Heh. Sorry, not interested. Maybe someone else is. Good luck.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 1/29/2014 2:06:52 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
miser...@gmail.com writes:
Marine,
I should add, in case it's important to you, that the X-E2 has an
onboard flash while the X-T1 doesn't.
If I
The mirrorless seem to be getting CLOSE to what I want. Sort of like,
I'll know it when I see it.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 1/31/2014 4:46:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
godfreydigio...@me.com writes:
On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:31 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
.. I am still sort of
On January 31, 2014 7:45:17 PM EST, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com
wrote:
On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:31 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
.. I am still sort of the opinion that *my* perfect camera hasn't
been made yet. ..
It's probably a fact that no camera can ever truly be perfect.
I've
On February 1, 2014 9:37:58 PM EST, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com
wrote:
On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 1/2/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
If there's one beef I have with all the Fuji cameras of recent years
(aside from
On 3 February 2014 08:18, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
If camera makers opened up their firmware, then I'd probably be able to end
up with a 98% perfect camera for no extra money, but nobody listens to Thom
Hogan, let alone to me :-/
Cheers,
Amen, the Sony RX100.. could benefit
On Feb 2, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
I've thought about that for the last 5 years or so. Shame there are no custom
camera builders, like there are tailors, architects or carpinters; at this
point I get so worked up by imperfect cameras that I'd be willing to pay a
On 31/1/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've come across a few that were quite nice, however.
This bloke seems to think the EVF is something special. Bit of a fanboy
maybe but he's not 100% on it. Interesting take.
On Feb 1, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 31/1/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've come across a few that were quite nice, however.
This bloke seems to think the EVF is something special. Bit of a fanboy
maybe but he's not 100% on it.
Hmmm. Interesting! Thanks, Cotty.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 31/1/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've come across a few that were quite nice, however.
This bloke seems to think the EVF is something special. Bit of a fanboy
On 1/2/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
If there's one beef I have with all the Fuji cameras of recent years
(aside from the weird processing required for the X sensors), and with
the Sony A7, it's the placement of the EV Compensation dial. The right-
rear corner is just wrong--I
On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 1/2/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
If there's one beef I have with all the Fuji cameras of recent years
(aside from the weird processing required for the X sensors), and with
the Sony A7, it's the
Heh. I thought saw a X-M2 at CES. No longer sure, maybe it was the X-T1.
Or the X-E2. Whatever it was, it was brand, brand new.
MarnieHuh, probably not. I have conflicting desires to dump my Canon
equipment and get the K-3 or a Fujifilm or something similar that is
smaller. But the
On 31/1/14, eactiv...@aol.com, discombobulated, unleashed:
*my* perfect camera hasn't been made
yet.
Mark.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Heh. I thought saw a X-M2 at CES. No longer sure, maybe it was the X-T1.
Or the X-E2. Whatever it was, it was brand, brand new.
Marnie Huh, probably not. I have conflicting desires to dump my
Canon equipment and get the K-3 or a Fujifilm
On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:31 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
.. I am still sort of the opinion that *my* perfect camera hasn't been made
yet. ..
It's probably a fact that no camera can ever truly be perfect.
I've come across a few that were quite nice, however.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 29/1/14, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Give me a bag of cormorants any day.
MARK!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
It's a very nice body, similar to OM-D E-M1. I don't mind EVF, the
latest iterations are quite good. Magnification could be better
though. I'm not planning to get a mirrorless system, but now it would
be a tough choice between this and the Olympus.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The Olympus looks really good, but I'd be leaning towards the SONY a7,
despite it's now documented shortcomings, with an adapter it would make
my full frame K and M lenses their proper focal lengths again. I really
don't like the fly by wire focusing that seems to be the new normal for
most
I am interested in the X-M2, not sure of the differences between it and
this one. (It has a viewfinder also, saw it at CES).
Marnie
In a message dated 1/28/2014 3:40:28 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
co...@seeingeye.tv writes:
On 28/1/14, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
And I'm really not
Marine,
I should add, in case it's important to you, that the X-E2 has an
onboard flash while the X-T1 doesn't.
If I come across as a Fuji salesperson, I'm not. I'll happily let you
know all the things that annoy the hell out of me on the X-E2 :-)
Cheers,
--M.
\/\/o/\/\ --
On 29/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
If I come across as a Fuji salesperson, I'm not. I'll happily let you
know all the things that annoy the hell out of me on the X-E2 :-)
My X-E1 I got used will eventually go - but it's a capable little camera.
Wish list:
X-T1 and X100s black.
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steve Cottrell
[...]
X-T1 and X100s black.
The 56/1.2 looks pretty cool:
http://cdn0.mos.techradar.futurecdn.net//art/cameras/Fujifilm
/Fuji%20X-
T1/Product%20Shots/Fuji_X-T1_34-580-90.jpg
or
Marnie,
You mean the X-E2? There is an X-M1 (not X-M2) but it doesn't have a viewfinder.
