Igor PDML-StR wrote:
HAR!
That's a nice one, Bruce!
Larry:
Com'on! What you are saying is that if your calculator is broken, two
numbers cannot be added correctly.
You can still tune the colors if they are present in the RAW file. Yes,
it might take longer time, but it is possible. But if th
HAR!
That's a nice one, Bruce!
Larry:
Com'on! What you are saying is that if your calculator is broken, two
numbers cannot be added correctly.
You can still tune the colors if they are present in the RAW file. Yes, it
might take longer time, but it is possible. But if they are not there, no
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>>
>> Not having shot a grey card can make it hard to make sure the colors are
>> accurate, or more difficult to get the rendering your want. But it does
>> not change whether the colors come through or not.
>
> Not doin
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Larry,
The first photo is very good. The second one can benefit from some
trimming, but I am not sure if even that would help with that bright
thing in the left bottom corner. I'd try to spot-treat it to tune down
the brightness of that object.
Good idea, I used the gra
Larry,
The first photo is very good. The second one can benefit from some
trimming, but I am not sure if even that would help with that bright
thing in the left bottom corner. I'd try to spot-treat it to tune down the
brightness of that object.
Sorry, but I find that logic (quoted below) faul
Larry Colen wrote:
Very cool.
By the way, your email is showing up with no way to tell the original post
from the reply. Most mail clients tend to preface the lines of the original
email with a character, like '>'. I wonder if yours is colorizing using
HTML, which then gets stripped out.
+
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
We had a particularly pretty orb spider in the front yard. This one was a
lot redder/oranger than most of ours, unfortunately the color doesn't really
come through, I forgot to shoot a grey card.
Both shots done with available light, K-1 and Tamron 90/2
Larry Colen wrote:
We had a particularly pretty orb spider in the front yard. This one was a
lot redder/oranger than most of ours, unfortunately the color doesn't really
come through, I forgot to shoot a grey card.
Both shots done with available light, K-1 and Tamron 90/2.8 macro
https://www.fli
Agreed. http://xkcd.com/1747/
m
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> First shot is the excellent. Good looking spider.
>
> Paul via phone
>
>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 8:32 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>>> Nice level of detail in each image. I
First shot is the excellent. Good looking spider.
Paul via phone
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 8:32 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>> Nice level of detail in each image. I think the colors are quite nice and
>> natural.
>
> Thanks Dan. It looks very much like most of the one
On 10/18/2016 8:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
We had a particularly pretty orb spider in the front yard. This one was
a lot redder/oranger than most of ours, unfortunately the color doesn't
really come through, I forgot to shoot a grey card.
Both shots done with available light, K-1 and Tamron 90/2.
Brian Walters wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
We had a particularly pretty orb spider in the front yard. This one was
a lot redder/oranger than most of ours, unfortunately the color doesn't
really come through, I forgot to shoot a grey card.
Both shots done with a
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> We had a particularly pretty orb spider in the front yard. This one was
> a lot redder/oranger than most of ours, unfortunately the color doesn't
> really come through, I forgot to shoot a grey card.
>
> Both shots done with available light
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Nice level of detail in each image. I think the colors are quite nice and
natural.
Thanks Dan. It looks very much like most of the ones around here do, so
maybe my eyes were fooled by the light or something.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danielj
Nice level of detail in each image. I think the colors are quite nice and
natural.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> We had a particularly pretty orb spider in the front yard. This one was a
> lot redder/oranger
We had a particularly pretty orb spider in the front yard. This one was
a lot redder/oranger than most of ours, unfortunately the color doesn't
really come through, I forgot to shoot a grey card.
Both shots done with available light, K-1 and Tamron 90/2.8 macro
https://www.flickr.com/photos/el
On Oct 14, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Don Guthrie wrote:
> Here's my non helpful reply, I like the color version my wife prefers
> the B&W ( and she never likes any of my B&Ws).
If we all agreed on everything, we'd have nothing to argue about.
> Good job either wy.
Thanks.
>
>
> This one is NSFA(*)
This one is NSFA(*)
Saw another web, this one with a European Orb spider. I experimented a bit
with the flash, and am pretty happy with the way this one turned out:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8081265450/in/set-7215763175798/
I also processed one of the ones from this morning (no
18 matches
Mail list logo