great story
Dave
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 8:38 PM Larry Colen wrote:
> Turns out this was from 2013, but it’s still a fun photo, and the Beatles
> were known for shooting with Pentax…
>
> Five kids cut class to try to see the Beatles. They didn’t get in but
> Ringo took their photo. Fifty years
Turns out this was from 2013, but it’s still a fun photo, and the Beatles were
known for shooting with Pentax…
Five kids cut class to try to see the Beatles. They didn’t get in but Ringo
took their photo. Fifty years later it was published
https://www.today.com/popculture/ringo-starr-reunites-
Ha! Thanks Paul
ann
On 12/6/2018 9:08 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
It’s growing on me. In truth, There’s never one right way to frame a photo. I
tend to grid most of my pics, but I’m sure many consider that too restrictive,
Let me be among the first to wish you a happy birthday!
Paul
On Dec 6
It’s growing on me. In truth, There’s never one right way to frame a photo. I
tend to grid most of my pics, but I’m sure many consider that too restrictive,
Let me be among the first to wish you a happy birthday!
Paul
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 7:55 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> Especially for Paul
Especially for Paul and John Francis... I'm not sure the color version
that you guys are trying to get me to straighten is worth the effort.. I
may actually have another one
and of course the original chrome. Have three frames in Tri-x located..
which might be salvageable given todays technolo
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:16 PM, John wrote:
> Wasn't Asahi the original name for the cameras they manufactured &
> Pentax was a model name they applied to their reflex cameras when they
> added the pentaprism?
>
Yes. My first Pentax had "Asahi" on it, as well as "Pentax" and
"Spotmatic." It
I believe when they first got into manufacturing cameras Asahi was a
"horizontally integrated" (??) conglomerate; the company that owned the
breweries also owned newspapers, manufacturing, glass-making ... they
started spinning off various subsidiaries post WWII.
Wasn't Asahi the original name fo
Asahi is a decent beer.
Of course, Asahi is a common brand name used by many unrelated Japanese
companies. "Asa hi" means "morning sun," which is an alternative for
"rising sun," the symbol of japan. (The Japanese name for their country,
Nihon or Nippon, means "origin of the sun," a name borrowe
http://www.wsj.com/articles/ab-inbev-to-sell-eastern-europe-beer-brands-to-asahi-for-7-8-billion-1481613040
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.n
On 9 October 2016 at 12:50, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Apparently, the "Liver Bird" is mythical. The College of Arms, who granted
> Liverpool its coat of arms in 1797, basically said "fuck it, it's a
> cormorant".
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liver_bird
I thought you and Lisa wanted them to be co
> On 08 October 2016 at 21:21 Chris Mitchell wrote:
>
>
> On 8 Oct 2016 18:25, "John Francis" wrote:
> >
>
> > Those of us around in the 1970s would also think you might be referring
> > to the two female members of your party ...
> >
> > "The Liver Birds" was a very popular (and long-running)
On 10/8/2016 10:23 AM, Alan C wrote:
Interesting. I thought Liverbirds were something else. Presumably you
tried to blast them with that bazooka thing in the background?
Apparently, the "Liver Bird" is mythical. The College of Arms, who
granted Liverpool its coat of arms in 1797, basically sai
On 8 Oct 2016 18:25, "John Francis" wrote:
>
> Those of us around in the 1970s would also think you might be referring
> to the two female members of your party ...
>
> "The Liver Birds" was a very popular (and long-running) British sitcom
> built around the premise of two young women sharing a f
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 02:20:53PM +0100, Chris Mitchell wrote:
> Those are the green things on top of the building. Pronounced lie-ver. Part
> eagle and part - wait for it - cormorant. Carrying a sprig of seaweed;
> liver apparantly being an Anglo Saxon word for seaweed. In the foreground
> are PD
Interesting. I thought Liverbirds were something else. Presumably you tried
to blast them with that bazooka thing in the background?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Chris Mitchell
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 3:20 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Liver birds - very on
Those are the green things on top of the building. Pronounced lie-ver. Part
eagle and part - wait for it - cormorant. Carrying a sprig of seaweed;
liver apparantly being an Anglo Saxon word for seaweed. In the foreground
are PDMLers Lisa, Mark, Karin and me.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dej58thlsj7f9l
Yeah, right... <-- I don't recall the exact name of the character from
"Office Space", but you certainly know what I mean...