The guts of the X-E2 and X-T1 are very similar: Same sensor and image
processing engine, and probably same AF algorithms (at least once they
release new firmware for the X-E2). The EVF on the X-T1 is larger
Good point, Bob! Though 80 cormorants would make for a spikey camera...
Cheers,
--M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 29 January 2014 17:26, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
-Original
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:00:04PM +0200, Attila Boros wrote:
It's a very nice body, similar to OM-D E-M1. I don't mind EVF, the
latest iterations are quite good. Magnification could be better
though. I'm not planning to get a mirrorless system, but now it would
be a tough choice between this
On 28/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)
http://www.fujirumors.com/wake-up-its-real-x-t1-announced-live-blogging-
press-realease-pre-orders-and-more/
A digital LX? (Yeah, I know it's only APS-C, but this is a legitimate
question.)
Yes it
Well, but arguably, sir, you get to keep your hat uneaten...
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 28/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)
Well, but arguably, sir, you get to keep your hat uneaten...
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 28/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)
Looks like a nicely designed body, similar aesthetic to the Nikon Df with many
discrete dials, buttons and knobs. I hope it has an up to date EVF (on par with
the Sony A7/A7r or Olympus E-M1) and feels good in the hand. I know Fuji's
lenses are generally quite good; they're building up a decent
Nice, but I won't buy one until they come out with a Full Frame model.
Wah, wah, wah!
;-)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)
Kind of looks like someone took parts of Sony's new FF mirrorless, and
the Olympus OM-D, (doesn't matter which one really), and built a new
camera out of the parts around an APS-C sensor. From the front it looks
a lot like a nice compact film SLR from the late 80's before AutoFocus
took
For those that are wondering, a size comparison with the K-3:
http://j.mp/1f8Xz5k
Pretty similar from the front, but take a look from the top; big
difference there.
And Cotty, I assume you saw the EVF size comparison on the DPR preview:
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Miserere
Sent: 28 January 2014 20:34
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT - Re: Yo Cotty, check the new Fuji out!
For those that are wondering, a size comparison with the K-3:
http://j.mp/1f8Xz5k
On 28/1/14, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
For those that are wondering, a size comparison with the K-3:
http://j.mp/1f8Xz5k
Pretty similar from the front, but take a look from the top; big
difference there.
And Cotty, I assume you saw the EVF size comparison on the DPR preview:
On 28/1/14, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it.
I am, slowly being won around. This one is OLED and supposedly one-tenth
of the lag rate of previous incarnations...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||
On 28/01/2014 2:33 PM, Miserere wrote:
http://4.static.img-dpreview.com/previews/fujifilm-x-t1/images/vf-sizes.jpg?v=2721
Fuji is trying really hard to make me part with my hard-earned money...
Not having seen an EVF that doesn't make me hurl, I will probably like
this camera from afar.
On 28/01/2014 3:29 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
If you prefer an SLR you've got to put the mirror box somewhere.
The 17.7 registration distance of the X-mount keeps the camera thinner
as well.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bob W wrote:
And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it.
Same for me. For now.
But I expect EVF's will eventually get as good as optical viewfinders
and will replace them the elimination of the moving mirror, prism,
etc. will make the cost reduction irresistible
On 28/01/2014 6:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it.
Same for me. For now.
But I expect EVF's will eventually get as good as optical viewfinders
and will replace them – the elimination of the moving mirror, prism,
etc.
Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/01/2014 6:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
And I'm really not interested in an EVF, however hard they push it.
Same for me. For now.
But I expect EVF's will eventually get as good as optical viewfinders
and will replace them – the
Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice, but I won't buy one until they come out with a Full Frame model.
Wah, wah, wah!
;-)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)
We haven't seen a lot of cost reduction so far from using EVFs. Take for
example two roughly equivalent cameras an EVF Olympus OM-D EM-1 at 16mp
and the K-5II. The cameras spec sheets are very similar, weather sealed,
Magnesium alloy bodies, With really about equal IQ, both have weather
Since the Fuji cameras were designed from the beginning with an APS-C
sensor and a whole new lens mount so there is no existing base of lenses
designed with a big enough image circle to cover a 24x36mm sensor,
Demanding a FF solution is worse than silly. It would be like demanding
that
I don't believe in the notion that EVFs are primarily intended to be cost
reduction. At the present time, they represent the second most expensive single
component in these cameras, the primary imager sensor itself being the first
most expensive. Inexpensive pentaprism viewfinder technology is
Just another argument in favor of a FF DSLR from Pentax. bigger and
brighter viewfinder.
On 1/29/2014 1:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't believe in the notion that EVFs are primarily intended to be cost
reduction. At the present time, they represent the second most expensive single
Everyone else is welcome too, of course :-)
http://www.fujirumors.com/wake-up-its-real-x-t1-announced-live-blogging-press-realease-pre-orders-and-more/
A digital LX? (Yeah, I know it's only APS-C, but this is a legitimate
question.)
Cheers,
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --
46 matches
Mail list logo
