Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest

2003-11-16 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi Ann ... I have a few pics for that contest, and was concerned about them having been put up on my web site and that one was in the PUG. I sent an email asking for clarification and received TWO replies, one saying that if it's on the web, it's considered published, the other taking a

Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest

2003-11-16 Thread mike wilson
Hi, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Smithsonian contest coming up - One of the rules is No previously published works. Is a photo in the PUG considered published? Is a photo on my homepage previously published? If you show it to your friends, it's published as far as British law is concerned.

Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest

2003-11-16 Thread Paul Stenquist
No and no. Previously published is a photo in a consumer magazine or other format that was on sale to the public. Unless someone is paying to see it, it is not published. Paul On Sunday, November 16, 2003, at 01:56 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Smithsonian contest coming up - One of the rules is

Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest

2003-11-16 Thread Paul Stenquist
for a photo contest Smithsonian contest coming up - One of the rules is No previously published works. Is a photo in the PUG considered published? Is a photo on my homepage previously published? The PUG is considered a publication, AFAIK. I recall haiving this discussion with Igor (our man

Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest

2003-11-16 Thread Paul Stenquist
On Sunday, November 16, 2003, at 05:17 PM, Cotty wrote: \ Go for it Ann. Consider that by 'published' they meant in print. Feign ignorance if questioned. .02 and good luck :-) Exactly. Does anyone really think they're going to check entries against the PUG? And does anyone think that great

Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest

2003-11-16 Thread Rob Studdert
On 16 Nov 2003 at 17:50, Paul Stenquist wrote: The PUG is an informal sharing of photographs, much like showing it to our neighbor. There is no compensation, therefore it is not published. Sorry there are plenty of instances where work is published without the author attaining payment for

Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest

2003-11-16 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Rob Studdert Subject: Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest On 16 Nov 2003 at 17:50, Paul Stenquist wrote: The PUG is an informal sharing of photographs, much like showing it to our neighbor. There is no compensation, therefore

Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest

2003-11-16 Thread Butch Black
- Original Message - From: Ann Sanfedele Subject: Defining previously Published for a photo contest Smithsonian contest coming up - One of the rules is No previously published works. Is a photo in the PUG considered published? Is a photo on my homepage previously published

Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest

2003-11-16 Thread Paul Stenquist
I sell a lot of photographs to magazines. I have never had a problem with previously published unless the photo appeared on a printed page in another mag. No one that I know worries about photos that have appeared in obscure places on the net. Thus, PUG photos are not published, at least not

Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest

2003-11-16 Thread Paul Stenquist
: Defining previously Published for a photo contest On 16 Nov 2003 at 17:50, Paul Stenquist wrote: The PUG is an informal sharing of photographs, much like showing it to our neighbor. There is no compensation, therefore it is not published. Sorry there are plenty of instances where work

Photo Contest

2003-02-07 Thread Al Shaikh
I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images. Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal. Enjoy Good luck al

Re: Photo Contest

2003-02-07 Thread Mark Roberts
Al Shaikh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. Aw hell, none of us will enter because we know Mike Johnston will walk away with all the prizes... :-P -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing

Re: Re: Photo Contest

2003-02-07 Thread David Brooks
I'll sacrifice myself and enter a few,just to make him work for itvbg Dave(2 flowers)Brooks Begin Original Message From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 07:41:02 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Photo Contest Al Shaikh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought

Re: Photo Contest

2003-02-07 Thread Ann Sanfedele
Al Shaikh wrote: I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images. Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal. Enjoy

Re: Photo Contest

2003-02-07 Thread Timothy Sherburne
Ann... Just to be fair, one has to join PDML in order to participate in PUG, and those donations go to support the website and pay for the prizes. I don't think usefilm.com is making a killing on this. My guess is that the calendars are a lot like those sold by Photographer's Edge. t On 2/7/03

Re: Photo Contest

2003-02-07 Thread Al Shaikh
1) The contest is for 5 flower images, so you can show a little thought and put together a series of decent images. Any gimp can take one decent image by accident but putting together a mini portfolio is more of a challenge and perhaps will help show a bit of your visual style. 2) You can put

Re: Photo Contest

2003-02-07 Thread Al Shaikh
Hi tim, This is what the calendars look like if you are curious: http://digi-labs.net/ Basically we don't get a penny for putting up this contest, we give a little publicity to the vendor and they sponsor something nice for our members. That's the whole deal. al Timothy Sherburne wrote:

Re: Photo Contest

2003-02-07 Thread Brendan
I already have 2 calendars with my name on it, that and theres no way were going to win aginst that shoe box of slides. But it's a good spot to get critique. --- Timothy Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ann... Just to be fair, one has to join PDML in order to participate in PUG, and those

Re: Re: Photo Contest

2003-02-07 Thread David Brooks
I just saw your entry Brendan,I'm sending one tonight.I can only send one a day anyway.I have no jpg's in the office computer to sendg Dave Begin Original Message From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:22:11 -0500 (EST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Photo

$130,000 Photo Contest

2002-12-24 Thread Ken Archer
Did I get your attention? The Valley Land Fund in South Texas stages a photo contest on even calendar years to promote the conservation of land and wildlife in the border area. Landowners and photographers are equal partners in the contest which has a top prize of $30,000. This year's

Re: photo contest--Is this one legit?

2002-02-21 Thread Ann Sanfedele
Ken Archer wrote: Sounds like a good contest to me. You pay them $40 to look at your entries and then All entrants grant Communications Arts the right to reproduce work selected in the 2002 Photography Annual, the Communication Arts Web site and in materials used to promote the magazine

photo contest--Is this one legit?

2002-02-20 Thread Paul F. Stregevsky
I just received this message. Did anyone else? What can anyone tell me about it? Subject: Call for Entries Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 05:50:54 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 COMMUNICATION ARTS ILLUSTRATION AND PHOTOGRAPHY COMPETITIONS Now is the time to promote your

Re: photo contest--Is this one legit?

2002-02-20 Thread Bmacrae
Paul... Comm Arts is basically a trade publication. My wife works at a printing broker and they use Comm Arts for ideas for designers that come to them with projects...designers on their own use it all the time. It's a very nice piece. I look forward to thumbing through it every year. The

Re: photo contest--Is this one legit?

2002-02-20 Thread Bmacrae
Paul... Completely legit. Comm Arts is a trade publication that comes out every year. It is used by designers and others in the advertising/publishing world as a way of sharing ideas and scouting talent. My wife works for a print broker and they use Comm Arts all the time. Very nice book

Re: photo contest--Is this one legit?

2002-02-20 Thread Bmacrae
REDUNDANT... gee, why is it when my email says it didn't send and it did? ... ??? :-( Brendan electronically handicapped MacRae - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users'

Re: photo contest--Is this one legit?

2002-02-20 Thread T Rittenhouse
] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:48 PM Subject: Re: photo contest--Is this one legit? Sounds like a good contest to me. You pay them $40 to look at your entries and then All entrants grant Communications Arts the right to reproduce work selected in the 2002 Photography Annual

<    1   2   3