On 26 Oct 2002 at 16:21, Lon Williamson wrote:
> Reminds me of people who thought they were producers telling
> musicians or record company execs that we'd "fix it in the mix".
> My 10 years of running an audio studio sayeth different: "fix
> it before it hits tape." I agree with ya, William.
I
kakuuta 2002 19:13
Aihe: Re: Vs: OT: Re: Med format exhibit in Texas, great stuff
>If it had been, I'd have used Pentax sights.
>
>--- Raimo Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>> I´m really glad that it was not you after all.
>> All the best!
>&
n viesti-
> Lähettäjä: Chaso DeChaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Päivä: 24. lokakuuta 2002 21:45
> Aihe: Re: OT: Re: Med format exhibit in Texas, great
> stuff
>
>
> >Physical violence is not a rude topic un
a 2002 21:45
Aihe: Re: OT: Re: Med format exhibit in Texas, great stuff
>Physical violence is not a rude topic unless it
>definitely results in murder.
>
>
>--- "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would never hurt YOU, but...
>>
>
No I think it is part of global warming.
Ken Waller
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Re: Med format exhibit in Texas, great stuff
> I believe that's c
That could be cheaper than the alternative I was contemplating -
drilling a hole in the side of the fridge to mount the new Pentax DSLR
in order to capture a 'real' image that would hold up in criminal court
in case I was in breach of the Kyoto accord...
Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote:
I co
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: OT: Re: Med format exhibit in Texas, great stuff
> I believe that's contrary to the Kyoto Treaty... :-)
They're smart. They didn't sign onto it.
WW
>
> Norm Baugher wrote:
>
> > I think the
I didn't take Daniel's comment as a "violence joke"...
Chaso DeChaso wrote:
Chaso: makes murder joke
Daniel: too, too rude of you.
Chaso: OK, gotcha
...time passes...
Daniel: makes violence joke
Chaso: OK, I see, violence jokes are OK as long as
its not murder
Various people: me no get it
No problem - and very nice response. As it happens,
my brain also rather hurts at the moment - I think I
may have inadvertently tried to use it earlier - so
I'm off for a while...
[cheers heard 'round the pdml]
--- Chaso DeChaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chaso: makes murder joke
>
> Daniel:
Hi, Chaso,
You're right, I obviously didn't get it.
You're also right, my brain ~does~ hurt when I think. Also when I don't
think. It pretty much hurts all the time, but maybe that's because I've
been fighting a cold all week long, I dunno.
On the up side, however, thanks for recognizing my co
Chaso: makes murder joke
Daniel: too, too rude of you.
Chaso: OK, gotcha
...time passes...
Daniel: makes violence joke
Chaso: OK, I see, violence jokes are OK as long as
its not murder
Various people: me no get it, me brain hurt when me
try to think. Me make joke instead.
--- frank ther
I believe that's contrary to the Kyoto Treaty... :-)
Norm Baugher wrote:
> I think the light in my refrigerator stays on after I shut the door.
>
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
Was Daniel or someone else talking about refrigerator
lights earlier?
--- Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the light in my refrigerator stays on after
> I shut the door.
>
> Chaso DeChaso wrote:
>
> >Physical violence is not a rude topic unless it
> >definitely results in murde
I think the light in my refrigerator stays on after I shut the door.
Chaso DeChaso wrote:
Physical violence is not a rude topic unless it
definitely results in murder.
--- "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would never hurt YOU, but...
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I'm really s
Physical violence is not a rude topic unless it
definitely results in murder.
--- "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would never hurt YOU, but...
>
> Steve Desjardins wrote:
>
> > I'm really sorry if we offended you - please don't
> hurt me . . . .
>
=
Chaso DeChaso
"Le
On 23 Oct 2002 at 7:41, Keith Whaley wrote:
> Not to be obstreperous or contentious, but...
>
> Rob Studdert wrote:
> >
> > On 23 Oct 2002 at 6:02, Chaso DeChaso wrote:
> >
> > > This is not a seminal point about whether one has a
> > > relationship to reality more than the other. However,
> >
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: Med format exhibit in Texas, great stuff
>
> a quote from Fujifilm Profesional Data Guide, publication
AF3-102E:
>
> "While the human eye can adjust to extreme differences in
brightness, even
> when the ratio bet
Agreed. I'd like it applied to the argument at hand,
though, which would be (translated): film isn't less
authentic than digital because nothing exists anyway,
nothing is true, nothing is objective, etc. Then we
have the crux on the table. Then we can make
progress.
--- "Daniel J. Matyola" <[E
Would you believe...rude because scary?
--- "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Too rude.
>
> Chaso DeChaso wrote:
>
> > Gotcha, no death jokes. Too scary.
>
=
Chaso DeChaso
"Less is more cheap" - Osvaldo Valdes, Architect
Many great philosophers have made that precise point.
