From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/01/12 Sat PM 11:43:21 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - one of my first with the 35
Scott Loveless wrote:
I don't either. I'm not particularly fond of them myself, though I do
wear one more often than
02:50
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - one of my first with the 35
god how i hate children. Well the shot evokes a reaction...
makes me want to stomp that crotch dropling till its eyes shoot out.
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645.
It's
apparent
Scott,
I understand about helmets. Never was too successful at getting the
kids to wear them...
Your picture is very appealing - the little girl, the bike, the
training wheels and the schoolyard.
I remember taking my kids over to the schoolyard to practice riding.
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 11,
Nice Scott. I have some photos of Erin in similar poses.
Good one for the photo album.
Dave
On Jan 11, 2008 8:27 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:27 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645, 35/3.5, E400X. I don't have a clue what
the
exposure was.
Scott,
Don't obsess about the slight curves--they're not
apparent unless one looks for them. Nice shot.
I'm wondering about the color--it has an antique
Kodachrome look to it. Is that intentional or a
scanning bug?
Rick
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an early (for
David J Brooks wrote:
Nice Scott. I have some photos of Erin in similar poses.
Good one for the photo album.
Thanks, Dave. Much appreciated.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganSNewBike/photo#5154394198121539746
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganSNewBike/
photo#5154394198121539746
I like this a lot ... a great photo.
Thanks, Godfrey.
Who cares about a little bit of rectilinear distortion like that?
That lens was about all I used on the 645 while I had it on
Rick Womer wrote:
Scott,
Don't obsess about the slight curves--they're not
apparent unless one looks for them. Nice shot.
Thanks, Rick.
I'm wondering about the color--it has an antique
Kodachrome look to it. Is that intentional or a
scanning bug?
Yes! Correcting for the red
Scott: I love the coloring, prefer the curve. Enjoyed seeing this. She's
a sweetie. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:27 PM
Subject: PESO - one of my first
On Jan 12, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganSNewBike/
photo#5154394198121539746
Who cares about a little bit of rectilinear distortion like that?...
I don't really mind the curvature. I guess if I was doing
architectural
photography
In a message dated 1/11/2008 5:29:08 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645, 35/3.5, E400X. I don't have a clue
On 11/01/08, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645, 35/3.5, E400X. I don't have a clue what the
exposure was.
I do not understand about helmets.
About the only good thing that I see about them is that they
make some retailers a lot of money. About the only real
study as opposed to Emotional Crap done on bicycle helments
was in Britain, it basically said when you need a helmet
(car bike crash) the
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/01/12 Sat AM 01:27:02 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - one of my first with the 35
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which
Graywold,
You and I made it thru childhood without helmets.
We experienced only moderate damage. ;-)
I can remember some cracks on the concrete that
had the adults sending me inside to lay down.
There's nothing wrong with some protection.
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 12, 2008 12:48 PM, graywolf
On Jan 12, 2008, at 10:48 AM, graywolf wrote:
I do not understand about helmets. ...
Obviously.
A helmet is designed to reduce acceleration and distribute point
impact loads on your skull and brain. That they work to reduce head
injuries has been well documented by every credible
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Polyhead
Sent: 12 January 2008 02:50
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - one of my first with the 35
god how i hate children. Well the shot evokes a reaction...
makes me want to stomp that crotch dropling till its eyes shoot
On Jan 11, 2008, at 8:27 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645, 35/3.5, E400X. I don't have a clue what
the
exposure was.
On 12/01/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
A helmet is designed to reduce acceleration and distribute point
impact loads on your skull and brain.
To be honest Godfrey, there is rather a large supposition in this sentence.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On Jan 12, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Cotty wrote:
A helmet is designed to reduce acceleration and distribute point
impact loads on your skull and brain.
To be honest Godfrey, there is rather a large supposition in this
sentence.
Articulating that is left as an exercise for the reader. ;-)
On 12/01/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Articulating that is left as an exercise for the reader. ;-)
LOL!
Touché!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:27 PM
Subject: PESO - one of my first with the 35
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645, 35/3.5, E400X. I don't have a clue what
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I remember that one. Very nice. Didn't you have another at a gas
station?
Thanks. :-) Yes, Skull Valley Station in Utah. I posted that one in
the PAW 2006 set:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/39.htm
That trip was in November/December 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganSNewBike/photo#5154394198121539746
I like this. The apparent vignetting helps here. Pink, young girl in front
of darkish school background -- has a special poignancy.
Marnie aka Doe
Thanks, Marnie. Several people have
graywolf wrote:
I do not understand about helmets.
I don't either. I'm not particularly fond of them myself, though I do
wear one more often than not these days. It's hard to tell the kiddos
to put one on if Dad isn't wearing his. I don't wear one when it's
really hot, because even with
mike wilson wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganSNewBike/photo#5154394198121539746
I was going to ask if you intended the Holga effect but I see from
later response that you manipulated it in the correct way to do that.
So I assume you did. Whether intentional or not, I
Doug Brewer wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganSNewBike/
photo#5154394198121539746
Excellent shot, Scottie. You've outdone yourself here.
Thank you, Doug. That means a lot to me.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
. Cheers, Christine
Thanks, Christine! Much appreciated.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:27 PM
Subject: PESO - one of my first with the 35
This is an early
Scott Loveless wrote:
I don't either. I'm not particularly fond of them myself, though I do
wear one more often than not these days. It's hard to tell the kiddos
to put one on if Dad isn't wearing his. I don't wear one when it's
really hot, because even with the ventilation I find them
Note also that the ducted helmets actually improve cooling. They're
cooler at speed than helmetless.
-Adam
Who doesn't ride without a helmet.
On 1/12/08, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
I don't either. I'm not particularly fond of them myself, though I do
wear
On Jan 12, 2008, at 3:43 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
... I do think their effectiveness is debatable
Not me. Not since July 26 last year.
Went down hard. 9 stitches next to left eye (just below where helmet
ends). The helmet was crushed in just above where I needed stitches. I
shudder to think
On Jan 12, 2008, at 17:21, Scott Loveless wrote:
graywolf wrote:
I do not understand about helmets.
I don't either. I'm not particularly fond of them myself, though I do
wear one more often than not these days. It's hard to tell the kiddos
to put one on if Dad isn't wearing his. I don't
I think this is really good shot.
Even with wide lens the 645 works to make it look real and 3D.
Boris
Scott Loveless wrote:
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645,
Gee Scott, looks pretty good to me as far as composition. I don't see
any distortions that jump out at me making the lens choice obvious.
I had a 35mm for mine as well and it was my favorite lens for other
than weddings/portraits. It really is a great lens for wide coverage
when you need it, and a
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645, 35/3.5, E400X. I don't have a clue what the
exposure was.
Thanks, Walt. Much appreciated. If you look at the roof of the
building in the background, it's got a curve to it.
Walter Hamler wrote:
Gee Scott, looks pretty good to me as far as composition. I don't see
any distortions that jump out at me making the lens choice obvious.
I had a 35mm for
god how i hate children. Well the shot evokes a reaction... makes me want to
stomp that crotch dropling till its eyes shoot out.
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645,
Yeah, I can see it, but it doesn't bother me. It is the sort of
distortion that could quickly and easily be corrected in PS. :-)
Walt
On 1/11/08, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Walt. Much appreciated. If you look at the roof of the
building in the background, it's got a
Thanks, Bob. The whole building has a curve to it. I'm actually
starting to like it.
PA requires anyone under 12 to wear a helmet and I really don't remember
ever letting her ride without one, but apparently I did. Were it not
for you mentioning it I never would have noticed.
Bob Sullivan
40 matches
Mail list logo
