At what speed will you rate them?
DGAJ I've got three rolls at 12500, five rolls at 6400, nine rolls at 3200,
DGAJ and one roll at 1600. (And two that don't have a speed written on them,
DGAJ so I have to look them up in my database by roll-ID...)
Ok, so I got to a computer this evening for a
On 4/27/05, D. Glenn Arthur Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started developing film at home, using Sprint developer.
Oddly, I've been getting better results with 120 than with 35mm,
though I may have finally solved that (I just don't know why).
Sprint says this developer is the same as D76
Thanks for the answers. (So far it sounds like I should probably
use a different developer, even though there's some chance that
experimentation will show decent results from Sprint.)
Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED], who suggested Emofin, wrote:
DGAJ But the main question I've got today concerns
I think Kodak still makes a transparency kit for BW film. It was meant
for use with Plus-X not Tri-X however.
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
Thanks for the answers. (So far it sounds like I should probably
use a different developer, even though there's some chance that
experimentation will show
On Apr 29, 2005, at 11:39 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I think Kodak still makes a transparency kit for BW film. It was
meant for use with Plus-X not Tri-X however.
I think the reversal kit was originally designed for Panatomic-X. Could
be mistaken, it's been years and years since I made BW slides.
Quoting P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think Kodak still makes a transparency kit for BW film. It was meant
for use with Plus-X not Tri-X however.
Thought they made one for T-Max 100, or is that one history?
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: OT: Developng questions
I think Kodak still makes a transparency kit for BW film. It was meant
for use with Plus-X not Tri-X however.
The original kit was designed for Panatomic, and they reformulated it for
T-Max100.
I tried
DGAJ But the main question I've got today concerns TMZ and Delta 3200.
DGAJ I've just about run out of TX to develop (yes, of course, I'll go
DGAJ shoot more, but in the meantime ...) so I'm thinking of trying
DGAJ the high-speed stuff. The question is: should I go ahead and
DGAJ do it in the
I've put Delta rated at 1600 through Microphen and found the result
more than acceptable. It may be that 20C versus 24Celsius matters
also as I like more the outcome at lower temperature - longer
developing.
Servus, Alin
Frantisek wrote:
DGAJ But the main question I've got today
(I haven't been reading much -- not feeling well has left me with
insufficient energy to keep up. This is temporary, and I will
still peek at the list to catch answers...)
Hey folks,
I've started developing film at home, using Sprint developer.
Oddly, I've been getting better results with 120
10 matches
Mail list logo