On 1/20/2016 12:16, Larry Colen wrote:
Boris Liberman wrote:
The fact that local official dealership is no longer pushing new gear,
means that in 1-2 years (if not so
Boris Liberman wrote:
The fact that local official dealership is no longer pushing new gear,
means that in 1-2 years (if not sooner) they'll stop providing service
for Pentax. This is absolute show stopper for me. Granted, I am using
Zeiss M-mount lenses on Ricoh GXR-M bodies and I've no clue
Peter, the advantage that you have is that with relatively minor extra
payment, you can still ship your gear that needs service or repairs to
one of the service centers inside USA. If I were to do so in a direct
manner (not asking my friend living in Chicago to pass FA 77 to Bob
Sullivan and th
It's that way most places Boris, the only way I can really get Pentax
Gear is Internet mail order, which is true for most of the U.S. After
Japan the U.S. is probably the biggest market for Photo Equipment, yet
Pentax has less of a presence than Panasonic a relative newcomer. I
suppose that w
Hello there :-).
Recently, I bought a cheap DA* 16-50/2.8 with broken SDM that was
converted to screw-driven AF. Unfortunately, it would seem that the lens
got damaged during postal transfer. So, I had to take it to the local
service center today.
This is only minor trouble, really.
The maj
What he says is accurate. Macros are often designed for fine focusing
action when focusing close up. It's not just the lens mentioned in his
review - most macro lenses are optimized for close focusing.
The most extreme example among the lenses I have is a Kiron 105mm f.28.
The focusing mechani
Essentially, it is a comment on SMC Pentax F 50mm f/2,8 Macro lens.
Care to look at?
https://celasun.wordpress.com/2015/10/06/smc-pentax-f-50mm-f2-8-macro-lens-a-short-review/
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wor
https://www.etsy.com/listing/49717466/a-humorous-red-cardinal-perched-on-a?ref=market
Not that anyone should buy anything from regretsy...
--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy,
crazier.
- H.L.Mencken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.n
:-)
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> So it isn't only typos we have in common...
>
> ann
>
>
> On 9/18/2013 11:44, David J Brooks wrote:
>>
>> I have done this more than i like to admit
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>>>
>>> Panic
So it isn't only typos we have in common...
ann
On 9/18/2013 11:44, David J Brooks wrote:
I have done this more than i like to admit
Dave
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Panic moment, I couldn't get anything to come into focus when I put the 30
year old 28mm lens -- al
I have done this more than i like to admit
Dave
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> Panic moment, I couldn't get anything to come into focus when I put the 30
> year old 28mm lens -- almost 40 years now - on the K-5 . Once years ago I
> had to have it repaired because of a f
On 9/18/2013 00:31, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Hmm. The rubber surround isn't too deep and just protects your glasses, at
least on the Pentax models I had.
It sticks way out on the one I got - maybe it was a replacement? Anyway
I always have taken them off. THe putty is a good idea, tho.
ann
Hmm. The rubber surround isn't too deep and just protects your glasses, at
least on the Pentax models I had.
If you're going to remove it, the diopter adjustment will get knocked around
pretty easily. A little wad of museum putty will lock it in place.
G
On Sep 17, 2013, at 6:26 PM, Ann Sanf
Pentax rubber eye cups seem to be amazingly fragile, exceeded only by
how amazingly expensive they are.
On 9/17/2013 6:13 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Ann, this is probably obvious, but center may not be optimal for you.
Stare at the viewfinder info while nudging the diopter adj back and
forth a notc
:
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: moment of panic, followed by "phew" - ON topic
Ann, this is probably obvious, but center may not be optimal for you.
Stare at the viewfinder info while nudging the diopter adj back and
forth a notch and you may get a sharper positi
I removed the eye cup altogether.. don't like them - cuts out too much
of the view.
