pentax Gallery has played a
MR major part in motivating
Thanks Jack and Ken.
Actually I do have a hard time imagining that. :-)
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Tom, can't you
include the MX (for shame!)
and last time I checked, their lens list didn't include the original
K series.
After weeks/months of being too busy, I'm determined to get out and
do
some shooting this weekend and I think the Pentax Gallery has played
a
major part in motivating me. Come
David Savage wrote:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home
Not to be a spoilsport or anything, but what are the licensing terms on
uploaded photos?
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Doug Franklin wrote:
Not to be a spoilsport or anything, but what are the licensing terms on
uploaded photos?
From the FAQ:
Q: Who will own the rights to my photos?
A: You will. Copyright of the Images will remain the property of the
photographer. A credit will be provided under all images.
On Mar 21, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
David Savage wrote:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home
Not to be a spoilsport or anything, but what are the licensing
terms on
uploaded photos?
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artist?action=artistFaq
Photographer retains all rights. Normal kind of gallery arrangement.
Paul
On Mar 21, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
David Savage wrote:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home
Not to be a spoilsport or anything, but what are the licensing
terms on
uploaded photos?
--
Thanks,
Mark Roberts wrote:
Q: Who will own the rights to my photos?
A: You will. Copyright of the Images will remain the property of the
photographer. A credit will be provided under all images.
Nice. I haven't yet had a chance to upgrade my Flash player software
and go check it out.
--
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/03/19 Mon PM 04:12:31 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Response
I finally got an invite and a note from carolyn apologizing for the delay.
HOWEVER, The site was telling me I need Adobe 8.0 flash
Congrats. Jens.
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/20/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wo-hoo!
I am poud tthat I am now presented in the Pentax Photo Gallery - along with
excellent photographers like Paul Stenquist, Bruce Dayton, Dag Thrane, David
Svage, Mark Cassino, Dario Bonazza, Scott Loveless -
Go for it Dave.
Maybe you'll succeed where I failed :-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/20/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we have time., i'll find a cat shot and submit it and see what happens
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Am curious. Anyone know when this thing will go live?
Bong
On 3/20/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool! We have one more PDMLer on the Gallery!
--
Bong Manayon
http://www.bong.uni.cc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
It will undoubtedly be a while. It's still not working very well.
When I go to my page I get anywhere from two to twenty-four images.
It's a crap shoot. No pun intended. Well, maybe a little pun
intended:-).
Paul
On Mar 20, 2007, at 7:19 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
Am curious. Anyone know
, 2007 12:40 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
It will undoubtedly be a while. It's still not working very well.
When I go to my page I get anywhere from two to twenty-four images.
It's a crap shoot. No pun intended. Well, maybe a little pun
intended:-).
Paul
On Mar 20, 2007
On 3/20/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go for it Dave.
Maybe you'll succeed where I failed :-)
Maybe not.:-) Most of my cat shots are of the Nikonious Shootapus variety.
Although i did find a few cougar shots from 2005/6 shot with Pentax gear at GFM
Maybe, just maybe
Dave
Well, seems I'm in too :-)
Six out of the 12 I submitted sofar have been 'approved to the gallery'
1 * istD macro (the pearl web)
1 * 67II landscape/travel
1 * MZ-S nature
3 * PZ-1 landscape/travel
I concentrated on the older scanned material sofar.
Saw some amazing work of familar names
601 - 700 of 903 matches
Mail list logo
