> On Dec 18, 2017, at 2:08 PM, John wrote:
>
> On 12/18/2017 12:14, Eric Weir wrote:
>>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:16 PM, John wrote:
>>>
>>> I would also include a text file on the disk with a copyright release
>>> granting them permission to
On 12/18/2017 12:14, Eric Weir wrote:
On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:16 PM, John wrote:
I would also include a text file on the disk with a copyright release granting
them permission to print the images (save them a hassle from any photolab they
might ask to make the
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:16 PM, John wrote:
>
> I would also include a text file on the disk with a copyright release
> granting them permission to print the images (save them a hassle from any
> photolab they might ask to make the prints).
Wondering if there’s a
On 13/12/17, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>- Make a set of JPEGs of the best ones for them. A reasonable size that
>they can put on their phones, essentially, something like 1600 pixels on
>the long edge works well.
>
>- Forget delivering raw files to anyone who is not a
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:43 PM, John wrote:
>
> USB would work fine. If you're putting any kind of watermark or copyright
> notice on the images, you definitely want to give them the copyright release
> because a lot of labs like Walmart, CVS, Costco won't allow them
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:38 PM, John wrote:
>
> The sensor in our DSLRs have a ratio of 2:3
>
> Hi-res means the image can be printed at 300dpi. Size the images to 2400x3600
> and they can print any size up to 8"x12".
>
> Lo-res images are displayed on a computer
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> Thanks again, Mark. Hopefully one last puzzlement. You suggest 6-megapixel
>> images but also 2000 X 6000 pixels, which is 12-magapixels.
>
> Sorry. I meant 2000 x 3000
>
>> And by consumer printers I take it
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> - ALWAYS curate what you show them FIRST to be your best work, and show them
> the FINISHED work, not "work in progress."
> - ONLY offer what shows your work off in the best light.
>
> [IR: It's been formulated
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> 1. I have a policy: I never give RAW files to anybody. (In the film era, I've
> never given negatives to anybody, with just one exception for a close friend
> of mine per a special agreement).
> I would only
On 12/13/2017 18:25, Eric Weir wrote:
On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:16 PM, John wrote:
I would burn the images to a CD/DVD. Provide hi-res JPEG files they can print
and lo-res copies in case they want to post them to Facebook or other social
media.
I would also include a
The sensor in our DSLRs have a ratio of 2:3
Hi-res means the image can be printed at 300dpi. Size the images to 2400x3600 and they
can print any size up to 8"x12".
Lo-res images are displayed on a computer screen at 72dpi. I'd go 800x1200 just
to make the math simple.
On 12/13/2017 18:01,
Eric Weir wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>> Don't worry about setting ppi. Consumer printers will handle that by
>> themselves when the customer chooses a print size (and I've printed up
>> to 12 x 18 from 6MP ist-D files). For
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Don't worry about setting ppi. Consumer printers will handle that by
> themselves when the customer chooses a print size (and I've printed up
> to 12 x 18 from 6MP ist-D files). For phones and tablets the
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:16 PM, John wrote:
>
> I would burn the images to a CD/DVD. Provide hi-res JPEG files they can
> print and lo-res copies in case they want to post them to Facebook or other
> social media.
>
> I would also include a text file on the disk with
Eric Weir wrote:
>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Mark Roberts
>> wrote:
>>
>> Downsize everything to 2000 x 6000 pixels
>> Convert to sRGB color space
>> Give 'em hi res JPEGs and wash your hands of it.
>>
>> The 6-megapixel size will work on most phones and
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> I’m a bit unclear about the relation of pixel size and print size.
I have Lightroom export specifications specified in different ways. One is for
an image 4 X 6 inches with 300 pixels per inch. I take it that would be
I would burn the images to a CD/DVD. Provide hi-res JPEG files they can print
and lo-res copies in case they want to post them to Facebook or other social
media.
I would also include a text file on the disk with a copyright release granting
them permission to print the images (save them a
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 1:07 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Ken got it right. High quality hi-res jpegs are fine for making prints. Both
> low-res and hi-res should be in SRGB color space. Don’t release RAW files,
> even if someone requests them. The RAWs are your negatives,
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Downsize everything to 2000 x 6000 pixels
> Convert to sRGB color space
> Give 'em hi res JPEGs and wash your hands of it.
>
> The 6-megapixel size will work on most phones and tablets (my tablet's
> native
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> Long experience delivering prints and image files to clients says to me:
> - ALWAYS curate what you show them FIRST to be your best work, and show them
> the FINISHED work, not "work in progress."
> - ONLY offer what
Ken got it right. High quality hi-res jpegs are fine for making prints. Both
low-res and hi-res should be in SRGB color space. Don’t release RAW files, even
if someone requests them. The RAWs are your negatives, and public images should
reflect your rendering.
Paul
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 12:39
FWIW, suggest you provide jpegs in two versions - low res for use on phones and
computer and high res suitable for printing and not provide the RAW files.
-Original Message-
>From: Eric Weir
>Subject: Floundering about how to provide images for a "client"
>
>
>My
Eric Weir wrote:
>
>My only experience publishing photos is putting albums up on Flickr. I have
>not printed a single image.
>
>Yesterday I photographed an Iraqi refugee family at a community college
>graduation ceremony here. (One of their daughters graduated with high honors.)
>Ive weeded
Godfrey made several very good points. I had been thinking about some of
them myself, but forgot to add to my response.
And I would like to highlight a few of them, very nicely formulated by
Godfrey with minor comments from myself:
Godfrey DiGiorgi Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:04:52 -0800 wrote:
Eric,
1. I have a policy: I never give RAW files to anybody. (In the film era,
I've never given negatives to anybody, with just one exception for a close
friend of mine per a special agreement).
I would only consider giving RAW files in very special cases.
Several photographers that I know
First: Is this for pay or as a gift? In either case, talk to them, show them
the photographs, and ask if they'd like any. Presuming they say yes...
- Make a set of JPEGs of the best ones for them. A reasonable size that they
can put on their phones, essentially, something like 1600 pixels on
26 matches
Mail list logo