I think my glasses may have slid the diopter over...
FOrst thing I did was set it when I got it... and center is about as
good as it gets. but removing the eye cup probably made it easier to
move the diopter t
f 2.8 SMC M - super lens!
ann
On 9/17/2013 18:50, Zos Xavius wrote:
Is it the M28? I have the 3.5 and its probably my favoritest lens
ever. I've taken more pictures with that than any other and it always
delivered when stopped down slightly. My copy sadly has stuck aperture
blades. Its sitting
, followed by "phew" - ON topic
Ann, this is probably obvious, but center may not be optimal for you.
Stare at the viewfinder info while nudging the diopter adj back and
forth a notch and you may get a sharper position. I also find it's
easier to manipulate that thing if I remove the
I done that too, Ann. :-/
Godfrey
On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> Panic moment, I couldn't get anything to come into focus when I put the 30
> year old 28mm lens -- almost 40 years now - on the K-5 . Once years ago I
> had to have it repaired because of a focus problem.
Is it the M28? I have the 3.5 and its probably my favoritest lens
ever. I've taken more pictures with that than any other and it always
delivered when stopped down slightly. My copy sadly has stuck aperture
blades. Its sitting in a pile of things to hopefully soon send to
eric.
On Tue, Sep 17, 201
Ann, this is probably obvious, but center may not be optimal for you.
Stare at the viewfinder info while nudging the diopter adj back and
forth a notch and you may get a sharper position. I also find it's
easier to manipulate that thing if I remove the rubber eye cup first.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at
Panic moment, I couldn't get anything to come into focus when I put the
30 year old 28mm lens -- almost 40 years now - on the K-5 . Once years
ago I had to have it repaired because of a focus problem... . so I took
it off, set it aside, and put on the 50... still fuzzy.. nothing in
focus. as
See also: Scammers Attempt to Rip Off Successful Campaigns Using Indiegogo
http://makezine.com/2013/08/02/crowdfunding-confusion/
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> With a strong sense of déjà vu I pass along news of a guy who is
> creating a cartridge for 35mm film camera bo
Yeah, that's what I was thinking.
On 8/26/2013 10:46 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Silicon film, big topic of discussion on the PDML, and elsewhere about
10 years ago, (pre *ist-D). Prototypes were actually developed
eventually, for Canon and Nikon analog cameras. You can read about it
here.
http://w
On 27/8/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Not until you correct the spelling mistake in our sig.
I'm trying to learn Spanish
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Producion
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Ma
Not until you correct the spelling mistake in our sig.
B
On 27 Aug 2013, at 08:10, "Steve Cottrell" wrote:
> On 26/8/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Awsome - he cites Ken Rockwell as a reference, so it's certain to work,
>> and come to market.
>>
>> Therefore I have decided to pu
On 26/8/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Awsome - he cites Ken Rockwell as a reference, so it's certain to work,
>and come to market.
>
>Therefore I have decided to put my house on the market and give all the
>proceeds to this guy, so he can make 2 digipods, and I can use a £30
>camera aga
For me, something like this would be a bit of fun and not much more.
I'll watch the project with interest but I doubt it can be produced at
a price I'd be prepared to pay.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southern
Silicon film, big topic of discussion on the PDML, and elsewhere about
10 years ago, (pre *ist-D). Prototypes were actually developed
eventually, for Canon and Nikon analog cameras. You can read about it
here.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/tag/silicon-film
On 8/26/2013 3:26 PM, Bruce Walker w
Interesting idea. Among the things that give me pause are a thanks to
Ken Rockwell for teaching him about the sensors(?). Not such a good
commentary on his level of sophistication.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> With a strong sense of déjà vu I pass alon
Awsome - he cites Ken Rockwell as a reference, so it's certain to work, and
come to market.
Therefore I have decided to put my house on the market and give all the
proceeds to this guy, so he can make 2 digipods, and I can use a £30 camera
again.
B
On 26 Aug 2013, at 20:26, Bruce Walker wro
With a strong sense of déjà vu I pass along news of a guy who is
creating a cartridge for 35mm film camera bodies that outfits them
with a digital sensor and USB memory ...