Chaso DeChaso wrote:
> All of these are excellent points (and beautifully
> stated, by the way) but most can also be applied to
> seeing - to how our eyes receive, alter, etc. what is
> around us. Consequently, if such as the below are the
>
- Original Message -
From: Dr E D F Williams
Subject: Way off topic: Re: Med format exhibit in Texas, great
stuff
>
> There is nothing 'cheap' about Photoshop. And I meant exactly
what I wrote.
Which was a non sequiter to what you thought you were responding
to.
>
Too rude.
Chaso DeChaso wrote:
> Gotcha, no death jokes. Too scary.
All of these are excellent points (and beautifully
stated, by the way) but most can also be applied to
seeing - to how our eyes receive, alter, etc. what is
around us. Consequently, if such as the below are the
key points of argument, then one must also begin an
argument that what you see can neve
Gotcha, no death jokes. Too scary.
--- "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not the sort of thing one generally makes jokes
> about, at least not
> on a civilized forum like this one.
>
> Chaso DeChaso wrote:
>
> > You know of course that I was serious, right? No
> one
> > cou
Too bad that you've had to make a compromised choice,
but I understand.
--- Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Message text written by
> INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Until very recently photorealistic painting would
> have given you far more
> control over content creation than photography
I agree that the seminal issue is how hard it is - but what does it say
about an artist if his choice of medium is entirely contained in it being
the least difficult? The medium choice in my opinion should be best, not
easiest. But that's just me, of course. That is a belief that not all will
It's not the sort of thing one generally makes jokes about, at least not
on a civilized forum like this one.
Chaso DeChaso wrote:
> You know of course that I was serious, right? No one
> could be joking about anything unless there is a
> smiley face at the end of the statement, right? - it's
> i
I admit I am usually suspicious of change, particularly when it comes about
as rapidly as these internet conventions and is advocated mainly by a
category of people with perhaps the least imaginable understanding of what
is lost when established ways of doing things are altered.
Debates similar
>The list gets OT from time to time and there are as
>many arguments about what constitutes OT as there is
>OT material. I'm bored by printer question and find
>them OT but I've long since complained about them.
>I've not even contributed to this list's ponderous
>volume in months, unlike some pe
That it is easier is sometimes a recommendation against it. I love how all
of a sudden in the last ten years people suddenly find it so difficult to
live without smiley faces in their writing and find all sorts of
justification for how necessary they.
easier to simply append a textual isn't
Not to be obstreperous or contentious, but...
Rob Studdert wrote:
>
> On 23 Oct 2002 at 6:02, Chaso DeChaso wrote:
>
> > This is not a seminal point about whether one has a
> > relationship to reality more than the other. However,
> > wet photographs are valued differently than digital
> > phot
Dr E D F Williams wrote:
>
> My Dear Keith,
>
> You answered for William.
>
> For the last twenty years or so, after leaving the academic world, I have
> been writing for a living. As far as I know those who read my stuff don't
> get the wrong idea. The people who employ me to write, (Nokia is
On 23 Oct 2002 at 6:02, Chaso DeChaso wrote:
> This is not a seminal point about whether one has a
> relationship to reality more than the other. However,
> wet photographs are valued differently than digital
> photographs in courts.
Yeah, eventually wet photos will be usurped by digital photos
Where was the part about the law?
--- "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a trial attorney, I strongly disagree with your
> statement of the law.
>
> Chaso DeChaso wrote:
>
> > I'm not arguing about the sworn statement part.
> When
> > accompanied by a sworn statement, it posses
Just because you think it so doesn't make it so. Or
perhaps it does (in your reality).
--- Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Message text written by
> INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >I'm not arguing about the sworn statement part.
> When
> accompanied by a sworn statement, it possesses
> dif
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I'm not arguing about the sworn statement part. When
accompanied by a sworn statement, it possesses
different value in courts is what I am saying.<
they have identically the same value when accompanied by the sworn
statement, that of the trust i
Nice Comment.
Chaso DeChaso wrote:
> Maybe kill yourself and have someone take shots of it
> and post them to the internet?
As a trial attorney, I strongly disagree with your statement of the law.
Chaso DeChaso wrote:
> I'm not arguing about the sworn statement part. When
> accompanied by a sworn statement, it possesses
> different value in courts is what I am saying.
> I'm not saying one is inadmissable, or one is a
I'm not arguing about the sworn statement part. When
accompanied by a sworn statement, it possesses
different value in courts is what I am saying.
I'm not saying one is inadmissable, or one is always
better, or one cannot be used without sworn statement,
or ... ... ... I'm just saying they are v
ect: Re: OT Non Pentax Rap Music Nonesense (was: Re: Vs:
> Vs: Re[3]:
> Med format exhibit in Texas, great stuff)
>
>
> I said I was guilty and promised to stop. What more do you
> want me to do?
> Unsubscribe?
>
> "Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)" wrote:
&g
Maybe kill yourself and have someone take shots of it
and post them to the internet?
--- "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I said I was guilty and promised to stop. What more
> do you want me to do?
> Unsubscribe?
>
> "Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)" wrote:
>
> > Sorry, Dan, but it
41 matches
Mail list logo