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/digipod
I know there are folks here who have been waiting on this for a decade
and will be
It appeared there was "PDML bounce" language to forward my earlier comments.
May be something I just hadn't previously noticed.(?)
Jack
--- On Wed, 5/4/11, Brian Walters wrote:
> From: Brian Walters
> Subject: RE: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
> To: &
Jack
>
> --- On Wed, 5/4/11, Jeffery Johnson
> wrote:
>
> > From: Jeffery Johnson
> > Subject: RE: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
> > To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'"
> > Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2011,
Woops..Thanks for the "bounce", Brian.
Jack
--- On Wed, 5/4/11, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
> From: Jeffery Johnson
> Subject: RE: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
> To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'"
> Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2011, 4:17 PM
>
Behalf Of Jack
Davis
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 7:37 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
Seems to me that Pentax specifically ask that water marks not be applied. It
may now be the case that a "Pentax Team" does not make the final ju
Brian Walters
> Subject: Re: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2011, 3:57 AM
> On Mon, 02 May 2011 22:10 -0500,
> "Jeffery Johnson"
>
> wrote:
> > Well I was a bit pleasantly surpr
On Mon, 02 May 2011 22:10 -0500, "Jeffery Johnson"
wrote:
> Well I was a bit pleasantly surprised to see that one of my photos that I
> submitted was accepted in the Pentax Photo Gallery:
>
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#/section=ARTIST&subSection=12267170&s
> ubSubSection=12759326&lang
It just dawned on me that I should have just said a BIG Thank You to all
that have commented and congratulated me instead of swamping the list with
individual messages.
Jeffery
--- On Mon, 5/2/11, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
> From: Jeffery Johnson
> Subject: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax
] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:02 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
On 5/3/2011 06:10, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
> Well I was a bit pleasantly surprised to see that one of my photos
> that I submitted was accep
, May 03, 2011 10:43 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
:-)
Simple but beautyful. Well done.
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2011/5/3 Jeffery Johnson :
> Well I was a bit pleasantly surprised to see that one of my pho
AlunFoto
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 10:58 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
A worthy entry! Congrats.
Jostein
2011/5/3 Jeffery Johnson :
> Well I was a bit pleasantly surprised to see that one of my photos
> that I submitted was accepted
At last count I had 115 in the Gallery including 5 in the premier
collection.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "AlunFoto"
Subject: Re: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
2011/5/3 Larry Colen :
I won
Ken Waller definitely is in the Premire, as is Bong.
I have 10 up ... started this January - and haven't sent them much...
got a bit discouraged after some of my fave bw shots
were not accepted. I"m not submitting every week and I only once got up
to 10 - it's just too much work.
ann
D
That's incredible! Congratulations to both of you! Who else has more
than 100? [NOT me]
More interestingly, to me at least, who has images in the Premier
Collection? Come on, 'fess up.
[I will gladly disclose that I do NOT have any in the Premiere
Collection, and that I am awed by the quality
81 at this point. (scenic/nature/wildlife)
Jack
--- On Tue, 5/3/11, AlunFoto wrote:
> From: AlunFoto
> Subject: Re: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2011, 8:53 AM
> 2011/5/3 Larry Colen :
> &g
A worthy entry! Congrats.
Jostein
2011/5/3 Jeffery Johnson :
> Well I was a bit pleasantly surprised to see that one of my photos that I
> submitted was accepted in the Pentax Photo Gallery:
>
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#/section=ARTIST&subSection=12267170&s
> ubSubSection=12759326&la
2011/5/3 Larry Colen :
>
> I wonder who on PDML has the most. I think we have a few members who are in
> the triple digits.
Bong has 240. I think he leads in a big way.
I have 137,
Not updated on anyone else, though.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
:-)
Simple but beautyful. Well done.
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2011/5/3 Jeffery Johnson :
> Well I was a bit pleasantly surprised to see that one of my photos that I
> submitted was accepted in the Pentax Photo Gallery:
>
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#/section=A
Nice shot, Jeff. Congrats!
Jack
--- On Mon, 5/2/11, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
> From: Jeffery Johnson
> Subject: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Date: Monday, May 2, 2011, 8:10 PM
> Well I was a bit pleasantly surprised
> to see that one o
Behalf Of Pete
McIntosh
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 3:10 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT or Perhaps on Topic: Pentax Photo Gallery
I've just requested an artist id. How long has this taken others?
Ciao,
Pete Mac in Melbourne
Sent from my iPad 2
On 03/05/2011, at 18:00,
On Tue, 03 May 2011 18:10 +1000, "Pete McIntosh"
wrote:
> I've just requested an artist id. How long has this taken others?
If your name's not Larry, maybe a couple of days to a week.
:-)>
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ry
On May 3, 2011, at 1:10 AM, Pete McIntosh wrote:
> I've just requested an artist id. How long has this taken others?
I think it took me about a year and six attempts
>
> Ciao,
>
> Pete Mac in Melbourne
>
> Sent from my iPad 2
>
> On 03/05/2011, at 18:00, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>>
>> On May
I've just requested an artist id. How long has this taken others?
Ciao,
Pete Mac in Melbourne
Sent from my iPad 2
On 03/05/2011, at 18:00, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On May 2, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>
>> On 5/3/2011 06:10, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
>>> Well I was a bit pleasantly s
On May 2, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> On 5/3/2011 06:10, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
>> Well I was a bit pleasantly surprised to see that one of my photos that I
>> submitted was accepted in the Pentax Photo Gallery:
>>
>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#/section=ARTIST&subSecti
On 5/3/2011 06:10, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
Well I was a bit pleasantly surprised to see that one of my photos that I
submitted was accepted in the Pentax Photo Gallery:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#/section=ARTIST&subSection=12267170&s
ubSubSection=12759326&language=EN
Jeffery
Congra
Well I was a bit pleasantly surprised to see that one of my photos that I
submitted was accepted in the Pentax Photo Gallery:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#/section=ARTIST&subSection=12267170&s
ubSubSection=12759326&language=EN
Jeffery
___
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Jeffery Johnson
wrote:
> LOL I cheated and sled it over to the 1:50 mark and yes it is rather on
> topic...
Had to play it twice, but i saw it on the second run through.
Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [m
They definitely were fans of Pentax. It gave the company a big boost
in the 60's.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> Well, it doesn't get much more conclusive than that, does it? :-)
>
> How great is that?
>
> -- Walt
>
> On 3/13/2011 1:50 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
>
Well, it doesn't get much more conclusive than that, does it? :-)
How great is that?
-- Walt
On 3/13/2011 1:50 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
Further evidence the Beatles must have been Pentaxians:
http://zavali-gorizont.livejournal.com/2354.html
:)
-c
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Wal
LOL I cheated and sled it over to the 1:50 mark and yes it is rather on
topic...
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Walter Gilbert
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 1:09 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Remarkably On-Topic
Further evidence the Beatles must have been Pentaxians:
http://zavali-gorizont.livejournal.com/2354.html
:)
-c
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> I was just listening to this tune (one of my favorite Beatles songs of all
> time, BTW) and just happened to glance up at the
I was just listening to this tune (one of my favorite Beatles songs of
all time, BTW) and just happened to glance up at the screen right about
the 1:55 mark.
The Beatles - This Boy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VY-BzepTXkA
Do check it out. I think y'all will be amused.
-- Walt
--
PDML
Keep looking! It's my favorite lens, especially for shooting events.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sun, 6/6/10, Boris Liberman wrote:
> I tried to find a mechanically decent
> sample of FA 24-90/3.5-4.5 but failed so far. Ideally, I'd
> like something like 24-90/4.0, but such a b
On 6/3/2010 3:03 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Boris, this Pentax lens is an extremely well made "tank." I enjoyed one for several years
and sold in for a bit over $1,000 USD a couple years ago. I felt it somewhat heavy and
"sides" all this new D glass was out.
I bought the DA* 50~135, did some semi se
with the FA 28~70
f/2.8 and decided to let it go. I'm sure it's pleasing it's current owner
somewhere.
Jack
--- On Thu, 6/3/10, Boris Liberman wrote:
> From: Boris Liberman
> Subject: On topic of lenses and enablement, for a change
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
Hi Boris,
I could hook you up with a DFA 50. I'd say LNIB to LNIB-. Please
contact me offlist if you're interested.
Cheers
Ecke
2010/6/3 Boris Liberman :
> Hi!
>
> I'm thinking of two things that I might want to do next with my gear
> cabinet.
>
> 1. Galia seems to have a liking of shooting small
Hi!
I'm thinking of two things that I might want to do next with my gear
cabinet.
1. Galia seems to have a liking of shooting small things. I seem to have
a liking of making her use 50 mm lens, to which she does not really
protest. Adding these two, I am thinking of buying a 50 mm macro lens
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:06 PM, mike wilson wrote:
> Allow me to hate you. For a moment.
Permission granted. For a moment.
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pd
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:44 AM, mike wilson wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
For Sunday, March 7th:
http://www.whattheduck.net/strip/174-sunday
I don't get it.
It's about measurbating. You wouldn't and t
On 10/3/10, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I really did get it. I was just joking.
No way. I'm gutted...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:44 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>
> frank theriault wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> > For Sunday, March 7th:
>> > http://www.whattheduck.net/strip/174-sunday
>>
>> I don't get it.
>
> It's about measurbating. You wouldn't and that's a g
never forget there are also times when you cant shoot and gearfaggotry
helps you to get over them
in my case i cant leave home much so i hunt for (and exercise with)
the necessary gear
same thing when i cant cook i tend to spend time sharpening knives etc
cheers
ecke
there are times for shooting an
A reminder for us all.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> For Sunday, March 7th:
> http://www.whattheduck.net/strip/174-sunday
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCR
> 010/3/10 frank theriault :
>
> I don't get it.
gearfaggotry. (word from an image linked in a post here some time ago)
some or often times gets in the way of photography
cheers
ecke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
frank theriault wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> > For Sunday, March 7th:
> > http://www.whattheduck.net/strip/174-sunday
>
> I don't get it.
It's about measurbating. You wouldn't and that's a good thing.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> For Sunday, March 7th:
> http://www.whattheduck.net/strip/174-sunday
I don't get it.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/l
On Mar 7, 2010, at 8:28 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
For Sunday, March 7th:
http://www.whattheduck.net/strip/174-sunday
How astonishingly on topic.
I just took advantage of the last hour of daylight and went for a walk
in the park across the street with my cameras. I ended up with the
DA40
If we're all out shooting how did I read this?
Been away from the computer for a couple of days, 975 unread PDML
messages and counting...
On 3/7/2010 3:06 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Mar 7, 2010, at 08:28 , Mark Roberts wrote:
For Sunday, March 7th:
http://www.whattheduck.net/strip/174-
On Mar 7, 2010, at 08:28 , Mark Roberts wrote:
For Sunday, March 7th:
http://www.whattheduck.net/strip/174-sunday
We are all out shooting today, how do you expect anyone to get the
message?
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
“If I could tell the story in words, I wouldn’t need to lug a
Appropriate eh.;-)
Dave
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> For Sunday, March 7th:
> http://www.whattheduck.net/strip/174-sunday
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vis
For Sunday, March 7th:
http://www.whattheduck.net/strip/174-sunday
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
> > I was mooching around in one of the camera shops in Central London
> > yesterday and noticed in one of their cabinets a SMC-A
> 28-80/3.5-4.5
> > lens, and it was only about £69- if I remember correctly.
>
> Do they have an FA80-200 f/2.8 at that kind of price?
>
> One can dream :)
>
No,
On Oct 18, 2009, at 10:34 PM, Bob W wrote:
I was mooching around in one of the camera shops in Central London
yesterday
and noticed in one of their cabinets a SMC-A 28-80/3.5-4.5 lens, and
it was
only about £69- if I remember correctly.
Do they have an FA80-200 f/2.8 at that kind of price?
1 - 100 of 387 matches
Mail list logo
